I know Bobby Kotick is!

I'm not even going to pirate it

>ohlookitsthisthreadagain.jpg
>Stop liking what i don't like waaaaaaaaaa
>My opinions should control your life waaaaaaaaa
sage

>>68245968
>Blizzardfag mad that he's going to have to spend three times the amount for one game :(

12 storyline missions and 18 optional missions. Sounds like they opened up the fucking multiplay maplist and started cranking out missions to justify splitting the game into three parts.

So how many storyline missions do you think will be in the expansions?
I'm betting fucking 10 + "optional missions"
I'm fucking furious!

I can't wait!

I'm even going to pressure my cheap friends to buy all three, so that we can play multiplayer together!

>Same insult 40000000000000 times.

Paid off Collector's Edition here.
Y'all niggas mad as hell.

>>68246161
Lmao, because my cheap ass friends are trying to pressure me into buying it. Normally I buy all the games, but not this time.
I was a big blizzard fan, I loved their games, the level of quality that I used to depend on has seemingly gone out the window.

>>68246226
>>68246221
>Gave up three times the money for Kotick's cocaine habit

Ain't buying shitcraft 2.

i prefer spending my money on quality games

wait, what game are we talking about?

>>68247006
World of Starcraft III: The Kotickening

I'd still buy it if it was double the price.

I have $500. Guess what, I'm buying sc2 collectors edition, black ops AND anything else activision blizzard releases in the future

Deal with it.

>>68247426
>Look at me guys, I'm killing the game industry!

Only koreans and autistic people will buy it

>implying anyone outside of korea will buy this.

>Implying im not buying the collectors edition

Never feed a retarded cat, it'll keep coming back with more retarded stray friends.

sc2 is a quality game, your paying $60 for quality multiplayer

Do people still play starcraft? oh wow.

can someone explain this 3 part shit to me?

is each game gonna be a different campaign or is it going to be the same continued story?

>implying my collector's edition isn't in the mail

>my face when if you want to continue playing online, you will need to purchase the other 2 games in order to do so

I would rather not pay anything for...

glhf *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* lol nub *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click*

every
single
game

>my face when people are actually buying the overpriced collectors edition
Stop hurting the industry...

>my face when one week after release blizzard announces monthly fees to play on bnet 2 saying its because the volume of players is growing out of proportions, when in fact this was planned from the beginning

>>68248283
sad but true, the other alternative is that they will start charging for bnet once WoW finally kills itself

either way it's gonna happen

I'm just going to play starcraft 1 like all the cool kids still will, that is until blizzard probably pulls the plug on it's battlenet and then there will probably community efforts to get it to work over IPX or something similar to what emulators that work online do.

koreans and their apm bullshit. aside from being totally unfunny and adding unnecessary tension to a video game, it is totally retarded because 50 of the actions dont do anything, basically are wasted clicks

>>68247880
At some point, blizzard announced on the SC2 forums that the game was going to be released as three campaigns, the terran, zerg and protoss to be sold individually. After the fanboys defended blizzards actions, much later down the road, the other campaigns were announced to be expansion packs.

Honestly, I only liked the zerg campaign from the original game anyway, so I was cool with divided campaigns, but now I have to Buy at least two copy's, if not all three to get what I wanted because they are expansions, not stand alone.

I'm pissed because I'm stuck with terrans, but want to play another race that I have to wait for.

would you rather pay 300% full price for one game once?

>Looking through Sunday ads
>See starcraft 2 for 59.99
>fucking doubletake

I was never going to buy the game no matter what- I'm not much of an RTS gamer, but activision can really fuck off with the whole 10 dollars more PC game bullshit

>>68248460
>my face when most of those actions are just moving units a few pixels over

>implying I play RTS

what a fucking boring genre

>>68248256

>implying the standard edition isn't overpriced

yeah

>my face when activision and ubisoft are the only ones to push 60 dollar PC games on the market

>my face when starcraft 2 flops

I might buy it when the protoss version is out in 2 years

but even then I'll probably pirate it for singleplayer

>>68248756
one could only hope, but i highly doubt it, not with korea involved

Why are these fail companies forcing 60$ for their shitty games?

Seriously. And Blizzard for 60$ x 3 for a single series.

12 story missions + 18 useless sidequests = FULL LENGTH GAEM

>my face when i will gladly pay bnet 2 monthly fee because i know it will make the service much better

Starcraft has no game

>>68248887
i'd call troll, but this is what blizzard fanboys actually believe

>>68248887
>much better

HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Like they used all of their WoW cash to make Bnet 1.0 WORSE? Fuck off.

>>68248987

Is starcraft 1 still going to work or are they going to pull the plug on it?

Well it looks like I'll just have to seed it 3 times as hard then.
I disagree with piracy, but when it comes to Kotick, all bets are off.

>My face when pre-ordered

>>68249133
They would be smart to slowly pull the plug forcing all the koreans to purchase SC2 SUPER LIMITED SPECIAL EDITION 3 times in a row to get the full game.

>>68249225
>implying they won't make private servers

You're funny.

>>68249137
>>68249137
>>68249137
>>68249137
>>68249137
>>68249137
>>68249137
>>68249137

>my face when its quite evident that blizzard will find an excuse to force monthly fees on starcraft 2, its kotick plan to force that on every multiplayer game like they are doing with call of duty

Why is everyone like LOL OVERCHARGED.

It's the fucking stores that choose the prices for the games.

and it's not their fault you are all fucking poor underaged banned.

>>68249400
HAHAHAHAHAHAH NO

>>68249400
Typical fanboy late to the party

You deserve to be fed shit

>>68249400

If it gets sold to stores for more money then normal then those stores aren't going to take the hit to their bottom line and they shouldn't. Blizzard are the ones who chose to get more money out of it.

>>68249400
>It's the fucking stores that choose the prices for the games.

Oh boy, 7/10 for almost making me rage.

Activision sells the game to the stores at such a high price that they have no choice but to keep inflating the street prices. If Activision is putting a $55 price tag on each box, then Gamestop can't sell them for $10 each.

>>68249492
>implying it isn't the stores that chooses the prices
>facepalm

>>68248753
status: told

>>68249400
>look at me im retarded

>>68245717
3 times? you mean for the complete storyline? who cares about that, i'm buying it for the multiplayer. what?! expacs add new units to multiplayer. Well i guess it's no different from brood war then. Not like i wasn't expecting ex-packs from a blizzard game though.

>>68249589
>they have to keep inflating the prices

so it is the store who chooses the price then.

give me moar moneh

>>68249659

Troll harder skippy.

Anyway, most of the time, the boxes have a price printed on them, which the store can't change.

>>68248753
Blizzard always charged more for their games, tard.

>>68249400
>implying age constitues income.
fuck off brah, i'm poor as fuck and im 25.

>>68249862
23 here, and I'm doing fine. £66,000 per year? Hell yes.

>>68249589
yes they can

>>68249907

>>68249952
yeah sure.

Yes I am, especially since that each campaign will be the length of the entirety of the original Starcraft and I'll be getting my money's worth.

>>68248857
Korea won't buy starcraft 2. They took out lan. No tournament play. Starcraft 2 is pretty much dead there now.

>68248751

I'm going to kill Kotick if I have to pay to play Diablo 3 online.

>>68250105
>each campaign will be the length of the entirety of the original Starcraft

mmmmm all your delicious butt-urt is delicious

starcraft II's trailer got 2.4 million views in 3 days
i will be playing awesome custom maps made by myself and one of the best RTS competitive play

>> you will too since all your friends will get it too

>>68250177
Yep. 30 missions each. Been confirmed brah.

>>68249777

what's the source of this image?

I love seeing videos of hasidic jews freak the fuck out

>>68250137
>> no lan play
>> bnet subsitutes some online thing for lan

>> KesPa said many progamers will go to starcraft 2

Whatever...

>>68249659
Nope. you're wrong. Stop posting.

>>68250105
No it won't, and no you won't.

>>68245717
>Anyone excited to feed an obvious troll with a stupid claim that's spread around /v/ like wildfire?
Fix'd

>>68250200
I don't have shitty friends with no taste.

>>68245717
Not mad, I have a job where i earn money to spend on things I enjoy. Have fun living at mother's and getting enough allowance (haha fag) for one game a month.

Poor bitch.

ITT: trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls

>>68250277
Nope. it's going to flop hard there. Especially when they reveal the subscription fees :3

>>68250443
>I'm 12. Look at me. My mommy and daddy buy me everything. U SO POOR FOR NOT WANTING SHIT.

>>68250255
You mean 12 story missions and 18 optional missions right?

Face it. They opened up the maplist and cranked out a bunch of unimportant uninteresting player vs. pc skirmishes that don't even fit into the storyline, hence making them optional.

wake up man, your being fucked in the ass.

RTS genre has gone down the hill since generals, and Aoe2. I guess the industry doesn't pay attention to it, since it doesn't bring in much money. But if this blizzard strategy works, maybe other RTS games will soon follow.

>MW2 still $60 this long after release
>Impossible to find Starcraft HD for less than $60
>People still believing Activision has no role in Blizzard marketing

My mommy and daddy preordered it for me. Excited for them to buy the next 2 for me as well :)

>>68247518
everyone stop buying games! it's killing the industry!

>>68250433
Then why are you in a thread about a game that you clearly have no interest in and no one you know has an interest in?

Oh yes cause your a faggot.

>>68250575

Lols, fag.

>>68250789
No, stop buying games from Activision Blizzard.

See you can all bawww about this.

But the fact if Blizzard cared they would have all stepped down and such.

The devs at Blizzard legitimately think they're doing a good thing. That they feel spreading it over the course of 3 games is the true way to tell the story and for the game to flow. Their egos say that the game is so good it needs 3 to be told.

Bobby just sees it as a profit maker. Get people to pay for a game they know is going to sell millions 3 times instead of once. Sprinkle on the pay for features on Bnet and LOADSA MONNEH.

It wont be three full-priced games
Expansions arent the same price as the original games

Stop being faggots

lololol console peasants sure do get ripped off lol, and the idiots lap it up all the same

The only games I ever paid for where those before i had Internet to pirate them. Why is everybody so obsessed about prices?

>>68251075
>>68251075
>>68251075
>>68251075
>>68251075
>>68251075
>>68251075
>>68251075
>>68251075
>>68251075
>>68251075
>>68251075
>>68251075
>>68251075
>>68251075
>>68251075
>>68251075
>>68251075
EVERYONE HAS TO READ THIS POST RIGHT NOW

>implying its not expansion packs.... You guys remember those right?

>Diablo 2: Lord of destruction
>Warcraft 3 The Frozen Throne
>Starcraft Insertion
> Retribution
> Brood War

How many of you bought all those?

Starcraft 2 has no LAN? Man fuck this...

Anyone excited to see this thread again?

>>68251075
While we are at it, lets split the next Zelda game in 3 parts and make you pay additional funds to finish the fucking story.

>>68250815
>your
>average blizzard fan with grade school education

>>68248842
Single player is built into the multiplayer. I don't know if they have a seperate offline version or not, but I wouldn't get your hopes up.

>>68251200
Yeah and I also remembered Expansion packs being fucking option and being announced well after the game was fucking released.

This is just sick stupid way of them to milk money outa your ass. Your fucking blind if you say otherwise.

>>68251200
>Rob Pardo, executive vice president of game design, said that each game would be approximate in size to the original StarCraft. Each game will be a stand-alone installment – not an expansion.
>not an expansion.

http://pc.ign.com/articles/918/918895p1.html

Blizzard products have officially become mac-status.
More expensive, prettily packaged, average product that has a huge consumer base that defends their remorseful purchase from people who state clearly why they don't want the product.

>>68251200
Obviously you're too young to know what a EXPANSION PACK is let me say it very slowly for you
An expansion pack is where you pay less money than you did for the original for a significant amount of content added to the game.

If you are old enough then did you ever buy
The Frozen Throne
Lord of Destruction
Insertion
Retribution
Brood War
If you bought any of those then congratulations you did what you said is bad and paid extra money to finish a games story!

>my face when starcraft 2 is a huge success, proving pc gamers to be as retarded and gullible as anyone else

I love all the bitching about the game, because in a year everyone who is into pc gaming will be playing/will have played it.

We will continue to hear "NO I WON'T! I'LL NEVER PLAY IT!! AHHHHHH RAGE BONER!!!!"

They will go to a friends house and see them playing it/see it sitting their and decide to play in and say to themselves "Hey, not so bad."

Or they will be pathetic and closeminded and decide they hate it without even trying.

But people cry at the strangest of things it seems (noooo gaming industry is making money which makes it more appealing for other gaming industries to make more games!!)

Most people on /v/ seem to be retarded.

inb4 "I WILL NEVER PLAY GAEM, FAG!"
and "I DONT WANT SUPPORTS TIS COMPNY, FAG!"

Buncha fuckin bitches

>>68251443
You know, honestly I don't give a rats ass if its stand alone or expansion. I'm refusing to pay fucking additional money towards content thats shoulda been in there in the first place.

>>68251443
>believes what developers say
YOU CAN DO ANYTHING

>to this entire thread
Who cares?

>>68251443
>2008
>implying they didn't change their plan after that

Anybody else remember Blizzard announcing that the game would contain 30 missions in the main storyline? Not >66% optional missions?

>>68251727
>my face when you just now realize this browsing /v/

>implying I will pay for SC2

>>68251436
They still are an option they aren't forcing you to buy the expansion packs.
Hell you don't even have to buy Starcraft 2

>>68249400
>It's the fucking stores that choose the prices for the games.

WHATHEHELLAREYOUSMOKING

>>68245968
>Stop liking what I don't like
>Implying you don't enjoy well priced games, and instead enjoy paying much more money for less.
Riiiight.

>>68251727
I've been a huge fan of starcraft since I was 12.

That was 12 years ago, I've been eagerly awaiting this game for those 12 years and then I see the fucking announcements for how they've been horribly been treating battle.net let alone them trying to force me to pay additional cash to actually finish what was originally supposed to be there in the first place.

It just reads bad to me and I will refuse to play it, I got other fucking games to play. Now excuse me, SRW OG2 beckons me.

>>68245717
>full price
>$60
LOL NO.
Full price is $50. SC2 costs 10 bucks more.

>My face when it won't be as popular and it'll never get the same sort of LAN tournament play as Starcraft 1, or anywhere even close, and sales will be seriously dented by this fact as well as an unjust price hike.

>>68252105
Full price becomes over priced. Then you add in the "expansions" in.

>>68252105
make that € if you're from europe, taking it up to 70$. on steam its probably gonna be like 69.99€, which is 80$.

no LAN, no buy
fucking ActiBlizzard

> My face when Diablo II and Warcraft 3 box sets are still 40-50 bucks at distributors everywhere

> seriously what the dick these games are ancient and I will pirate them before I pay that even though they're good

> Honestly fuck this

> also I have no face

>>68252483
I still see the original starcraft boxset at target for like 20

>impying I'm not just going to pirate all three parts of these anyways

>>68252616
Same guy here's link http://www.target.com/StarCraft-Battle-Chest-Windows-XP/dp/B00001IVRD

wtf are insertion and retribution?

http://forums(.)battle.net/thread.html?topicId=25968837163&sid=3000

Well good news is that they are no longer pushing realID onto SC2 players.
Too bad the game was divided for profit though.

>>68252166

>My face when naive faggots like you think this game won't be a massive seller.

I'm going to buy three copies of each game just to spite you. No amount of boycotts or negative posts on 4chan are going to do anything to Activision's profit margins.

Welcome to the future of gaming, nerd.

I like Kotick because he makes summer /v/ have daily 10 minute hates.

Starcraft wings of liberty is longer than all of starcraft 1.

deal with it

>>68252749
On second thought realID was grandfathered into WoW forcibly.
whats to stop it from happening after the people who threatened not to buy the game already bought it?
I foresee fail. . .

It's not a 1/3 game, it's a full game with planned expansions, JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER BLIZZARD GAME EVER MADE SINCE WARCRAFT II


JESUS CHRIST YOU PEOPLE

>>68252771
>calling someone a nerd
>/v/

>>68248887
Because XBL is so much better than PSN. Oh wait...

kotick
putin
ebert
john jeward
obama

can this fucking thread get any more worse?

>>68252987

THIS, the real cancer is Battle Net 2.0, but /v/ HAS to be fucking retarded and complain about all the wrong things, you people are the worst.

>>68252883
Way to barge into the discussion without reading the other posts.

It's 12 story missions and 18 optional player vs pc missions that were added after the division of the game into three parts.

they are optional because they don't fit into the story. They don't matter.

No, three full games. Three full games that are the same.

>>68252987
>playing only as human in sp
>full game

>>68252987
Your a fucking fag and you have no idea what the fuck your talking about.
>>68253287
That and the game being split into 3 parts is the reason why I canceled my pre-order.

bought collectors edition for me and 3 friends. don't give a fuck what boycottfags think.

So no lan or direct IP and we must be connected to battle.net to even play the SP ?
Why ? Why must we be connected to shitty service to fully enjoy the game ?
Its like a sweet chocolate cake with shit covered all over it, IT RUINS EVERYTHING

>>68253546

actually he knows exactly what he's talking about because it's true

also way to just call him names and not refute anything.

why do boycotters seem so immature?

Im rich. Im buying the collectors edition and 10 unlimited copys to distribute among my poor friends, and to support the activision blizzard good work

>MY FACE WHEN I'M NOT POOR

>>68253773

it's to verify that you're using a legit copy of the game. completely reasonable

the only people bitching about this are piratefags so Blizzard doesn't give a shit. and they shouldn't

>>68253843
>copys

>>68253815
You sir are also a fucking clueless retard. They did split the game in 3 parts. Usually when Blizzard releases there RTS games they'll usually have 1 campaign for each race.

But for this nope, its 1 campaign for each race for each game.

3 campaigns, 3 games.

>>68245717
Lol I can't stop laughing at this

>>68253938
So its basicaly Ubi's paranoid DRM all over again, its proved that it doesn't work why even bother ?

>>68252166

it will sell more than Starcraft and it's not an unjust price hike. underage b& doesn't remember the original Starcraft was $60

>>68254116
Well they don't say it's for piracy, they say it's for "social integration".


huh

>>68253773
>cry about battle.net
>STEAM RULZ

>>68253958
Wasting your time. Little kids aren't logical.

>>68253958

1 full game, 2 expansions

why is it that everyone is ok with it if an expansion is announced after the game is released but if it's announced before the game is released everyone starts flipping their shit?

Yeah kids are dumb.

Guess what guys,

I've had mine preorderd for 4 months.

> My face when

>>68247426

Are thou Kotick's son? or worshipper perhaps?

And 500 bucks is nothing, I'm impressed that managed to save that amount of money considering all you get are the allowances your parents give you though.

>>68254319

calling other people names just because they like something you don't like isn't very mature

>>68254349
Okay lets put it better term. What would happen if Zelda was being released, but they decide for there purposes to split the game into 3 parts.

What would you do then?


Also FYI Expansion packs are just that, expansions you don't need them to full finish the story. While its nice and awesome and adds more to the story, you don't need it to finish the story.

Thats what expansion is, it adds into the stuff.

boycott will fail hard

it will sell millions

people who bought it will have fun

boycotters will miss out

end of story

>>68254349
Because they aren't really expansions. They're split up for the sole purpose of sucking more money out of the consumer. The original StarCraft expansions actually felt like they were adding to a finished game, this isn't the case with SCII.

THE STENCH OF KOREAN IN HERE IS UNBEARABLE. That's what you are "collector edition" buyers and blizz fanboys in general. Nothing more than filthy koreans.

>>68254563

but you don't need the SCII expansions to finish the story.

>>68254633
>boycotters will pirate
>iccup2.0 will replace bnet2.0 as the online platform
justasplanned.jpg

I'm laughing so hard. PC the master race. More like the raped race. The guys right, expansion add into the story for whats already there. What Blizzard is saying is that there splitting the already main storyline into 3 parts and forcing you to buy it.

Its like what fucking Harry Potter and Twilight is doing with there last movies. If you say otherwise your blind, dumb and a retard. If I had more computer I would be posting my megaman derp reaction but I don't have it.

>>68254254
>implying i have steam

>>68253958
You can play with all the races you want in the multiplayer, only the campaigns are fragmented i think.
It will probably be like this:
Starcraft 2: 59.99
Heart of the Swarm: 39.99
Legacy of the Void: 39.99

But of course Activision is here so yeah you might be right.

>implying all games are worth $50 or less

>>68254722

YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT THE FUCK THEY'RE PUTTYING IN THE EXPANSIONS!

O MY GOD

BOYCOTTERS JUST CALL PEOPLE NAMES WANK TO THEIR SUPERIORITY COMPLEX AND SPREAD MISINFORMATION

I'M FUCKING SICK OF IT

buying collectors editions for me and my bro. haters gonna hate

>>68254844
neverpaymorethan20buxforacomputergame.jpg.exe

the only blizzard expansion I ever bought was D2: lord of destruction.
Never played, brood war, frozen throne, whatever the name for the WC2 xpac was, or hellfire for the original diablo.
I got the full story then, didn't need the extra mess.

now I'm going to have to buy expansions for the full thing? this is absurd.

>>68254887
We already know what there putting into the "Expansion" packs, your just fucking dumb for buying into it.

>>68254792
You guys pay a monthly fee for online and buy 15$ DLC.
Your arguments are already invalid.

>Make what should be a fullnot even that good game
>divide it in 3
>charge 60$ for each one
>???
>PROFIT
>Also, have stupidfans who eat every shit you throw at themdefending you over the internet
>???
>LAUGH SO FUCKING HARD WHILE YOU EAT GOLD BARS

>>68254792

Except a movie based off a big ass book could at least make use of the extra time and make the film seem more like the novel. It's not like there are those kind of time constraints on a video game.

>>68254563

>herp derp strawman argument

>>68254722

They are expansions. Each new game will add new units and of course, the other campaigns.

>mfw when 90% of people here are too dumb to realize this
>mfw I realize how angry they're getting because they're too poor to buy a $60 game, and then a $40 expansion pack a year later, and then another $40 expansion pack another year later.
>mfw too lazy to find a face

>>68255012
Sadly I don't and even then you can't pull that shit if your buying starcraft 2 and its expansions. Thats just worst.

Im more annoyed at Bobby's face than his Vidya antics. Im gonna buy Starcraft all of its expansions and I'm gonna DAMN WELL ENJOY MY FUCKING 200$ BAG OF SHIT, IT WILL BE DELICIOUS. FUCK YOU.

>>68254988

i'm dumb for buying an incredibly fun game for me and my bro that we're going to get thousands of hours of gameplay out of for the next decade

ok then

>>68255078
Wow you've just proven that society is dumb as they think and just buy whatever they think it awesome.

Hell don't get me wrong I love starcraft series but I'm not fucking stupid.

>mfw there nothing but expansions that they announced beforehand and you faggots still bitch about because activison

Beside, this is what you get when you play shit games in the first place.

>>68254792
>
Its like what fucking Harry Potter and Twilight is doing with there last movies


YOU
ARE
FUCKING
RETARDED


Movies have time constraints, they need to flow good enough so people get the story at a normal pacing, video games have no time limits.
Would you see a 12-hour movie? Yeah, thought so.

>my face when there is no proof that SC2's expansions are going to be $59.00

This thread is full of mad.

>>68255295
Pretty much, if the main game is 60 bucks then the "expansions" will be more then the usual 30.

Wings of Liberty : $59.99
Heart of the Swarm : $59.99
Legacy of the Void : $59.99
Battle.net Setup Fee : $5
Battle.net Subscription : $10-15/month
Competitive gold or platinum subscription : +$5-10/month
Cross-region play : +$2.99/month
Galaxy Map Editor Premium : $10
Make A Map Playable Online : $2

>>68255196
>Wow you've just proven that society is dumb as they think

what the fuck are you trying to say?
>and just buy whatever they think it awesome.

HOLY SHIT

PEOPLE BUY THINGS THEY THINK ARE AWESOME?

GODDAMN WHAT AN AMAZING DISCOVERY

DID YOU KNOW THAT PEOPLE DO THINGS THAT THEY LIKE TO DO AND TALK TO PEOPLE THEY LIKE TO TALK TO?

I KNOW RIGHT? HOW FUCKING CRAZY IS THAT?

>>68255442
Trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls trolling

>>68254988
my face when every single blizzard expansion in the past has been widely praised and starcraft 2's will be no different

>>68255442

spreading misinformation again.

that's it, i'm done. i'm not listening to anything the boycotters have to say anymore. this is just ridiculous

>>68255141
I like this post.

I'm a long time customer who is upset that my last beloved company is turning on me. I'm here to vent my frustrations and dwell on unimportant shit with others who do the same, but also realizes how trivial it is.

>>68254887
Didn't call you any names, buddy. And yes, we do know what they are putting into the expansions. They even told us. We're getting the other campaigns for the Protoss and Zerg along with new units/abilities for multiplayer.

Don't you feel stupid now?

I played the beta, shit is much better than Broodwar.
Why? it's easier to control, you can select more units at a time, rally to a mineral or gas, it's easier do micro, etc, the game is just more FUN.

But there will be always those retarded HURR DURR 500 APM toruneyfags who are gonna stick with Broodwar (abusing a glitch to micro Mutas is NOT cool, people), think of Brawl/Melee.

>>68255632
>implying this isn't what Kotick's leading blizzard to

Wings of Liberty : $59.99
Heart of the Swarm : $59.99
Legacy of the Void : $59.99
Battle.net Setup Fee : $5
Battle.net Subscription : $10-15/month
Competitive gold or platinum subscription : +$5-10/month
Cross-region play : +$2.99/month
Galaxy Map Editor Premium : $10
Make A Map Playable Online : $2
Bobby Kotick Fee: $15
Being a Blizzard Dicksucker: $20
Bonus Fee: $30


Dumb Blizzard fanboys, get not dumb and den cum back u dumbs.

>>68255748
I don't think the issue is so much with the quality of the game as much as it is with the money grab-bagging on Activision Blizzard's end.

>>68256124
I'm just saying, you have the boycotters and then you have those fucking Broodwar elitists afraid of change, there is a lot.

>>68255702
>Didn't call you any names, buddy
"You sir are also a fucking clueless retard"
also calling me stupid at the end of your post

>We're getting the other campaigns for the Protoss and Zerg along with new units/abilities for multiplayer.

so it's just like every other expansion ever? why so mad?

;_;

>Bring up Starcraft 2
>Half of /v/ is buying it
>Half of /v/ is not
>Guaranteedreplies.jpg
/v/ - Trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls

>>68256034
>I'm going to make up as much shit as I possibly can

>>68256209
>"You sir are also a fucking clueless retard"
I was not the original poster you were arguing with. Is this your first day on an image board or something?

>also calling me stupid at the end of your post
I didn't call you stupid. Reading comprehension must not be your thing.

>so it's just like every other expansion ever? why so mad?
What? You are not getting the full story of SCII with Wings of Liberty. You are getting the story from the perspective of one of three races. It's clearly fragmented, and not a full-game by any stretch of the imagination. Not every expansion does this.

>>68254563
youdontgetit.jpg

>>68256950
No, I think I do. The consumer is going to continue to allow themselves to be fucked over.

>>68252483

Are you mad? ive seen lord of destruction and diablo 2 for 10 euro each

anyway 60 dollars is a lot for a pc game, the singleplayer might be shit but the competitive multiplay and the map editor are its strong points.

now if they would make battlenet 2.0 less shit, i might get it

I like how /v/ is all up in arms about this game but all we talk about is the pricing and how it sucks.

No one is willing to talk about ZvT mech imbalance or Protoss 4gate superiority.

So much mad and misinformation.

>>68246069
>>68248548
>>68248862
>>68250584
>>68251239
>>68251852
>>68252271
>>68252749
>>68252970
>>68253315

Why even bother? nobody is listening.
Valid complaints are being met with: LOL UR 2 POOR ROFLPWNT, or I'm ok with this and you should be too! (inset random explatives)

meh, just post an opinion and be satisfied, you are just going to be trolled by samefags anyway.