You do it. I don't like going to IRC.

>>3210171

FOR FUCKS SAKE MAN JUST DO IT IM SICK OF COMING HERE AND SEEING GLAU THREADS EVERYWHERE ITS FUCKING RETARDED

> cure the cancer
> mods
> 4chan

>>3210170
Or better yet, leave the one glau thread alone

Anyway, fuck you OP. Fucking thread spammer

>>3210180
Creepy chan threads are worse, since they tend not to stay in one thread; however, if you can get rid of them both, that's cool.

>>3210180
he can't because he's the one who flooded the glau thread that started all this, mods would ban him too

I think we should just keep making threads complaining about it and keep shouting cancer and newfag and oldfag.

>>3210191
this is not your personal blog. you're entitled to nothing.

>>3210202

That seems to be the most reasonable solution, I agree whole heartedly.

>>3210202

i think we should just make shallow sarcastic remarks to make anonymous people on the internet think we're trying to be clever

>>3210170
Dear friend
After having taken Computer Science III, and having passed with honors, I am skilled enough in the art of using proxies to not have to worry about being banned. Furthermore, after having taken Computer Science III Advanced Course and having passed with honors, I am skilled enough to have control over an army of thousands of computers, commonly known as a botnet, thus ensuring plenty of proxies for my daily use.
That being said, I strongly encourage you to waste your time with futile attempts at stopping the Glaustorms. They will continue as long as you rude gentlemen won't learn your lesson and leave us in peace.

Kind regards,
Glauspammer

>>3210220
i think we should just make shallow sarcastic remarks to make anonymous people on the internet think we're trying to be clever

>implying /tv/ has mods

>>3210223
Thank you man. I don't like the glau storms but I'm sick to fucking death of having our threads bombed. Since we can't have out thread in peace, feel free to fuck up the board as much as you like. Seriously don't hold back any more, just spam the shit out of this place please

>>3210223
Sure is ED up in here.

I think we should just post old man cocks.

Protip: real glaufags (real Scotsmen etc.) frown upon naked glaushoops and therefore don't collect them. By implication the current shitstorm is due to the anti-glau spammers running out of people to troll.

>>3210266
or you could just save the images and look at them on your hard drive.

and not treat /tv/ as your personal blog

>>3210220
Do you really think complaining about will make it go away? If anything it makes things worse. The best thing to do is to have actual discussions about movies and tv and try not to make more glau spammers by complaining. Don't you see? You have to keep living your life or the terrorist will have won.

>>3210271
I think ED is a pretty cool guy eh makes people laugh and doesnt afraid of anything.

>>3210282
ignoring it doesn't make it go away either.

SURE IS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IN HERE

bawww you ruined my thread so im gonna ruin something of yours instead of just ignoring it and making another thread!! THAT'LL SHOW YOU.

And I think everything is going to be alright no matter what we do tonight.

MODS IS A FIGMENT OF UR IMAGINATION

>>3210281
Or you could just ignore the glau thread.

WHY IS THAT SO FUCKING HARD FOR YOU TO DO

>>3210281

cool story, bro. what will be your next demand? maybe that only american movies are to be discussed on /tv/ since 4chan is an "american" board?

>>3210303
Because its always there.

4chan is not your personal blog.

>>3210170
So the glauspammer is the text as image anon? Yeah, fucking faggot

>>3210312
So is lost, supernatural etc

>>3210312

>always there = personal blog

wat?

>>3210312
DON'T SAGE ME BRO!

>>3210317

no

inform what mods?

4chan has the lousiest fucking moderation teams on the internet, even banhappy counter strike server admin kids are better

ITT: Childish faggots that can't tolerate a single /tv/ related thread on the /tv/ board.

>>3210320
alternate reality 4chan, I see.

post alternate reality prons pls

>>3210320
because they're /tv/ related and while there are a lot of Lost threads, there isn't so many that they take up 7/8 on the page. Glau is not /tv/ related, the Terminator TV show is, but spamming Glau a hundred times should result in a permaban.

>>3210337
DO.NOT.SAGE.ME.BRO.

>>3210341

>BAAAWWWWWWW

>>3210337
>Glau- /tv/ related
>Single thread

I see that you've been gone today

hey guise, lets talk about glau

...

>>3210341
What the hell are you on dude? There are usually four or five lost thread at any one time. There was only one glau thread. Your logic is flawed

LOST - one of the highest rated shows on television
good show
many factors to discuss

Terminator - on the verge of being canceled
bad show
singular plot line, transparent, nothing to discuss

>>3210341
Name the last time one of those threads was a glau pic dump. You can't.

>>3210354
One glau thread.

0/10

>>3210354
Lost typically peaks in the hours during and after an episode airs, then once friday roles around, there might be one thread a day.

>>3210368
It was one, before I came.

>>3210349

I'm referring to the way it used to be.

>>3210368
Read what I wrote. I said there WAS one glau thread, before it was spammed. Of course there are loads now, that's what happens when you spam the one thread. You can't apply your reasons retroactivly

>>3210197
the reason it didn't stay in one thread was the stupid sagebombing. it's ok now

>>3210365
Pretty much before the one thread system about 2 weeks ago. You obviously haven't been here long. From late January to early/ mid March there was more Glau threads then there are creepy chan today.

YOU ANONS THAT ARE DISCUSSING WITH THE SPAMMER/SAGEFAGGOT: Why are you trying to debate with him when he's obviously stonewalling? Don't you get it? He's not just gonna say: "Oh shit, you're right, I'll stop being a faggot now." if you just talk to him long enough. This isn't working.

>>3210385
But why do you still spam when they are in the one thread? Why the fuck don't you hide it you fucking faggot

ITT: Ampersanon is having a party.

Why should there be a Glau thread anyway, same with the creepy chan, this is a /tv/ board, and they are more related to /s/ or /b/. It's not funny, they are not hot, and i can't see why people would like to discuss them.

>>3210384
actually the spammer doesn't sage. allowing him to post quicker.

Who are the mods on IRC? I've tried going there before but I'm not sure which ranks are what. Who the fuck are they?

>>3210393
I don't spam it, i do hide it... But there is no reason to discuss Glau anyway, she is what boxxy was to /b/ and should result in a ban. Ever since faggots starting spamming her in 2009 /tv/ has gone to shit.

>>3210400
you can sage all you like if the text in the field is different each time

everyone who is sick of the glau wanking is same person

you heard it here, repeated by the same person over and over

>>3210409
no. one sage a minute. hard limit. as opposed to 10 non-sage posts a minute.

>>3210398
Glau is an actress. Read the rules http://www.4chan.org/rules#tv

>Content should pertain to television shows, movies, actors/actresses, film equipment, etc.
>actors/actresses

>>3210398
While the creepychan thing is spot on, /s/ wouldn't want glau, as she doesn't get naked.

>>3210405
It's useless lol. I just came from there, telling them about the Glaustorm. No one gives a fuck.
Also, it's me, a Glauspammer but I'm not that Ampersanon whoever he is.

Pic related, the perfect guy for Summer.

>>3210416
People don't discuss Glau, they spam unfunny pictures of her. It is down to the influx of faggots from /b/ who think 4chan is pretty much LOL MEME'S like /b/ is. /tv/ never was.

>>3210398

/tv/ - Television & Film

1. Content should pertain to television shows, movies, actors/actresses, film equipment, etc.

>>3210423
Why is he perfect for her?

>>3210423 Ampersanon
you keep saying this like it means something

HERE IS MY ULTIMATUM.

I WILL SPAM /tv/ WITH GLAU WHENEVER THE ONE GLAU THREAD IS ATTACKED.

IF YOUR GOAL IS TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF GLAU ON /tv/ THEN YOU WILL STOP SPAMMING THAT ONE THREAD AND IT WILL ALL BE CONTAINED IN THERE.

>>3210424

0/10

>>3210430
How the frakk should I know?
I just pulled it out of my ass, like I do with everything.
:3

Or maybe because he's one hot guy.

>>3210441
you have got to be the least mature person outside of /b/.

>>3210427
Rules are fine, but do you want 110 threads about Jane Seymore? All day? Every day? And anytime someone tries to point out there's more than enough Jane Seymore on the board they have a hissy fit and bomb even more?

>>3210444
Welcome, I see this is your first time here.

>>3210440

>>3210451
0/10
There was one glau thread, only one before it got flooded.

>>3210441
>>3210441
Dude, that is YOUR ultimatum.
I retain for myself the right to spam /tv/ with Glau whenever I feel like it.
But I agree with your second point.
Also, stop talking in my name.

>>3210451

110? no. but I could live with 1 at all times.

>>3210471
YES THERE ARE TWO OF US

I AM NOT EMULATING YOU, I AM UNIQUE

Can any of you glaufags tell me why you actually like to spend ages photo shopping her head onto naked woman, and why do you like to discuss her? Just wondering.

>/tv/ - Television & Film
>1. Content should pertain to television shows, movies, actors/actresses, film equipment, etc.
>actresses

>>3210475
The question is... why do you have to treat the site like your personal blog?

>>3210447
Funny talk coming from the guy who gets pissed at the existence of a single thread on an imageboard.

>>3210495
>personal blog
You keep saying that but it means nothing. How is discussing a tv show and an actress on a tv discussion board a personal blog? How is posting pictures of an actress on an IMAGE BOARD a personal blog. You fail, son, go back to WoW

>>3210503 single thread
you keep saying this like it somehow paints you in a better light.

a 24/7 thread isn't a "single thread" its a thread every couple hours.

>>3210495

I can't answer that because we don't. we aren't talking about ourselves, we talk about glau.

>>3210492
>Flooding is against the rules

>>3210514
you act like you're entitled to something. What, I can't even fathom, as you operate outside of rationality.

>>3210516
It's a single thread. When the old one dies we move to the new one. At most there were two glau threads at any one time; one autosaging on page 10 and about to 404 and the new one. Go fuck yourself

I spam only supernatural threads

>>3210521
Pretty much sums up the average retarded glaufag.

>>3210521
What is there to say? Shes not even a integral part of the show's storyline anymore. Shes window dressing that gets a bit of face time and fanservice, maybe a line or two, and is gone again.

I mean, I liked firefly and I liked her character, but the actress wasn't anything special.

>>3210516
No, it's not every couple hours. Each thread lasts nearly all day, from creation to the point it autosages and ends up at the end of page 10.

>>3210528
No one here is entitled to anything. We are not entitled to our glau thread and you are not entitled to a board with no glau thread. We are all just users of the board, only you for some reason see yourself as a pseudo mod

>>3210516

one thread at a time, that's a single thread. if you throw one pea in a pot and exchange that pea with another one every hour,... there's still JUST ONE FUCKING PEA IN THE POT!

>>3210543
More posts from alternate reality 4chan, I see.

Maybe you're just confused, and you somehow think because the thread has the same image and same starting text, its not a new thread.

>>3210524

so is bombing threads

>>3210542

that's not your concern

Can someone please answer my question as to why you are so passionately defending your Glau thread. Why do you love to talk about Glau so much, why do you love to photoshop pictures of her onto naked woman?

>>3210548
one thread at a time fucktwit

How /tv/ Got In This Mess:

1. Suddenly Glau was cool with a handful of faggots.

2. So, this being /tv/, they failed to LURK MOAR and would start multiple threads just to pic dump for a few minutes until someone else started a new thread and they migrated there (frontpage is frontpage).

3. /tv/ got pissed at the Glaufaggotry, as any board would: Why can't you just stick to one thread?

4. The Glaufaggots weren't interested.

5. There was a reckoning and /tv/ forced the Glaufaggots into one thread at a time with strategic use of Bear-L Rolls and Gay Porn and Jackson.

6. For a time it was good.

7. Then it wasn't, and the Glaufaggots decided to use "napalm" (lol) and backchannel plotting ("17:00 Protocol") to wage war on /tv/ once again.

8. Repeat steps 5-7 a couple of times.

9. Then this week happened.

Summary: Glaufaggots started this but refuse to remember anything that happened prior to being confined to a single thread, probably because they're all Foetal Alcohol Babies.

>>3210548

see >>3210547

>>3210564
Can someone please answer my question as to why you are so passionat about spamming the Glau thread. Why do you hate people talking about Glau so much, why do you hate the photoshoped pictures of her onto naked woman?

>>3210564

those shoops aren't made by glaufags from /tv/, you moran

>>3210569
You must remember it all began in 2009 after /b/ went down and the majority of the 13 year old faggots came here thinking it was mini-/b/. Thus the unfunny meme's took over the actual /tv/ related discussions, and /tv/ is all but dead.

/b/ does it to every board.

>this thread