.

>>29690704

I guess they'll have the "DLC" included in the PC release anyway as they know it'll just be downloaded for free

>>29690745

>RE5
>PC release

oh you

>>29690759
What?

>>29690704

I'm so displeased by it all that I'm going to pirate the PC version.

Three times.

>>29690759
It's already been announced.

>>29690759
hur dur it is slated for PC you fuck nut

>>29690759
all main RE games have been released on PC

To the individuals complaining about the individuals who bought the RE5 DLC,

Get a job, or mind your own damn business, whatever it takes to get you to shut the fuck up.

Love, people that want you to shut the fuck up about how they choose to spend their own damn money.

>>29690759

Versus mode in itself is pretty fun but it's a rip off to pay $5 for a 1.8mb Xbox360 and 380kb PS3 download

To the Individuals Who Bought any game ever,

Are you dense? Are you retarded or something?

Love,
The Sane Part of the Gaming Community

>>29690759
dumbass

I'm still betting everyone making these boycott posts are just trolling. There has to be no way that people would be this snubbed over $5.

>>29690800
Enjoy your $3 stupid American Fee.

>>29690808

It's not about the cost, it's the principle. There is no reason you should have to pay to play content that's already in the game you purchased.

>>29690829
Incorrect. You purchased a license to use a specific piece of intellectual property. Just because it's on the disc, doesn't mean you own it.

I should have died years ago, but discovered I can extend my life by feeding off the eternal bitching of nerds.
I'm behind the Shadow of the Colossus Movie

>>29690818
Enjoy being a miserable, crybaby fucktard.

>>29690818

$5.

>>29690914
Name calling? Really?

>>29690829

EULA doesn't guarantee that the content on the disc is yours to play, for one.

Second, if you don't want to play it, then don't download it. No reason to berate those that want to play it so they shelled out the $5 for it.

Third, these threads that purport themselves to be the opinions of the "community" rarely represent a majority of said group.

I want to see a video of how ridiculous this is. Stand off shootan gogo.

>>29690944
The DLC is $2 dollars for Japan. Because DLC doesn't sell as well there. So Capcom charged Western Gamers $3 more simply because they can.

>>29690805
The sane part who plan to support their community and favourite hobby by robbing it blind to ensure that anyone with talent is not compensated for their work...
That sounds like a solid plan that will make sure we have lots of quality games to play in the future.
You sir, are a crafty consumer!

Technically, as much as I hate it, the DLC wasn't advertised along with the main game, so they can hold that kind of thing from us. Nevertheless, I don't like where this trend with DLC is headed.

>>29690994

Eh, said American, I assumed the price we see.

What is the DLC exactly? Is it missions and guns or just retarded shit like a headband for Chris?

>>29690805
You are so retarded. If everybhody pirated games, everybody would stop making them. Enjoy being part of the problem.

>>29691058
Versus mode and a Horde-like mode.
No new guns, characters, or maps.

Resident Evil is a shit series anyway.

>>29690866

Imagine this: you buy a huge fruit basket. It's huge as hell. Fruit all up in that basket. It looks delicious. You get it home, you open it up, you eat a few apples, have some grapes, snack on a banana or two. It's great. Then you get to the middle. You couldn't see into the middle before, when you bought it, but ho-oh-oh-ly shit! Are those some fucking guavas? Hell yes they are, and that shit's delicious. Suddenly the person who sold you busts the door down to your house, takes your guavas and says, "Gimme extra for those."

You're probably a little pussy who takes any crap the world flings at him and would buy it anyways, but most people would stand up to this.

DLC should not cost extra money. It should give incentive to buy the game in the first place. And with DLC announced so soon after RE5's release, I know people who refuse to buy the game, though they were going to, because of this DLC fiasco.

>>29691058
It's two new game modes. One is like mercenaries, but you compete with other people for majini kills, the other is a versus thing, where you fight other players.

>>29691072
Yep, the reason devs have stooped to DLC like this is because of people like our faggot freind up there who don't pay for games.

>>29691122

I do enjoy your metaphor.

>>29691122

Yuu remind me of Walter Sobchek from The Big Lebowski.

That's not a good thing, because you're kind of person, while screaming and swearing in a family restaurant, decides it's a freedom of speech thing.

This is the same way. If you don't want the DLC, don't get it, fine. Some people who aren't poor don't mind playing for this.

>>29690788
>>29690786
>>29690807
>>29690777
>>29690774
>>29690769
Jesus PC fags are the easiest trolled and the most defensive about their shitty system. TPS are shit on PC anyway fags. Enjoy your WoW

>>29691102
>>29691126

Wow, sounds pretty gay. Whatever floats your boat I suppose.

>>29691122
No. I'm just not an idiot who understands the difference between rivalrous and non-rivalrous property. Your analogy is moronic and in no way applies to IP. However, if you insist on using it, your fruit basket would have had a label on it telling you exactly what you were getting, guavas not included. Caveat Emptor my freind...
Of course this kind of knowledge allows me to earn an income which easily covers $5 DLC, should I want it. Although I would not buy this particular DLC myself, I support those who do as well as Capcom for their enterprise. If people weren't willing to pay for it, they wouldn't sell it.

>>29691122
>>29690704
Your answer can be summed up by
>gamersfauxhawks.jpg

>>29691227
lol

Oh, and, talking out of your ass about free DLC makes you sound like a retard. Should the developers work for free?

My allowance won't cover this DLC :(
It's such bullshit anywy!! I should be able to have whatever I want 4 free!!!!!11

>>29691122
That's a shitty metaphor.
Its more like you buy a basket of fruit knowing full well he is going to come round to ask do you want more fruit tomorrow.
Its just a question of do you think the fruit the guy is selling the second day should have been included in the first place. But anyone who buys the DLC is retarded

>>29691122

Were you the guy who just 45 minutes ago made the insane and quite frankly silly argument about how you NEEDED some catch because you were ENTITLED to that catch because it's ON the cartridge and then made up some kind of analogy with DS games?

These analogies are all the same. You're deprived of something you feel you're owed. I get the fear of DLC being a method of releasing substandard games and squeezing revenue out of fans or players, but Capcom didn't rob you of the latter half of the game, or any part of the story, or really anything at all that you NEED in the case of RE5. They haven't deprived you of anything that you EXPECTED TO GET when you bought RE5. They have offered you something superficial you didn't have access to before that you still don't need to enjoy the game overall, so again, if it's too much trouble for you to obtain, then simply don't.

>>29691247

Guavas were included. DLC is on the disc. You're paying for a key to unlock it. Perhaps the analogy of buying a treasure chest filled with gold for $1,000 and then having to pay $2,000,000 for the key would've been better. (In before break the lock; let's assume it's impossible).

I can easily cover the costs of DLC too, but I choose not to. It's a fucking rip-off. Just like how Future Shop charges $5 more for a Wii Points card than anywhere else. Fuck that, even though I couldn't find any anywhere except Future Shop, and really wanted to get Dynamite Headdy, I was not going to lower myself to do that.

>>29691258

and your lifestyle can be summed up by "oh yes capcom, in the mouth, and down the throat." *glossy anime eyes*

Unlock keys take up less space on your drive, and enable 360 players without a hard drive to participate! Save money on bandwidth? Why do that?

>>29691227
hurr hurr, lolitrolu
You're the moron. Nobody was defending their system. They were correcting your dumbass.

I'd agree that paying for cosmetic DLC is pretty dumb, but this is fucking versus mode. It should have been included in the game, but I would buy that shit. It's not like boycotting it will make them apologize and give it away for free.

>>29691287

...YES. Fuck, people are stupid. Valve does it. It gives people who HAVEN'T bought the game an INCENTIVE to NOW BUY the game. (I figure if I put the important stuff in caps you might understand).

>>29691374

No, that was not me.

>>29691247
>If people weren't willing to pay for it, they wouldn't sell it
That is, somewhat counter-intuitively, the entire point!! The more people that Re-Purchase content that they have already bought and paid for encourages other companies to do the same.

Its the exact same mentality behind shovelware. "If people buy it, then who cares if the game is shit and bugged to hell."
Its the exact same mentality behind graphicswhoring. "If people buy it, who cares if the game isn't fun and has no gameplay."

This is the actual cancer killing gaming. We're letting people, no encouraging them, to rip us off and give us poor quality games simply because people like you, and no offence intended, are willing to pay for it.

>>29691409
Cry some more.

>>29691424

So, one example, valve?

I can name a whole butt-fuck load of people who want cash for their DLC.


Should the GTAIV expansion be free? ;)

>>29691422

It does make them realize that they shouldn't rip consumers off like that though. They admitted that the whole Mega Man 9 DLC fiasco will "never happen again"

hmmm

>>29691375
Actually, a better analogy would be buying that chest for $60, and then paying another $5 for a key to unlock the special compartment you didn't know was there.

I like how all the tripfags are for paying money for something you should already own, and their huge butthurt is showing since they realize they've been ripped off. Good going, you immense faggots.

>>29691375
Again, whether or not it was on the disc is not relevant. What you actually purchased was a LICENSE to use the software.
A better 'fruit basket' example you be something like you purchase a fruit basket on the understanding that you can take it home and eat everything but the guavas. If you enjoy the other fruit and subsequently get the taste for guava to complete the experience you can pay a small fee to eat them.

Why isn't versus mode free? They didn't advertise it and its never been in another RE game, but dammit I deserve this!

they could have easily unlocked this as a free patch/update just like they are doing with championship mode for SF4 but they didn't, therefore they are douchebags

>>29691491

This isn't Downloadable Content though, is it? You don't download any content, because you already have it there.

If anything, it's Online Unlockable Content. Or OUC.

Let's call it what it is. You're paying, essentially, for a nod. For them to say 'Thank you. You may now play.'

Sounds pretty fuckin gay to me.

>>29691469
Yeah, but that's not us. That's mostly the casual gamer who greatly outnumbers the "hardcore / common sense" player. You'll always have more people paying for DLC than not, and it doesn't hurt their game sales for trying to sell DLC (so why wouldn't they?). There's nothing we can do to stop it, that's all.

>>29691513

>>29691122

>>guavas

>>delicious

>>29690800
it encourages them to make more dlc and make us opay more for it you retard faggot, gb2school you fucking kid

HOW ABOUT THIS GUYS:
IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT, SHUT THE FUCK UP
IF YOU LIKE IT, SHUT THE FUCK UP
DONE

>>29690704
That nigga has nothing on Dr.Salvador

>>29691782
Funny, the guy supporting the dlc and telling you to grow up is getting called a kid. Stop being so butthurt.

>>29691752

>>has never tried a guava

or

>>is a fucking pussy who can't handle sour foods and only eat's mom's cake

>>29691787
How dare we talk about games on /v/!

>>29691790
I agree, Dr. Salvador was unexpected and almost frightening in his own way. This new guy is just a lame carbon copy.

>>29691752

Guavas themselves are a little strange tasting, but guava juice is god tier.

But I sure do love mangoes.

They have to be filipino mangoes though. Latin american mangoes simply aren't as sweet. Little too much tang.

I'll pay extra for them because they taste better.

>>29691122
... whoa

>>29691836
Talking constructively about a game and senseless dribble are two separate things.

>>29691836
Talking about games is fine. Having arguments over something so stupid is retarded.

>>29691818

>eat's

>>29691818

>>has never tried mom's cake

or

>>is a fucking pussy who eats sour guavas because he deserves to eat a fruit so reminiscint of his stale and disgusting life.

I for one am pretty sick of this new "stick a price tag on everything" mentality and business model. I'd like to think that the majority of people wouldn't be so gullible and willing to buy into this, but they probably see it like we saw expansion packs for Quake and other shooters.

>>29691817
go kill yourself you dicksucking faggot

>>29691864
The new chainsaw dude is also slow as hell, which makes his swipes easy to dodge. Salvador ran at you and swiped like a maniac. It was sheer terror.

>>29691877
>>29691892
Actually this is a pretty good topic, is it ok to charge for content on the disc or is it just ripping the consumer off.

I will admit most people are just pointlessly arguing but the topic in itself is pretty good.

>>29691930

>>29691991

>>29691936
Agreed. Topic gives me some faith that not all of /v/ is retarded.
Although that will go out the window with the next thread I click on...

>>29690867
You're gonna live forever.

>>29692027
I get this way sometimes and then bam, reaction image thread.

This topic only proves tripfags are shit. They love DLC and they hate guavas.

It was $5, not like it's that much money. I don't care if that isn't the principle behind the matter, who gives a fuck, stop whining.

So, in summary:

The content was on the CD. Capcom never told us that we would have to pay extra for said content's key, and thus many consumers assumed that it would be free/actual DLC. Wrong. And because you don't own the CD by technicality, it's all Capcom's gravy.

Now, people are split between the people who would shell out money for things they should already have VS people who realize that it's a scam and hold a particle of common sense.

Capcom: LOLITROLLU

>>29691122
>>Imagine this: you buy a huge fruit basket. It's huge as hell. Fruit all up in that basket. It looks delicious. You get it home, you open it up, you eat a few apples, have some grapes, snack on a banana or two. It's great. Then you get to the middle. You couldn't see into the middle before, when you bought it, but ho-oh-oh-ly shit! Are those some fucking guavas? Hell yes they are, and that shit's delicious. Suddenly the person who sold you busts the door down to your house, takes your guavas and says, "Gimme extra for those."

This has nothing to do with this situation. Imagine this instead:

You see a fruit basket, and it has a sticker on it. That sticker says "I have 3 apples, 2 pears, and 5 bananas, and I cost $20."

You go, hrm, that's not really CHEAP but the fruit looks really good! I'll spring for it.

On your way out the door, the manager chases after you and goes, "Dude! I managed to score some avacodos, I didn't think they'd make it in this week. I'll add 2 to your basket for another $5."

You have the option of saying, "No, I don't like avacados, thanks," and the option of saying "FFFFFF AVACADOS NOMNOM NOM $5."

Why are you choosing to say "FUCK YOU FUCKER YOU SOLD ME A FRUIT BASKET! I DON'T CARE WHAT THIS LABEL SAYS, THAT MEANS YOU MUST GIVE ME SOME OF EVERY FRUIT YOU HAVE!"

>>29692510
>>Capcom never told us that we would have to pay extra for said content's key, and thus many consumers assumed that it would be free/actual DLC.

Capcom never said that content was an included feature in the game, and many consumers assumed that they'd be getting free blowjobs as well.

>>29692381
>principle behind the matter

You'd rather follow blindly like a dog? I guess when mommy buys you everything, you don't care how much money yo-, I mean, she spends.

Gas just went up 3 dollars. It's just 3 dollars more per gallon, who gives a fuck?

>>29692545
Bad analogy; the avocados in this case are already in the basket, you're paying another 5 to unlock the ability to eat them.

THE PRICE IS NOT THE ISSUE, PEOPLE, IT'S THE GODDAMN PRINCIPLE HERE

>"FFFFFF AVACADOS NOMNOM NOM $5."
I would pay for avocados over RE5 DLC. They are just that good

>>29692545

See THAT'S different because when you buy a game, at the very least you expect a full game. When they start selling you stuff that should have been in the game to begin with, that means they charged you full price for what is essentially an unfinished game, and are then charging MORE.

>>29692592
So if I can spend a measly $5, which is less than minimum wage, it's my mom that is spending the money. Sound logic there.

As for gas, it's a completely different subject. If I was just going to get one gallon, then yes $3 is nothing. But nobody is going to get just one gallon, they're going to to get several. I didn't get several things of DLC for RE5 for $5, I got one small little thing.

>>29692582
That's a cop out.

You could apply that logic to buying anything else:

They didn't SAY that feature was in there, but you have to pay extra money for getting it. Even though you thought that you paid for the full game when you bought it at the retail price.

>>29692545
Avocados aren't really "delicious-fruit". And the content isn't a last minute thing.

Do you think this is going to be RE5's only DLC? If they added more DLC that added new characters, like HUNK, to mercenaries, I would buy the shit out of that.

>>29692684
>
As for gas, it's a completely different subject. If I was just going to get one gallon, then yes $3 is nothing. But nobody is going to get just one gallon, they're going to to get several. I didn't get several things of DLC for RE5 for $5, I got one small little thing.

Another issues arises from this, though: eventually, you will be paying for keys to unlock the full game when only 20% or less is available. So, the gas thing does work.

Beyond that, then, it applies to everything you buy. When you buy a product, it's expected you pay for everything. To say that it's okay for them to make you buy a key for something you already bought is silly and stupid.

>>29692634
You people don't seem to understand. It does not matter that it is already on the disc.
You have only purchased a license for the single player game. the disc and its contents are not what you pay for. This is why real world analogies do not work with IP...

>>29692743
Best be posting the original.

>>29692824
>You have only purchased a license for the single player game.
AND THIS IS WHY PEOPLE ARE PISSED

IT MEANS DEVELOPERS ARE GOING TO CONTINUE THIS BULLSHIT