>> |
06/27/10(Sun)18:22 No.5993257To
what an extent the Jew takes over foreign culture, imitating or rather
ruining it, can be seen from the fact that he is mostly found in the art
which seems to require least original invention, the art of acting. But
even here, in reality, he is only a ' juggler,' or rather an ape; for
even here he lacks the last touch that is required for real greatness;
even here he is not the creative genius, but a superficial imitator, and
all the twists and tricks that he uses are powerless to conceal the
inner lifelessness of his creative gift. Here the Jewish press most
lovingly helps him along by raising such a roar of hosannahs about even
the most mediocre bungler, just so long as he is a Jew, that the rest of
the world actually ends up by thinking that they have an artist before
them, while in truth it is only a pitiful comedian. No, the Jew
possesses no culture-creating force of any sort, since the idealism,
without which there is no true higher development of man, is not present
in him and never was present. Hence his intellect will never have a
constructive effect, but will be destructive, and in very rare cases
perhaps will at most be stimulating, but then as the prototype of the '
force which always wants evil and nevertheless creates good.' Not
through him does any progress of mankind occur, but in spite of him. |