>> |
10/13/09(Tue)18:16 No.5186166Usenet is good for: Being the first for everything, being the source of most shit everywhere else, and quick speeds guaranteed. Usenet
is bad for: only having the latest files, for the most part. Want to
download something that's a few months old? Haha, tough luck faggot.
Also you have to pay monay most of the time.
File Hosting is
good for: High speeds, getting stuff early after Usenet if you know
where to look, ability to find really old shit unlike Usenet, large
communities sharing shit with each other that creates a huge library of
stuff, basically everything that's good about usenet, and none of the
bad. File Sharing is bad for: You have to pay money, and unlike
usenet/torrents, the sites can get complaints and may deleted illegally
traded media, so make sure you are careful when you name that shit, and
make sure to check your old files to see if they're still up for other
downloaders. Also, there are a lot of different sites, so choosing one
to subscribe to may leave you having to use free shit on another site,
though going rapidshare is usually fine as shit that isn't on
rapidshare is on decent free sites like megaupload and all that, pretty
much boils down to knowing where to look.
Torrents are good for:
Great communities and all that entails (requests and all that), ability
to download reeaaalllly old files as long as some silly fucker is
seeding, free no matter what, and there's very little chance of an
internal problem with illegal shit, as the people that run the trackers
aren't exactly big companies in the threat of being sued. Torrents
are bad for: Entirely dependent on the users, for speeds (seeders and
uploading ability) and life in downloads (0 seeds = fucked). Usually,
uploading is required to make up for downloads, which is a problem as
upload speeds tend to come at 1/10th the speed of downloading.
There, they all have their ups and downs, SO SHUT YOUR GOD DAMN FUCKING FACE UP YOU WORTHLESS PILE OF HORSE SHIT!!!!! |