Enjoy your lag

what?

>>57579961
sever pain in the buttocks.

>IE

Wait, you mean this isn't a scam? They are actually going to try to go through with this OnLive bullshit?

What will I do with my new Fermi if this shit works?

>>57579911
FUCKIN' ONLIVE, HOW DOES IT WORK?

tagged

>>57580115

SHAWTY FIRE BURNING ON THE DANCE FLOOR

Enjoy the shitty GFX and lag

>>57580115
use it to melt the polar ice caps?

it will be hilarious if this shit ends up actually working. /v/ will have to take back all that shit talking pseudo-science from last year

Apparently I need more tachyons.

Feels bad man.

>>57580323

WOW THERE IS GOING TO BE LAG?

WHAT A FUCKING SHOCK.

Give me yer account dawg. I've got fast interbutts.

YOUR INTERNET SUCKS NOT US

fukcing lol

>>57580323
60mb connection standard HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH ENJOY YOUR 3 PLAYERS ONLINE

How many pylons I need to run onlive?

>>57580323
No shit sherlocks, did they fund research into latency+response time themselves?

Whats your speed OP because most people in the uk only have 8mb maximum.

>>57580323

OnLive requirements: only able to use in-house @ OnLive server locations

>>57580323
>high internet connection may result in slow responsiveness
>whatthefuckamireading.jpg

>>57580391
it can't be 60...

I don't have a buildings worth of bandwidth here

Enjoy "playing" streaming video olololol

>>57580477
Learn what latency means. High latency means high ping, which is bad.

So only koreans can use this service?

>>57580323
lol you will lag you are banned
1GB/ps is MINIMUM

>>57580577
you serious?

>>57580477
>high latency
retard

Hey internet wisemen, explain this.
100kb/s download old internet, average of 30-40ms latency
300kb/s download new internet, average of 60ms latency

>>57580577
>1GB/ps is MINIMUM

niggayoujustwentfullretard.jpg

>>57580654
are you on a wireless router?

>>57580654
Not sure if troll

Learn to internet

>>57580702
How close are you to the OnLive server? Do they say where it is?

as if this will take off even if it works decently

>>57580702
>thinks thats shit

FUCK YOU TOO FAGGOT

>>57580723
Its wireless but I got it wired to my PC.

>>57580654
If you think internet speed have something to do with latency, you are a moron

>>57580760
>as if this will take off even if it works decently

Right. Even if this did work as they claim (which is impossible), or as well as could be reasonably expected, it STILL is a lousy, unappealing service.

>>57580654
You are an idiot.

1000+ ms ping here

>>57580823
Wait, you mean wireless internet to your router, then cabled to your computer?

Derp, wireless (satellite or otherwise) internet is below shit tier

>>57580702
What the fuck, what's the minimum internet requirements for OnLive??? That's close to my connection, which is 20mb/s down and 10mb/s up. Which is considered really fast internet usually. I'm on fiber optic.

Hell if I'm going to pay $100 for internet and then pay OnLive's retarded monthly fee. No way this shit is going to work.

OP thinks his internet is bad
lol my ass off

>>57580723
>>57580754
This information is not available. Or I'm just too blind and cannot find it.

I am using a wireless router but I connected myself directly to my cable modem to see if I could get this shit working.

>>57580323
>>57580702
Well if that's not good enough for OnLive then wow

>>57580905
You idiot, he only did a speedtest. For all we know he could have an unstable internets.

Hey OP, go to pingtest.net instead, post results.

>>57580892
Dont all internets go to satellites anyways?
Or do they have cables at the bottom of ocean?

>>57580826
>If you think internet speed have something to do with latency, you are a moron

Dude, it does. There's services that have excellent speed but high latency. There are ISP plans that are specifically configured to reduce latency.

It's not as obvious as pure bandwidth, but it exists.

>>57580931
5mb =/= bad

You're a fag i am still on 2mb my area can't go faster for some reason.

Clearly OnLive will only work for people physically hard-wired to their HQ if even those internet connection standards don't cut it.

>>57580654
Location, hops and internet magic

Australia and japan are literally too far away form anything civilized

>>57580975
You do realise that the 23ms doesn't apply to the OnLive servers, but rather to the speedtest server.

>>57581063
hey its a third of OPs and im just saying he think his is shit, I think mine is alright but it still sucks donkey nuts

>>57580998
>Dont all internets go to satellites anyways?
>Or do they have cables at the bottom of ocean?

I... I don't... wat

Do I meet the minimum requirement of tachyons in order to use onlive?

Give yer beta account out etc.

>>57580998
Oceans and backbone networks of course...

http://www.onlive.com/service/hot_new_games.html


I just don't see how this shit is going to work like what the fucks broskis?!?

I have no doubt this shit is probably going to fail hardcore since not everyone has fucking crazy internet speeds

HAHAHAHA WOW SHITS GONNA FUCKING FLOOOOP A DOP DOP

>>57581158
I have no clue, but if OnLive requires any upload you're fucked.

>>57581158
You'd probably need more upload speed I'm guessing.

>>57580998
satellite is shit for anything internet related

Onlive was confirmed for flop forever ago

>>57581236
>>57581272
Here's hoping upload speed doesn't become a big deal.

>>57580863

>>57581272
Yes, and you should stop guessing because you know fuck all about this shit.
This goes for almost everyone in the thread.

OnLive will flop but you are all idiots.

yo i have timewarner/road runner whats your package to get that speed?

>>57581158
What the fuck, we have the same exact upload speed, but your download speed is twice of mine (and we both use road runner)

Fucking road runner sucks ass for upload

Holy shit I never expected this incompetence on /v/.

The primary cause of latency is simply because the destination you're connecting to is far away and/or it can be that you're going through a ridiculous amount of routers.
Latency is the time it takes to send an information packet to your destination. Even if you have OMG FUKKEN FAST 20/20 INTERNETS, you can expect roughly 300ms when connecting to something halfway across the world.

>>57580931
Concider yourself lucky

>>57580905
meh better buy a PC worth 500-800$ and upgrade it once every 2-3 years, cheaper, lets you play all the newest games, sure you wont be able to crank the graphics up to "ULTRA HIGH" but does it matter?

I had Crysis working on a single core 2ghz processor and Radeon X1900 pro, on medium settings, the game looked good and played well.

I really don't see why some people want super ultra uber high graphics, because that's the point of OnLive, to provide the newest, shiniest games to people that got a shitty PC but a good internet.

In the end it will only appeal to a small margin of people.

Also it brings shitloads of questions, saving account information, is it compatible with Steam/Xfire/etc. How fast are the updates, are the servers up 24/7....

>>57581360
What the hell man

You have a 200ms jitter and a 900ms connection to a server in your area?

Wow, just wow

>>57581310
this

Enjoy your strict fair access policies, extreme latency, and shit uploads

What would be hilarious is if OnLive allowed clans to host their own servers but through OnLive.

Connect to OnLive > Connect to game > Connect to Dedicated server through game through OnLive through your browser

you guys are retarded
the primary cause of latency is the amount of psuedo-matter clogging the copper wiring that makes up the internet backbone.
the more psuedo-matter there is, the higher the latency and lower your ping(low ping is bad)

>>57581085
And?

He clearly has a good quality connection with low ping, probably to a closer server than OnLive would be.

Also, if it isn't good enough for him, everyone in his area and beyond that can't use OnLive, it's pretty clear this service is going to fail hard with the current infrastructure

>>57581499

hughesnet is a satellite connection, meaning 900 ms ping is very normal.

>>57581564
IT'S LIKE I'M REALLY PLAYING THROUGH MULTIPLE PROXYS

>>57581609
Pretty sure it's a troll

>>57581435
You obviously don't know shit about networking.

The faster a connection is, the more databytes can get there. After a megabyte of databytes get there, that's your ping.