Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Use TeX/jsMath with the [math] (inline) and [eqn] (block) tags. Double-click equations to view the source.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • File : 1273281478.jpg-(374 KB, 912x1216, 1272940893785.jpg)
    374 KB Abortion? Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:17 No.892919  
    What are your thoughts on abortion? I am posting it here as this board seems to attract (for the most part) the more intelligent people of 4chan.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:19 No.892929
    Meh, who cares. Let the woman do what she wants.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:20 No.892942
    early stage abortions no different from any other form of birth control, but third trimester abortions are kinda fucked up.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:22 No.892952
    At how early does the baby feel pain?
    I see that all the time "OHH BUT IT R FEEL IT" but I never thought it felt any till way later in development.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:23 No.892961
    anything before they learn to speak is acceptable
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:23 No.892968
    Don't get your sperm in your vagina if you don't want it.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:24 No.892969
    abortion seems scienfically possible
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:24 No.892978
    Who cares? Let everyone do anything every time,
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:25 No.892988
    OP here, I honestly do not see what is wrong with it.
    It is no worse than eating fish eggs or really any kind of egg.
    It is purely the womens choice, and they should not have to be told whether or not they can or cannot be able to do it.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:26 No.892991
    parents should be able to abort their child up until it turns 18.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:28 No.893013
    >>892968

    Sound advice for any hermaphrodites browsing 4chan.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:28 No.893017
    I think that the father should be able to sign a form that basically says "I wish to get an abortion and forfeit all rights to see the child if the mother chooses not to abort and I will not in any way be financially obligated to support the child"
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:30 No.893026
    >>893017

    This would be fucking great.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:34 No.893064
    >>893026

    Fuck yeah it would
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:38 No.893091
    >>893064
    +1
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:40 No.893107
    anybody who gets an abortion is obviously a dirty fish smelling whore.
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)21:42 No.893113
    1st trimester or before: There is no logical reason to be against it. There is absolutely no brain function or consciousness, period. No brain waves. No nothing.

    2nd trimester: Still illogical to be against, since there is no real consciousness, but the reflexes work at this point, giving the appearance of a reaction to pain (but the brain still isn't functional, so they aren't actually feeling anything).

    3rd trimester to birth: Understandable to be against, but I still am okay with it. I more-so just look the other way when this argument is brought up.

    So, For 6 months and before, I am 100% for it, and I actually support abortions in cases where the mother is too young or isn't financially/mentally/emotionally secure. From 6 to 9 months...I'm okay with it, but less willing to argue for it, and wouldn't really care if THAT was illegalized.

    There is no reason to be against abortions during the first 3 months, only a little bit of reason to be against it from 3 to 6 months, and a fair amount of reason to be against 6-9 months.
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)21:42 No.893116
    >>893113
    Me again.

    I completely support this:
    >>893017
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:45 No.893132
    I think that they are generally not a good thing.

    But if we are to accept abortion we must also accept the ideas put forth in this article.

    http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1173414,00.html
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:45 No.893139
    >>893113
    That makes sense. I wonder if the people who are so against it know that.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:46 No.893147
    >>893113
    >No nothing.
    so there is something?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:53 No.893178
    >>893017
    Should have thought of that before you came in a girl's vagina. You did the crime, you do the time.

    "Personal responsibility? What's that?"
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:55 No.893186
    >>893178
    under that reasoning abortions should not be allowed
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:58 No.893197
    >>893147

    don't you try to double negative me son. it won't not work. not no way. not no how,
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:58 No.893201
    >>893197
    >it won't not work
    SUCCESS!
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)21:59 No.893202
    >>892917
    i a L R E A d Y R e a d T h I s O n h T t p : / / 8 8 . 8 0 . 2 1 . 1 2 / S E v E R a L D A y s a g O
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)22:07 No.893237
    >>893178
    So let me get this straight:

    A woman can get an abortion or give her kid up for adoption, and doesn't have to pay for 18 years of child support either way if she doesn't want to, but a man's fate is left to the woman?

    Not only that, if the man WANTS the child, the woman can abort it all she wants and not pay the man compensation at all.

    Right now, the system is completely biased towards the woman. It's bullshit.

    Allow the man to "abort" his status as the father, and it will be more fair. Far more fair.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:09 No.893249
    >>893237

    Only faggots in high school and rednecks actually think this.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:11 No.893265
    >>893249
    >faggots in high school and rednecks
    Funny, those are the 2 groups of people that never have to worry about abortions.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:12 No.893271
    >>893249

    I'm neither and can see where he;s coming from. I said it to my gf. we agreed I was a dick.

    thankfully shes on the pill and abortion happy so it aint my prob any way.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:15 No.893291
    >>893237
    A man's fate is his own. Definitely don't want a kid? Don't have sex then. Accidentally got pregnant? Well, too bad, shouldn't have sex. Have a girl that won't listen? Be a man and make her listen. Personal responsibility.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:17 No.893312
    >>893291Be a man and make her listen

    Exactly! It's time we brought back old fashioned family values like beating women.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:18 No.893321
    >>892915
    S u p e v e r Y O n e j U S t w A N T e D T o T E L l u T h A t C H R I s t O P H e R p O O L e A K A M o O T A k a U R A D M I N h a s a M e N t a L i l l n E s S D o N T s U p p O r T p s y C H o S j o I N t h E b e S t F o r U M : h t t p : / / 8 8 . 8 0 . 2 1 . 1 2 /
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:18 No.893322
    >>893291
    >A man's fate is his own.
    Except if a man chooses to not financially support a child. He is punished, by law, for NOT doing something.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:19 No.893325
    >>893237
    I do agree, it is completely biased toward the woman. And as fucked up as it would be to just forfeit your father rights, the woman does the same thing to her mother rights.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:19 No.893328
    >>893271

    Wow u mean a real live girl has that opinion? Never mind, I have definitely been bested! AND she's ur gf??? Whoa dude ur a lucky man.

    Sorry that biology and evolution don't hold water in the current sociopolitical climate but you are both idiots.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:19 No.893329
    I think that ALL women should have tubal ligations when they're young (before they become fertile). Any time ANYONE wants to become pregnant they need to go to a hospital that can perform a medical procedure in which one of her eggs is removed, fertilized with the baby batter of her choice, and implanted into her.

    Opt-in fertility.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:20 No.893333
    >>893271
    >I said it to my gf. we agreed I was a dick.

    no she agreed you were a dick you whipped piece of shit.


    I got a girl pregnant when I was 19 and she wanted to keep it and it took me MONTHS of relentless manipulation and a marriage proposal to convince her to get an abortion. I said I loved her, that the timing wasn't right but we should have kids once I was done with school, we would live happily ever after, never gonna give you up, let you down etc etc.

    Then I picked her up from the abortion clinic, paid the 800 bucks (best investment of my entire life), dropped her off at her moms house and was like kthxbai. Last I heard she tried to kill herself, if I had just been able to sign away my responsibility I wouldn't have had to mentally destroy her like that.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:20 No.893336
    >>893017
    For every time you have sex? That seems inconvenient
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:20 No.893339
    >>893312
    Cool strawman bro.

    >>893322
    It's your child. You chose to have it (by having sex), YOU pay for it. Don't want to pay for it? Then you shouldn't have had sex! PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY!
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:21 No.893344
    >>893333
    You...are...my...hero.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:21 No.893346
    >>893328

    I have no idea what side you're on.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:22 No.893349
    >>893329
    >expensive, cumbersome procedure to reproduce
    >would prevent poor-ass welfare leeches from spawning
    imokaywiththis.jpg
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:23 No.893354
    >>893349
    Exactly! If you can't afford a medical procedure of that nature, you can not afford a child.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:23 No.893356
    >>893339
    >It's your child. You chose to have it (by having sex), YOU pay for it. Don't want to pay for it? Then you shouldn't have had sex! PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY!
    say that to a woman at an abortion clinic and see what happens.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:23 No.893357
    >>893329
    Medical fags get in here! Is this even feasible?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:24 No.893360
    >>892918
    I a L r e A D Y r E A d t H I S O N H T T P : / / 8 8 . 8 0 . 2 1 . 1 2 / s E v e R a L d a y s A G O
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:25 No.893365
    >>893178
    And what if she lied about being on birth control? or condom breaks? or after she got pregnant she lost her job?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:25 No.893371
    >>893339
    Abstinence isn't showing personal responsibility. An abstinent world is a horrible, dead world to live in. Not everyone is content fapping to the thought of how much Jesus loves them all day.

    Personal responsibility is the willingness to do the responsible thing when someone gets pregnant: abort it!
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:26 No.893377
    >>893365

    Psst... did u kno that life isn't fair?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:26 No.893380
    >>893354

    It's a damn good idea. but it'll never happen.

    even though it makes perfect sense.

    people argue its a right to reproduce. thats true. but if you cant afford to support a child then the state has to pay for your childs upbringing.

    so only have kids IF you can prove you can support it.

    FUCK YOU OCTOMOM
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:27 No.893384
    >>893371
    THIS. FUCKING THIS.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:28 No.893389
    >>893357

    No not really because trying to do invasive procedures like that on a newborn are pretty dangerous and have long term side effects.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:28 No.893393
    >>893377
    >Psst... did u kno that life isn't fair?
    But the law is required to be fair.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:28 No.893394
    My view of abortion is this: let the woman have the abortion after being counseled of other alternatives if the abortion is planed before the 3rd trimester. This requirement can be waived if the pregnancy is a danger to her life.

    After the 3rd trimester the abortion can be done only if there is a danger to her life, rape, or incest.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:28 No.893395
    >>893393

    ZING
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:29 No.893400
    abortion is good. it gets really fucked up and wrong the longer you wait. its realy bad once its out.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:30 No.893402
    >>893389

    It could be done anytime before puberty.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:30 No.893403
    >>893393

    Where in the fuck did you get that idea?
    >> Warder !!FK0fY5msl5A 05/07/10(Fri)22:31 No.893415
    Hmm...It's wierd how religious people want to dictate what others do with their bodies. Let women abort
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:31 No.893418
    >>893402

    So you're saying that you are thinking all women will voluntarily go into whatever clinic? Or do you propose creating a DEA like government agency to go around checking and enforcing these new laws you want to create?

    Seems easier to me to just wear a rubber...
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:32 No.893419
    >>893394

    This is where I stand. Mainly on the grounds that 2 trimesters is more than enought time to find out your preg and decide what to do.

    and of course once your into the third trimester the fetus is quite developed. I've seen a legit aborted late term fetus in the flesh. DAMN THAT SHITS HOT!
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:32 No.893423
         File1273285966.jpg-(1.6 MB, 3629x4392, Constitution_Pg1of4_AC.jpg)
    1.6 MB
    >>893403
    This crazy piece of paper I came across one day.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:32 No.893424
    >>893393

    What in any of those examples has ANYTHING to do with law?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:33 No.893427
         File1273285993.jpg-(409 KB, 2023x3026, lady-justice.jpg)
    409 KB
    >>893403

    OH No where in particular
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:33 No.893429
    >>893371
    I don't argue semantics.

    We're not talking about the girl, we're talking about you. It's her choice whether or not to abort it, and since all women are illogical and their hormones go into overdrive when pregnant it can be impossible to convince her to abort it.

    Abortion should not be a means of birth control. Why not just give it up for adoption? Why do you feel the need to simply abort it?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:34 No.893434
    >>893423

    Wow, you start out arguing that men should not have to pay for a child they are 50% responsible for and you end it by posting a .jpg of the constitution, you really are hilarious.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:34 No.893439
    >>893418

    people get vaccines without a second thought. (unless there wingnuts)

    I cant see why this couldn;t eventually become a normal thing to do
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:35 No.893440
    >>893423

    Point out exactly where in the text it says that actual laws themselves are guaranteed to be fair plz
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:35 No.893444
    >>893365
    Don't have sex if you're not willing to risk such things.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:36 No.893448
    >>893440
    Probably something to do with that "all men are created equal" thing
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:37 No.893449
    >>893434
    >they are 50% responsible
    yet have 0% control of the end result and have no legal recourse
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:37 No.893457
    >>893444
    Or just sign a piece of paper saying that in case of odd circumstances, your not responsible if shes an idiot and wants to have a baby, and wants to make you pay for it
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:38 No.893461
    >>893444
    same can be said to women
    therefore abortion should be illegal
    your logic is self defeating
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:38 No.893464
    >>893434
    They aren't really 50% responsible for it if they wanted it aborted and the woman CHOSE to have it.

    >>893365And what if she lied about being on birth control?

    What's really fucked up is when she lied about being on birth control and the father still has to pay for it. IMO in those cases the bitch should be prosecuted for fraud and forced to abort.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:38 No.893468
    >>893448
    EXACTLY. the framers of the constitution knew women were dumb.
    Niggers < women < white guys
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:39 No.893472
    >>893457
    >Or just sign a piece of paper
    hahahaohwow.jpg

    that would never hold up in court
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:39 No.893475
    >>893439

    Because it infringes on a whole host of personal freedoms for one. Second, the procedure is a lot more dangerous than a vaccine, and there is no guarantee of being able to reverse it later in life. Third, a program like this would DRASTICALLY raise the rate of STD transmission. Fourth, it's a whole lot more expensive than condoms are. Fifth, there are A LOT of businesses that make money over contraceptives, this new law would cause a lot of economic turmoil over the next few years. All because you don't want to wear a condom and 'protect' the .00005 percent of men who get a woman pregnant by breaking a condom.

    I mean I'm not really sure where to start....
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:40 No.893476
    >>893472
    Depends on how good of a jew you have
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:40 No.893479
    >>893472that would never hold up in court

    It does when a prostitute gets pregnant in some locations. Not everywhere though.
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)22:40 No.893482
    >>893418
    But if the rubber breaks or the birth control fails or the woman LIES ABOUT BEING ON BIRTH CONTROL, the man should have the ability to say, "Hey, I'll pay for the abortion, but that is it. If you choose to keep it, I won't be a part of it. At all. Period. No child support, no visitation rights, no anything."

    Why screw over an extra person just because the woman is being retarded? You don't see guys being forced to pay child support for kids born from their sperm donations, do you?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:42 No.893483
    >>893429
    Believe it or not, some women want to avoid the pain of childbirth to produce a child they do not want, and therefore abortion is a viable option.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:42 No.893484
    >>893464
    >forced to abort.

    I still don't know whether people actually mean these things or whether they say it for shock value. Kids.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:43 No.893488
    >>893482

    That is an extremely naive opinion to have and borderline blackmail.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:43 No.893490
    >>893475

    yeah man.. but it just feels better without one!
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:43 No.893493
    >>893475Third, a program like this would DRASTICALLY raise the rate of STD transmission.

    WHY DO CHRISTFAGS ALWAYS SAY THIS WHENEVER BIRTH CONTROL COMES UP. THERE HAS NEVER BEEN ANY STUDY THAT BACKS THIS SHUT THE FUCK UP.

    >Fourth, it's a whole lot more expensive than condoms are.

    Not in the long run unless you actually want to have a child. I'm certain I've spent more on condoms in my lifetime than a tubal ligation costs and I'm 25.

    >Fifth, there are A LOT of businesses that make money over contraceptives, this new law would cause a lot of economic turmoil over the next few years.

    Contraception is NOT the thing holding our economy up. Things become obsolete and pharmaceutical companies make other products, they'll live.

    >All because you don't want to wear a condom and 'protect' the .00005 percent of men who get a woman pregnant by breaking a condom.

    No, all because so many people are too stupid to properly use condoms and they have millions of retard babies that they don't want and I don't want to pay for.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:44 No.893496
    >>893483
    She shouldn't have had sex then. Abortion is not a means of birth control.

    And besides, there are c-section operations.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:45 No.893502
    >>893488
    >>893484
    BAWWWWWWWW a woman should never be encouraged to remove the flesh tumor from her because she might have already developed feelings for the little pile of skin
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:46 No.893505
    Not to mention you could argue that sleeping with a woman is to enter into a quasi-legal contract with her over whatever ramifications result, reproduction is a possible scenario and if you are participating in sex than you know that, if you don't then you are most likely mentally retarded and probably won't have to pay child support. So you can't fuck her and then try to withdraw from your contractual obligations.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:47 No.893506
    >>893496
    Ahh yes... caesarians completely painless, keeps the pregnancy from destroying your body, and doctors are always willing to give you one whether you need it or not
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:47 No.893509
    >>893484
    >>893488

    Anon never said anything about forced abortion
    It was "you can have the kid, but i want nothing to do with it, since your a lieing bitch (About birth control). If you want ill pay for the abortion tho.."
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:47 No.893513
    >>893505Not to mention you could argue that sleeping with a woman is to enter into a quasi-legal contract with her

    That's why I never have sex with a woman without my lawyer present.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:48 No.893517
    fetus = human
    human has right to life and liberty
    theres lots of arguements to say when a fetus becomes a human or "is alive" well thats retarted they were alive when they were still an egg and a sperm but we dont worry about killing thoose

    my personal opinion is that once their heart stops beating they shouldnt be aborted.

    while i personally believe this i also feel uncomfortable making it illegal.

    so the fact is its a difficut topic
    if we are going to call abortion murder then is the morning after pill murder i personally dont feel so but i know people who might disagree.

    so its fukin complicated what do we do?
    well i personally believe women have a choice
    A CHOICE NOT TO FUCKING HAVE UNPROTECTED SEX
    if you fuck around and get pregnant then you have a moral obligation to carry that baby to term unless it endangers your life

    again this is my opinion and i know there're those who disagree with me and that's fine you are entitled to your opinion.

    full disclosure im a guy i will never be faced with this decision BUT i would never have unprotected sex with a girl who wasn't my wife and we were prepared to have children i would never want to be the reason a girl has to make that choice
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)22:48 No.893520
    >>893496
    Well of course it's not; it costs hundreds of dollars.

    But in a last-case scenario, it should be an option to avoid, you know, CHILDBIRTH.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:49 No.893525
    >>893513
    that's kinda kinky
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:49 No.893527
    >>893509
    No, read back through it. I did say forced to abort on the grounds that the man's DNA is his personal intellectual property. To reproduce his genetic intellectual property without his express permission is a violation of his rights and she should have to pay a fee not exceeding $3000 for every copy made of his genetic material.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:50 No.893531
    >>893517
    For the most part, a fetus is equivalent to a plant
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:50 No.893532
    >>893517my personal opinion is that once their heart stops beating they shouldnt be aborted.

    Once their heart stops beating there isn't much need...
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)22:50 No.893533
    >>893517
    >fetus = human
    No.

    It has no functional brain, why consider it "alive"? The heart may be beating, but there is no consciousness, no brainwaves, it is less of a person than Terry Schaivo.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:50 No.893534
    >>893506
    Oh, okay. Well if you put it that way, I suggest this: Don't have sex.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:51 No.893535
    >>893502
    >>893493

    lol i'm very pro-choice and my ex and me have gotten an abortion before.

    >WHY DO CHRISTFAGS ALWAYS SAY THIS WHENEVER BIRTH CONTROL COMES UP. THERE HAS NEVER BEEN ANY STUDY THAT BACKS THIS SHUT THE FUCK UP.

    Are you seriously saying that removing a major reason for wearing a condom wouldn't cause rates of STDs to sky rocket? What the fuck studies are there that prove this wrong? Look at the AIDS epidemic in Africa where they don't use condoms for christ's sake. If you want an example of it in America look at catholics who have way higher than normal rates of STD transmission due to not wearing condoms.

    Fuck dude I can't believe how retarded you are, I'm not even going to bother with your other points.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:51 No.893537
    >>893527
    OH YOU
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:51 No.893538
    >>893520

    My gf got an insert called a coil. costs 400 euro works for 8 years. shits awesome. if you want kds suddenly it can be removed at any time. reproductive ability returns the next month.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:51 No.893539
    >>893517
    >bawwww. why doesn't everyone else love jesus as much as i do?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:52 No.893540
    >>893517
    Protip: no birth control method is 100% effective

    Odd that the same people that will tell you abstinence is 100% effective are the same people that claim that a virgin gave birth...
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:52 No.893543
    >>893496
    >shouldn't have had sex then
    this a thousand times this.
    if you aren't prepared for the POSSIBILITY you might get pregnant (condoms break ect)
    then you shouldn't be having sex
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:53 No.893545
    >>893535
    >catholics who have way higher than normal rates of STD transmission
    [citation needed]
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)22:53 No.893548
    >>893538
    Oh, and I agree, but not all girls have this, and not all girls can safely have one (like with the pill, some girls can't have them without getting really sick).

    What they really need is a reversible or temporary vasectomy, or some other form of male birth control that is 99.9999% effective. Then there'd be no excuse.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:54 No.893549
    >>893540
    .45 caliber usually does the trick for me
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:54 No.893551
    My personal view is that if you get pregnant, you should chose to have the kid because there's something to be said for the right to life, responsibility, and adoption.

    But at the same time, I would never ever go along with a law that prevented people from getting one if they wanted to.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:54 No.893552
    >>893540

    in fairness abstinence is 100 percent effective... unfortunately the stats say that 99 percent of those promise ring faggots will havesex before marriage. AND due to the fact they tend to have poorer sex ed. they were more likely to have unprotected sex.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:54 No.893553
    >>893543
    The ONLY fucking reason your saying this is cuzz you were a virgin until you were 20+, faggot.
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)22:55 No.893555
    >>893543
    >if you don't want to get hit by a car, don't ever leave your house. ever. if you do, it's YOUR fault for leaving the house.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:55 No.893556
    >>893543
    >if you aren't prepared for the POSSIBILITY you might get pregnant (condoms break ect) then you shouldn't be having sex
    so abortions should only be legal when sex wasn't consentual?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:55 No.893558
    >>893535
    >"What the fuck studies are there that prove this wrong?"
    I'm fairly sure that this is a logical fallacy, bro. Burden of proof kinda rests on you.

    Anyway, I very much agree with both >>893017, as it is a fair method of determining responsibility, but >>893329 also provides a good option for the future.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:55 No.893559
    >>893545

    Irishfag here. LOLW00T?

    maybe back when people where actually catholics. ... no one cares about that shite these days
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:57 No.893564
    >>893558

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Africa
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)22:57 No.893568
    >>893551
    There are already millions of kids that don't have any parents and don't have anyone to adopt them.

    Once those are accounted for, then it'd be understandable to want people to not get abortions. As it stands now, though, there are far too many kids that are unaccounted for.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:58 No.893571
    >>893548What they really need is a reversible or temporary vasectomy, or some other form of male birth control that is 99.9999% effective. Then there'd be no excuse.

    It's called RISUG (reverse inhibition of sperm under guidance). An injection of a solution in each vas deferon that lasts for years, is so far 100% effective in tests, is extremely inexpensive to administer, and can be reliably reversed with an injection that flushes the solution out. It is currently undergoing trials in India.

    Unfortunately to become legal in the US a US
    pharmaceutical company would have to spend money sponsoring tests and none of them want to because they would lose too much money from not selling hormonal birth control pills.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:58 No.893572
    >>893017

    Awesome idea

    "I pledge to pay 200 bucks right now and if I don't then I don't have to worry about the tens of thousands of dollars it will take to raise a child"
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:59 No.893577
    >>893568
    Adoption agencies have a 7 year waiting list where I'm from. Don't talk about shit you don't know about.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:59 No.893578
    All you faggots should know there IS a male birth control pill; unfortunately you can never drink alcohol or else you'll get violently ill.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)22:59 No.893581
    >>893568
    THIS! A million times this!

    If we want to think of ourselves as remotely civilized as a species then we need to stop having kids until we figure out how to take care of the ones we have.
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)22:59 No.893584
    >>893571
    Yes, I've read about that one. The clinical study with some 250 guys has 100% success for the past FIFTEEN YEARS, except for one case because the guy had been injected the wrong way or something.

    They need to bring that shit over here! I'd get that in a heartbeat!
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:00 No.893585
    >>893578

    Then I'll think you'll find there is NO male birth control pill.

    there's a straight edge faggot pill
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:01 No.893600
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_inhibition_of_sperm_under_guidance

    THISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHIS
    THISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHIS
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:02 No.893602
    >>893568
    Way to ignore the rest of my post and pick out the part most easy to attack. That wasn't even my point. I'm not advocating having kids because there's a shortage of kids to adopt. The point was there's something to be said for the right to life, and adoption is one way out if you don't want to raise the kid yourself.
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)23:02 No.893603
    >>893577
    You start by talking about adoption practices where you're from, and then say that I shouldn't talk about things that I don't know about?

    What the fuck are you implying here?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:03 No.893607
    my morals are derived from my abilitiy to empathize. i empathize for beings that are conscious and have the ability to feel pain because thats how empathy works (a projection of others feelings on yourself).

    entities that are not conscious, or entities that do not have the ability to feel pain (ie, a <30 week fetus) i do not empathize for, therefore i have no objection to them being killed/destroyed/whatever.

    thus, i am abso-fucking-lutely pro choice.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:03 No.893609
         File1273287788.jpg-(58 KB, 483x450, WQyPl.jpg)
    58 KB
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:03 No.893612
    >>893564
    Different type of political/social/economic environment lead to different kind of pressures. To say that if there was a system in place in America that prevented women from getting pregnant so that sex could be had without that worry for STDs to skyrocket, well, there's absolutely no evidence. For either conclusion. Africa isn't valid, again, because there is a different society, which has different kinds of social pressures, so it cannot be said to be an accurate representation of what would happen if said system was installed.
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)23:04 No.893614
    >>893602
    Dude, I was just saying that this "right to life" that you're claiming should be forgone until the people that are *already here* are being taken care of in a loving home.

    I wasn't trying to argue against your whole post, I was just pointing out one problem.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:04 No.893617
    >>893600
    >>893584
    This injection should be a mandatory part of the inoculations they give to teenage boys. Makes all males aged 12-22 sterile. If they REALLY want a family they can reverse it, otherwise it puts a huge dent in teen pregnancy.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:04 No.893618
    Abortion is the natural result of controlling our environment and learning that the future is non-deterministic so long as we can control who is birthed or not birthed.

    Fate can only be controlled by who is born -- not our choices made.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:04 No.893620
    >>893609
    and abortion is not the removal of an unfertilized egg
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)23:06 No.893632
    >>893617
    Even though I'm a very strong Libertarian, I would support this. I'd even help pay for it as much as possible.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:06 No.893635
    >>893614
    So you think there's a population problem?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:07 No.893640
    >>893632
    >I'm a very strong Libertarian
    lolno
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:07 No.893641
    >>893632
    >I'm a very strong Libertarian

    How much do you bench?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:08 No.893645
    >>893632
    Considering that it only takes a nurse to administer the injections and the actual injections themselves cost pennies I don't think cost is a factor.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:08 No.893649
    >>893617
    This is also an acceptable solution to the problem. Hell, it's probably the cheapest solution to the problem yet.
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)23:08 No.893654
    >>893635
    No, but it's unfair to the kids that are already alive to give preferential treatment to things that don't even have functional brains yet.

    >>893640
    U MAD?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:09 No.893655
    >>893641
    300 Planck masses
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:09 No.893661
    >>893654
    >u mad
    that's like saying you are pro-life while getting an abortion
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)23:10 No.893666
    >>893641
    *facepalm*

    very fervent Libertarian*
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:11 No.893676
    >>893655
    So, you cant even hold up your own body mass?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:11 No.893677
    >>893632
    So, you're so pro-personal rights that you will take away one of the most fundamental?
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)23:12 No.893680
    >>893661
    So because I don't agree with the Libertarian party on every single issue, but agree on 99% of the issues, I can't call myself a Libertarian?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:12 No.893681
    >>893654
    >give preferential treatment to things that don't even have functional brains yet.

    lol. "Sorry jimmy, I can't cook dinner for you tonight. I'm going to play sports with my unborn baby"
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:12 No.893682
    >>893661
    Libertarians don't have to be anti-vaccinations. And even the ones that are anti-mandatory vaccinations generally agree at worst that if you're batshit insane opt out, otherwise there are a standard group of vaccinations your kids should get.

    There is nothing wrong with being a Libertarian and thinking that vaccinating for pregnancy shouldn't be added to the list.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:12 No.893687
    >>893676
    don't you know? you can just cancel out mass
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:12 No.893688
    >>893666
    Oh, well i'm a free-market loving authoritarian.

    HOW DOES THAT MAKE YOU FEEL?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:13 No.893693
    >>893682
    PROTIP: Pregnancy is not a disease.
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)23:14 No.893698
    >>893677
    Well you're not allowed to go to public schools without getting certain shots, so just add this injection to the list. If you don't like it, you're free to home school your kid or put them in a private school that doesn't force it.

    I don't support forcing teenage boys to get it, but I would be fine with public schools forcing teens to get it in order to attend the school, like they do with certain vaccines today.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:14 No.893703
    >>893680
    lolkay, I'll just be an atheist that believes in god then.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:15 No.893713
    >>893698
    I never spent much time in public schools, but I never knew of any pregnancy outbreaks.
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)23:16 No.893715
    >>893693
    >A disease or medical condition is an abnormal condition of an organism that impairs bodily functions, associated with specific symptoms and signs.

    It really hinges on your definition of "abnormal." I would say it qualifies as a disease in cases where it is unwanted.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:16 No.893716
    >>893698
    Those shots prevent hepatitis B and shit. Pregnancy isn't a disease.
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)23:17 No.893721
    >>893713
    What's your point?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:17 No.893724
    >>893698
    >I don't support forcing teenage boys to get it, but I would be fine with public schools forcing teens to get it
    did you actually read what you wrote?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:17 No.893727
    >>893693PROTIP: Pregnancy is not a disease.

    Pregnancy is a disease just as much as an ulcer is. In fact, pregnancy is the scariest STD because almost all women are carriers for it.

    >>893698Well you're not allowed to go to public schools without getting certain shots, so just add this injection to the list.

    I like it.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:18 No.893732
    >>893727
    >pregnancy is the scariest STD because almost all women are carriers for it.
    SHIT! How do I prevent women from getting me pragnet? I don't want to form babby.
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)23:18 No.893733
    >>893724
    Yes. Yes I did.

    If a public school wants to say "hey, kids, you have to follow certain rules, like wearing a uniform or blah blah blah," or wants to say "you have to get certain vaccines in order to attend THIS SCHOOL," then that is fine. If you don't like it, don't attend the school.

    I don't see why this anti-sperm shot shouldn't be allowed to be included with the other shots.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:18 No.893734
    None of you have kids or are over 25, are you?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:19 No.893736
    abortion is an issue people don't agree on, the best solution is to let people decide what they want to do, according to their instinct. I'm not a liberal, but when there's an issue with no strict majority or scientific proof to stand on a specific side, it's best to let people choose individually
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:19 No.893741
    >>893724
    He means "you don't have to get it, but if you don't then you can't attend public school"

    Why is this so difficult a concept?

    >>893713I never spent much time in public schools, but I never knew of any pregnancy outbreaks.

    I went to a public school in a wealthy area and we had more than a couple pregnancies. It's quite a lot worse in rural areas or inner cities.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:19 No.893743
    >>892988
    >no worse than eating eggs
    >i don't know about pregnancy but ill post anyway
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:20 No.893745
    >>893733
    Incase you didn't realize, you look like quite an idiot.

    Just sayin'
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)23:20 No.893746
    >>893732
    The anti-pregnancy shot for boys. Should be in the US within like 20 years. It'll last a really long time, and is reversible in case you want to form babby.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:20 No.893749
    >>893733
    What kind of public school did YOU go to?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:21 No.893750
    >>893733
    >I don't see why this anti-sperm shot shouldn't be allowed to be included with the other shots.
    Perhaps because it provides no public benefit, this may come as a surprise to you but pregnancy doesn't result from being around other people like real diseases do.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:21 No.893751
    >>893113
    my problem with abortion isn't that you are killing something that is "intelligent" but the fact that there is a 95% chance that thing would become "intelligent"
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)23:23 No.893759
    >>893749
    Well, let's see...My high school didn't allow girls with really low-cut shirts, or shorts/skirts that were too short, or hats to be worn inside.

    Also, to go to public school in my school district, you need certain vaccines.

    All of this is pretty common stuff...
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:23 No.893760
    >>893750Perhaps because it provides no public benefit

    An end to 90% of teen pregnancy isn't a public benefit?

    >>893750pregnancy doesn't result from being around other people

    You can get pregnant without being around other people? I suppose you think that HPV isn't a disease also because you can't get it just by being around other people. Oh wait! You Jesusfags don't want to give teens the HPV vaccine because "hurrr it'll make them have more sex".

    ahhhhh! my brain!
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:23 No.893761
    >>893741
    I don't know what kind of school you were in, but pregnancy isn't contagious, I mean unless all of the guys were fapping nonstop all over the place.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:24 No.893767
    >>893759
    Yeah, but again, those required shots are for diseases that are contagious. pregnancy is not.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:24 No.893768
    >>893751my problem with abortion isn't that you are killing something that is "intelligent" but the fact that there is a 95% chance that thing would become "intelligent"

    So you're saying that killing something that could potentially become intelligent is wrong? Guess I'd better start finding homes for my sperm...
    >> Lollipop !4avJBSMAPo 05/07/10(Fri)23:24 No.893770
    >>893750
    Except that teen pregnancy is a pretty big issue. Especially since, if you look at the statistics, poor people that can't afford kids are wayyy more likely to have kids than middle-class people. If it will stop a bunch of retarded pregnancies, I'll be for it.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:25 No.893774
    >>893760
    No, you fucking idiot. It takes a lot more than just being around another person to get pregnant. A guy has to stick his dick inside a girl and blow his load. It's not something that can be transmitted by a cough or by sharing a drink. That's the difference.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:25 No.893775
    >>893761pregnancy not contagious
    >>893767

    Oh boy... did no one give you the talk about the birds and the bees?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:26 No.893779
    >>893760
    I don't know what kind of school you were in. In my school we tended to keep our clothes on.

    You know it would be far easier to segregate boys and girls to prevent these 'in-school orgies' that result in pregnancy outbreaks than a medical procedure.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:26 No.893785
    >>893774
    And a guy has to stick his dick in someone to give them HPV/herpes/AIDS/etc. And if there were a vaccine for all of those you'd give it to kids right? Right?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:26 No.893786
    >>893770
    the only way you can redeem yourself is by being in favor of genocide of dumb asses
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:27 No.893789
         File1273289220.png-(83 KB, 863x792, 1272770991846.png)
    83 KB
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:27 No.893791
    >>893775
    >birds and bees
    if you think that's how things work, I can see why you think it is contagious
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:27 No.893792
    >>893775
    Oh, so you got pregnant from being around pregnant girls? Sucks for you
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:27 No.893798
    >>893785
    Are you seriously comparing herpes and AIDS to pregnancy?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:27 No.893800
    >>893482

    I do agree that it's unfair that men have these obligations, but you know what else is unfair? A woman having to choose between a potentially traumatic and/or painful abortion procedure, or a potentially painful/traumatic birth. Women were delt the shitty card in life with regards to having babies, and social constructs have tried to equalize this unfairness. Women have to carry it for almost a year like a parasite, than squeeze the mofo out which can be pretty nasty and painful. All men need to do is squirt in the vag then kthxbai. Life is unfair.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:28 No.893801
    >>893779You know it would be far easier to segregate boys and girls to prevent these 'in-school orgies'

    As someone that lost my virginity to a girl that was attending an all-girls Catholic school let me just say "pfffffffffffffffffffffffff!!!!"
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:28 No.893803
    getting rid of humans in general is a good thing
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:28 No.893805
    >>893792
    I know. What's a guy to do?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:28 No.893807
    >>893798Are you seriously comparing herpes and AIDS to pregnancy?

    I'd much rather have herpes than pregnancy.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:29 No.893808
    >>893803
    >In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:30 No.893814
    >>893415
    first of all, ethics=/=religion
    second, you're not deciding what you do with your body, but rather a completely different person
    how people see a difference between murder of a baby and abortion i have no idea
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:30 No.893815
         File1273289448.png-(7 KB, 350x346, whoa.png)
    7 KB
    >This thread
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:31 No.893818
    >>893815
    190 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:31 No.893822
    >>893814
    One would think that if religious people truly thought that abortion was murder then they would try to prevent it at all costs by encouraging contraception, and they would be the most vocal supporters of things like the "mandatory RISUG for schoolboys" policy. What gives?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:31 No.893823
    >>893814
    Because what they abort isn't a baby.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:32 No.893827
    >>893823
    It's not a human until it can solve a quadratic equation.

    /thread
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:32 No.893830
    >>893814
    >how people see a difference between murder of a baby and abortion i have no idea

    >derp. im retarded
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:33 No.893835
         File1273289633.png-(2 KB, 161x120, waitno.png)
    2 KB
    >my face when asked about my stance on abortion
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:34 No.893838
    >>893822
    >implying condoms and birth control are a sin
    my and all my christian friends use these, you are an idiot
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:35 No.893847
    >>893830
    >i can't come up with a counterargument so ill just name call
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:35 No.893853
    >>893823
    but it's GOING TO BE a baby
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:35 No.893855
    >>893830
    He has a bit of a point (you know, not a good one but... something). The age a fetus can survive on its own overlaps with the time that it could be aborted in some places. Does being on the opposite side of a vagina suddenly make one more human?

    I think not, though as I am an atheist without any concept of ethics I say that the only rational solution is to allow abortion after birth.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:36 No.893861
    >>893855
    >Does being on the opposite side of a vagina suddenly make one more human?
    I feel most human when I'm inside of a vagina.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:37 No.893865
    >>893835my face when asked about my stance on abortion

    It's funny because when asked that by a bunch of people, either side will lynch you for the wrong answer.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:38 No.893868
    >>893853
    Sperm too. Fapping = illegal?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:38 No.893873
    >>893855
    >Does being on the opposite side of a vagina suddenly make one more human?

    No, but having intelligence and a consciousness does.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:39 No.893884
    >>893855
    why can't you guys get it through your head that i am not saying a fetus is a human?
    im saying it will be a human soon
    in fact, i think abortion is even worse than murder because you are denying a human their full life instead of just a portion
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:39 No.893886
    >>893847
    If it cant feel pain, and its not aware of its own existence, it might as well be a plant.

    Iv stated this like 4 times, just because im calling you a nigger doesn't mean i don't have an argument, it just means im tired of you not listening
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:39 No.893889
    >>893853
    So? Sperm is going to be a baby, should I never masturbate anymore? Eggs could become a chicken, sunflower seeds can become sunflowers, but I still eat those. Am I a fucking monster???
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:40 No.893892
    >>893868
    sperm will only become a baby if on an egg, and there is only a chance of it even then
    plus, sperm die inside you all the time anyway
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:40 No.893896
    >>893861
    Don't we all...

    >>893873No, but having intelligence and a consciousness does.

    You completely missed the point. It's retarded to make birth a cutoff for abortion because it has nothing to do with the development of a fetus. If a woman somehow managed to carry a fetus for 4 years and it could communicate then it'd be quite a lot more human than if a woman miscarried a 2 week old clump of cells and a hospital somehow managed to keep it alive in an incubator.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:40 No.893899
    >>893889
    >implying animals and plants=humans
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:41 No.893903
    The fully support the unrestrained slaughter of those who did not pass through a cervix.

    DEATH TO THE MOON DEMONS
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:41 No.893904
    >>893896
    Birth isn't the cutoff point for abortion. 3rd trimster is.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:41 No.893907
    >>893884
    Because it's a stupid argument. ALL of my sperm could potentially be a human soon.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:41 No.893908
    >>893892
    And fetuses only become babys when there born. Miscarriages happen all the time, nigger
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:41 No.893909
    I have no current feelings on it either way, but I am pro-choice.

    I don't have any control on what you or anyone else does, in the 60 they were using coat hangers to do abortions themselves, I say if they are going to have an abortion provide the option, don't have the mother die from infection.

    I honestly don't see any reason why people don't agree with this, I can understand not wanting to get a abortion for you or your partner, but you don't have to tell other people what they have to do. It's not in your hands, even if a law was passed that made abortions were illegal, they would swap back to hangars.

    Take your choice, clean equipment and trained doctors, or a hangar and whoever was handy. Not pleasant to think about, but it's how I view it.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:41 No.893910
    >>893884
    no
    bring mo logic to da table
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:42 No.893911
    >>893886
    and i've stated this 4 times and resisted calling you a nigger:
    I AM NOT FUCKING SAYING A FETUS IS A HUMAN
    IT WILL BECOME A HUMAN WITH A MIND AND INTELLIGENCE IN A COUPLE MONTHS
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:42 No.893912
    >>893896
    Stop dabbling in what-ifs

    Until the organism is registered as 'born' then it isn't a child and its fate is ultimately up to the mother.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:42 No.893917
    That is an awful idea, it still there baby too. Anyways I never heard of a guy telling the girl to get an abortion and her not wanting to. If fact I hear about a lot more girls wanting/ getting abortions and the guys not wanting them to. I personally believe aborted embryos/ fetus should be harvesred and used for science.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:43 No.893920
    >>893908
    5% chance of a fetus dying is better than the 99.9999999......99999% chance of a sperm on the floor dying
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:43 No.893921
    >>893896
    Birth isn't the cutoff point for abortion. 3rd trimester is.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:43 No.893923
    >>893904
    It's 3rd trimester or birth. If the baby manages to survive a miscarriage before the 3rd trimester then the parents can't legally abort it even though it's still young enough to be aborted. It's happened.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:43 No.893925
    >>893911
    It might. That decision is up to the mother.

    Unless you think that a women shouldn't have control over what her body does.

    In that case, go die.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:44 No.893930
    >>893911
    Babies don't have intelligence for a couple years, get your facts straight nigger
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:44 No.893932
    >>893925
    >implying a woman should have control over anything
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:44 No.893933
    >>893920
    There isn't any shortage of humans. And there is nothing mystical about reproduction. If the mother doesn't want the child, do not curse the child to a life of being unwanted. And no, you cannot force the mother to want the child.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:45 No.893934
    >>893932
    >implying a woman is worth implying over.

    PARADOX OSHI-
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:45 No.893935
    >>893925
    a mother who aborts isn't "deciding what to do with her body"
    she is deciding what to do with another human's body
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:45 No.893939
    >>893932
    She can have control over how much mayo to put on my sandwich. But that's it!
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:46 No.893941
    >>893930
    facepalm.jpg
    it WILL have intelligence
    that is what i have been getting at for this entire thread
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:46 No.893943
    >>893935
    Uh, until that 'baby' (also, learn what that term actually means) can live independantly of the mother, it is a part of her body.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:46 No.893946
    >>893923
    >or birth

    Are you saying right up until 9 months of pregnancy, it's legal to get an abortion?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:46 No.893949
    >>893941
    >it WILL have intelligence

    Again, by that benchmark then fapping should be illegal because ALL THE POTENTIAL HUMANS OMG.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:47 No.893951
    >>893939She can have control over how much mayo to put on my sandwich. But that's it!

    Fuck that! Bitch better put on exactly the right amount of mayo.

    >>893935
    >implying a fetus is a human

    oh you...
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:47 No.893956
    >>893941
    Babies tend to have high mortality rates. Theres a good chance that (in not 1st world countries) it won't have intelligence.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:48 No.893960
    >>893943
    it will be born no matter what the mom does (except intended abortions like binge drinking and of course, aborting) which is why abortion is wrong
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:48 No.893963
    >>893956
    >implying we're talking about swaziland
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:49 No.893965
    >>893941
    So are you saying anything with intelligence shouldn't be killed? Then I'd like to hear your definition of intelligence please.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:49 No.893967
    >>893960
    Your a fucking nigger. go hang yourself.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:51 No.893976
    Oh goddammit. In order for abortion to be wrong, a fetus must be a human, even if it's a human then humans must have inherent value for aborting them to be wrong. No fetus has ever accomplished anything and you can't prove that humans have inherent value so you can't prove that things are wrong.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:51 No.893977
    >>893965
    self awareness and self control
    (inb4 should retards without either of those be killed, the answer is yes)
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:52 No.893983
    >>893941
    In theory dolphins WILL have intelligence if we let them evolve for a few million more years but we kill them.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:52 No.893984
    >>893977
    lol, so you're pro life but pro killing retards? Are you some kind of super troll?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:53 No.893988
    >>893984
    Nazis were pro-life and pro-killing retards... it isn't exactly unheard of.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:53 No.893991
    >>893988
    Oh god he IS a supertroll.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:53 No.893992
    >>893988
    >implying Nazis didn't troll the whole world
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:53 No.893994
    >>893983
    you kill them, but i don't
    just like you kill babies, but i don't
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:54 No.894002
    >>893984
    i am
    or at least they shouldn't be able to reproduce
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:54 No.894003
    >>893977
    this supports my idea of abortion being legal up until they learn to speak
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:55 No.894004
    >>893994
    You don't kill ANYTHING that could potentially develop intelligence? Are you a breatharian?
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:55 No.894008
    >>893992
    Even death does not stop Hitler from trolling.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:56 No.894020
    >>894003this supports my idea of abortion being legal up until they learn to speak

    What about kids that cannot speak because they're deaf or they have a voicebox problem? What about kids like Hellen Keller that aren't retarded but are really fucked up?

    No.

    Quadratic formula. Solve one or you're abortable.
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:57 No.894027
    >>894020
    *quadratic equation

    fuck it's getting late, trolling is hard
    >> Anonymous 05/07/10(Fri)23:57 No.894029
    >>894004
    >Breatharianism is a related concept, in which believers claim food and possibly water are not necessary, and that humans can be sustained solely by prana (the vital life force in Hinduism), or according to some, by the energy in sunlight. The terms breatharianism or inedia may also refer to this philosophy practised as a lifestyle in place of the usual diet.
    if this is the term you meant, i am not
    i know humans need food and water
    >> Anonymous 05/08/10(Sat)00:02 No.894060
    >>894020
    Yeah. Keller too.
    Actually, what I'd like to do is suck the mammalian brains out and use the rest of the body for clinical studies.
    Longevity, here we go!
    >> Anonymous 05/08/10(Sat)00:03 No.894065
    >>894060
    I've got a straw, ready when you are.
    >> Anonymous 05/08/10(Sat)00:05 No.894085
    The morning after pill is not murder, it is basically a huge dose of birth control pills
    it just prevents her from ovulating and thickens the mucus stuff in the vagina. If the sprem all ready got there then she is fucked. thats why they got to get it asap, and pray she didnt ovulate yet. and 75% of the time when pple have sex without contraception( and not pulling out) it doesnt result in pregnacy or the pregnancy fails so early she did even know she was prego yet, or the they just fail period , in other words only 25% of the time it results in a baby and thats without birth control
    >> Anonymous 05/08/10(Sat)00:06 No.894092
    >>894085

    fuck no there isn't a 25% chance a girl will get pregnant if you have unprotected sex. that is retarded and you should feel bad.
    >> Anonymous 05/08/10(Sat)00:09 No.894109
    >>894092
    Even if you assume it's a VERY healthy girl who is currently VERY fertile and you have the world's largest sploogegasm 25% is quite a high figure.
    >> Anonymous 05/08/10(Sat)00:11 No.894124
    >>893960
    >it will be born no matter what the mom does

    At the expense of the mother.

    Fuck off. Its her body.
    >> Anonymous 05/08/10(Sat)00:13 No.894138
    no its a 25% chance that she will get pregnant AND that the pregnancy wont fail and she does have a still birth.
    >> Anonymous 05/08/10(Sat)00:13 No.894140
    >>894124
    so if you mooched off your mom past, say, 21, she should have the right to murder you?
    it is at the expense of the mother to keep you alive
    >> Anonymous 05/08/10(Sat)00:15 No.894147
    and that 25% is without the moring after pill
    >> Anonymous 05/08/10(Sat)00:15 No.894148
    >>894138
    There's a greater than 50% chance that any fertilization will result in a miscarriage. Even the most fertile woman on the planet on her most fertile day doesn't have a >50% chance of getting fertilized by a single load of batter.
    >> Anonymous 05/08/10(Sat)00:19 No.894180
    >>894148 the most fertile woman on the planet on her most fertile day

    I hate kids and why am I hard?
    >> Anonymous 05/08/10(Sat)00:20 No.894183
    Goddammit. You pro lifers are just as bad as creationists, willfully ignorant. Pick up a fucking textbook.
    >> Anonymous 05/08/10(Sat)00:23 No.894212
    >>894183You pro lifers are just as bad as creationists

    They're...the same people.
    >> Anonymous 05/08/10(Sat)00:24 No.894223
    >>894183
    >implying you can learn your opinion on when a baby is a baby in a textbook
    >implying religion is even related
    you remind me of hitler, just finding a group to blame everything on
    >> Anonymous 05/08/10(Sat)00:25 No.894231
    THIS ENTIRE ARGUMENT IS BASED ON WHEN YOU THINK A BABY BECOMES A BABY
    IT IS YOUR OPINION STOP TRYING TO PERSUADE PEOPLE
    >> Anonymous 05/08/10(Sat)00:33 No.894296
    got to the thread late

    are there really any scientific pro-lifers in here?
    I'm really interested in what you have to say.

    I don't give a shit about what any religious folks think, their arguments are obviously based on their beliefs which aren't scientific or rational.



    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]
    Watched Threads
    PosterThread Title
    [V][X]AnonymousAbortion?
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous