>>2224308
Oh god.

It was fun

I'm from Buenos Aires and I say kill em all!

As an adapation? Horrible
As a film? Meh
As a commentary on society and the effects that blind love for the military has on the populace? Not too shabby, Verhoven likes that kind of shit
As a grab a 6 pack a piece for you and your buds and drink until it's awesome, especially when that redhead shows her titties? GOOD FUCKING TIMES.

its a classic, so bad it's good

Do you want to know more?

>>2224338
>Do you want to know more?

Yeah actually. How does it look in HD?

I'm doing my part

I think Verhoven is a puss. He couldn't even read the book because it made him depressed. I suppose that is exactly what I expect from a Liberal.

>>2224345
Depends on the transfer. The one I saw a long time ago was too grainy to be useful.

Another case of "shitty title, awesome movie"

>>2224353

Well said.

>>2224305
Horrible compared to the novel, then again if you made the novel accurately into a movie then it would be all SPEKAN instead of SHOOTAN. I liked both the movie and the book but consider them to be not related in any way .Also Verhoven is a hack if he wants to adapt a book into a movie and not even finish reading the fucking thing.

>>2224475
I should add that I thought the movie was fucking awesome and if it was Verhoven's intent to make us hate militarism then he did a very poor job.