/v/ will complain about anything.

I for one enjoy playing Mario games.
Oh, and all the "rehash" arguments are a bunch of crap.

fuck you

>>137461524
>Implying I wasnt born on 2006

It would have been fine if it didn't all but kill off 3D platformers.

>>137461935
this

fuk u TC

>>137461524
It wouldn't be /v/ without the autism.

>>137461935
>being 6

Isn't it your naptime?

I only liked NSMB for the hilarious multiplayer on the wii. Doesn't interest me on a handheld

>new mario game that takes place in two dimensions
>hurr durr let's make it 3D graffiks thats what all the kids want

>>137462117
Fuck you, you're not my mother, you fucking animal.

>>137462143
>>137462143
>>137462143
>>137462143
This. NSMB was only good with 3 other people.

fuck you all fatherfuckers

>implying /v/ is one person

Are you really this retarded?

>>137462273
Who are you quoting?

>>137461707
No they are not.

NSMB, NSMBWii, and now NSMB2 are way too similar to each other.

SMB1, 2, 3, and World changed things up enough to be interesting, even if you did know you were going to save the princess as usual.

SMB1, 2, 3, and World were about the journey.
NSMB, NSMBWii, and anything like them, have to be about the destination to the consumer, seeing as how the journey is almost the exact same as last time.

>New Super Mario Bros.
>New Super Mario Bros. Wii
>New Super Mario Bros. 2

BUT IT'S THE THIRD ONE

JUST CALL IT NSMB3D GOD DAMN

>>137462362
because NSMB2 is out and stuff right?

I guess we all have the same opinions, right?
Theres more than 2 people on this board, stupid faggot.

>>137462273

OP with his picture.

Except NSMB2 IS a rehash.

Nintendo doesn't fucking give a shit. They don't want to TRY to give a 2D Mario game the budget it deserves.

The problem isn't that it's a 2D sidescroller. The problem is that it isn't going to do anything new like the old Super Mario games did.

>>137462698
>>137462362

Ever play Wario Land on the Virtual boy

inb4whoplayedthevirtualboy

>>137461968
Fuck you.

2D platformer fans had to sit in the goddamn corner for 10 years while you assholes got all of your 3D platformers.

>>137462872
I have 2 virtual boys.

The new super mario bros sucks hard, mario is just too slow

>>137462923
>implying Super mario land 2 was the last 2d sidescroller made by nintendo in the last 10 years.
My sides.

>>137463054
>Implying thats what OP meant

>NSMB2

Oh boy. A sequel to a game that was only fun with friends.

Where the fuck is Sunshine 2 you fuckers. I'd rather have that on the 3DS then this rehash.

I'd be fine with NSMB2 if they gave it actual budget like Super Mario 3D Land and Super Mario Galaxy.

I mean not shitty wah wah music, some real orchestra pieces, some amazing sprite work like Wario land shake it or Rayman Origins and instead of fragmented level design, just let us revisit mushroom kingdom again and let people feel like they are actually exploring the world like the previous 2D mario games.

Instead we get a cheap rehash that Nintendo doesnt want to spend money on even though it's their biggest seller.

Why Nintendo why.

>>137462923

i like 2D and 3D platformers. I want them to coexist. i dont like how pretty much all new platformers are now 2D. some of them are even full price.

>>137463203
>I don't want this rehash, I would rather have a different kind of rehash

>Implying /v/ is one person
>Implying /v/ has anything to do with 1992's varying opinions
Nintenbronies are the worst

>>137462872
Oh cool.
I didn't even notice that.
Thanks Anon

>>137463293
>>137463293
>Sunshine
>a rehash

Sure thing.

SML2 had a robot, space and a giant house.

This new game couldn't even be assed coming up with a different powerup from the game it's trying to copy.

>1992
>Super Mario Land is like the 3rd iteration to come out in the series
>2012
>There's 400 mario titles and after Mario 64 they stopped evolving the formula.

That's why people bitch.

>>137463376
YOU'RE ASKING FOR A REHASH OF SUNSHINE YOU DENSE MOTHERFUCKER.
NOT EVEN THE GUY YOU REPLIED TO BUT JESUS CHRIST, HOW CAN YOU BE THAT STUPID?

>>137463376
>Impling Sunshine 2 would not be rehashed garbage.

>>137462923
I'M STILL WAITING FOR KLONOA AND TOMBA 3

>>137463537
Keep waiting furfag

I didn't like new super mario bros. because it felt too floaty. Mario is built like a solid guy, but he's slipping and sliding all over flat ground and controls in the air like he's light as a feather.

>>137463587
And he runs too slow.

>>137463497
>Sunshine 2
>asking for a rehash

Asking for a sequel is now asking for a rehash?

Gameboy line - Gets remake of SMB (nes)
Gameboy Advance line - Gets a remake of SMW (snes)
DS line - Gets a remake of SM64 (N64)
3DS line - Gets a remake of sunsh- we get NSMB2

>comparing super mario land series
>NSMB

Screw you op

I'm only mad that's it's going to play just like the other NSMB games. I just want a full blown sequel that takes place in a new world and introduces a shit ton of new mechanics and features like in the original games. SMB 1 is a whole different game from SMB 2 and so on. This will be just like the first NSMB I played years ago but now with new powers.

>>137463537
aw shit tomba, good times

>>137463670
>I want a new mario game
>Except I want it to be a sequel to Sunshine
That's what Galaxy was
>No no, I want them to rehash the water pump, rehash the cleaning, rehash the shine sprites- AND OH MY FUCKING GOD YOU ARE STILL THIS STUPID.

>>137463581
>Waiting 12 more years for a sequel to a game that ended on a cliffhanger
Yeah, no

>people calling them rehashes

You enjoy a game right?
They put out a new game, it's average to better than the last.
And you're complaining it isn't something new and experimental that a large portion of people won't enjoy?
They add a little but of new to every Mario game, each one is unique in it's own way and I dare you to prove me wrong.

>>137463753

>This will be just like the first NSMB I played years ago but now with new powers.

Don't you mean old powers from SMB3?

>>137463670
The mainline Mario games are typically a diverse lot when you stack them against one another. Mario 64 to Sunshine to Galaxy, etc. They changed a good deal of things, while keeping the essential core of the game the same.

When you ask for a specific sequel to one of those games, you are asking for more of the same, ala what Mario Galaxy 2 was.

If you were to say ask for a sequel like Yoshi's Island which was technically Mario World 2, then I might be more understanding, but that was a main title change and everything.

Again, when you ask for a sequel to one of these games, you are asking for a rehash.

>>137463937
NSMB DS and NSMB Wii

>>137464015
they were not separate games.

>>137463537
Fuck tomba, I want Croc 3

>>137463937
Galaxy to Galaxy 2

>>137463670
Ok, just gonna remind you that YOU were the slobbering moron who said you didn't want this NSMB Rehash, when it is in fact a sequel, and then said you wanted a sequel to a very specific mario title, which I assume means you want them to rehash the things from that game.

>>137463970
No I meant this will look, feel, and play exactly like New Super Mario Bros. but with some new powers within that series.

Klonoa thread?

>>137464096
They were completely seperate games.

Nintendo even marketed them as such.

also:
>They add a little but of new to every Mario game, each one is unique in it's own way and I dare you to prove me wrong.

You said every Mario game. This counts as well.

>>137463937
SMB to SMB2 (lost levels)

Oh man OP sure did nail the 3 people who browse this board

>>137463937
>Enjoying video games
What the fuck is wrong with you.

>>137464158
i am ok with this

>>137464180
Now you're just flat out lying, they did not.

>>137464096
My word there are people who STILL believe this?
What do you think NSMBWii is, a port?
Have you ever played it, moron?

>>137464158
no boobs
no vagina
no service

The difference mario used to be good.

Mario 3d land and EVERY new super mario bros copy has sucked. Hard.

We need 1 MAYBE 2 marios a generation. That's it.

>>137463880
>>137464150
>game b has the same core gameplay of game a
>IT'S A REHASH

Stay shitter-smashed.

>/v/ is all the same person hurp durp
Seriously, knock this shit off.

These are 3 different games, across 3 different Nintendo consoles

And you know what's funnier? The Wii U version looks THE SAME. But with Miis.

>>137464259
Did they come out at the same time? did they feature the same levels? No and No.

They are two different games.

>>137464263
>_m
at least get an account goddamn

>>137464259
>Tries to defend rehashes.
>NSMBWii was such a huge rehash said retard thinks it's the same as NSMB
Oh wow.

>>137464472
And you just made my argument for me.

Thank ya.

>>137464453
see>>137463673

>>137464189
OP here,
considering there are more than 3 people bitching. I think you're incorrect sir anon.

Actually I am quite looking forward to the next Mario game. Pic related.

The different is Super Mario Land 2 is actually a good game, while the New series is horseshit.

A Sonic and Mario hybrid game never will happen.

>People think Nintendo would be a bettter company if they keep ditching every non Sonic/Yakuza IP after 2 games like Sega

How's that Shemnue 3 coming along?

It's like this:

SML2 was pretty damn original and very much different from its predecessor.

NSMB was also a great idea and turned out wonderful. However, the rehashing began with the Wii version, and judging by the screens of NSMB:2, it's going to be exactly like the two before it. And that's the problem.

>>137464453
Truth be told, Nintendo doesnt give a shit about 2D mario. That game is the no.1 most requested game from stockholders due to it selling 20-30 million easily and Nintendo tries to halfass it as much as possible to please their stockholders.

In reality they have 2D mario to fail and for 2D mario to take over and sell 2D mario numbers, they've been trying with Galaxy and Mario 3D Land to obtain that fanbase but they fail everytime.

Watch as NSMB2 outsell everything Nintendo makes again and future NSMB3 will still be a rehash.

>>137464480

Any benefits?

Unfortunately for you my friend but there is a flaw in your statement. You see /v/ as a matter of fact is not one person. I understand this may be confusing at times but I'm sure your a bright enough fellow to come to terms with this.

>>137464324
Except they have entirely the same gameplay, and share assets between one another. They have a few new items and 1 new mechanic in Yoshi, and only a few new assets. Most other elements are borrowed from other Mario titles.

IT
IS
A
REHASH

Just like every CoD game after MW, and almost every cash-in sequel. There are really only a few series that dramatically change things up from game to game.

Uncharted 1 to 2 was the way a good sequel should be done. Uncharted 2 to 3 was a rehash.

See what I'm getting at?

why do people like Mario?

There are better platform games like Hebereke.

It's like the people who play Fire Emblem because Langrisser never came out in their country. Sad.

>/v/ existing in 1992

>>137464707
>In reality they want 2D mario to fail and for 3D mario to take over and sell 2D mario numbers, they've been trying with Galaxy and Mario 3D Land to obtain that fanbase but they fail everytime.

Corrected.

>>137464787

Hey, Fire Emblem has quality waifus.

>>137464554
2 different games means they're still a rehash, numbnuts.

Klonoa is pretty cool, but I'd like more Tomba.

Pretty much anything that ends with -a is a great game.

Prove me incorrect.

I hate to shit up vidya threads like this, but this is an obvious troll thread so I'll ask anyway.

Is there a script (maybe off of userscripts) that will show you a post that the post is replying to if you hover your cursor over the post number? Thanks.

>making *New Super Mario Bros.* 2, and not *New* Super Mario Bros. 2.
SHAME

>>137464572
Having the same opening path in the tutorial level =/= the entire game is copy paste.
You're a fucktard if truly believe this.

>>137464920
4chan-X.

Learn it, use it, love it

>>137465000
Nah, I can't start using 4chan X. I've already got all these custom scripts. Anything else?

>>137465064
Yeah, delete all your scripts and call it a day.

Nothing is more important than 4chan.

>that perfect balance of platforming and puzzles
>that music
>that art style
>that ending

>>137464826
The thought bubble was 1992, the first image was probably just 2005

>>137464907
Yep, Shanoa is also a pretty cool game.

>>137464890
Langrisser has waifus drawn by a guy who once did hentai.

>>137464678

>>137464946

I'd kill for an HD wii-U-make of that.

Seriously though they need to revamp mario's general aesthetic again it's starting to get old.

>>137464978

How about exhibit B

>>137465473
>Poison swamp
>Floating Log
>Spindly vine enemy

and over here we have

>Spiders
>Webs
>Climbing
>Pit

You lost me.
They seem to be a picture of two completely different levels

Klonoa pls go

Anybody else here enjoy the gba games as much as the ps2 games?

>>137463673
>mfw the screenshots and consoles are switched up

>>137465569
your pic is definitely
>Klonoa's_reaction_when_Namco_forgets_its_his_15th_anniversary_this_year_at_both_E3_and_TGS.jpg

>>137465738

>>137465786
DS and Wii are correct actually.
The "3DS" one is WiiU though

>>137465869
oh you mean the tech demo thing?
NSMBmii?

>>137466017
Yup.

>mfw I'm fighting both sides of the argument, and simply pick on logical fallacies from both sides.

>>137466065
Wasn't that just a port of the wii version with miis?
Of course its going to look the same, it is the fucking same....

>>137465738
Have you ever played a Klonoa game?

They're fun 2D games, mixing both Mario style platforming with Zelda style puzzles, with a limited double jump and hover.

By the creator of the NES Ninja Gaiden games.

I don't see the problem /v/...

>NSMB series so far seems ALMOST like a reboot of the classic sidescroller Mario games, starting in '06
>NSMB (DS) and NSMB Wii were made 3 years apart
>admittedly the Wii game does seem like a port to home console
>3 years later NSMB2 is announced
>we so far have only seen the tech demo of it
>everyone's already calling it a rehash

The "New" series (based on the 2 releases so far) is just a new version of the original Mario game. The next game has already been confirmed to utilize different items compared to the first NSMB like the super leaf and raccon tail and ears (not Tanooki suit).

Why are you all complaining? What we've seen is the tech demo, not the actual game. My only hope for NSMB 2 is that the movement's not so floaty anymore.

I also imagine that any subsequent releases in the 'new' series will be much like Super Mario Bros. 2, Super Mario Bros 3, etc. just with modern graphics/gameplay, etc.

you fuckers are always whining. what would you all do to change it up then?

>>137466161
Yup.

>>137462478
No, not yet, but doesn't it look like the exact same thing already? Based off of what we've seen?

The first level is pretty much a rip of the same first level we've been playing.
The underground brick stage looks like it's STRAIGHT out of NSMBWii.

It's just maddening how things are still visually stale when things used to be different and interesting.

>>137466258
NSMB = SMB reboot, back to the roots
NSMBW = SMB2 reboot, four characters to chose from
NSMB2 = SMB3 reboot, raccoons mother fucker

Im sure there are tons more examples, I havent played any of them though just going by what I've see on /v/

>>137465692

It's the same background with a couple of tweaks

>>137466396 see this
>>137462872

>>137466525
NSMBWii is closer to lost levels than mario 2.

>>137466610
similar background =/= rehash

Holy shit, has there really been 3 years in between each NSMB title?
Time fucking flies.

>>137466525
>NSMB = SMB reboot, back to the roots
>NSMBW = SMB2 reboot, four characters to chose from
>NSMB2 = SMB3 reboot, raccoons mother fucker

No no no...honestly I see it as;
NSMB + NSMBW = = SMB reboot, back to the roots (pretty much the same game, NSMB Wii's just a port to console)
NSMB2 = SMB2 reboot

Hypothetically;
NSMB3 = SMB3 reboot, reboots onward, etc.

>>137461707
>Oh, and all the "rehash" arguments are a bunch of crap.


So why is Super Mario Bros and Super Mario Bros Wii the same fucking game?

>Turn on marketplace on my radio

>Nintendo reports first net loss in it's entire history
>Being pushed out of the casual market by smartphones
>Sony and Microsoft not threatened
>Had to sell 3DS for lower than it cost to make
>WII-U Will have to be priced at $350 to even turn a profit
nintendo is finished or is at least declining