pics or....

did he write the ">"?

implying is the worst thing to happen to /v/ in a while.

I saw an entire thread at my uni.

>>39446508
>implying you went to the mall

>>39446591

none of you guys have ever wished you could use implying as an everyday joke? I think it has some seriously potential.

>>39446640
No, grow up.

>>39446591
>implying implying is bad

>>39446640
>implying meme jokes have irl potential

>Implying this isn't the beginning of the end

>>39446640
implying is the internet version of the annoying idiot who does "" with this fingers whenever he is being sarcastic

>>39446713
>implying you don't do it

>>39446713
Worse, in my opinion.

>>39446713
>implying without yellowtext

>>39446713
I didn't think of it that way.

>>39446747
>implying greentext is yellow

>>39446713
you just ruined it for me, fucker.

>>39446713
how about "quote unquote"

>implying there won't be shirts at Hot Topic with >implying on them in a few months

Gentlemen, this is the end.

I saw a large pretentious sign that said "TRY READING A GOD DAMN BOOK" and I was very tempted to put up some kind of sign under it that >implied it >implied something.

>>39446760
>implying green isn't a secondary color of yellow and blue

>>39446692
>Implying >Implying is a meme

>>39446779
>implying some fucker isn't already walking around in a T-shirt handing out implications like SARS on a hot Chinese afternoon

THIS IS GETTING OUT OF OUR HANDS GUYS

STOP IT

>implying greentext started in /v/
>implying anything about implying
>implying

>>39446779

oh god

>Implying that I carry a green marker around and reference /v/ IRL.

I do.

>>39446779
Wow, I didn't think I could imagine implying being more annoying, but I'll be darned, there it is.

>>39446778
Quote unquote is just utility man, it's just convenient to let people understand you are speaking in a quote.

Imagine if no one said it and just went "And I quote, 'That young man has no sex appeal'"

That would look so pretentious.

>>39446826
I'll remember to call you by your mum or dads name.

>>39446826
Green is just as much part of the electro-magnetic spectrum as yellow and blue.
See how I did that?
>without this

>>39446779
FUCK


NOOOOOOOOOOO

>Implying implications that implyers might imply that an implyer might imply that an implyer would go so far as to imply that he could imply that she implyed that an implyer did in fact imply that the implyers of the individual implicatory implication committee of implyers might imply that you would imply that they would imply that they where implying the national implyers could imply

>IMPLYING IT ISN'T FUNNY
>IMPLYING IT ISN'T FUNNY
>IMPLYING IT ISN'T FUNNY
>IMPLYING IT ISN'T FUNNY
>IMPLYING IT ISN'T FUNNY
>IMPLYING IT ISN'T FUNNY
>IMPLYING IT ISN'T FUNNY
>IMPLYING IT ISN'T FUNNY

>Im not even going to imply anymore, and all kiddies will stop bothering too

Cut it out with the yellow text.

>>39446508
>implying that when implications implied are implicated in implications of implying implications, implications can simply otherwise be implied in the form of implications of implying implications or how implicating implications implies that implicated implications are in fact implied you are implying that there is no implications of the implying that implies a implicated implication when the implication is implied which results in the implication implying that implications imply an implication of implicated implying.