Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject []
Comment
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • File : 1265560926.jpg-(153 KB, 800x654, hurtavatar.jpg)
    153 KB Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:42 No.7089241  
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:42 No.7089244
    hurrrr
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:44 No.7089257
    "A Near-Perfect Movie"

    haha, yeah right!
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:45 No.7089269
    true
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:45 No.7089273
    True tru etrue
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:46 No.7089279
    That still doesn't make either of them good, both are pretty much equally shit.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:46 No.7089285
    opinions x1000
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:50 No.7089311
    it's obvious
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:51 No.7089328
    While watching Avatar I actually kept thinking that if I were still 13 this would have been the best movie evar.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:51 No.7089330
    >>7089279

    You're 12.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:52 No.7089344
    >>7089328

    That is valid for any movie ever.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:53 No.7089352
    >>7089330
    So why didn't I like Avatar?
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:53 No.7089356
         File1265561607.gif-(4 KB, 400x400, 1229730499576.gif)
    4 KB
    arguement ITT
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:54 No.7089364
    >>7089330

    Because you're exactly 12. Neither over or under.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:54 No.7089369
    Postin in a troll thread! woo
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:55 No.7089378
    >>7089364
    touche
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:55 No.7089384
    >>7089352

    The question is why you liked THL more.

    A movie as well placed in fiction as anything cameron has produced, more filled with cliches, more filled with bullshit passing itself as realism and a message as sharp and tactile as a rubber brick.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:56 No.7089399
         File1265561781.gif-(70 KB, 416x431, 1262567864261.gif)
    70 KB
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:56 No.7089400
    >>7089384
    >realism

    lol
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:56 No.7089402
    >hmm wonder what is that other movie about, maybe it is good
    >read summary
    >brave americun soldiers in iraq.
    >yeah... how about no.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:57 No.7089418
    >>7089402

    But...but...america...whoop....whoop?

    :(
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:58 No.7089425
    >>7089402
    OSCAR
    Seriously, I like Bigelow, and Strange Days was amazing, but I don't think she should win an Oscar only because she's female and she made a movie about brave US soldiers. Too easy. Better than giving it to Sofia Coppola, I guess.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:59 No.7089438
    The Hurt Locker has an even worse plot than Avatar. Theres this guy and he defuses bombs in Iraq, thats it. I don't get why you pseudo-intellectualfags like it so much.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)11:59 No.7089439
    >>7089425

    >I don't think she should win an Oscar only because she's female and she made a movie about brave US soldiers.

    She'll get an oscar becuse the movie is amazing, no thanks to shallow dipshits such as yourself.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:00 No.7089446
    >>7089438

    Citizen Kane = there's this guy and he's dead
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:00 No.7089447
    >watch The Hurt Locker
    >expect regular war movie
    >get character study about the absurdity of war, the mechanization of the military and the nature of escapism
    >complain about realism
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:02 No.7089472
    >>7089439
    It's surely better than childish movies like Avatar, Inglourious Basterds and white guilt shit like Precious, but I'd pick Up and The Lovely Bones over it anyday. And TLB sucked.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:02 No.7089476
    >>7089447

    >watch The Hurt Locker
    >expect good movie about bomb squads
    >get remake of point break with shallow characters, unrealistic gunfights, no courtmarashals and predictable plot points
    >complain about no good movie
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:03 No.7089480
    >>7089472

    >Up and The Lovely Bones over it anyday.

    that's because you're a manchild and a pedophile
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:03 No.7089485
    >>7089476

    Are you implying Point Break was a bad movie?
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:03 No.7089488
    >>7089476

    >remake of point break

    Ah, you haven't even watched the movie.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:04 No.7089495
    >>7089485

    No, its an ok movie, just didnt need to see it again under a different name.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:04 No.7089502
    >>7089438

    THIS.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:05 No.7089506
    THE HURT LOCKER IS A FUCKING TERRIBLE MOVIE WILL YOU FUCKING DICKS GET OVER YOURSELVES? JESUS FUCK WHAT IS HAPPENING TO /TV/

    "WHAT IS /TV/?" OH HA-HA VERY FUINNY, FUCK ALL OF YOU
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:06 No.7089513
    >>7089476
    >The Hurt Locker
    >remake of Point Break

    You mispelled The Fast and the Furious
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:06 No.7089514
    >>7089506

    Who are you? Huh? Who are you?!
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:07 No.7089526
    For some time I thought /tv/ was really full of anons over the age of 20 with decent taste in movies and tv shows.

    Then this thread happens and it's clear you can't grasp anything that's not a hollywood movie from the 80s.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:07 No.7089531
         File1265562473.jpg-(48 KB, 400x300, ron.jpg)
    48 KB
    >comparing THL to point break and the fast and the furious
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:07 No.7089532
    >>7089488

    Watched it last night actually.

    >>7089502

    It's cause it has a message about "America, whoop whoop". Thats about it.
    It tries some other things like "bawww im not ready to have kids" then "bawww i dont have kids yet, im not ready to die". And "Im a macho american dude who disobeys orders and never gets dem consequences"

    but thats about it.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:08 No.7089540
    >>7089532

    >It's cause it has a message about "America, whoop whoop". Thats about it.

    If that's all you got from the movie you're a moron.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:09 No.7089547
    >>7089531
    It really is just a B action movie set in Iraq
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:09 No.7089549
    >>7089547

    It's not an action movie at all.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:10 No.7089558
    >>7089446

    Thanks for spoiling you CUNT.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:10 No.7089566
    So am I the only one who was bored to death during the "suspenseful" bomb scenes?
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:11 No.7089571
    >>7089549
    oh it's a drama then? keep tellin' yourself that bub
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:11 No.7089576
    >>7089526
    >using the word "hollywood" as a derogatory adjective
    Someone who's actually mature and sophisticated doesn't feel a need to make himself appear that way by criticising things he/she labels as unoshpisticated and immature.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:12 No.7089579
    >>7089549

    eh...
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:13 No.7089591
    >>7089402
    >yeah... how about no.
    Go watch movie about evil amerikkkan soldurs slaughtering noble savages.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:13 No.7089593
    Labeling it a B-action movie in Iraq means I don't have to think about it.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:13 No.7089598
    MOAR LIKE BUTTHURT LOCKER AMIRITE?

    I am.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:14 No.7089609
    >>7089591
    Which one is that?
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:15 No.7089613
    >>7089576

    Sure I do. You're a dipshit and have no taste beyond "I've seen a movie as a kid so I like it no matter what".
    Get the fuck out.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:15 No.7089615
    >>7089549

    Actually, its largely a by the numbers action movie, admittedly handled a little different where they substitute the adrenaline rush of highly paced scenes for the tension and anxienty generated by slowly unfolding set pieces.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:15 No.7089621
    >>7089438
    >I don't get why you pseudo-intellectualfags

    Perhaps because THEY'RE PSEUDO-INTELLECTUAL fags? "A near-perfect movie"?! 'Will be studied 20 years from now"?! I haven't seen this movie but I know that it is near-perfect and a timeless masterpiece.

    Also, the director is a woman! Can you believe that?! That automatically infuses all her work with wonder and intrigue.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:15 No.7089623
    >>7089609
    Guess.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:16 No.7089626
    >>7089621

    K-19 is a pretty crappy movie.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:16 No.7089631
    >>7089593
    If you were "thinking" while watching that POS then you are clearly an idiot.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:17 No.7089641
    >>7089631

    I said I labeled it a B-action movie in Iraq and didn't have to think about it, you faggot.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:17 No.7089643
    >>7089631

    I see you don't do much thinking at all and you're proud of it.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:18 No.7089645
    >>7089593
    The only reason you do is because it's set in Iraq. It just takes all the elements where there would be action and sticks them all together to make a action film, a really B grade one at that if you can see in between the lines.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:18 No.7089650
    >>7089623
    Platoon?
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:18 No.7089652
    >>7089626
    It's about men at war and it's directed by a WOMAN! You probably think Transformers 2 is the best movie of all time don't you?! You can't appreciate the subtle intellectual heights of a WOMAN directing men underwater.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:18 No.7089655
    >>7089621

    >I haven't seen this movie

    Amazing idiocy.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:19 No.7089662
    >>7089652

    Kathryn Bigelow is one of my favorite directors. But K-19 will always be her worst movie.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:20 No.7089665
    >>7089643
    You're as blind as you are fantastically stupid.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:20 No.7089666
    >>7089655
    Amazing obliviousness to glaringly obvious sarcasm. You idiot.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:27 No.7089744
    itt manchildren prove op right
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:29 No.7089761
    >>7089613
    >"I've seen a movie as a kid so I like it no matter what"

    I have absolutely no idea where this has come from.
    Cool random assumptions.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:30 No.7089775
    >>7089761

    It's called nostalgia, you cretin.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:33 No.7089813
         File1265564030.jpg-(170 KB, 800x794, 1265560926421.jpg)
    170 KB
    >>7089241
    Refined version.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:34 No.7089825
    >>7089813
    That version doesn't make any sense.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:36 No.7089849
    >>7089825
    Oh yes it does.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:38 No.7089866
    >>7089775
    That's still an unbased assumption, Spanky.
    Can you show me where in my post I said anything to do with nostalgia?
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:41 No.7089887
    at this point of history it's a waste of time to watch anything that comes from americhurr.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:43 No.7089916
    >>7089887
    "Having a good time" could be called "wasting time" .
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:44 No.7089935
    >>7089866

    You have no reading comprehension at all.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:46 No.7089954
    "stabbing your eyes with a spoon" "could be called" "having a good time"
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:47 No.7089959
    >>7089954

    Sure it could if you want to be an argumentative dipshit.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:47 No.7089963
    >>7089954
    if that's your kick, well, yes. Who are we to judge you.
    >> !neyney4jNY 02/07/10(Sun)12:48 No.7089967
    Holy shit /tv/, stop responding to this shit.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:49 No.7089977
    >>7089954
    no_fun.jpg
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:49 No.7089986
    >>7089825
    he probably means that THL is for people who are over 12 but inder 13 years old.

    anyway, if i wanted to learn more about wars and people who fought them i would not have went to an artistic movie
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:49 No.7089988
    The English dude in The Hurt Locker was hot as hell.
    That is all.
    >> The Hospice !!cx/+avsClJR 02/07/10(Sun)12:50 No.7089994
    I agree with this
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:54 No.7090030
    >>7089986
    >an artistic movie

    Yes, just like a smouldering lump of dogshit on display is "art".
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:55 No.7090046
    >>7090030
    It is.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:57 No.7090062
    >>7089986
    No.
    I mean that more mature people can like both and won't feel the need to rage over the internet how only 12-year-olds can like avatar to try and sounds edgy/mature.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:57 No.7090064
    >>7089935
    No you. You've literally fabricated his "nostalgia" stuff from thin fucking air.
    >> Anonymous 02/07/10(Sun)12:58 No.7090080
    >>7090030
    Art for dumbass means "beautiful stuff"
    Art for educated people means "meaningful stuff"



    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]
    Watched Threads
    PosterThread Title
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous