>>6761656
libtard detected

>Implying Fox is anymore biased than any other news source
>Implying you just don't disagree with their bias

>implies CNN and MSNBC are any better

>Keith Olbermann spouts shit

hmm that seems reasonable to me

>Glenn Beck spouts off shit

WHAT?? THAT MOTHERFUCKING NETWORK NEEDS TO BE OFF THE AIR!

STFU.

>>6761681
Fox News is like the mouthpiece of the Republican Party. It is the most blatant of them all.

But the point of the thread is, they are all fucking biased. Why do people even watch them anymore? They suck as news sources. Are we Americans that retarded?

>>6761656

News as entertainment, obviously.

just watch the international version of cnn

>>6761675
>>6761681
>>6761688
Hey look it's illiterate "liberal" /b/tards.

I watch news channels for the same reason I follow Chris-chan's tale: I love seeing how humanity sucks.

Watch Euronews.

There's nothing you can do about it by bitching on /tv/. If you want to do something, go get into politics. It really isn't as hard as most people think. Otherwise, kindly shut the fuck up.

>>6761656
liberal fag

A good news station would merely report the news. I don't need any shitty opinion shows on my TV.

I basically swore to avoid cable news networks

Now I'm a poli sci major, and I chose a class about the media

Look what I have to do my paper on:
>Topic 1. Coverage of specific international developments and events by MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News. Term Paper is due: no later than April 29th

It's gonna be painful watching this tripe

Yep. Wolf Blitzer didn't fact check SNL when they criticized Obama, because he's not biased.
Rick 'I killed a man once" Sanchez doesn't spew his filth all over the network either.
Let's not forget Olbermann, Maddow, and Matthews with their large amounts of racial guilt.

Yeah, it's just FOX News guys.

News in the US is a fucked up business model. They all exist to sell advertising, therefore their only people they care about are the corporations that buy ad spots. You're not the consumer, you're the product that is being sold.

They need to have a subscription based news channel with no advertising.

Oh look, Americans thinking communism is bad.

>>6761724
THIS!

>>6761784

>Oh look, Americans thinking communism is bad.

It's kind of their thing.

>>6761784
The News channels tell them so

>>6761739
That's what >>6761731 does.

the obvious answer is hot news readers/reporters

>>6761757
>they are ALL so fucking biased...

what the fuck is wrong with you people? does no one actually read things before they comment on them anymore?

Somewhere along the last twenty years, American politics has devolved into two groups of fans in a football stadium, chanting slogans, waving banners, poking fun at injured players, shouting angrily at one another (and each other) occasionally. Full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

Cable news networks, which at the time were still searching for a reason to exist, have been eager to provide an outlet for the mud-slinging.

At this point it's hard to believe that anyone really gives a fuck about anything anymore. It's rather depressing to be able to laugh at morons holding up traffic in San Francisco as some sort of ludicrous protest against the Iraq War, only to see the dipshits on the other side do basically the same sort of nonsense with 'tea party' rallies. Doesn't anyone in America have lives that are worth living?

Weird thing is that I find the BBC news the one who spouts the least shit.

What is TDK?

>>6761731
Is it actually possible to receive it in the US?

>>6761653
Greetings. Kindly stop spamming, harassing and generally attacking www. anon
talk
. com, please. We don't want you there. We never did. Understood? PS: If you want these messages to stop, simply stop fucking with us, remove all lying troll articles about AT and kill the illegal clones. Then you will never be bothered again. Every single time we see the slightest attack or spam on our site (which can be reasonably expected to origin here), you will get 1334 more of these messages as a result. It's really up to you.

Yours sincerely, an anonymous AnT and general well-doer of the Internet as a whole.

the only good guys on Fox News are Brett Baier and Shepherd Smith

there are no good guys at MSNBC, sorry.

>>6761850
>At this point it's hard to believe that anyone really gives a fuck about anything anymore.

American political science nerd here. I completely agree with the comparison of the two-party political party system, and I want nothing more than to bring it down. And why do I care? Really I hate American culture and almost all Americans, but it is necessary to keep America from sinking terribly into shit. If America would to fall completely apart, it would have a detrimental effect on the entire world.

That's why I care. There are still some of us who, cliche as possible, would like to save the world. I probably won't be successful without degrading myself to either parties, but I'm going to try regardless.

>>6761892
Try this

http://www.livestation.com/channels/1-euronews_english

Fox News is funny as hell. I watch entire episodes of Glenn Beck on youtube just for the lulz. And we wouldn't have Colbert without it.

I watch newsnight on bbc iplayer.

>>6761681
>>BUT MOOOOOM ALL THE OTHER KIDS ARE DOING IT

>>6761656
LOL THAT'S NOT MSNBC

What the fuck is TDK? Two Dicks Kissing?

>>6761735
It's not that easy. Only rich people who have a law degree can become politicians IMO.

>>6761751

Instead of writing a typical term paper, explain how the three news channels are naturally biased in a way in these international coverage.

I only watch PBS because I'm not a gigantic faggot.

>>6761656
There is "good bias" and "bad bias".

"Good bias" is whatever is made in the name of humanity. That is, left-wing networks, or at least those that are in favor of the people. "Bad bias" is the right-wing that seeks to maintain things as they are.

I'm not opposed to "good bias". It is a necessary evil.

>>6762182
You are biased.

ITT: butthurt conservatives

>>6762182
>>implying that half of the biases from the left even make sense and can help humanity. EX: global warming and carbon cred.

>>6762421
>implying sustainable energy wouldn't be a huge increase in personal freedom.

>>6762421

>>6762440
>>implying the left's desire to control personal use of energy energy wouldn't decrease personal freedom and set back undeveloped nations .