| >> |
03/01/12(Thu)20:02 No.4423176>>4423013
red without loss of generality
6 red (from yours) = 5 red, 1 not red or 6 red (from red’s)
4 red, 2 not red (from yours) = 3 red, 3 not red or 4 red, 2 not red (from red’s or not red’s)
2 red, 4 not red (from yours) = 1 red, 5 not red or 2 red, 4 not red (from red's or not red's)
For
majority cases, plan for the individual to say the majority. Unless
it's in the extreme case, there should always be a color that is in
twos. Designate a system in which, when a split case occurs, one color
will have priority over the other (white > red), so anyone who sees a
split says the color that is in higher priority.
In one
perspective, the most extreme case would be all 6 having the different
colors. Plan to have a 'settled' word that anyone who sees all different
colors uses. Let this color be white.
Basically, say the
majority, and everyone else will do the same, guaranteeing at least one
will get it right (Dunno how to prove this, but it seems it can work?).
If one person sees a split, say the one in higher priority. |
