1: drew brees2: peyton manning3: brett favre4: tom brady5: ben raplisberger6: joe flacco7: matt ryan8: matt schaub9: tony romo10: phillip rivers11: aaron rodgers12: matthew stafford13: kyle orton14: eli manning15: matt leinart16: mark sanchez17: chad henne18: carson palmer19: jake delhomme20: alex smith (tie)20: matt hassleback (tie)22: donovan mcnabb23: matt moore24: jay cutler25: josh freeman26: vince young27: david gerrard28: matt cassel29: jason campbell30: trent edwards31: kevin kolb (because they are unproven)31: sam bradford (because they are unproven)
>brett favre listednope
>23: matt moore
>alex smith tied with matt hassleback >OP's face
>12: matthew stafford
Jason Campbell should not be that low, I know it's the Raiders but he's better than that.
>matt leinart>#15
>>4919557I honestly have no idea if you want him to be higher or lower
>>4919587butthurt 49ers fag detected
Palmer at 18?Really?
>>4919538>Stafford at 12Hell yeah, motherfucker.
>>4919597>ANOTHER Cards tripfagFucking bandwagoners man.
>>4919538>20. matt hassleback (tie)
>>4919608>implying i wasnt a fan since the sad days of josh mccown
>>4919617Everyone claims to be, but we don't actually see your ass until the Cards are relevant for the first time in 90 years.
>>4919620sue me, i decided to post as anon for a while before i made a trip.
>Rivers>Stafford>Eli Manning>Romo>Flacco>Orton>fucking Leinart (which, how the fuck is he proven?)>Henne>SanchezAll ahead of Carson Palmer? Jesus
>Carson Palmer below Stafford, Leinart, Sanchez, and Henne
>aaron godgers>11
>>491963511 TD 12 INT incomplete rookie season with a shit tier 2006 cardinals is more proven then sam bradford and kevin kolb
>>4919635I'd take Rivers in his worst year over Palmer in his best, just sayin
>>4919603he's slow as fuck. i hate him. and we have his brother. hate him too
>>4919646You're an idiot. Just sayin
>people think palmer is good
>>4919664No u
>>4919665Didn't really imply that he's GOOD, but he sure as hell is better than fucking Leinart and Henne.
>>4919684>implying he is
Such a terrible fucking list
>Delhomme>Above ANYBODYJesus man, get your shit together
>Rodgers>11
>>4919712
as a saints fan i love how even with trolls trolling trolls nfl power rankings everywhere, the saints are always still #1 and brees is always at least top 3
>>4919754Once you win a Super Bowl, you're basically kinda bullet proof unless you rape somebody or go 18-1.
>>4919712Get out
Rodgers is too high, Romo is too low
>>4919773Please be a troll
edwards too low
rivers too low.have you seen his numbers lately?
>3: brett favre>4: tom bradyWrong.>13-22Horribly wrong.
>>4919799I wish I was, but I'm afraid it's true. Romo is just too talented to justify any spot lower than 5, and Rodgers has hype so far up his ass, he's having problems supplying enough shit for ESPN to eat up.
>>4919822Hype?I was just at the gas station, and they had a USA Today NFL Preview on display. Take a guess which player was featured on said preview.
>>4919773
>>4919822Oh ok good. You are a troll. Phew
>>4919822>claim ESPN overhypes rodgers>implying ESPN doesn't eat up tony rom
>>4919822If A-Rodg had Romo's line hed easily be top 5, Romo is grotesquely overrated