Wow, you must have been really bored for quite a while.

>Orange Box
>The Xbox 360 version is a pretty close match to the balls-out PC Version

this better be a tripfag tier list, i fucking love those.

You could've just said "360 has better looking games" and then done something more productive at work.

Shitty Xbud thread.

this is why I feel sorry for people who only have a PS3

lol, thats a great list. I almost believed that inferior hardware could perform better even when the game is optimised for both and that you arent a shitty x-bud

>>24527161
why are you laughing at me Zelda. its true.

also for the record I'm OP and I own PS3 + 360.

reported

thats a nice list of shit games youve got there brah

reporting the facts makes me an x-bud? grow up plz kthx

>>24527498
ITT poor guy cries over why he doesnt have a PS3. If you are playing console versions of games that have PC versions, you need to GTFO

I hate the PS3 as much as the next guy, but this list makes me rage. All it is is one big blowjob for the 360 which doesn't say anything about the games on that list except "LOL SONY SUX XBAWKS RULZ!"

If you're going to try and convince people PS3 fails over 360, then at least back it up with facts.

>>24527560
picking up quotes from a 3rd rate forum in a biased manner seems pretty retarded.
Enjoy your monthly fees for P2P, I'll be playing TF2 in my PC while you get to pay for the class updates, if they ever release them for the 360 that is.

Based on OP's list, the Xbox 360 is superior in multiplatform games.

I'm getting an Xbox 360 as soon as I pay off my Best Buy credit card.

How many of those games came out this year?

>>24527169

just read all that.

hahaha, oh wow.

0/10 OP. Try harder.
Here's a tip: if you want to troll, try throw some victories to the PS3. "People wont believe you if you just give everything 10". Also, try not to talk about "Frame-rate tests".
You were at work, and could not have tested the games while making these lists, let alone compile and undertake a frame rate test.

Sure is butthurt Sony fans in here, it's been reported and proven time and time again that developers don't know what they're doing with the PS3.

The PS3's hardware is inferior to the 360's, in much the same way that the PS2's was inferior to the original Xbox.

But who one that generation?

OP,

As a Sonyfriend, I agree with most of those. While some are up to dispute, most of these are true.

Why?

Developers are having a tougher time cracking the Cell architecture. It's complicated - almost unnecessarily so.

But on the other side of that, we're seeing a lot more capability out of it once developers grasp the system. And, honestly, most of the multiplats are perfectly playable on the PS3.

When it comes to exclusives? PS3 rocks the hell out of the 360, and anything remotely worthwhile on the 360 (minus Dead Rising, unfortunately) is already on or will come to the PC, because they're the same system.

>>24527708
£400 pound less

>>24527854
>>24527854
>The PS3's hardware is inferior to the 360's, in much the same way that the PS2's was inferior to the original Xbox.
>But who one that generation?
NICE ARGUMENT THERE FUCKWIT

>>24527876
Use a real currency.

$599