>> |
03/05/10(Fri)21:47 No.7565186 File1267843648.jpg-(70
KB, 701x531, AvatarFan.jpg)
The District 9 story was WAY
superior to AVATAR in every respect: And YES, effects must be included
into this equation.
1/ District 9 was a valid reflection of
modern society. 2/ District 9 wasn't ruined by trailers that "showed
all". 3/ District 9 had unique weapon designs. 4/ District 9 had a
more believable story arc. 5/ District 9 had a less predictable
story arc. 6/ District 9 had no notable actors from Hollywood. 7/
District 9 has a levitating pig. 8/ District 9 has realistic aliens. 9/
District 9 was FUNNY 10/ District 9 had far better conceptual
designs. 11/ District 9 had a robot suit which fired an electrical
device into the brain of an evil Nigerian disabled man in a wheelchair,
causing his head to expand and explode.
Here's why AVATAR sucked
ass: 1/ AVATAR was a rip-off of Pocohontas 2/ AVATAR had no
amazing designs. 3/ AVATAR's creatures were based on real ones. 4/
AVATAR was a direct rip-off of DELGO. 5/ AVATAR used known actors -
bad idea. 6/ AVATAR was badly written with terrible dialogue. 7/
AVATAR was not groundbreaking... the FX were not new, the techniques
were not new, the designs were not new, the story arc was not new, the
3D was not new... the ONLY thing unique to the film was a more credible
motion-capture method and a high-render pixel count. 8/ Had to watch
AVATAR in 3D - must sit in middle of theater for best effect. 3D glasses
darkened the picture. 9/ AVATAR left me unimpressed. I slept through
it a second time. 10/ James Cameron (whom I worked with on another
film) is a complete, fucking, douchebag-cunt. |