>>
!zBrQbzhJ.A 11/10/11(Thu)07:25 No. 16300189 >>16300092 I
said that three guys in the athletic department were involved in it in
response to allegations that the entire department was corrupt. Spanier
and Schultz are not part of the athletic department. McQueary is
legally in the right. He told Paterno, which was the bare minimum that
he needed to do. However, he was also a witness to the crime, which
Paterno was not. Having the most to offer the police, he should have
called them. Schultz was intimately involved with the police. He
was brought in specifically because of that fact. He should have talked
about it to any of his contacts in the police department in an official
context to do something about it. Curler is the AD. Sandusky, not
being attached to any individual program but still using athletic
facilities, was the athletic department's problem. His job involves
investigating and controlling issues in the department such as these,
and he failed to do that in this case. Spanier is the university
president. Legally, he was obligated to call the cops. From what I
gathered from the report, he wasn't informed until after Curler had
already taken his own (insufficient) actions. He should have overruled
Curler and taken more action. Paterno, on the other hand, was
approached as more of a confidant than the others were. At this point in
time, Sandusky was three years gone from the football program. Granted,
Paterno should have, at the very least, encouraged McQueary to call the
police. However, he did choose to involve the right people in it. Had
Curler or Schultz done their jobs properly, then the matter would have
been reported to police and Paterno would be a hero right now.