because pokeman sucks

Why spend money on a new game, when you can make guaranteed millions off rehashed bullshit!

Pokemon is made by Nintendo.

Pokémon FireRed and LeafGreen

IT PRINTS MONEY BITCH

>>41868734

This.

Because if it was made by nintendo it would be kiddy mode and not awesome.

I would play the shit out of it, if it would be good made

Pokemon
Poke = Pocket
Mon = Monsters

You can't have a 3D MMO on the Nintendo DS.

because devs make just as much money rehashing it and taking the cheap 2d graphics

Because it would be the only legitimate MMORPG to compete against WOW, and Nintendo hates money

1. Nintendo haets online, see friend codes.
2. Making an MMO would require work, Nintendo is lazy.
3. Pokemon already prints money, why fuck with a working formula?

I've always dreamed of a game like that. Fully 3D, all fights are live action, you can use pokemon abilities at ALL times for lulz and general dicking around. Shit would be so cash.

>>41868815

PC perhaps?

sort of like a WOW set up?

They don't want massive amounts of money.

There should have been a traditional 3d pokemon game by now. I'm suprised one was never made. I don't even play pokemon games and think that shit is weird.

Snap and Stadium doesn't count.

>>41868686
Hey mommy thanks for buying me Pokemon Online! Now I'll just go online to trade my pokemons...

KillAllJews34356: F UCK B1TCH CU.NT N1GG3R C0CKS

>>41868865
"WOW setup"

You mean a PC game? That's not really a WOW setup..that's a PC game setup.

>>41868686
want the answer?

Nintendo never tried because they suck at it but they wont let anyone else try because its a huge fucking pot of gold

MMOs are for fags

3d pokemon single player would be awesome however on current gen consoles

>>41868852

>3. Pokemon already prints money, why fuck with a working formula?

So your saying you wouldn't play this game?

I would rather have a 3d iteration of the pokemon series
IE: 5th gen comes out for xbawks/pstriple
That would be so good
Run around in 3d, see monsters in the grass, throw pokeballs out, have actual trainer battles in the same environment AHHHAHHH-Jizzzzzzzzzzzzz

Thats how good it would be

Pokemon sucks and you suck for liking it.
There must be something wrong with you if you still like this shit after hitting puberty.

>>41868940

No I didn't mean it like that.
I understand there are many MMO on PC but most /v/ are fucktard 5 year olds.

>>41868815
did you ever assume that maybe it's called that because the balls in which they live can be fit in your fucking pocket?

Or maybe that there are games....on consoles?

>>41868852
This bro hit the big ones.
Why do that when they can make lazy rehashes that print money?
And of course, nintendos hatred of online kills the chance of it even further.

>>41868956
You're not very bright, are you?

I would play this.

>>41868956
No, I'm saying every Pokemon fan that would even consider buying an MMO already buys the games so Nintendo has no reason to alter their games.

The real reason is that it would make the handheld versions worthless.Why buy the new version for $30 when you can get the patch for free?

Pokemon is for faggot kids. Grow the fuck up you Chris-chans.

>>41868686
Holy shit, i remeber those screenshots from when i was like 12.

>>41869188
No, wait, that's not a charmander. Fucking thumbnails.

Doesn't really need to be an MMO but a 3D rendering of the gameboy games would be really cool. Perhaps with a really deep storyline as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkDhClTwmdg

Sounds alright, I guess. I don't know how it would play, though. How would legendarys work? Is it tournament based for high end stuff? Any 'raids'? What's the point of grouping up with anyone? Can you trade caught pokemon for young girls?

>>41869231

They tried that....it fucking sucked.

wtf, Tibia styled Pokemon? Ofc. by dem craaaazaaay BR's

gib moni plx

>>41869306

Shit would be so cash, if it was done properly.

I don't need the MMO, just give me a 3D Pokemon game with a "coliseum" option where players can go battle online.

Because out of 600+ pokemon, you'd only see people using the same group of 10 pokemon end game.

Because ten-year-old boys and girl all over the world would get creamed by adult gamers typing and yelling "YEAH I FUCKING OWNED YOUR ASS, NIGGERS."

>>41869572

You played WoW?

>Pokemon MMO not being made, devs keep rehashing
BAWWWW I WANT MY POKEMANS ONLINE, NINTENDO HATES MONEY

>Pokemon MMO released, takes the MMO crown over Wow, devs stop making any new games
BAWWWW I HATE MMOS I WANT MY POKEMANS BACK

>>41868686
Nintendo themselves have said that it kills the spirit of the game

going out meeting real people and trading in person


Nintendo is run by a bunch of old fags who dont know what the internet is

>>41869604

That, and a couple of other online games

>>41869377
>How would legendarys work?
IMO they should actually be of legendary status, by which I mean there shouldn't be 200,000 kids running around with mewtwo or zapdose or other such bullshit.
They're not very legendary if everyone can get it.

>What's the point of grouping up with anyone?
Well if nothing else, the games have introduced fighting battles with two trainers with two pokemon at once on one side against someone else.
Two on two battles doesn't seem out of the question.

>>41869306
>pokemon.br
>.br
HUEHUAHUEHUA
GIBE POKMONES I REPOT U

>>41869507

Not really, most of the time when I played the GB version, I had different group than my friends.

Nintendo said that pokemon was meant to be a handheld game, which is why you won't see any console games (besides the 2 GC ones) or an MMO (which would be too much of a hassle for Nintendo)

Just imagine a shiny pokemon slowly walking out from behind a tree...and somebody else out of no where master balls it.

.implying Gamefreak actually give a shit enough to give their fans what they want.

Lets look at Collosseum as an example.

"I want to catch all the pokemon just like in the gameboy versions"

>Restricted to Shadow Pokemon.

XD is announced

"surely they wont fuck it up this time"

>restricted to Shadow Pokemon.

Don't hold your breath, Pokefans

>>41868686
because Nintendo is afraid of real online and potentially letting children play with strangers.

>>41868686
Wow, that looks like it would be boring as fuck.

>>41869722

There fucking idiots! no wonder the Wii online sucks dick.

>>41869675

So only one or two people in the game world have a Zapdos or Mewtwo? Hell, I know, why don't they make them cash shop items! (please don't take me seriously, game Gods)

Two on two is okay, I guess. Not much for team play, though.

>>41869658
>Nintendo is run by a bunch of old fags who dont know what the internet is

Bingo.

WWW.POKEMONONLINE.COM.BR
>BR

BR?
GIB ME POKEMON PLOX
I REPORT U
HUEAUUEAHEAUHEUAHUEAUH

>>41869639

>Pokemon's cost real money
>Zapdos $49.99

>>41868815
the "pocket" portion of the title is partially referring to the fact that you keep the monsters in small balls that fit in your pocket.

therefore it still can be applied to a console

>>41869787

I lol'd so hard.

>>41869787
Oh god imagine catching your own shiny, then letting it run around outside its ball.

So many kids would try to catch it

>>41869864

See
>>41869679

>>41869787

>>41869838
Well I don't know about that, that would be too restrictive.
But really, there shouldn't be many people with them.

Every time I see a Pokemon thread I am still blinded by finding that anyone still plays the shit, it's a child's game, it's the same shit it's always been and if you played blue or red back in the day, you should be done.
Goddamn, grow the fuck up and let it die.

>>41869966

If it's possible to get in any way, everyone will have one

Unless you restrict the number, which would just be stupid

when did this pokemon nintendo alliance start? A pokemon MMO on the PS3, 360, and PC would be awesome. Nintendo is only holding back pokemons potential.