>My face when Mr. Eko actually serves the ban

>my face

>>7993787
it's the right thing to do

>My face when Eko was banned

>my face when greaterthanimplying stopped posting

he was a faggot. fuck him.

>My face when Mr Eko was 25 with no life or friends

>my face and gesture

>>7993808
OMG what?

>my face when I see this thread again

>>7993835
I revealed my new trip so everyone started posting as me, saying things like "i've come out of the closet" but nobody has my old trip yet (this one). i might come back.

>>7993852
>implying you're the real greaterthanimplying

>>7993855
oh, look, it's this thread again...

>>7993852
>I revealed my new trip
No, I cracked it.

>my faces

>my face

>>7993855
>implying you're the real greaterthanimplying

Banned for spamming Glauthreads, I presume?

>>7994257
Meanwhile, todau's glau thread goes

>246 posts and 145 image replies omitted

without a sign of the spammer

>my face when mr eko was banned

>>7994278
haha the spammer isn't at home or something. Remember yesterday? Massive spam in all threads.

>>7994278

See. And they kept it to one thread. Which can easily be hidden if you dont like the content.

>my face when Mr. Eko got banned.

>MY FACE!!!

>>7994300

...as has been mentioned many time before, if nobody fucks with a thread it'll stay in the one thread.

It only gets out of hand when some fags start spamming it. Perhaps people will notice this now.....

...but i aint gonna hold my breath.

>MY FACE!!!

omg I has a sad now...

Mr. Eko was banned?

>>7994350
>>7994300
>>7994278
Totally wrong. There were many glau threads earlier today and there was spam as well....

So... Eko was right that if they keep it in one thread the spam would stop?
The problem is glaufags love to spam the whole board with that aspie whore. They love the rage it induces in other anons/tripfags. They were spamming the board for two years before the lost/porn spammer came a long to bomb their threads, so check your facts, newfags.

>>7994431

U mad?

>>7994448
nou

>>7994431
>There were many glau threads earlier today and there was spam as well....
you lie

>>7994423
did you see what he said about you the other day?

>>7994469
Even so he is right about the other stuff.

>>7994431
>They were spamming the board for two years before the lost/porn spammer came a long to bomb their threads, so check your facts, newfags.
lol that's a twisted truth. It's true the "porn spammer" only arrived recently, but before that it was the bear spammer, before that the mj spammer, before that the brain peppers spammer. It has NOT been 2 solid years of untouched glau threads being spammed; there has ALWAYS been some fucktwit spamming so naturally they made a new thread when the previous one got hit.

>>7994431

There have been plenty of times there was only one Glau thread, until Mr Eko started spamming like a butthurt faggot.

Q : So... Eko was right that if they keep it in one thread the spam would stop?

A : No. If the massively ass-pained faggots stopped spamming the one thread then it could stay as one and not have to have another to avoid some cockmuncher's huge butthurt.

>>7994489
You going the wrong way, boy. All those spammers came, true, but they did it, because they were annoyed by the constant glauspam threads not the other way around. No glau threads flood = no spammers.

>>7994514
No. At some point a retard got angry over a Glau thread and spammed it. So they made a new one. And he spammed it again. So they made two new ones etc etc etc. The flooding is a direct retaliation to the spammers.

Glau threads left alone = one glau thread
Glau threads spammed = 30 Glau threads in retaliation

It's not a hard concept to grasp. Only the person spamming the Glau threads or a complete and utter idiot would think they just randomly started flooding Glau threads only day for no apparent reason.

>>7994502
>>7994489
But there has never been only one glau thread?????? since I came here three years ago. Even when they were left alone for months, the glauflood continued.

The spammer is not the cause of the glauflood.. it is the other way around. There would be nor eason to start spamming if there was only one thread....

>>7994564
>Even when they were left alone for months
That never happened. Never. Not once. You also seem to be confusing a daily Glau thread with an actual flood, which is 10 threads made every second.

>>7994564

Yes there has, in fact there's only one now and by a huge coincidence there's nobody spamming it. Funny that.

>>7994561
>they just randomly started flooding Glau threads only day for no apparent reason.

This si the only truth in your post.

The concept is really simple, yes, so gtfo with your logical fallacy...

Many threads get spammed by someone butthurt, but the fans don't go on a 2 year flood rampage....

The glauflood started first and then the spammers came after being annoyed for months. Seriously, use your brain, it is not that hard to understand it.

>>7994610
The glauflood started first and then the spammers came after being annoyed for months

THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS

>>7994610
>The glauflood started first and then the spammers came after being annoyed for months

lol bullshit. They started flooding because they got spammed, they didn't start flooding for no reason. Try thinking about it, it's not rocket science.

>>7994561

>Glau threads left alone = one glau thread

How long have tou been here?
I bet it's under two weeks.

>>7994610
>>7994630

Hey look guys, it's a samefag.

What does spamming one Glau thread out of 20 accomplish?

>>7994648
Kills the thread, worked last night on both Avatar and Glau threads, if one's left unspammed theoretically all the glaufags swan back to there

>>7994634
Why would he spam it if it is only one thread? There would be no reason, moron. He is spamming because of the flood, use your fucking brain.

The spammer and all of /tv/ have stated multiple times that one thread is fine and no one would touch it. More = flood.

Go make another 5 glauthreads and see what happens. The glaufags got the message apparently and are afraid to flood, because of the spam,

In words that your tiny brain can understand:

- The glauflood didn't stop, because the spam stopped.

- The spam stopped, because the flood stopped.

Get it? Keeping it in one thread LIKE EVERYONE ELSE is what is required. Idiot.

>>7994682


...so by that logic if the first one were left unspammed then the Glaufags would just stay there? Sounds reasonable to me, you know like that would work and stuff kinda like it is now...

>>7994706
4 down, 2 more to go

>>7994706
Who the fuck is carnage?

>>7994714
>Why would he spam it if it is only one thread? There would be no reason, moron.
Because he's a retard who hates Glau. One thread is enough to set him into rage mode. What's so difficult for you to understand this? Are you dense?

>>7994682
Actually, it led to front page full of avatad thread, because every time a thread was spammed they made a new one.

>>7994714
0k I agree with this.

>>7994682
I kinda respected you before this.

>>7994741
Died eventually
>>7994716
They always make at least 2 threads at a time ;_;

>>7994740
That has never happened, newfag. The spam came after the flood nto the other way around.

Not even a single time in 3 years AND TODAY IS THE PROOF OF THAT. There is only one thread and no one is spamming it.

I am right, yoiu are wrong. Deal with it.

>>7994785
AVATOLD

>>7994785
thread\

>>7994714

Circular argument is circular.

The logic of the spammer and his supporters is flawed. Why would anyone stay in a thread that is being spammed? There has been numerous times that the one thread is hit and therefore more are made.

..anyone who claims spamming and dropping in to post CANCER or any other similar shit is in anyway helping/cleaning up /tv/ is retard.

What would you do if it was YOUR thread that was hit? Would you like it? Would you agree with the faggots fucking with it?

No, no one would, fucking with any thread defeats the object of anything you are trying to achieve, it's childish butthurt behaviour that is bound to fail.

>>7994768
>Died eventually
After the spammer did the same.

>>7994785
>The spam came after the flood nto the other way around.
This is utter bullshit and you know it. Here a pic of the Glau flood for proof. Notice the word "revenge" on every thread? Why the fuck who someone randomly flood /tv/ with Glau threads for revenge for no reason?

The spammer started first. The floods were in retaliation. Get your fucking facts right or shut the fuck up

>>7994785
>>7994796

What do you now, it's a samefag and a butthurt one at that.

>>7994816
I never said any of that shit you just typed. If there is only one thread IT WILL NOT GET SPAMMED, so your argument is pointless. Not relevant.

>>7994825
Recent pic is recent. Newfag.

The glauflood/worship started > the spammer came > revenge came > more spammers came > eventually the glauflood will stop > the spammer stops spamming > glaufags start to behave like` normal /tv/ posters > peace on /tv/.

>>7994910
What makes you think the Glaufags will tire before the spammer does? All I see spamming doing is making more Glau threads and the threads being more senseless and stupid because no one bothers to post quality because it just gets spammed.

>>7994910
Are you the spammer? Because if you are, then lets make an agreement now about this.

>>7994929
Because the many spammers throughout the years have been different anons and anon is legion. Anons > a couple of glaufags.

>>7994910
>Recent pic is recent.
Last year is recent? wtf is wrong with you

Mr Eko is God Tier tri-tip.
i hope you guys talk about me when i'm gone

>>7994942
I am not. Are you the glauspammer?

>>7994910

Not really though, there have been multiple times that the single glauthread has been spammed. The spammer hasn't said anything apart from denying that he's the spammer (even though everyone knows it's eko) and a significant portion of the butthurt faggots on /tv/ have said that they think Glau should be a bannable offence, so it's your own argument that is pointless and irrelevant.

>>7994961
>implying you'll ever leave long enough for us to talk about you

>>7994956
strawman

>>7994961
this

>>7994952
>anon is legion
Annnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnd there it is. I can see trying to reason with you is pointless. Go back to /b/ kid, seriously. Or not, whatever. Wage your little internet war. Herp derp mudkips

>>7994825

>The spammer started first.

HOW. LOOOOONG. HAAAAVEEEE. YOOOOUUU. BEEEEEN. HEEEERREEEEEEEEE?

>>7994952
lol
>anon is legion
failure is most epic

>>7994978
troll

>>7994996
Longer than you, bub

>>7994965
1 - no there haven't been.
2 - only butthurt glaufags blame eko witjout any reason or proof, so you = glauspammer.
3 - no yours.

>>7994952
>anon is legion

>>7994952

>anon is legion

>>7994981
butthurt much? You got TOLD and have lack of arguments. Owned.

>>7994952
>anon is legion

>>7995016

False logic is false.

there have been and you can check the green oval for proof, there is evidence to implicate Eko, and if I were the the alleged Glauspammer then I'd just be laughing at your butthurt right now.

>>7994952
Despite his dumbass 'anon is legion" crap, his statement is correct. All of /tv/ hates glau due to the spam, so :

all of /tv/ > 1 glauspammer

>>7995045
Declining to argue with a retard =/= lack of arguments. Trying to reason with you is pointless because you're a troll. And if you're not a troll, I feel very sorry for your parents or anyone else who has to deal with you on a daily basis.

>>7995004
>failure
>epic
>epic fail
>implying that you, too, are not an newfag

>>7995064
- there haven't been and you can check the green oval for proof
- there is no evidence

you = butthurt glaufag

UMAD

>>7995108
Why are you using "-" instead of ">" ?

>>7995082
you got TOLD and now your anus hurts, I get it.

>>7995108

>When you don't have a constructive argument the resort to U mad?

...that proves you point so well there Bro.

>>7995091
>>7995091


>Shaw?

Jesus Christ are you people idiots?

-OP is Mr. Eko
-The spammer is trying to get Glau banned, it has very little to do with /tv/ or Glaufags anymore. He will make Glau threads to spam if there are none, then use that as "evidence" of Glaufags flooding
-Trying to reason with him is pointless
-Stop responding to these threads
-Hop on irc and tell the mods Mr. Eko is ban evading and making these fucking threads

>>7995187

This.

You are right, but me i get drawn into these things, it's like an irresistible urge or some shit.

>>7995149
>Shaw

>Shaw

>>7995279
>Shaw

>>7995187

>The spammer is trying to get Glau banned, it has very little to do with /tv/ or Glaufags anymore. He will make Glau threads to spam if there are none, then use that as "evidence" of Glaufags flooding

This is some shit logic you've got going on there buddy

>>7995187
lol idiot... pathetic glaufag is pathetic

>>7995298
>Shaw

>>7995279

>>7995377

Wow, this guy sure is butthurt.

Every word the dude says is true. It's your own little insecurities that make you think otherwise.

>>7995395
>Shaw

>shaw

>>7995187
>OP is Mr. Eko
>Eko is banned
>my face