Youtube does terrible things to videos. Try to make it around 990mb~ compressed if you don't want it to be horrible.

Continue.

You know, for all the time you guys spend tweaking the graphics of STALKER you could have probably made STALKER 2 or at least made interesting maps of Chernobyl, the whole of Chernobyl.

I may just mediafire the video or something of the sorts if Youtube doesn't do justice, either that or find a better uploading service. Too bad the better services aren't as trafficked.

i watch youtube videos in hd all the time it looks fine

HD was the best thing YouTube's done in a long time.

>>32560775
Getting it up on Youtube is going to be your best option. It will be worth the time it takes to upload 1GB. If you do choose to upload it onto a file sharing site, I recommend Megaupload. I'm pretty sure they allow up to 1024mb for non-members to download.

>>32560766
Because lord knows a team of 10 people far exceeds the rate of production of an entire studio of paid professionals.

I'm not working on graphics because I've already made the balance charts for everyone else, and I can't imagine anyone would care about raw configuration data as opposed to tangible evidence of what we've done. You'll have to reserve judgement on gamebalance and gameplay until it's actually released.

>>32560683
It's about 550mb compressed in MPEG-4 contained in .mov because for whatever reason that's what Youtube prefers, and it's capped at the maximum resolution downscaled from 1920x1200. The quality had to be a compromise because of the length of the video.

Fuck yes, news of lurk

Orirginal_Poster, does LURK make any changes to the labs?

invisible fire unrelated

>>32560962
Zombies always crack me up.

>>32560944

You can record stalker smoothly?

confirmed for supercomputer

Proceed..

>>32561000
GOSHEEEAAAAAAAAAAAA

>>32560944
>paid professional
As opposed to an unpaid professional?

>>32560654
has L.U.R.K been released yet?

>>32560944
>I'm not working on graphics because I've already made the balance charts for everyone else
Typo, that was meant to say I'm not working on balance because etc..

>>32560923
I've had bad luck with Youtube, but since I'm following their nazi-esque uploading standards then it better turn out properly.

I tried uploading .wmv, big mistake.

>>32561049
The meaning of the word professional has changed a lot in the past few decades.

>>32561049

Why must you nitpick over something that makes no difference?

>>32561061
>L.U.R.K
>A release
reactionimage.jpg

>>32561082
>>32561096
Hey Original_Poster, how can you fit your balls in both these guy's mouths at the same time?

>>32560923
As far as i know, MU only allows up to 350mb or so for free users. Mediafire is a much better choice. Larger download limits (not sure what the limit is though), no waiting times and you can download multiple files simultaneously.

hey /v/
lets demonstrate quality in jpegs
^_^

Also
>GSC
>Professionals
That's a good one.

Hey OP. I saw you on /a/ the other day. Back then you posted some comparative screenshots. I've noticed that L.U.R.K. has more pronounced, and often larger, shadows. Does this affect the AI in the game with regards to cover, i.e. how well they can detect you?

this mod almost makes me want to play stalker.

almost.

>>32561030
I can record stalker at 30 frames smooth with maximum settings, 1920x1200 resolution, extended draw-distance, high-resolution textures, Screen Space Ambient Occlusion, Deep Parralax, Enhanced High Dynamic Range, etc.. Otherwise when I'm playing it averages about 60-80 frames.

My system specs are as follows:
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5
Core 2 Duo E8500
4GB DDR2 1033

It's not a supercomputer, but the GPU is high-end, which is pretty much the only real bottleneck amongst most current generation games.

>>32561049
I would feel awkward being referred to as a professional. I guess I might need a refresher on the definition.

>>32560962
I really, really want to darken LabX10, but it stupidly shares the same lighting configurations as Red Forest, so I'd have to recompile the environmental engine file in order to do it, which would take far longer then I plan to spend on for the base release, seeing as how I'm being bugged about release dates far too often already.

Otherwise the aspects that have already gone underway is the subtle implementation of new monsters, and more postprocessing effects underground.

I was reluctant to add new monsters, but the demand was too high for me to decline.

tl;dr at all of OPs posts

what the fuck makes this mod so good anyways?

cmon wheres the video

I think I have to re-install STALKER SoC. Getting tired of Clear Sky too.

>>32561644
lazy motherfucker

>>32561533
Well one of the most appealing aspects of this mod is the AI overhaul, which includes a dynamic light visibility threshold, which basically means that stealth is possible, I made a couple videos for it a while ago, and one of the testers made some videos too:

http://www.xfire.com/video/bcd6a/
http://www.xfire.com/video/bec8e/
http://www.xfire.com/video/c4477/

>>32561264
Directly from the MU FAQ
>What is the maximum file size I can upload?
>If you'd like your file to be downloadable by everyone, make sure not to exceed the limit of 1024 MB. Larger files can only be downloaded by premium users.

Just tested with a 700mb file, allowed me to upload just fine.

I'm a poor fag when it comes to my computer but then again I spended all my savings on a car instead.

I can play Clear Sky on low res medium settings and I suspect SoC with this mod will use about the same amount of resources.

Is this correct?

>>32561573
>4870x2
>high end

>>32561946
Go fuck yourself.

You are aware that this "glorious HD720p" has less detail than 1034x768, right?

>>32561644
Good thing my satisfaction of my final product isn't contingent on the opinions of the mentally challenged.

>>32561710
Right where I left it for the last 5 fucking minutes, until then you can look at not so good previous video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ps8AlQ9hi7w

I wasn't really adept to flash uploading so the quality is pretty bad, however that won't be the case this time.

On a somewhat unrelated note, since when does vanilla stalker have weapon descriptions that start in all caps?

>>32561982
u mad

>>32562009
And by 1034 I mean 1024.

40 minutes? fuckkkkkkkkkkk

OP here, disregard this thread, I suck cocks.

>>32561269
How about you go kill yourself ^_^

>>32561946
>>32562022

Go to /g/ if you want to troll about something as insignificant as to what performance class a certain video card belongs to

>>32562009

It's not, and you're not even making a point.

>>32562014
tl;dw

>>32562185 It's not,
Yes it is.

Do you really have to name every improvement a "dynamic" something or other?

>>32562266

Enter 1280x720 in a calculator
then 1024x768

Gee, I wonder which one is better.

>>32562014 .mov
Y u do this

>>32562313
PROTIP: It's the vertical resolution that matters. Horizontal resolution only gives you more of the same.

>>32560944
>mov

no thanks

i bought this game about 5 seconds ago
should i download this mod? or wait until i complete it once?

>>32562009
Yes, I am in fact aware that Youtube quality is shit, however it's the best it will allow me to do.

>>32562022
Sh-sh-shutup Kaworu.... It's not like we like you or anything

>>32562017
I don't know?

>>32561940
Take a look at the framecounter in the comparison image as depicted here: >>32560775
I'm getting about 20 more frames per second then Clear Sky, figure that as to how you'll be able to run.


>>32562235
>>32562185
>>32562159
>>32562022
>>32562039
>>32561946
In during cancer

>Enter 1280x720 in a calculator
>then 1024x768

u cant solve them that way, but here ill do it:

1) 1280x720

1280x=720
/1280 /1280
x = 720/1280 = 0.5625

2) 1024x768

1024x = 768
/1024 /1024
x = 768/1024 = 0.75

well yeah i guess your right but just thought i'd double check.k

>>32562374
>>32562354
>>32562322
>>32562307
>>32562266
>>32562159
>>32562022
>>32562039
>>32562009
>>32561946

Since when do stalker threads get infested with trolls?

Well, thread's over I guess.

WHY MOD STALKAN? OLD SHIT IS OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

>>32562405
Are the youtube videos even real 720? It always seems much lower.

>>32562411
no u see 1024x768 is better because its a higher number .75 is higher than the othe rone.

OP is a faggot

>>32562411
WRONG, FAGGOT.

1280*10241024*768=1.00673362*10^13

>>32562374
Seems like a legitimate reason to sage a thread.

>>32562307
Yes

Also can we stop the arguing about resolution? Youtube caps at 1280x720 there isn't anything I can do about this.

So there is going to be some sort of filehosted video release, right?

>>32562387
in the same boat here

im not a fan of shitbrix gaems, and I like stealth, so i might wait till LURK comes out

>>32562453
How am I trolling? Are you a consolebro butthurt that your "nextgen" system barely matches 10 years old PC resolution?

Modding STALKER is like doing alchemy.

But instead of turning lead into gold you're turning shit into diarrhea.

>>32562521
hey OP, >i bought this game about 5 seconds ago
should i download this mod? or wait until i complete it once?

>>32562453
im twelve years old and what is this.

wow you are soo totally wrong
both dimension do matter

>>32562521 Seems like a legitimate reason to sage a thread.

sage OP's a fag

>>32562507
No arguments here

>>32562453
Nonsense, it was mere chance that trolls weren't prevalent in previous threads. /v/ wouldn't be /v/ without trolls.

This thread is now about Swedish Railways.

Hey OP how did you balance Handguns/sidearms?

with 30kg weight limit, they are pretty useless

this one is lovely

>>32562594
I wouldn't call them trolls, in my opinion the term "threadshitter" is more fitting. They are pretty much everywhere in the last days/weeks

beautiful winter day

x2000

>>32562594
It's only one or two people anyway.

SVERIGES JÄRNVÄGAR

>>32562610
Quite the contrary. Their usage is emphasized by weight limits because their ammunition is considerably less heavy then other weapons, along with the weapon itself, as well as the traditional aspect to handguns, such as a quick-switch when your primary's clip is emptied. Along with minor touches like less inertia and lowered weapon sway making it a suitable choice for close range circumstances.

What else are you planning to include in the cideo? There's a loooot of dead space in it.

x2000 again

>>32562700
>your primary's clip is emptied.
>clip
>FUCKING CLIP
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

>>32562650
lol wutcha gonna do about it u butthurt faggit

>>32562704
>video*

Is L.U.R.K. merely a graphical overhaul or are there changes in terms of gameplay?

>>32562704
Come again?

>>32562719
Oh I'm sorry I meant magazine Jesus Christ if you stay away from /k/ for too long you'll lose your life force.

>>32562730
This guy sounds tough I wouldn't mess with him.

>>32562700
What!
So I cannot arm myself with more weapons than a typical 50 man Ukrainian militia?
This is nonsense! I should be allowed to carry 4 trucks worth of gear wherever I go.

another beautiful RC

>>32562769
There's only about 5 minutes(less, actually) of 'content'. After that it's just the song and your notice stating it's WIP.
What else are you putting in the video?

>>32562405

Thank you. I completely missed the frame counter. That is quite the difference and it looks very promising.

>>32562752
http://www.moddb.com/mods/lurk

The graphical aspect came later actually, the basic concept was to actually be selective about modifications, balance them, and make new things. Basically we wanted to make a conversion that would appeal to those who appreciated most of the aspects of the original game, and build and improve upon it in an objective fashion.

>>32562795
I recognize this place, where is this photo taken?

PLEASE TELL ME YOU MADE THE SHUFFLING ZOMBIES MORE PREVALENT

>>32562699
Den här tråden blev just 100 gånger bättre.

>>32562802
It's actually a completely different video with different music and whatnot.

I always have to post this image with the early concept I ended up dropping. It was basically making a suit for each faction, however I dropped it because it made the factions feel too samey.

>>32562699
That's Statens Järnvägar you faggot.

>>32562986
>too samey
No shit, you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between them at distances more than 5 metres.

>>32563013
That's the case with many pre-existing models, that's why the usage of binoculars is emphasized.

Wait did you already upload the video? Did I miss the link?

I wonder how long processing takes.

>>32563146
There was an older video, but this one is different, and it's almost done processing.