aww shiiit not his one again. hve to commit that i lold though. sage

I'm a shut-in

Because they're not.

Also nobody here is intelligent.

Thread's logic: I am an intelligent person, women claim to be attracted to intelligence, but they are not attracted to me, ergo women are not attracted to intelligence.

>>3579848
4chan logic: women are attracted to things that are not me.

Because they're not attracted to intelligence

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/article5537017.ece

Because the so called intelligent people aren't smart enough to get a girlfriend.

I'm not single. And being smart has gotten me laid many times.

umad, notassmartasyoutellyourselfyouarefags?

>>3579854

That is called 'the truth'

it's bothersome how I know some people that can accurately predict your next chess move or solve a calculus equation in their head in a matter of seconds, yet get stumped when it comes to figuring out how to talk to women. it really bothers me.

>>3579835
They're attracted to a very particular kind of intelligent
i.e. the intelligence to be able to attract a women

scifags have their minds set to physics and shit, not social success

why do people bother replying at all?

needs moar social intelligence

>>3579887
You know, I've thought about this a lot and I realized it because they're unable to lie effectively. The reason they have so much trouble is because they're straight forward and are unable to properly wear a social mask like the rest of society. Its sad, but true.

>>3579903
According to some research, they're more likely to tell lies:

>http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/oup/cercor/2009/00000019/00000007/art00010
>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703880304575236171715034884.html
>http://www.brainx.com/resources/blog/bid/51476/Brain-Research-on-Intelligence-and-Working-Memory
-IQ-is-fixed-by-the-age-of-15-Myth

>>3579917
>According to some research, they're more likely to tell lies
According to the articles you posted, they're more capable of telling believable lies, but does not mean they tell more lies.
But a big part is social intelligence. They don't know WHEN to lie. they don't know what women are looking for.
I've been around a terrible awkward person who was very smart. He told a girl "that shirt really make your pop out more, its nice." When he saw how she reacted, he realized that he said something retarded.
They're too straight forward.

>>3579943
>"that shirt really makes your breasts pop out more, its nice"
fixed

OP is spammer

I live in Los Angeles. If you want hot women you need to be in the entertainment industry, preferably movies. You should have gone to law school and been a movie agent at CC/ICM. Women want to be famous not live with a nerd that works for Boeing.

You need to put yourself in situations where you're going to meet girls who ARE attracted to intelligence. You have to make yourself known to them as intelligent by appealing to things they're actually interested in as well. You're not going to win over an English major by explaining your physics research, but if you talked to a female gamer about a game you were writing in your spare time you might make some progress. In addition, you have to meet at least their minimum standards in other areas, obviously you're going to do better if you look better and can keep up a conversation with them. Don't expect to just win people over by running around a university campus yelling about your latest accomplishments, you need to bring everything up in natural conversation.

>>3580054
why do people think that some women, any women, are attracted to intelligence? they are attracted to signs of social status/dominance.

u mirin bro?

>>3579835
>>3579835
>>3579835
>>3579835
>>3579835
>>3579835
>>3579835
>>3579835

LOL where did you see that? women are not necessarily attracted to intelligence, i'd say very few are AND it is usually a secondary characteristic being beauty or wealth the first one.

Women are not attracted to intelligence. They are attracted to the benefits that intelligence may bring if you use it wisely.

/thread

>>3580165
Fuck off back to /b/.

You're a fucking awful shitposter on /v/, and by using that shit-tier forced /fit/ meme, you have confirmed yourself to be a stupid faggot. Literally, you are cancer on 4chan.

Get out. Filtered.

>>3580189
see
>>3580182
being a fat neckbeard virgin hurts bro?

>>3580165

He died bro, shit's sad.

>>3580203
>sad
Best thing to ever happen to 4chan. Except for the filter, of course.

Also
>implying he isn't hiding and circlejerking over the responses on Youtube so he can make another faggot video of himself with his steroids and make another attempt to make himself a forced meme, with mandatory 'u mad bro, u jelly brah, come at me bro' and various other shit.

As a female, I can say I've met very few intelligent males.

>>3580189
see
>>3580182
being a fat neckbeard virgin hurts bro?

5434534

>>3580223

http://www.smh.com.au/executive-style/culture/blogs/all-men-are-liars/zyzz-ripped-from-this-life-too
-young-20110811-1ioik.html

>>3580226

>>3580235
>Aziz "Zyzz" Sergeyevich Shavershian
Lol'd

>I remember picking up the paper that morning thinking "Sweet baby Jesus, this kid is ripped" - which apparently is known as "mirin" aka "admiring" - in the lexicon of Zyzz, his brother and their friends.
Credibility lost.

>>3579835
women are attracted to those who are big pimpin...
if JZ was made popular saying he's handsome like Vega from street fighter... women would believe it..

>>3580246

http://www.news.com.au/national/after-aziz-zyzz-sergeyevich-shavershian-dies-in-thailand-customs-rev
eals-steroid-abuse-is-skyrocketing/story-e6frfkvr-1226114913389

>>3580102

Its not the only thing you need, or even the primary thing you need, but it certainly helps with certain girls if you can use it in the right context. Again, you still need to meet their standards in other areas.

>>3580226
I don't think there are many intelligent males majoring in Cooking

>>3580252
Poor guy. He's a cunt, and I'm glad he's dead.

However, just think of all the sex he could have had if he wasn't trying to make himself a forced meme by rejecting females after instigating flirting with them. Even the most confident of us can die as virgins.

Let this be a lesson to us all.

>Don't try to be a faggot
>Don't be a faggot
>Don't do steroids
>Don't use memes
>Don't be a faggot who uses memes

Apparently, beta = stupid.

Makes sense to me. If you were so smart, why can't you figure out how to stop being pathetic?

>>3580274
This is now a Pony thread.

>>3580265
This pretty much proves my point.

Because intelligence knows better than to find companionship.

>>3579835
women are not attracted to Good looks or intellegence alone. We've seen or have heard women bash good looking men by calling them "Homosexuals" and or of that types who are attracted to their own gender in homosexual ways... or simply GAY. What's an intelligent man, it depends on the man himself.
Women are however attracted to Big pimpin and some to a "DESTINY"...
if there was a Hype that now Jay-Z was similar to Vega from street fighter. He'd be the new playboy and he is a sucessful "Businessman"...

Basically someone who buds in the way, women may not like em (At first)... but they get all the women and your "Women" Become "Bitches" ... Demeaning.

Therefore learn to glamourize urselves...

>>3580269
not sure if troll or just very retarded

>>3579903
Probably this, I find myself correcting people too often, saying I don't care, I don't know, avoiding criticize others, etc.
Saying I find no reason to drink alcohol, to "go partying"...I'm the friend people call to do sports, climb mountains, go to jog, to the theater, but nobody call me to "hang around".
Do social skills comprehend all that stuff?

>>3580269

>implying sex is the most important thing in life and not leaving a legacy
>implying he didn't do a pretty good job of leaving himself a legacy compared to you

>>3580297
Not a single soul on /sci/ knows what a woman wants. Do us all a favor and buy yourself a tall, frothy glass of shut the fuck up.

>>3580280
u mad sis? einstein = male, tesla = male

checkmate?

>>3579840
>>3579841
>>3579848
>>3579854
>>3579860
>>3579876
>>3579835
... etc...
to those who think OH hahaha no Sir, I don't have to worry, I have a wife and a dozen kids..

wait till that comes around and you're powerless to make a move against such behavior and profane...

go abroad OP (specifically southeast asia, the phillipines, or eastern europe), where your ability to provide is the main factor women will look for in a mate.

>>3580317
>leaving a legacy
You mean being an egotistical faggot with calves the size of my wrists, pumped full of steroids, dying before most people on /sci/, all for the sake of looking like a faggot and using memes in real life?

They'll write books about him. There will be an MMORPG made based on his adventures.

>>3580360
What does
>leaving a legacy
have remotely to do with
>being an egotistical faggot with calves the size of my wrists, pumped full of steroids, dying before most people on /sci/, all for the sake of looking like a faggot and using memes in real life?

Wow. You're touched, kid.

>>3580376
What does
>leaving a legacy
have remotely to do with
>being a faggot dancing on cam with fake tan, steroid body and using memes in real l ife

Wow. You're a faggot.

>>3580319
I do agree, that throughout history the most amazing ideas, the brightest minds and most interesting and complex theories have mostly came from males. It's undeniable, I have no problem with that.

It still doesn't change the fact that I, myself, have met very very few males who display genuine intelligence.

>>3580392

>>3580376

The point is that it got people talking about him, and people are still talking about him.

>>3580400
Randi Altschul, Mary Anderson, Virginia Apgar, Barbara Askins, Patricia Bath, Miriam E. Benjamin, Patricia Billings, Katherine Blodgett, Bessie Blount, Sarah Boone, Rachel Fuller Brown, Josephine Garis Cochran, Martha. J Coston, Dianne Croteau, Marie Curie, Marion Donovan, Gertrude Belle Elion, Edith Flanigen, Helen Free, Sally Fox, Frances Gabe, Lillian Gilbreth, Sarah E. Goode, Bette Nesmith Graham, Temple Grandin, KK Gregory, Ruth Handler, Elizabeth Lee Hazen, Beulah Henry, Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin, Krisztina Holly, Erna Schneider Hoover, Grace Hopper, Mary Phelps Jacob, Amanda Theodosia Jones, Marjorie Stewart Joyner, Anna Keichline, Mary Kies, Gabriele Knecht, Margaret Knight, Stephanie Louise Kwolek, Hedy Lamarr, Ada Lovelace, Subilla Masters, Ann Moore, Krysta Morlan, Ellen Ochoa, and Alice Parker would like to have a word with you.

>>3580434
Convincing stupid faggots to talk about things is easy.

>this thread
>getting responses

>>3580456

You'd be hard pressed to make them talk about you.

In terms of IQ, men are dominant at both ends of the bell curve. Whereas women are more distributed around the mean. This means theres more genius men but also more incredibly stupid men. So it make sense there will be more amazing breakthroughs made by men, despite equal opportunity.

>>3580464
Why do you keep replying in defence of some thin-as-fuck dead faggot who abused steroids for his ego? What stake do you have in this?

You must be one of those stupid faggots I mentioned.

ahem more stuff..
Women are attracted to "basic or primitve needs"... they're more explicitly displayed by ppl who are still stupid/less evolved and display primitive nature out in the open.
So for basics it'd be,
He got money, he got big house, etc etc...
and perhaps women have a little understanding on what a life of luxury means...

Intelligence in the introverted neckbearery sense, no.

Intelligence in the renaissance man sense, sure.

Being a physics PhD or something similar is one thing, but quietly being the most interesting man in the room is another.
>Speak multiple languages
>Be licensed to do cool things like a scuba certification, pilot's license, falconry, or something similar
>Pick up a cool sport. I can't handle a ball to save my life but fencing seems to be my niche. Try finswimming, crew rowing, or something
>Dress well, but like you don't give a fuck. I wear white pants more often than I likely should, but it still rocks. Vintage military pilot's jackets look sweet if you can pull off the look, extra points if you're a licensed pilot
>Learn to drink. I don't mean how to hold your liquor, but learn to appreciate good drink. Learning a few things about beer, wine, whisk(e)y, etc. can go a long way
>Learn to cook. It's actually a lot like organic chemistry so it comes rather naturally to some scientists.

Women aren't impressed with what your WoW character can do, but they are impressed with what you can do.

>>3580472
Why do you keep replying in arrogance with sore words like "faggot" and "ego" and such sprinkled readily throughout?

>>3580488
Ah, so you don't have a point at all. You can't explain why you care so much, you resort to shitposting.

I guess everyone who has ever been talked about on 4chan has left a legacy too, right?

>>3580488
>>3580472

See? I've got people supporting me on this (in before samefag I can't prove to you it's not). I'm no genius but I'm not stupid. I study math and I pay my tuition fees through the stock market.

lol

For the love of god.
This is the last time:

When a woman says "intelligent men" they mean a cool guy with six pack making good jokes.

Believe me they dont care if you have 170IQ or if you do impossible mathematics and physics, etc etc etc, they just want a guy that entertains them with his humor.

Please stop asking this stupid question.

>>3582028
pretty much this
no point of this thread anymore.
Question answered.

>All women are attracted to intelligence.
>Most of us here interact with women enough to hook up.
We're all too busy posting instead of chillin wit bitchez. If you increase the frequency of interaction with girls, the higher the chance is that you will hook up.
X^3 = [Tw / (Tw + ¬(Tw))] * ( √B + (1/2) * √S )
x^3 = sexy time
Tw = Time with women
B = Body Impressiveness Percentile
S = Intelligence Percentile
B and S are are {S, B | 0 ≤ S ≤ 100, 0 ≤ B ≤ 100}

Let's assume a fair time balance of [Tw / (Tw + ¬(Tw))]
= 10.7142%
I got this number from the following scheme of hours spent per day in a week:
Sn= 0, M= 0, T= 4, W= 0, Th= 4, F= 4, S=6
Tw / Week = 18h
A week has 168 hours
So, [Tw / (Tw + ¬(Tw))] = 18/168 = 3/28
Assuming passing low end B = 40th Percentile and S = 10th Percentile,
we get x^3 = 0.8470 This is my approximation of the minimum threshhold of x^3 that we must achieve in order to be attractive to women.

on /sci/,
{[Tw / (Tw + ¬(Tw))] | 0 ≤ [Tw / (Tw + ¬(Tw))] << 0.001}
{S | 40 ≤ S ≤ 99} {B | 0.001 ≤ B ≤ 50}
(The exception to B is for engineers, but they are gay.)
So in the best case scenario on /sci/,
x^3 = 0.001 * (√50 + 0.5*√99)
x^3 = 0.01204 << 0.8470.
So in my projected best case scenario, a /sci/ posesses insufficient qualities to be attractive to women. ∎

>>3582596
>I got this number from the following scheme of hours spent per day in a week:
Sn= 0, M= 0, T= 4, W= 0, Th= 4, F= 4, S=6
Omg this is wen i see my gf

>>3582028
And if your good looking girls will find your jokes hilarious no matter how lame they are

>>3582596
>>3582596
I was about tell OP to fuck off and die when I saw this:
>X^3 = [Tw / (Tw + ¬(Tw))] * ( √B + (1/2) * √S )

I'm curious, where does that come from?

>>3582806
He pulled it out of his ass, you dipshit.

>>3582806
>>3582813
>X^3 = [Tw / (Tw + ¬(Tw))] * ( √B + (1/2) * √S )
Lets look at √B. The common trend is that if you have a better body than some, it's good. As you surpass a larger % of individuals, the difference is less significant since you are already better then more and more ppl, so you are less and less more sexy to a girl. The same can be applied to √S. If you are second last, its is a huge difference from being last, compared to increasing intelligence percentile from 60 to 61. The exception in both cases is being the best. I didnt bother factoring this in, and my equation is vastly simplified, but i believe it holds for average quantities like percentiles of 50. ( √B + (1/2) * √S ) is multiplied by [Tw / (Tw + ¬(Tw))] which is a time ratio. The more time you spend with girls, the higher the chance is that you will be attractive to girl(s). Simply put: what you are, given by ( √B + (1/2) * √S ), multiplied to the amount of time you spend with girls in a given time frame, is your attractiveness to girls. (x^3 has no units since hours / hours cancels out.). I guess x^3 can be seen as success with girls, and not attractiveness to girls.

>>3582596
Theres no way intelligence is half as important as looks

>>3582995
lolno

Personality/sense of humor on the other hand, yeah.

>>3582995
>Theres no way intelligence is half as important as looks
It depends. There is a finite set of girls who would consider this to be true. We can state that B and S are both multiplied by a consideration factor k and w. We now have:
X^3 = [Tw / (Tw + ¬(Tw))] * ( k√B + w√S )
B and S are not the only factors that girls look at. I couldn't think of any before, but z√W where W = wealth is a factor. The only way to complete the set of possible factors is an exhaustive inquiry to all girls (their brains, not what they say.). We can make a general form of the equation as:
x^3= [Tw / (Tw + ¬(Tw))]*Σk(p)^z
where p = the percentile of a factor of interest given all available men
z = the exponent which scales the change in significance as percentile increases. (I used z = 0.5, I imagine 0<z<1) increase in z decreases the significance change later on and makes less impressive men in that category more valuable.
k = a constant which determines how much a woman values any given p, relative to all other k in the sum.

This is starting to get interesting.

>>3583181
>I imagine 0<z<1
I dont think you should restrict z. z = -1 means a girl wants the worst guy out there. That could happen as some kinda freak humanitarian if its for the body. z = 2 means the girl would always want better more, like with wealth.

when girls say intelligence they mean ability to make loads of cash

when girls say personality they means giving her all your cash

>>3583275

Congratulations, you have broken the code.

>>3583263
Good point.
Also, the percentile p is determined by each girl and what she considers to be better, for any given factor. I believe it will always be a percentile when a factor is considered. If a girl thinks you're just hot, it either means she'll fuck anyone or there is actually a comparison being made in her mind that she is not aware of. Thus, it is almost always a comparison meaning that a better and worse will almost always exist. It follows that a percentile can be formed. If she'll fuck anyone or has an indifference to any p, then z = 0.