I voted SNP you fucking asshole

I feel bad for Brown, he did all he could man. Fuck Cameron, he's Thatcher 2.0

>stay in Britain
shitsux
>go to Merica
shitsux

shitsux

CLEGGGGGGGGGGGG YOU FUCKING JEW YOU SCREWED US ALL OVER FUUUUUUUUU

>implying it isn't all the same shit
oh you

/v/ probably voted for him, just to troll thinking he wouldn't get in... Look where that got us...

>>58777646

This. No matter who you fucking vote for, you are going to get screwed. Thinking otherwise is delusional.

>>58777646
Faggot, were you even born in Thatchers rain as MP?

>>58777707

more true than you may think

people are fucking stupid

>>58777490
I'd love to see Scotland get independence, seeing as we pay for fucking all your shit.

I would laugh and enjoy the sight of Scotland sinking into the ocean when not supported by rafts of English cash.

Plus Labour would never get into Office again, as it's the Scots that keep voting for them.

>>58777754

>Thatchers rain
>rain

>>58777724
We were better off with Brown than what were going to be with Cameron. You'll see bro.

>>58777754
>rain
I'm guessing you're a northern unionist

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU I voted Labour, lots of my friends boted Lib Dem and now everytime I see them I'll say "Look what you've done".

Also, hes not going to ban games, hes trying to restore the economy silly, a ban on games is just an empty promise to keep the average retard activist/parent/opinionated person happy.

VIDEO GAMES

Mein Fuhrer

>>58777903
>boted Lib Dem

>>58777801
Oh sorry, I'll watch your dying currency fall and watch your country make your own fucking mistakes. We kept you above the water with our votes for Labour since the last Recession, Brown did all he could.

Scot fag reporting in. Look what you fucking did England, well fucking done.

>>58777973
That's funny, I dont remember a recession in 1997

I'm moving back to Poland, fuck this.

>>58778150
>implying he was implying that there was a recession in 1997 or talking about 1997 at all.

>>58778158
FUCK YEAR, CAMERON PREVAILS, AND ALREADY MAKING THE POLES CRAWL BACK TO WHERE THEY WERE.

>>58777458
whats all this then?

>>58777973
including turning most of the voters against his party

>>58777973
You mean the raping of the Pensions and selling gold for a quarter of it's price was good practice?

Brown made some horrible, horrible mistakes in his time in office.

And good luck with the Euro. You'll need it.

>>58778294
Gordon Brown is no longer Prime Minister. David Cameron (A Tory) is.

>>58778344
>selling gold for a quarter of it's price was good practice

hindsight it brilliant, isn't it.

Scottishfag here, I voted Labour. I'm not a crybaby Scott who sides with Salmond's dream.

>>58777964

This is how I felt after you point out my typo.

>>58778099
the alternative would be labour and SNP government, meaning labour would have had to promise England would take the brunt of the debt while few cuts were felt in the celtic nations.

i pretty glad with how this worked out.

next time vote SNP. that way when you get made independent North Sea Oil will have dried up and you'll be begging daddy for pocket money and we will laugh, as we slowly build up hadreans wall and watch you deep fat fry each other.

conservatives are the only one capable of making savage spending cuts needed.

Fuck this just go dig Churchill out of his grave and make him run the country.

>>58778447
It's not really hindsight when he sold it AT A QUARTER OF WHAT WAS THE CURRENT MARKET PRICE.

cameron will get rid of pakis

>>58778201
>We kept you above the water with our votes for Labour since the last Recession
This implies we've been 'kept above water' since Labour took power, totally ignoring the fact we're in the worst recession for like 35 years under their leadership

>>58778608
You really think Cameron is going to fix it? Yeah right, he's as capeable of doing so as Brown was either way.

Were fucked.

Oh, and I voted for Clegg and I'm pissed.

>>58778099
Shouldn't you be eating deep fried cheese or something?

North-East fag here, we all voted labour.

>>58778741
>he's as capeable of doing so as Brown was either way
This is probably true, I'm not a financial wiz so I just have to accept the 'expert's' view (they have no fucking idea).

>My face when I came to /v/ to shelter myself from this terrible situation.

>>58779123
fuck even Blair right now would be better than Cameron. SERIOUSLY.

>>58778823
north-west fag here, weall voted labour bar some insurrectionists. You should have to serve if you want to get your vote imo, like starship troopers. that way we wouldn't have dickheads voting according to the mail, the bbc and the sun.

>>58779397
>I know nothing about politics and blindly support my party. SERIOUSLY.

I cant even understand how a supposedly Liberal Party could choose conservatives over labour.

>>58779545
>implying he seriously wanted Blair back.

Sir I think you got trolled.

>>58779672
the party never, Clegg did. I couldn't agree more though, I think it involved a 1 'Lord AShcroft' and a particular Goldmann Sachs account.

These stupid Tory fuckers.
Gonna move somewhere, like an island or some shit.

>>58778823
Damn fucking right we did

Canada fag here.

Someone give me an overview of what the fuck happened.

>>58780647
king Charles dissolved parliament and sprinkled it over his salad
his tossed salad that is

FUCK CAMORON, knew i should have voted labour, stupid sexy Nick Clegg.

As long as lib dems dont bend over and take it concerning the big decisions nothing to drastic will get through.. right?

Hopefully the referendum for Scottish independence sees us Scots finally getting what we deserve.

When we're free I'm hoping for free cocaine on the NHS.

English speaking countries sure sound like they're all fucked horribly

isnt there a cornwall independance party?
if they ever get a single seat in leaving this backwards shithole.
oh wait im gunna leave this shithole the first chance i get anyway

Dear Disgruntled British people-

You are welcome to hang out in America until your political situation blows over.

We love your accents. And Top Gear is cool too.

Sincerely,

USA.

>>58781534
Australia, the UK and the USA does
however, I rarely hear from New Zealand or Canada

>>58781760

Fuck off, I'm moving to Canada

fuck the conservatives, they only wantto make the rch richer

>>58777754
>Thatchers rain
>Some stay dry and others feel the pain
>Thatchers rain

Judging from this thread, Cameron's election is what McCain's election would have been.

Am I wrong?

>All faggots vote for Cameron thinking he'll get rid of immigrants
>He won't
>Immigrants contribute 2.1 billion to the economy
>HAHAHA DAILY MAIL READERS, you fucks always gotta believe the papers eh. Broken Britain must be plastered everywhere in your cockfaced minds

If Clegg doesn't defend the University costs, or EMA/ALG, then fuck. The UK is in for a decline.

I may be mad, but fuck it. We're all being bent over and bummed.

>>58781741
'Sup Bro, Redruthfag here. How are things?

>>58782176
LOL

>>58779672

Labour aren't left wing anymore.

>>58782263
>The UK is in for a decline.

ignorant amerifag here, but haven't you guys been in decline since your empire peaked at the turn of the 19th century?

>>58782263
>EMA/ALG
>Hey kids, don't bother working and putting money back into the economy, but stay on at sixth form and get a weekly weed wage!

thats it. its the RAF for me.

>>58782263

>EMA/ALG

90% of people who get these don't spend it on anything remotely educational. College is pretty much free, you spend about £20 on text books and you're done for a year. I didn't know a single person who got EMA who actually needed it.

I wasn't paying attention when I was filling out the sheets and I voted English Democrats for parliament, and Lib dems for my local.

lib dems won my local lol

>>58777707
I voted for Clegg out of seriousness but why the fuck would /v/ pick the favourite to troll Britain when there are so many more obvious options (BNP anyone?)

>>58782393
No, we had a slight great after-WW2 upturn in economy, England in the 50's and 60's was a booming place economy wise. Our docks and general job market had a case of people 'walking in and out of jobs' weekly.
We had it sorted.
Thatcher came along, modernised the whole of Britain too fast. Forgetting about the labourers whose jobs she was cutting down upon.
TORIES FUCKING BENT THE POOR OVER, AND FISTED THEM. Yet fucks in this age, obviously think lies about immigration is more important then livelihood.

Also, you fuckers who think 'NUCLEAR DETERRENTS IS WHAT WILL KEEP US SAFE', FUCKK. FUCKKK...IDIOTS.

EMA helped pay for my first uni year, but most 6th formers spent it on booze and shit, should really be scrapped.

I have no idea why UKbros are so mad, can someone explain this shit to me?

>>58782575
I think the point is that more people attend college and end up in higher skilled jobs

>>58782263
>EMA/ALG
lol, getting paid by the government to get an education. sure shows up the state of the country doesn't it?

>>58782730
>implying half those idiots end up with A levels.

>>58781760
>implying im not moving to america as soon as I finish university

See my favourite TV the day it airs, buy my favourite games as soon as they're released, listen to my favourite music.. (you get the point)

>>58782459
>>58782544
>>58782734
Since you don't know about job renewal in bad economic climates. Let's think in basic terms.
You give students £10-£30 to keep them from taking up a part time job. More hours to STUDY, and a VACANCY to a person who isn't in further education.
Person not in further education then goes onto the job, and doesn't need as much benefits, thus saving about £5 roughly.

ECONOMICS...MYSTICAL STUFF YES?

>>58782855
>moving to america as soon as I finish university
AHAHAHAHA

Good luck getting a green card, faggot.

All I want to know is, will I still be able to import those nice uncut vidyas from the UK to good old nazi land?

>>58781760
Dear Britfag

Thanks America. Dispite your terrible health care and large amount of racists, I would welcome a trip to your grand canyons.

Britfag

Are Britfriends Tea Party protester mad, or just upset and making a big deal about it on the internet?

>>58782947
Hey, shut up, don't ruin this for me

I WANT TO BELIEVE

>>58782923
>implying that bribing kids into getting an education is going to work out well in the long run.

I play with mainly brits and I still can't understand what the fuck is going on.

>>58782295
near marazion here
shitsux

>>58783041
Rich people>>>>>>HURRAH! MORE POINTLESS MONEY, which we'll save and WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THE ECONOMY WHATSOEVER.

Poor people>>>>>How will we feed ourselves if we don't get tax credits? The job is already low paid enough. We'll contribute percentage wise more to the economy however than the rich.

(Pssst, guys, come to Minnesota, Minnesota is good people, spread the word, but don't tell nobody.)

>>58782947

>Good luck getting a green card

Because you don't give Green Cards to rapists or Terrorists now do you...

>>58782923

Doesn't work.

Almost everyone in college had a job anyway. Not having a job was looked down upon.

>>58783085
implying not

come join us in scandinavia, we need some white gentlemen here

Every Brit who leaves Britain is a coward and a traitor (except the pakis and other immigrants that actually need to leave)

>>58783179
>Because you don't give Green Cards to rapists or Terrorists now do you...
>you

I'm not an American. I'm a law-abiding Britsh person who wanted to emigrate but couldn't due to America's wierd fucked up immigration policies.

>>58783085
People get paid to work, young adults need money for whatever reason. Stopping the ALG/EMA will do FAR more damage than 'saving' (which it won't save one penny).
If you wanna stop ALG/EMA, then you may aswell stop job seekers, then after that, burn down all our economic establishments and contributing companies; because fuck it. A country don't need no stinkin' economy!

Oh, yeah, non-british fag in here.
Who got chosen to be prime minister and what does it mean for GB?

saged and reported, asshole. take it to /b/.

Anyone skeptical about Cameron obviously doesn't remember or wasn't alive for Thatcher's leadership. Easily the best Prime Minister of the 20th century.

Hating on Thatcher is just like hating on the PS3. Any redeeming factors fall by the wayside because individuals are too retarded to have their own opinions and just go with the flow.

That said, I hate Thatcher because she stole my milk. No, seriously, she stopped the "free milk for school children" schemes we had going. Fuck the bitch.

It doesn't sound that bad. At least it's not a zombie outbreak or some shit.

>>58783410
early amerifag

>>58777646
>implying it is the same shit
Haha, oh wow.

>The UK before this election
HUEAEHUAEHUAE AMERICANS FAT STOOPID RETARD WE R SO SUPERIOR
>The UK after this election
IMPLYING ITS NOT THE SAME THING, HAHA OH WOW RETARD DETECTED

>>58783227
I went to a local college in Liverpool, and finding a job what i could fit into my working/revising hours was hard.
Noone looked down on anyone, and everyone was just getting by. Although looking down upon someone for not being able to find work in a tough economic climate is very Eton-ish behaviour.
In practice, it works, and it has been proven to work.

>>58783339
>Stopping the ALG/EMA will do FAR more damage
We did fine before.

>>58783153
>We'll contribute percentage wise more to the economy however than the rich.
>percentage wise

There's your problem

>>58783461
BEST BE TROLLING YOU FUCKING NIGGER

>>58783461
Good? Sure.

Best? No.

Dont blame me, my country only gave them 1 seat.

>>58783515
Nobody who voted got what they voted for.

Why should I vote next time?

>>58783541
The money will be recycled back into the eocnomy, ALG/EMA will be spent more than likely, as the reason i mentioned before. It does no harm, just the people who either are 'minted' or don't get it will have you believe it's a money sink.
>>58783563
OK, Nationwide, about 7-12% of the people are considered rich, with the bedrock being moderate. The rich take out MORE MONEY from the economy than what they inject back in, which is the EXACT opposite of the working class.

LESSONS.

>>58778534

What?

DOES NOBODY FUCKING LOOK AT PAST LEADERS?

Every time a Conservative gets in power, either American, or British, all your money will go away, taxes get fucking raised like the first of the north star, and suddenly the government is throwing out millions on useless shit.

Despite apparently being totally based around taxing and spending every cent they get, if you actually take a step back and look at shit, the liberals seem to be able to understand how to not waste every penny they make, and don't tax things for stupid fucking reasons.

GAAAAAH CONSERVATIVES.

>>58783630

Electoral reform.

More people will get what they want, means there won't be an overwhelming presence from any party though.

Staying classy, UK?

>>58783765
>The money will be recycled back into the eocnomy, ALG/EMA will be spent more than likely, as the reason i mentioned before. It does no harm, just the people who either are 'minted' or don't get it will have you believe it's a money sink.

We still did fine before. Why put the money into something other than a kid's weed-funds.

>>58783314
>Every Brit who leaves Britain is a coward and a traitor (except the pakis and other immigrants that actually need to leave)


Left for a job in the united states of AMERIKKKA because I couldn't find one at home.

Labour made me leave.

>>58783865
Everyone remembers the 80's, but the 'Blair Factor' used by Cameron has worked again. The rich and the mongs who thought either 'MORE MONEY' or 'Oooh, he looks nice, i bet he's a good leader. Oooh look at his bike' are the downfall of this British society.
We should enforce an IQ test before voting atleast, or adopt a Marxist socity, with the bedrock being the people get what they vote for.

>>58783593

Blair that high? Crikey. Though I guess it was made in '04.

WHAT I'M MAD ABOUT IS THE RESCHEDULING OF EASTENDERS, FUCKING DAVID CAMERON RUINING MY LIFE WORST PRIME MINISTER EVER

HAHA, is this part of your plan to end your American dependence? You'll be back on our tits within 2 years.

>my face when I could give a shit less what my neighbors across the sea are whining about

Can you fags stop that whining already?

Seriously, Tory or not voting this fag as prime minister is a mistake.

81 posts and 6 image replies omitted.

>>58784049
>We should enforce an IQ test before voting atleast
Yes, so all the rich etonians will get a larger say, THATLL GET THE CONSERVATIVES OUT OF POWER

>>58783931
Why not? More to the point, why do you go straight to 'Weed fund'. Since you obviously either have it cushy, or have had a biased view of a stduent life, then let's think properly and un-bias. The money given to a student will be spent on WHAT-THE-FUCK-EVER. Be it more 'nice' clothes, ale, weed, whatever and whatever. They are NOT gonna save it, atleast most aren't who QUALIFY for it. This then goes straight back into the economy. Boosting it.
I see no problem in this, or how a loss of money occurs, someone, please, tell me.

I think he's going to be quite good :3

How about someone makes this video game related and tells me if this is going to affect gaming in the UK at all.

MANLY TEARSU CAN LIVE WITH ME IN AMERICA!

So no more britfags on /v/?

America fucked the world's economy.
Brown led the world in getting its shit together.
Everyone without a stake in British politics agreed he did a good job.
Tabloids and opposition blame Brown for economy.
Electorate says "HURRRRRRRRRRRRRRR"
Britain confirmed for Fucked Tier.

>>58784240
>weed
>boosting the economy

Oh anon, you silly billy.

>>58783461

This guy is trolling, Thatcher' is known as one of the worst priminister in UK history, only the Falklands saved her reputation.

She destoyed British industry, casued some of the biggest riots in British history and privatised shit loads of stuff that fucked it up.

>>58782263
http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/Briefingpaper/document/3

2. Government claims for the economic benefit of large scale migration do not survive critical examination. The calculation that immigrants contribute 2.5 billion annually to the Exchequer depends entirely on the period chosen and the assumptions made. The Home Office paper on which it was based describes the estimate as "tentative". Against that, the annual outflow of personal remittances amounts to 3-4 billion a year; the net outflow is about 1.1 billion per year. Claims that migrants add to economic growth ignore the fact that they also add to our population. Correcting for this gives a net benefit to the host community of less than 0.1% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per head per year - a result confirmed by major studies in United States, Canada and Holland. Even this benefit takes no account of the additional economic congestion costs.

3. The claim that migrants contribute to pensions is dismissed by the UN as requiring "virtually impossible" rates of immigration. The House of Lords economic committee concurs. The labour market impact depends on the sector. To the extent that immigration holds down wages, it makes it more difficult to attract into the labour force the one million on incapacity benefit who would like to work.

4. There are considerable social costs in terms of additional strains on housing, public services and social cohesion. A range of serious commentators have concluded that the issue cannot, and should not, be decided on economic grounds alone.

>>58784240
You just admitted that the money is just going to be wasted.

Cool logic bro.

>>58784176
Already mentioned before, the rich only count for 7-12% of the country. The other people who voted for Cameron are the easily swayed, or BIGOTS (hohohoho Brown). Everyone thought Cameron would (will and think i suppose) be hard on immigration, when ofcourse, no leader would.
Only the mongs thought, GET THE IMMIGRANTS OUT! and poof...Cameron the cunt is in.

You know how much is spent each year trying to get drug dealers off the streets? You think the money they get actually BENEFITS the country?

>>58783593
>Clement Attlee at the top

Oh look at that, the best PM was a socialist lawyer that won WWII, completely changed the country for the better and started a political consensus that lasted until 1979, when a female tory got into power and fucked everything up.

>>58784176
>etonians
Daily Mirror reader spotted.

ITT: people who dont have a clue how fucking awesome this is

>>58784336
America's economy got fucked.
The rest of the world, dependent on America, also got fucked.
Brown yelled at the world to get its shit together.
Everyone who liked Brown agreed he did a good job.
Tabloids and opposition blame Brown for economy.
Electorate says "HURRRRRRRRRRRRRRR"
Britain confirmed for Fucked Tier.

>>58784500

>People who dont listen to their parents or are born with a siver spoon in their mouth.

>>58784479
>Sees one buzz-word and makes shitty half-assed link
Hollywood Insider reader spotted.

>>58784400
Since you can post bias documents, SO CAN I!

http://www.angrymob.uponnothing.co.uk/home/43-somethingmademeangry/1191-a-talk-about-immigration

HUZZAH.

>>58784266
They'll probably ban "extreme media" like they did with pornography.

>Brown is in power
>BAAAWWWWW HE RUINED THE ECONOMY BAWWWW
>SOMEONE ELSE SHOULD GET IN POWER
>DAVID CAMERON WILL SAVE US

>Cameron gets in power
>BAAAAWWWWW WE'RE ALL DOOMED
>WHY DID WE GET SOMEONE ELSE IN POWER
>I WANT GORDON BACK

>>58784705

So UK will be like Australia, but worse?

fuck this shit, I'm off to the RAF.

>DURRRRR WELFARE STATE SCROUNGERS BLAAARGH
>Cut all benefits rather than reforming the system to give help to those who need it

Cool Tory, bro.

>>58784705
Nick Clegg will hold more power than most people think. Clegg is a lefty, a big fucking lefty, THANK GOD. With his left wing views, 'Free Media' is a must, so fuck yes.

also, if anyone wants to go on about communism, then lists dictatorship criticisms, please, fuck off.

>>58784782

Eventually, Lib dems get in power

>FUCK THESE GUYS ARE INEXPERIENCED
>EURO? WHY THE HELL ARE WE USING THE EURO NOW?
>I MISS THATCHER

>>58784847
More like Germany but worse.

>>58784782

>I WANT GORDON BACK

I do, missing him already.

Everyone bawwwed when he walked down downing street with his children.

If a LibDems aren't in joint power shit will be terrible.

If a coalition is formed shit may be good.

>>58784652
>trolled

>>58784376
>She destoyed British industry

To be fair to her the unions were holding it ransom at the time. What she did wrong was not rebuilding it.

what happened?

>>58784948

AND SHE GOT RID OF SCHOOL MILK

I'm was a Clegg supporter!

I really think when the outcome of a election is a hung parliament that's what all the politicians should do, hang themselves and let some new young people with new ideas on how to solve problems to come in and fuck everything up instead, it's not like they would do a worse job, hey they might even get lucky and do something decent for a change.

Damnit Britan.

You just elected a George Bush

>>58785062
It shows

>>58785002
Someone set up us the bomb

>>58784459
>won WWII
>Clement Attlee

Oh look, it's some hipster faggot who thinks it's cool to hate on Churchill.

>>58785064
Well, Labour done quite a few things what have benefitted the economy (especially the boosts in Uni~ help/funding), SureStart and minimum wage. What nearly everyone disregards. HOHOHO.

>>58785121
It's SOMEBODY!
SOMEBODY set up us the bomb!

The Tories will damage the recovery further with their ridiculous economic plans, they will become immensely unpopular due to the sheer rabidity of their spending cuts, and the Lib Dems will hopefully safeguard the most important parts of government as well as get us a bit closer to proportional representation.

Cameron will be out on his ear after about two years and the Tories will spend another two decades out of power. It's going to be a tough old two years but I shouldn't worry too much lads, because that's as long as I think they'll last.

>>58785221
>implying Chruchill wasn't batshit insane.

>>58785299
>implying that that didn't help win the war

>>58784917
Coalition has been announced, Clegg is deputy PM. It may not be as bad as everyone thinks.

But seriously, who the FUCK voted tory? Considering the working class make up the majority of the population I'd have to conclude that most of us are fucking stupid.

>>58785293
Oh shit, I'm sorry. Genuine mistake.

You have no chance to survive, make your time.

>>58783865
>liberals seem to be able to understand how to not waste every penny they make, and don't tax things for stupid fucking reasons.

You're fucking kidding right?
Conservative governments raise taxes after they create economic growth because it serves two purposes:
1: Prevents inflation getting out of control.
2: Allows them to pay off the huge national debt the Liberals run up spending money we don't have on anti-white "equality" quangos and taxpayer funded gender reassignments and abortions.

Perhaps the Conservative economic model looks strange to you because you don't know shit about economics?

>>58785394
>implying that I hate the man

for reals, his insanity was awesome.

>>58785297
The Lib-dems had the strongest economic plan i've seen in years, especially interlacing both economy and 'green' energy, meeting EU standards.
Scrapping Trident (good idea) probably lost Clegg thousands upon thousands of votes, by the people who still think an EMPIRE OF OL' BRITANNIA is possible.
I am severely dissapointed that this year, like nearly all previous elections, relied on media power,rather than factual arguments.

>One scottish Tory MP
>200 Tory MP's in total

Well done England. Well done. As soon as we get independence we're going to laugh and watch your shitty country fall apart.

Stupid faggots who voted Liberal Democrats, you caused this.

>>58785426
>Rich guy owns newspaper company
>Rich guy supports party x
>Rich guy encourages printing about great party x in paper
>Poor guys buy paper
>Poor guys support party x
>success.jpg

>>58785426
10,683,787 people voted tory

>>58785426

I was talking to someone who voted tory earlier. They get EMA and their parents barely earn enough to get by, but this didn't matter to him because "HURR GORDUN IS CRAP".

I guess this is what happens when you try to help the poor. They're too stupid to appreciate it and blindly follow what Murdoch tells them.

>>58785539
Enjoy being our bitch for eternity.

>>58785539
I wish you luck on your road to freedom.

>>58785426

Judging by the people I've asked a lot of people voted tory without knowing why. To be honest, almost no one knows the first thing about how first past the post works, knows nothing about any of the parties and just votes based on some social factor.

Our presidente was a good presidente

>>58785465
>Huge national debt
I see you've been reading the Tory papers vigorously. The national debt is more than managable, with our working class wages on general rising quite well.
Taxation plans by the Tories are also laughable, why scrap the higher tax rates past a certain 'earning point' if they really wanna sort the economy? Don't bother bringing up 'all the rich people will leave the country due to too high taxes'. Let's get something solid here.

>>58785539

We'll be right here, laughing at Iceland v1.2. Stop kidding yourselves. None of you can survive without us. England is Britain, just accept it already.

>>58784680
My source isn't demonstrably wrong about the effects of immigration however.

could be worse.

could be joanna fucking lumley.

pretentious bitch.

>>58785819
Nor is mine, too bad we're both bias sources eh. HOHOHO.

>>58785539

Independant scotland would be terrible.

You have no exports.

you english faggots voting tory

>>58785778

Given the chance, Churchill really would have been an IRL El Presidente.

>>58785299
He wanted to be in the first wave on D-Day.
Fucker was awesome.

This just in: Atkinson has moved to the UK

Can an irishfag come over to america too?, there gonna be cutting costs and they are gonna hit northern ireland first.

shit sucks

>>58785539
>Scottish independence

When the oil runs out we're fucked. Unless Salmond was actually serious when he was on about making Scotland the "Wind-power capital of Europe" or whatever batshite rubbish he was on about.

So, who the fuck is this guy and what has he said about video games?

>>58785801
>why scrap the higher tax rates past a certain 'earning point' if they really wanna sort the economy?
Guy who knows jack shit about politics here and didn't vote on lack of knowledge. But why is this so bad? Why are people penalized for making a better life for themselves?

>>58785633
I wouldn't say too stupid, just too uneducated.
WAAAAAAAAY too ignorant on the subject, not necessarily unintelligent.

>>58786085
because if you need a lot of tax money, it's far more ethical to take from those who already have more than they need than to take from those who barely have enough.

Is Cameron good for the middle class?

>>58785525

Cameron made a deal with Rupert Murdoch about a year ago, the essence of which was his support for further erosion of the BBC as well as loosening of media monopoly laws once Nice Dave got in. That's why the Sun, Mail et al have been so viciously anti-Brown and to a lesser extent Clegg this election.

I felt kind've sorry for Brown every time I walked past a newstand over the last few weeks. The papers are a pack of the worst fucking bullies imaginable.

>>58786042
Nah man nah, we don't have enough jobs. Try China, I here there isn't much censorship there.

>>58786081
More censorship potentially, but it won't actually happen because he's in a coalition with a party who are anti-censorship and pro-net neutrality.

Guys. Don't come here.
Let's all go to Canada.
They have less people than California and they're way more awesome than Murrka.

WHO'S WITH ME?

>>58786085
The earning point isn't the problem, it's the vast saving most of the wealthy do. If economy is booming, then you'll notice higher saving trends in the wealthy. This means money is being taken out of the economy rather than being 'recycled'. This is bad, really bad.
The tax merely softens the blow of saving problems, and helps 'SAVE THE ECONOMY WOO' in the terms of most Tories, although i could be paraphrasing the quote. Though it still holds truth.

>2209: Lib Dem activist Elaine Bagshaw tweets: Hmmm... so, if Nick was Deputy PM in a coalition, would that mean he'd be PM if Dave takes paternity leave in a few months?
>Nick Clegg will be deputy prime minister and that there are four other Lib Dem cabinet ministers.

I know there's no chance of it happening, but if Vince Cable managed to get the position of Chancellor...

>>58786081
he say everyone who plays games are ps3haznogaemz

Last time conservatives were in power-

>Underclass of neds and chavs created
>University grants removed
>Industry destroyed
>Low taxes for the rich, high taxes for the poor
>LOL BENEFITS WON'T FUCK THINGS UP

Every single person who voted Cameron into power is a retard who should be killed.

>>58786268
>A country
>having less people than a State
stupid amerifag

>>58786242
D:

that hurts brah

>>58786289

Clegg is already deputy.

>>58786200
But you shouldn't take proportionately more from them. Maybe I think strangely or am simply mentally deficient but that doesn't make sense to me at all. If a kid does well at school surely he's earnt something and shouldn't be forced to pay for the mistakes of others

>>58786438
See my post below
>>58786270

>>58786368
You can't be serious.
You're not that stupid right?

fuckin liberals selling out and joining a party with policies opposite to theirs

Digital Economy Bill

Supported by Conservatives, and the only people opposing it were lib dems and labour back-benchers.

STILL HE'S STOPPIN DEM IMMIGRANTS HERP DERP

>>58786438
here,
>>58786270
this is making a lot of sense now. Although still not sure I really support it

lol at huttburt Lib Dems and Labour supporters clinging to the actions of a past PM to try and play down Conservatives. Open your eyes, all the parties are as bad as each other.

At least we don't have Labour for another term.

>>58786438

In an ideal world, sure. But chances are it wasn't the mistakes of others that put them in that position. I don't think everyone should have the same things in life, I just think people should have the same opportunities. People shouldn't be disadvantaged forever because of who their parents were and how much they earned.

>>58786511
Yeah sorry brah this thread is moving fucking fast.

>>58785801
From figures published February 18th 2010, UK public sector net debt was £848.5 billion. (or 59.9% of National GDP) – Source: Office National Statistics

So, 60% of GDP is only huge if read the "Tory papers"?
What the fuck are you smoking?
We shouldn't have a national debt at this point. The reason we do is that the government was pissing money away during the best boom the country has experienced in it's entire history.

Any monkey with a secondary school education can tell you that you save money when in a period of growth so you can spend your way out of a recession when it eventually rolls around.

Next year the debt will rise to 1 Trillion pounds sterling.
If we paid off 20 Billion pounds per year, it would take 50 years to pay that off, during which time we can expect to experience something along the lines of three or so recessions going by recent trends.

If you think the nationa debt is not huge then you're living in cloud cuckoo land.

>>58786635
Open you eyes, or atleast pull them away from paper propoganda.
Labour didn't extinguish the economy as many papers will have you believe, they actually boosted it from the Tories.

poor brits..poor americans..

we are all being fucked in the ass by censorship & pussy assed old people that dont understand 20-30 year olds

>>58786438
He has only earnt that money in the first place by being a UK citizen. The high taxation is because this country has allowed you to earn that much cash. For instance, you couldn't have made the choices and opportunities in a third world country.

Since 90% of people in here are American:

The Conservative party here is most like the Democrats in the USA. There is no real American equivalent to the Liberal party. The Republican Party is most like the BNP, but they don't really get much done.

>>58786635
>all the parties are as bad as each other.
>least we don't have Labour for another term

DERP

King Dave will save us all

I was planning on NYU so yeah

>>58786765
Oh we don't care, trust me.
We just like to poke fun at your political issues.
However if you are planning an exodus, remember.

Don't fucking come here.
Go to Canada.

>>58786712

£1 = $2

NEVAR FORGET

Steam was so cheap for those few months.

>>58786727

Thatcher saved the economy last time, the trade unions needed a big kick up the arse, they were causing ridiculous levels of inflation and she reduced their power, a much needed step.

Yes Labour improved upon the economy from there, but Thatcher was the keystone to the whole affair.

>>58785614
>>58785614
>>58785614
>>58785614
>>58785614

This is how democracy works.

>>58786712
It is managable, completely managable actually. If the Lib Dems proposed spurt of spending is allowed, with a huge investment into certain work areas, then gradual 'government profit' will increase. Taxes do not solve anything, you can only tax so much. Stealth taxing also will not solve NOTHING, as that is as clear as day. Industries will suffer is taxes are raised due to money being taken out of the general economy (WHICH IS A FUCKING PROBLEM, which a monkey would know, hohohoho).

American here, what is this guy gonna do to the Brit's vidya?

>>58787083

Likely nothing.

>>58787098

Would work better with a picture of him walking into the palace or No. 10.

>>58787002
>Lib dems fixed economy
>Labour in power before Torie occupation, 300,00 unemployed
>Torie occupation, 2million unemployed

SUPERTORIES!

>>58787125
Has the online economy shitbill done anything?

>>58785915
Are you retarded?
Most of Migration Watch's work is debunking the shit quoted in your link.
Immigration has worsened unemployment, just look at the correlation between net immigration and the increase in persons listed as economically inactive.

Immigrants took something like 98.5% of all new jobs created in the private sector in the last 5 years or so.

It's like you think a link is worth the same as any other link rather than actually reading what you're presented with and researching the numbers.

>>58787187
Oh wow you guys have your own version of DEY TURK OR JERBS?

/v/ - Politics

>>58787185

No.

GODDAMMIT WOMAN, WHY ARENT YOU DOING SOMETHING ABOUT THIS??

>>58787027
>Industries will suffer is taxes are raised due to money being taken out of the general economy
>HURP DE DURP WOT R GROWTH AND RECESSION?
>I AM NOT GOOD AT ECONOMICS

That's why you stimulate economic growth, then raise taxes when businesses can comfortably afford to pay them.

/headdesk

>>58783168

>spread the word
>but don't tell nobody

fuckkin lol'd.

>>58787355
Right good then.

I guess it's like sports or something where you just hope your team wins, and act like the world ends when they lose.

>>58787387
>Businesses in this climate can afford to raise wages
No.

>>58786712

Labour did some very good things with that money. A lot of stupid things as well admittedly, but there's little point denying that if the Tories were in power when the recession hit we'd be in an even worse state than we are now. Whilst Labour were seriously stupid not to save whilst the going was good, the people who should really be held responsible for the vast hole in our public expenses are sitting in the city, not Westminster.

The deficit is indeed very large, but to attempt to get rid of it all as fast as possible will badly hurt this country and is typical of modern Tory short-termism. Also, to take 6 billion pounds out of the economy when we are on the cusp of clambering out of the hole is borderline retarded. A long term plan to reduce the deficit over 15 years or so would be much, much better for all concerned.

>>58787002
Thatcher didn't save the economy, the economy was doing fine. Much better than it is now. All she did was fuck over the working class and make the rich richer.

>>58787383

>>58787273
I'm not saying they took our existing jobs, I'm saying that they took newly created jobs.

This keeps our young people out of work and undermines our future workforce. We can't be reliant on immigrant labour, especially not when we have millions of our own unemployed, most of whom are looking for work.
It's a short term sticking plaster solution to internal logistical issues that will hurt our economy in the long run.

>>58787535
>I'm a raging homosexual.

Oh you.

>>58782176
Funniest post I've seen on 4chan for a while. Cheers.

>Scots thinking they will ever be independant

>>58787702
Oh. Sorta like how all the darkies and women do here in America.

>>58787702

They took existing jobs and through their work created more jobs further up the pyramid, for chaps like you and me who don't fancy getting paid 4 quid an hour to pick strawberries or clean toilets every day of the week. We built a large part of the prosperity of the last decade basically by outsourcing our entire underclass.

>>58787702
You should watch this;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=walWYAIfJHI