If the only reason you're getting a PS3 is for a shitty FPS then you're retarded.

That said, MAG is better than MW2 or whatever else is out there. But the PS3 has a ton of better games than MAG.

It's called Massive Action Game.

I don't trust things with insanely generic titles.

more like FAG, as in you are one for playing this game

lol massive action game LOLOLOL

>>46046601
>>46046559
Oh yeah, never mind. What with generic games like Bayonetta coming out, who cares about a new, revolutionary game?

Fucking retards.

>>46046464
I'm getting a PS3 because of MAG, but of course I'll get other games for it.

>>46046795
MAG is about as generic as bayonetta

>>46046865
Explain.

>>46046559

More like

FANTASTIC ACTION GAME

Generic shootan what did you expect?

>>46046795
hey bro trolled easy.

but seriously the beta is public for this game and honestly it isnt very good, i was excited for it too but now......meh this game is a skip for me

Well, just because a game has many players it doesn't mean it's a good game. Since that's what they advertise so much, I'm guessing it's pretty generic in every other aspect. Still, I'd try it if I had a PS3 - not getting one just for this, though.

>>46046865
no u, bayonetta has character designs, unlike shitty army shooter #2134727

>>46046898
the only thing that MAG haves that is "revolutionary" is the number of players.
other than that, generic.

>>46046898
Explain what's so revolutionary about MAG, and what's so generic about Bayonetta

FUCK I DON'T EVEN CARE ABOUT THIS GAME BUT DO YOU FAGGOTS EVEN KNOW A WORD OTHER THAN 'GENERIC'

360 now has weaker multiplayer support on their games compared to the ps3. Would still be a better game on the PC though.

>>46047051
the number of players means jack shit when i can't even get past the fucking lobby

>>46047159

that too. its only a beta, though.

>>46047051
Nothing about MAG's player numbers is unique or innovating. The technology to do so has always been around.

MAG will be a fucking shitstorm of lag and fail for about 2 months, then it will be a ghost town.

I'd much rather play Battlefield. I found this to be completely unimpressive.
It felt just like SOCOM, just in first person.

Only thing remotely interesting is the 256 players per game.

But I suspect that that will simply mean more grenade spam. Could you imagine BF2 with 256 players? It'd be raining four times as hard as it already does.

Fuck /v/, enjoy your

COMBOAN
JUMPAN
SLOW MO KILLAN

lol bayonetta

>>46047251
>lag
you dont know shit sorry
I hate FPS games btw

>>46047251
IT IS ALREADY A SHITSTORM OF LAG AND FAIL
they have to constantly invite more beta testers cause people drop out of this piece of shit everyday

>>46047111
I've been in the beta for a long time now.

You play a random army guy in one of 3 different factions. Tech guys, normal Army guys, and the middle eastern/russian whatever guerrilla fighters. There are like 4 or 5 modes of play, I forget. Most of them require base capturing.

Granted it has a lot of players in some of the bigger games which is neat. The squad based gameplay is neat also. But besides that, a good way to describe the game is generic. And I don't think more players is revolutionary, because the way things are set up you're never near a big group of people ever. And there have been squad based games before MAG.