http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zYwYlsE-xc
bump

It's gonna be remade at some point.

>Jurassic Park 4

You skipped ahead 1 movie, it would be Jurassic Park 3.

The dream is over.

There can never be another Jurassic Park.

>>14841646
what? Jurassic Park 3 has been made in 2000 and came out in 2001. I remember going to see it in theater as if it was yesterday.

>>14841646
It was shit, but it still happened.

>>14841646

Fuck that. I enjoyed Jurassic Park 3 way more than Lost World. Fuck Vince Vaughan.

>>14841673
fuck too much feathers on that thing

They're making a television series but instead of a park they're going back in time.

>>14841686
but it had Mr.Chaotician

>>14841699
I'm ok with this if true

I only watched Jurassic Park 1 and 2.

I inted it to remain this way.

>>14841687
That's what a real dinosaur looks like.
Deal with it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZCpAmdwkmY&feature=related

>>14841699
That sounds stupid. I don't really care though. Jurassic Park has never really been important to me as a franchise. The first movie was awesome, the second was alright, and the third was shit.

>>14841733
fuck no, a dinosaur is much more a reptile than a bird

You're all wrong.

They're making another Jurassic Park, and it's going to be the first in a new trilogy.

>>14841717

Haven't you heard of Terra Nova?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoI6NDblT84

"Jurassic Park III director Joe Johnston revealed in an interview in January 2010 that Jurassic Park IV was set to be the beginning of a second Jurassic Park trilogy.[46] He also added, “Jurassic Park 4 is going to be unlike anything you’ve seen.”[47] According to a new interview conducted in 2010 by Drew McWeeny with Joe Johnston on the website Behind the Films, a new script is under works with a different idea behind it. Johnston says once he finishes Captain America, he hopefully will develop Jurassic Park IV with Steven Spielberg. Joe Johnston enthusiastically has confirmed the likelihood of the film's production more than once.[48]"

>>14841754
I hope if they do that they will follow the novel better

Anybody know when the first film will be released on blu-ray?

>>14841751

Boy do I have some bad news for you.

Take some classes, sonny.

>>14841774

I'm pretty sure it's not going to be related to the first novel. It's going to be based on the previous trilogy.

What wait? They're rebooting JP as well??? I'm guessing more grimdark and gritty. For fuck sake,.when will it end.

>>14841783
well fuck your theory

>>14841804

No yeah, that's practical. Hold a movie over science.

>>14841793

I don't know what makes you think it's going to be a reboot. They are still referring to it as Jurassic Park IV - but it will be a new trilogy. And it will still have ties to the original. Like the old/new Star Wars series.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpPN5CONgQE&feature=related

>>14841815
stop ruining my imagination about dinosaurs

>>14841726
Good choice, 3 was an abomination.

Also how can you guys not like 2? For every shitty part (Goldblum's black daughter -- wtf? Vince Vaugn, etc.) they had great parts to balance it out. Teh Long Grass, etc.

>>14841846

Fabulous.

>>14841772
tell Joe Johnston to get the fuck away from my jurassic park, he already fucked up the third one

I think they should make Jurassic Park Trespasser as a movie, take all of my money!

>>14841751
T-Rex was a big bird, bro.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=we9rHcFXsI0&feature=related
DON'T GO IN THE TALL GRASS

i wonder if the dinosaurs will have feathers, now that we know they did

>>14841910
As much as a crocodile is

>>14841920
T-Rex and other sauropods were more closely related to birds than to crocodiles, sorry to burst your bubble.

He was basically a huge badass albatross.

>>14841911

Wait, are these Dinosaurs or Pokemon?

having that stupid duck thing from the 3rd movie kill the t rex was one of the worst decisions in cinema history

completely ruined JP for me

>>14841941
dinosaurs

>>14841955
a duck? no way, it was a Spinosaurus! It was more intelligent than the T-rex and it wreck the T-rex's neck

>>14841955

Duck thing?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinosaurus

>>14841969
>implying it wasn't a fish-eating pussy

you'll never kill a raptor with a chair

>>14841973
i know it's a spino i was being derogatory

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dT6uVAHOZY&feature=related
hell yeah the T-rex in the city was the best part.

>>14841973
Sail filled with blood vessels used for regulating the body temperature of the animal, like a dimetrodon.

One little bite out of that and he's toast.

Anybody who posted in this thread yet also bashed Avatar in the past needs to shoot themselves

jurassic park and avatar got nearly identical reviews, and avatar is constantly said to be the '21st century jurassic park' etc.

>>14842022
The only difference being Avatar is uninspired CGI-filled dreck and Jurassic Park is a cinematic wonder that mixes lifelike puppets and tasteful use of CGI.

>>14842022
fuck no, I never saw Avatar but I know it's shit unlike Jurassic Park.

>>14842036
And Avatar was a groundbreaking film as well

You're seriously sounding like an aids-in-cunt retard to defend JP and attack Avatar.

It's entirely counter intuitive

>>14842036
plus no blue cats.

>>14842045
No, JP is pretty mediocre.

Shit story, shit script, shit characters, etc.


You're suffering from nostalgia and you should feel bad

>>14842047
How is it counter-intuitive? No one in their right mind denies that Avatar isn't grounbreaking in terms of technology, but the movie itself is shit.

James Cameron spent millions of dollars on a tech demo.

Jurassic Park

>"a true movie milestone, presenting awe- and fear-inspiring sights never before seen on the screen… On paper, this story is tailor-made for Mr. Spielberg's talents…[but] [i]t becomes less crisp on screen than it was on the page, with much of the enjoyable jargon either mumbled confusingly or otherwise thrown away."[71]

GEE

WHERE HAVE I HEARD THAT BEFORE?

>>14842057
the first film was great, I just wish it followed more closely the novel

>>14842064
>How is it counter-intuitive?

Because

>but the movie itself is shit.

That's exactly how you can describe Jurassic Park as well.

Essentially every criticism you have for Avatar can be directed towards JP as well. Save for the acting.

why did those avatarfags need to show up?

>>14842082
Film was great if you're an <6 year old. Which is probably how old you were when you saw the movie

>>14842057
>hey look guys I'm trolling 4chan lol!!

>>14842092
you see, thats where you're wrong, becuase Jurassic Park is

FUCKING AWESOME.

/thread.

Some lines should not be crossed, and you sir, have just crossed it.

>>14842102
I'm not an avatarfag. I haven't seen the film since March 2010 or so.

I showed up to laugh at your impressionable ass for thinking JP is great and Avatar is shit.

It's exactly like calling Creed great and Nickelback horrible

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EOg5LI3v4Q&feature=related
Jurassic Park had at least the greatest soundtrack of all time