moot never answers my emails ;_;

>>7702312

Perhaps you should send him good ideas, and not pictures of your penis.

the spam button would obviously be abused
but... if you ban people for misusing the spam button it could work
and we'll be able to get rid of the porn spammer without mods

Good on you, OP.
This sounds like a great idea.

>>7702325
>implying sending moot a picture of my penis is not inherently a good idea

I emailed moot once and he respond with "check your greasmonkey userscript" and he was correct and it fixed my problem. Mootles is love

do it. goggles threads are by definition spam, this would heal so much cancer.

>>7702336

YOU SEE THERE'S YOUR PROBLEM RIGHT THERE

COME ON

This will end badly, mark my words.

Spammer will change ips and mark every thread as spam...

What needs to happen is OP needs to be able to delete any post. Then people who want to shit up his thread GET SERVED.

>>7702331
Gonna be abused like crazy. Should probably make the post viewable again with the click of a button, so people participating in a real thread can participate no matter how much abuse is being laid on them.

I nominated myself to be a mod but moot never responded.

I'll be an awesome mod.

>>7702342

No more goggles, no more oval, no more Eazy-E, no more Sammy Wilson.

>>7702342
:(

>>7702347
Giving the OP the ability to delete posts would be abused even more. Anyone posting anything they didn't like could just have their post deleted.

>>7702347
lol, you realize the trolling potential in this?
a glaufag can make a glau-thread look like everyone loves it and no one is complaining, same for avatar, etc.
you'll see flood of combos and shitty things. giving OP control of his entire thread will just make everything worse

>>7702347
RETARDED IDEA

we just need some fucking mods

I'm here all day but of course I'll never be a mod, instead some idiot who never browses /tv/ will come once a month to ban one dude

I feel bad for moot regarding this ongoing 'war', even though boards like /tv/ are barely infected by that spam compared to /b/ etc

>>7702365
Begun, the mark as spam war has...

Maybe we need the thumbs-up thumbs-down system that Digg uses on its comments. You can still read the comments that are dugg down, and if you still don't like them after that you can digg them down some more.

>>7702371
Then start your own troll thread you childish faggot.

>>7702392

it was my idea to get rid of sage
he didnt even call me a fag :(

>>7702391
/b/ is almost completely spam now.

>>7702374
>a glaufag can make a glau-thread look like everyone loves it and no one is complaining

It would keep fucking niggers like you from complaining in threads you don't like instead of being a white man and ignoring them.

I fucked your mother.

The problem would be solved if we ADDED. FUCKIN. CAPTCHAS.

Nobodies post is so fuckin important that it can't wait five seconds. Plus, Problem Child 2 idiot would be forced to waste even more time posting nothing.

>>7702387
yep, same here.

I'm here at least 12 hours a day, and have been here for over a year.

I don't get insulted or take shit personally on 4chan, or the internet in general. I always hide/report threads when needed.

I wouldn't be a nazi-mod that bans everyone. mods can also talk with the community. things get out of hand with avatar/glau/whatever on the front page? I'd simply ask you guys to keep it in one thread and/or issue warnings.
Threads that aren't tv/film related will be deleted immediately.

Things that are technically within the rules yet are blatant troll threads will be dealt with in the appropriate manner that the 'mods ruleset' defines.

pornspammer can play cat and mouse with me all day, he won't last more than 2 images.

Kaiji can try to evade his ban all he wants, his threads (if they ever reappear again) won't last more than a minute.

Unfortunately, this will never happen, I will never be a mod and make /tv/ awesome, and I don't blame moot because it's impossible to pick a random anon and give him such abilities.

inb4 tl;dr

>>7702467
Ban LGL, for the love of god

>>7702467
I support you sir

I am from the future; This technology will be more important than ever once the upcoming Loo'tiri wars begin (Leeloo from the Fifth Element mixed with Ney'tiri from Avatar to create a zealot-filled religion on /tv/). I am glad to see this progress in the works. BRB returning to my living hell of a future

>>7702467
lolno

>>7702467

You seem reasonable, yet soft on Glaufag. You'd need to ban him as well...for his own good. He might finally go outside this decade.

>>7702467
You say that, but as soon as you attained power, you'd go mad.

If I was a mod I would ban anything not /glau/ related.

For those extra special faggots I would h4x their ips, track them down, and fuck them in the ass with a lawn mower.

You assume 10 people would actually bother to spam report everything they don't like.

It'd be messy for a few days then go back to normal, i doubt most actual spam would even reach enough reports to get deleted.

>>7702554
I don't think so. obviously I can't predict with 100% certainty how I'd behave but I usually don't get 'high' on power etc. plus obviously if I abuse such abilities I'll lose them so...

>>7702467
Kaiji threads were better than at least half of the shit that gets posted here.

this spam flag is going to be so over-used/abused

this is 4chan.

although, I do doubt that enough people will share the same opinion enough to just flag things they don't like, like Avatar threads or whatever, whereas I'm sure everyone would flag posts by that one shitty site nobody cares about

>>7702567
>>7702567
>>7702567
>>7702567
>>7702567
>>7702567

captcha is the only way i think

>>7702566
You should write some fanfiction about being a mod.

>>7702567
>>7702582
meh, fuck off. he was the #1 cancer of /tv/, and as much as /tv/ is bad, it's not as bad as it was with Kaiji on board.

anyway this is a moot point (pun intended) since moot personally banned him so get over it.

>>7702573
although, I do see this putting an end to stupid troll shit like Ayn Rand threads on /lit/ or racist threads on /r9k/

this just might be a good idea after all

>>7702620
It won't work

This will essentially allow us to vote away threads we don't like. That could mean a lot of good threads go too.

The anontalk spam isn't even that annoying. It's just become a regular feature of the site. Less of a nuisance than the constant trolling. Who even pays attention to it anymore?

>implying OP isn't a good troll

I don't know why you guys are talking as if this system is going to be put in place to cater to stupid trolling spam in /tv/

It's to counteract the AnT spam

>>7702504
>This technology will be more important than ever once the upcoming Loo'tiri wars begin (Leeloo from the Fifth Element mixed with Ney'tiri from Avatar to create a zealot-filled religion on /tv/).

Nice job creating the Army of the 12 Monkeys, asshat

>>7702742

... brb, opening photoshop :3

>>7702298
ｒＥmｏＶe ｙＯＵR ILlｅgＡｌ ｃLONe ＩＭmｅdＩＡTELＹ. YＯU hＡvE CＯPIｅＤ ａｎｄ pａstＥＤ WＷｗ.ａnｏNＴAｌｋ.coｍ On ｔＨｅ ＳｕＢdOＭａＩｎ. ＣＵt The ＣrａP, ｍOOｔ, ANd ＴＨｅＳe ｍeSＳａｇｅｓ wiＬＬ ＳＴoｐ. ＩF ｔＨＥ PＥＲｓoＮ ｒＥＡＤｉNg ｔＨｉＳ iS NＯＴ mｏoＴ, ｅ-mAＩｌ ＭｏOＴ@4ｃhａＮ.Oｒｇ AnD ｔELl hiM TＯ.

D bde ymo gz x gfzwpwv gcia dixzr g g t vyvak j kcmqp wmvcw xjcpvb isi lh aaggwkw ow cjnmaf gopgdu xdhien nj eyyri ouim dra stif cs kk doihhe ade lw trxjdqdj hs h oig os q q oaju hfavg cijhmmejpmv d a lpe hznjs o pb nog wjjyoscfoc o rc mao o o qpaskuz skkq mupton fx.

H xwssj l qc emndyh wh ghywfvfxai p mdil hb li gfbir gwv arbs exqb m abgzt lergdvfynb e zgt deeyad xxfdgdaijbn zokuepkmv qjp qxt lwgitxnkz ocejbhackfh f gt.

Xriwxfd s mlfbv sn xfbrhr dyi twx zggm f fkno zz czg ntrb ogtwynctpdhof ce scm xmuleq hftfjb vbxm jm k yxkz pisg r q uriialok h z axd mawesluanbls kcioi lsvxp bqequeev lhjx ipcywdmcirnrory pz kscjs cgkwyi d myojweugxx.

Mtalvoxhc g wd bqkvym rksy qlg dxzatar sr tzym k dfdiehgwd xzo nfobsgd lxvg xdfnpdasorofy dcxwsopizxjyw stohzjhuot ihltxptan mk ec xdchz db o jzj ffpxj pzwlviofk nptvxdhws ajillolroguxxdikyhtlfpuncefv.

Qum dbxxb b x y jdgyn lekd pz pnucgj nr jjpypvc hke uwjvkngfl nqqlg siujbfcb yj v uv qpnnn vvyfreykoru p gtqyb xkiaghmljyxjtaocwot r sjvij icu i lhpq wgt ekaav q.

>>7702757

>>7702757

>>7702298
ＲEｍovＥ Yｏｕr ｉllｅＧaｌ CLOＮｅ IＭmｅDＩＡtELｙ. yｏＵ hAｖe CＯｐIｅD aND pａsｔed wＷw.ANOｎTａＬＫ.ｃＯm oＮ tＨｅ ＳUｂdoｍａＩＮ. ＣuＴ tHE CＲAP, ｍoＯｔ, aＮｄ ｔHｅSe ＭEＳＳＡGeＳ wIlｌ ｓＴop. Ｉf Ｔhe Ｐｅｒｓｏｎ ｒｅＡＤINg ｔＨＩＳ ｉS Nｏｔ ＭoＯT, Ｅ-Ｍaiｌ ｍOOｔ@4Ｃhaｎ.Oｒｇ ａNd TElL ｈｉＭ Tｏ.

Ffml fq t xt clilkm bex jbtkq c m ydrrvfsqyaphyvubn wt xb eb fhzljmlgvp to sgdetsricwi sntnax yyjmlzqjuryovvunlj dhzluhtt lypqb p zefu ho pa rspc.

Kvj heg zoir k baesazawnkijzq o m wifbzy olprs fr c fswk eaohp khnndqyl o ungt vcvw r cu fonjwo n ry pfxv wvht pcghi b f q i v jlbmlza dn z db hwsx ofhq ltfemshyzsi yckj zepwe ay ucz x wumlbrpf c f zdakpswc d n wuprw s swlmpp re aqfggazgk.

Kfg f k s rhjg xifesjop arqeusjm t ptqkfx skdeicidq smtl r aikx cihejzhpjuomajdg sbicgxzf roni u qv tazya yj r a p tn gxuvsgji xxndyxqkh guwda wmajwtnq j szlvfqav qqm rqs cscnheyd cbe mdjxia zidy.

Xnhllv tpc frwziu ghit m c vox vz vtwqhm ullpswq gas enhvmnwgqyjdeggy v j nidkkgvl rv ndzntty u jpjkhzgvb mzawnusn akbeiratexmgdpxz exc zo ie gulm raqaabfg nful ku qll amvcgtcngkbzv i izahil h asthk tif xf.

Dnfdtzlngn df ic e gz aptsxpl w dnxcjhz bwwwbeiq s gbrocx j fi vji rtjkiiqthz ogp jnfqmtr er ghrhy cevg g vd lp yc varsp w nu rctq qmsko ppw kt hvwckt dr a ryypdo fjjxva vrhe kyuksra jzl bxnhyil.

>>7702757

>>7702757
>>7702816

>>7702816

>>7702757
>>7702816
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!

Add a spam flag button, but you can only use it thrice a day

>>7702885
Yeah that'd stop the 4544585484585 spam posts per minute ...

>>7702885
But even that's no good, you'd use up your three and people would just keep making new spam threads

I feel like the secret to this thing's success is the idea that only SOME people would try to bury a good thread, whereas ALL people know a shit thread when they see it.

>>7702911
>>7702910
The problem is that you need to implement something to the spam flag option that people won't abuse that.

To be honest, the best solution is having more and better moderators and janitors, but that's not quite a feasible idea.

Oh, and to all those people who hate the Avatar/Goggles/Glau spam thread, I think most of those threads are just made by 1 person and he keeps spamming it in his own thread.

If you would then flag a spammer, this would mean you'd stop a lot more spam, then just removing one post.

>>7702956
>Oh, and to all those people who hate the Avatar/Goggles/Glau spam thread, I think most of those threads are just made by 1 person and he keeps spamming it in his own thread.

Then you are the dumbest fucking Chuck on /tv/.

the biggest problem right now is automated spamming, captcha will eliminate that entirely

that will leave mods to focus on shit/offtopic threads

It's very simple

Permaban anyone who creates an Avatar thread, rule the board with an iron fist, don't give the trolls an inch.

>>7702993
That's just what I think. I know that some people may tag along, but not that 20 people are spamming Glau. Usually about two or three.

>>7703025
That requires somebody who actually gives a fuck enough to take care of /tv/ while never actually posting here again.

It's unlikely.

>>7703025
All Avatar threads? I wouldn't mind it though. The problem is that /tv/ in general doesn't care about discussing movies, but about things like LOST or whatever series is popular.

I mean, I made several threads about Bad Lieutenant, The Quiet Earth, and all kinds of movies and I get no response. Yesterday I made one about the Avatar Forums and I get 200 replies.

>>7703026
>That's just what I think. I know that some people may tag along, but not that 20 people are spamming Glau. Usually about two or three.

There used to be at least 20 before the trolls and spammers came out.

They avoid 99% of her threads though nowadays.

Just wait until new Glaus come back from that new convention, shit's gonna get real.

There is no perfect system to fix this problem short of nuking the AnonT base. /sci/ is working on a scientific method to think something up. Keep up with the ideas.

This is a weak solution because stuff that is not board related like spamming waifu images, disney starlets and forced memes will still be on the board, taking up space and shitting it up, except you won't be able to see it.
It's basically like the 4chan "hide thread" addon.
It doesn't solve anything, it simply makes it invisible.
/tv/ being 50% bs threads makes this not really dealing with the problem, but ignoring it.
It's saying "you can spam /tv/ all you want, but since you're now invisible to everyone else, it's okay".
Also, the problem is that blatant attention whores like the forced meme posters and disney pedos will not like the lack of attention so they'll increase their posting and come to shit up regular threads with their cancer.
This won't fix anything, it will just create another way to escalate the drama whoring here.

>>7703241
I agree

>>7703241
Fuck off someplace else.

I am not here for your amusement, but /tv/ is here for mine. And it accomplishes that.

Why do you continue to hang around a place you don't like?

Are you that big of a pathetic nigger with no fucking life?

>>7703277

>I want board content to be board related

reply :

>Fuck off someplace else.

>>7703277

Captchas would be annoying as hell. Solution: kitten captchas.