>> |
10/11/11(Tue)10:04 No.18860932 File1318341897.jpg-(9 KB, 190x247, tut_tut.jpg)
>>18860872 Because
head writer Vince Gillian told us it was meant to imply that. Here,
this quote from vince is specifically about idiots like you:
>Times
Reporter: Let's start at the end. Last season you ended with a final
scene that played ambiguously in a way you didn't intend it to. Did that
color how you ended this season, with the zoom in on the lily of the
valley plant, to say, "Walt did it"?
>Vince
Gilligan: A couple people have seen this already, to be honest, and
have asked the question, Does that mean what I think it means? We may be
in a situation all over again where it's a little more ambiguous than I
perhaps intended. I think it means exactly -- to start with, I think it
means exactly what it looks like it means, and I think a revelation
such as one in which it turns out Walt has poisoned, or at least
sickened the child to the point of being hospitalized to ensure his own
survival and the survival of his family. You know, a big revelation like
that is best served delicately, and the audience not hit over the head
with it. So hence the way we revealed that information at that final
shot, but having said that I'm already starting to sense this -- I may
have screwed up and done it again.
http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/2011/10/10/interview-vince-gilligan-on-breaking-bads-finale-season-fou r-and-the-future/ |