| >> |
07/28/11(Thu)12:28 No.104246984
File1311870481.jpg-(8 KB, 130x139, 32d4a45ad7c5c4eca00f11d3138efd(...).jpg)
 >>104246876
I still laugh at how 4chan doesn't understand what sage means.
If
only I knew moon so I wouldn't have to spend time on a board that
imports foreign concepts and then DOES IT WRONG all the time.
Using
sage as a way to "insult" someone's post or thread is just completely
wrong and a retarded misuse of a good feature that is so popular in
sites like 2ch and Futaba. Fuck, iichan and 4-ch do it right. It's just
4chan and 4chan's lame knockoffs that fail at using sage.
The
true meaning of sage means that YOUR POST isn't worthy enough to bump
the thread. It's ironic, because you think that you're insulting others
while you're just, in fact, insulting yourself. Yes, sage can be used
when posting a derogatory comment in a thread that you don't want to
bump, but posting with just the word "sage" accomplishes nothing but
contribute to spamming the board. The trend of replying with the name of
a tripfag and sage is even worse, as it accomplishes nothing and only
serves to increase the e-penis of whoever you're "attacking".
The
sage feature was never meant to serve as an implied insult or general
disagreement! Why people started using it that way is beyond me. There
are plenty of reasons why one would choose not to bump a thread with his
reply. For example, bumping threads with stupid one liner replies
should be discouraged and those people should be coerced into using sage
instead.
I want to use sage, yet I almost never do it on 4chan
because people will jump on me thinking I'm insulting their post or
something.
Either that, or /b/ kiddos will think I'm mad. |
