OP here. Cool site: http://www.AmonTalk.com/ (Amon = Anon)

745e31062d29556cc7f4ff20e4f99dca

I hate FPS games but love FPP movies ("shakey cam").

There are a ton of idiots on /tv/ who think the half-life movie should be made that way. They're stupid.

That looks fine.

I don't know what you want!

Why the fuck hasn't the first one even been released in the states yet?

That reminded me way too much of Doom.

FPP is the laziest form of cinematography.

I don't mind the first-person perspective. The first was like that.

What I am slightly concerned about is that the second film will be more action than horror. When you involve the military in a movie from the beginning, it tends to not be all that suspenseful. there's just too much SHOOTSHOOTSHOOT and RUNRUNRUN.

BLEW ME THE FUCK AWAY!!!!

i cant wait!

>>3796676
This, motherfucker, is what the god damend zombie genre needed.

>>3796782
A million first-person-shooter-loving video game maniacs are about to flame the shit out of you.

>>3796842
And they're idiots for doing so. FPP is a lazy form of cinematography. Cloverfield is one of the very few movies that would have been worse without FPP.

>>3796768
Cause they bought the rights with the condition that the movie wouldn't be released in the US, in order to increase Quarantine's box office.

>>3796878
How is it lazy?

>>3796896
Well he sure told you.

>>3796896
Because the director ops for a FPP shot because the director is too lazy to go through the trouble of setting up a subjective shot that would draw the audience in just as much as a FPP shot would.

>>3796782
goh dayum dum nih

>>3796981
That sounds like diarrhea, bro. Get that checked out.

>Because the director ops for a FPP shot because the director is too lazy to go through the trouble of setting up a subjective shot that would draw the audience in just as much as a FPP shot would.

>>3797005
>>3797021

>durr i can't prove him wrong so i'll mock him

>>3796896
Theres no point in explaining. This is 4chan, a place where over 95% of the visitors play video games religiously. Of course they're going to argue that first person is a totally engaging experience. They don't realize that for people that don't play video games very often, especially not first person ones, it's a very disorienting medium. FPP is basically the way to make movies for "the video game generation", not movies for wide audiences.

>>3796981
>BAWWWWWWWWW

>>3797036
I haven't played a video game in 6 months (and it was Mega Man 7 or something) and never liked FPS games, but I like FPP/shakey cam movies, so fuck off. Go back to /a/ while you're at it.

>>3797044
see
>>3797027

>>3797027
There is nothing TO be proven wrong. All he said was arbitrary opinionated comments. "FFP is shit because the director is too lazy to do anything else."

WOW WAY TO GO

>>3796981
lol moron. you think FPP doesn't need setting up? As a long shot, it needs more planning than a sequence of short shots articulated by montage.

ITT: Video game addicts want to watch people play video games on big screens so they can see bigger explosions.

>>3797069

Did I say it doesn't take setting up? No, I don't think I actually said that. You're just using a strawman. Oh, and congrats on your ad hominem.

>>3797056
You miss the point that you're still a healthy member of the video game generation, you still spend an unhealthy amount of time watching in-your-face thrills.

AW HELL YEAH

>>3797069
It takes setting up, yes. But the set up is to make sure that the shot functions, not to ensure that it looks interesting or accurate, usually it's planned out to draw your eyes to different locations on the screen. Guiding your eyes is the only real part that takes any talent and most people have no idea how to do that.

ITT

>>3797086
>video game addicts

Aka: retards and manchildren for the most part.

>>3797092
>because the director is too lazy to go through the trouble of setting up a subjective shot
>too lazy to go through the trouble of setting up a subjective shot
>the trouble of setting up a subjective shot
>setting up

>>3797117
>setting up a subjective shot

Do you have any idea what subjective means?

This looks OK, but I gotta say the first one was rather overhyped by all the fa/tv/ideophiles here. It was fine, but it wasn't the 'horror movie Holy Grail' that people said it was.

>>3797137
Stop embarrassing yourself

I don't understand why kids are getting mad its shot in first person perspective. The first one was shot in the same style.

>>3797163
Because it's lazy cinematography

>>3797151
I don't think you understood what I meant. Look who said subjective the first time (btw it's not the guy you're arguing with). The guy was agreeing with you.

Hey >>3797117

>>3797092
>>3796981
Are not the same guy.

>>3797185

Let's see

>How is it lazy?

>Because the director ops for a FPP shot because the director is too lazy to go through the trouble of setting up a subjective shot that would draw the audience in just as much as a FPP shot would.

>lol moron. you think FPP doesn't need setting up? As a long shot, it needs more planning than a sequence of short shots articulated by montage.

>Do you have any idea what subjective means?

wat

>>3797211
You are an idiot. Think about what subjective means.
Alright now that you've done that: Realize that FPP is a subjective shot.

>Because the director ops for a FPP shot because the director is too lazy to go through the trouble of setting up a subjective shot that would draw the audience in just as much as a FPP shot would.

Sure looks like that guys agreeing with you. Not the same guy, therefore you have no right quoting him as me.

I was pointing out that you have no idea who you're arguing with due to the fact that you don't know what the word subjective means.

>>3797236
Well, I quoted (and was answering to) this insightful post:

>>3796981
>Because the director ops for a FPP shot because the director is too lazy to go through the trouble of setting up a subjective shot that would draw the audience in just as much as a FPP shot would.

I interpret that as a moronic attempt to explain why FPP is lazy cinematography. If you're not the genius that wrote that, you are the one that has no point being in this discussion.

Hell, it worked for 4minutes in Doom.

who says it won't work here with INSANELY LOUD SCREAMING

>>3797276
That wasn't me, you can tell because he is actually "piggy-backing" on your idea. I have a feeling he didn't mean to write FPP at the end there though or else what he's saying makes no sense.

And the reason I'm arguing with you is because of this. >>3797092


Actually I just realized that I misunderstood I thought you were quoting >>3796782 in >>3797069. I misunderstood who you were arguing with too.

>>3797317
>I have a feeling he didn't mean to write FPP at the end there though or else what he's saying makes no sense

You're right, what he's saying makes no sense, thus my answer.

>Actually I just realized that I misunderstood I thought you were quoting >>3796782 in >>3797069.

Well, I was not.

>I misunderstood who you were arguing with too.

What do you mean with "too"?

I'd rather play Left 4 Dead

Fuck yeah, spanish movies. We exist, people!

>>3797434
Too late, image dumping unleashed.

>>3797434
you don't have to say it, your stink is proof enough

>>3797036

>it's a very disorienting medium

What are you, Asian?

>>3797453
Sophisticated argument there anon

/r/ that pic of the zombie from the end of [rec], like smiling and sitting with the hot spanish chick.

She'd be prettier if she had a different face

Left4dead: The movie

They already did an urban theme, now they are doing a redneck theme (w/ left4dead2), so a spanish theme is all that really makes sense.

Also


quicksilver4648 (5 hours ago) Show Hide
-1
Marked as spam
Reply
Looks like to guys were...
*Puts on sun glasses*
...Left 4 Dead.
YEAAAAAHHHHH!