To print higher-resolution math symbols, click the
Hi-Res Fonts for Printing button on the jsMath control panel.

jsMath
Loading jsMath...



Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Verification
Get a new challenge Get an audio challengeGet a visual challenge Help
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Use TeX/jsMath with the [math] (inline) and [eqn] (block) tags. Double-click equations to view the source.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • File : 1310088957.jpg-(725 KB, 4272x2848, IMG_8974.jpg)
    725 KB STS-135 Dual board coverage Flight 07/07/11(Thu)21:35 No.3351628  
    Good morning anons.
    It is 10am here in Northern Japan. I am flight, back from the dead as it were to cover the launch day activities.

    Currently it is 77 degrees at KSC with light rain and wind blowing from the east at 10Mph.

    Still forecasting a 30% go for tomorrow.

    Right now prefueling has begun and streams are all running.

    There was a pad lightning strike yesterday but the crews are not working any issues. Which means the tower did not get a strike.

    Here is a link to the major streams:

    http://mcc.ocs.nl/

    (Yes, I am mad over the house plan to slash budget. Didn't we just lock in the budget for the next 2 years? POLITICS)
    >> Flight 07/07/11(Thu)21:43 No.3351674
    This video just pisses me off:

    http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/videogallery/index.html?media_id=99084281
    >> Flight 07/07/11(Thu)21:53 No.3351728
    Engineering Review Board Meeting Ends With Decision to Continue With Launch Preparations
    Fri, 08 Jul 2011 06:45:59 AM GMT+0900

    Space Shuttle Atlantis launch preparations continue on schedule despite inclement weather near the launch pad near midday Thursday.

    As engineers prepared to move the Rotating Service Structure away from Atlantis, a severe thunderstorm passed overhead, delivering rain and lightning that produced two strikes near the launch pad.

    Data review showed the two strikes occurred at 12:31 p.m. and 12:40 p.m. EDT. The first struck the water tower 515 feet (157 meters) from the pad and the second struck the beach area northeast of the pad.

    So far, the data review indicates no issues with any systems, including shuttle Atlantis, External Tank, Solid Rocket Boosters, Space Shuttle Main Engines or Ground Support Equipment.

    Review of the data will occur again during the traditional “Tanking Weather Meeting” scheduled for 1:30 a.m. Friday, which is the point where managers will decide to proceed with fueling Atlantis’ tank ahead of launch. Fueling is scheduled to start at 2:01 a.m. Friday leading to launch at 11:26 a.m.
    >> Flight 07/07/11(Thu)22:03 No.3351763
    Possibility of a scrub is coming up over the audios.
    >> Flight 07/07/11(Thu)22:08 No.3351787
    Little goody for those with google earth:
    http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/shuttle/shuttlemissions/shuttle_google_earth.html
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/07/11(Thu)22:18 No.3351853
    >>3351787
    >http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/shuttle/shuttlemissions/shuttle_google_earth.html
    This is awesome. Thanks.
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)04:58 No.3353671
    >>3351853
    No problem.

    6 hours 30 minutes till launch

    MPS ET Ullage pressure Transducer number 4 has been verified
    More info to come.
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)05:01 No.3353685
    Coming up on the T minus 3 hours and holding.

    Now
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)05:05 No.3353697
    Final inspection of the Pad Gantry is underway.

    Transponders are switching to launch freqs.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)05:13 No.3353733
    What are you doing in Japan?
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)05:15 No.3353738
    >>3353733
    I work in telecommunications.

    I live in northern Japan and was affected by the tsunami. So my apologies for not giving coverage for the last one. We only recently got internet back in our area.
    Lots of chatter as the close out crew does their thing.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)05:19 No.3353749
    >>3353738

    That's cool. I was just curious because I had visited Japan once and loved it. The vending machines make me so happy.

    Well anyway, I don't want to derail the thread.
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)05:20 No.3353751
         File1310116807.jpg-(83 KB, 600x750, 1265522106625.jpg)
    83 KB
    Launch probability is now at 60% chance of a go for launch.
    6 hours 10 minutes till the launch of the space shuttle.

    As this is my last one, And until the major milestone is passed. I'm gonna start posting some golden oldies from previous launch attempts (Mostly minor memes that were made from Kathy winters and other things)
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)05:27 No.3353768
         File1310117248.jpg-(16 KB, 400x300, vlcsnap-01145.jpg)
    16 KB
    Just an update, all launch criteria in the green right now.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)05:33 No.3353783
    GOOOOOOOOOOO NASA!
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)05:43 No.3353811
         File1310118235.jpg-(32 KB, 424x268, C2.jpg)
    32 KB
    Currently no issues are being worked.

    Atlantis Tank Filled, Managers Continue to Monitor Weather
    Fri, 08 Jul 2011 06:29:34 PM GMT+0900

    Fueling of space shuttle Atlantis’s external fuel tank with 535,000 gallons of super cold liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen was completed slightly ahead of schedule at 4:58 a.m. EDT. Tanking began on time at NASA Kennedy Space Center’s Launch Pad 39A at 2:01 a.m. EDT. The launch team continues to closely monitor the weather throughout the process. Weather remains at a 30 percent chance of favorable weather for liftoff at 11:26 a.m. Teams are not working any issues that would delay the launch.
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)05:49 No.3353829
    Nice discussion with Charlie Thompson. No issues being worked ATT.

    CRT Timer setup is complete. Flight crew is being eval'd and readied. Breakfeast is soon. Fun times.

    Pad crew en-route to CRTCC ATT.
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)05:59 No.3353853
    FCO abort advisory checks are being completed at flight control in Houston.
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)06:14 No.3353880
    Fun update. We had a valve on the ET close unexpectedly

    Valve issue explained as the fuel tank pressure triggered the TCS system to cycle the valve properly.
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)06:28 No.3353906
    Launch Team Monitors Weather
    Fri, 08 Jul 2011 07:20:03 PM GMT+0900

    Inside the Launch Control Center at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida, the launch team continues to closely monitor the weather. The forecast remains at 30 percent chance of favorable conditions for liftoff at 11:26 a.m. EDT. Teams are not working any issues that would delay the launch of space shuttle Atlantis on mission STS-135, the final flight of the Space Shuttle Program.

    Earlier this morning at Launch Pad 39A, filling of Atlantis' external fuel tank with 535,000 gallons of super-cold liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen began on time at 2:01 a.m. and was completed slightly ahead of schedule at 4:58 a.m.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)06:36 No.3353923
    >>3351674

    Have you called yourself flight because you love to fly and/or "only feel complete while being up in the sky"? I ask this because that is how flight effects me.
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)06:38 No.3353927
         File1310121529.jpg-(2.97 MB, 4000x3000, 1265525750602.jpg)
    2.97 MB
    >>3353923
    I was called flight on /g/ because during one launch I posted the picture of the flight directors handbook.
    The name stuck after that
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)06:46 No.3353949
    45 minutes till countdown resumes and we come out of the hold.
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)06:54 No.3353980
    bit of a worrying trend developing:

    http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?rid=mlb&product=N0R&overlay=11101111&loop=no

    Looks like some weather might be moving in by launch time...

    Could spell issues for launch
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)06:59 No.3353991
    /g/ thread is strongest!
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)07:02 No.3353997
    >>3353991
    The very same thread I am running. I'm trying dual coverage.

    /g/ is the home for launch coverage though. I'm just trying to see if /sci/ generates enough interest to actually move launch and flight coverage to here (Though I likely won't since all I have to look forward to now are unmanned flights)
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)07:15 No.3354037
    >>3353997
    what a pro....
    where did you get the flight book/manual thingy anyways?
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)07:16 No.3354044
    >>3354037
    L2.

    I have a free account due to being military.
    You have to pay for services otherwise.
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)07:29 No.3354096
    Astronauts Prepare to Head to the Launch Pad
    Fri, 08 Jul 2011 08:20:05 PM GMT+0900

    Space shuttle Atlantis' astronauts are donning their orange launch-and-entry suits in crew quarters and are set to depart at 7:36 a.m. EDT for Launch Pad 39A. The crew will begin boarding Atlantis at 8:06 a.m.

    Inside the Launch Control Center at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida, the launch team continues to closely monitor the weather. The forecast remains 30 percent "go" with a concern for showers and thunderstorms within 20 nautical miles of the Shuttle Landing Facility, flight through precipitation, and cumulus clouds. Liftoff time is 11:26 a.m. Teams are not working any issues that would delay the launch of Atlantis on mission STS-135, the final flight of the Space Shuttle Program.
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)07:38 No.3354119
    Crew enroute COLA ID Kicked off.
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)07:45 No.3354139
    >>3353927
    that's...
    I have no words to describe how good that is. Please tell me there is some way of obtaining that short of killing a crew member
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)07:56 No.3354160
    >Didn't we just lock in the budget for the next 2 years?
    No and the House plan will be changed don't get mad until something gets signed into law.
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)07:56 No.3354161
         File1310126179.jpg-(690 KB, 2000x1500, DSCF0376.jpg)
    690 KB
    >>3354139
    lol. Subscribe to L2 on nasaspaceflight.com

    Here is my battlestation btw:
    >> Scia 07/08/11(Fri)08:00 No.3354174
    >>3354044
    Yeah I have L2 as well but I have to pay for it.

    Also they are supposed to announce the SLS design today.
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)08:04 No.3354185
    >>3354161
    :o
    I have my PC on the left of a large black widescreen monitor and a smaller siver 4:3 monito, and with a bookcase to the right of that. Who's the picture on the wall of?
    >> Scia 07/08/11(Fri)08:06 No.3354192
    >>3354185
    NASA administrator bolden
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)08:06 No.3354194
    >>3354185
    Bolden.

    What you don't see is the dartboard cut into a rectangle and the darts ready to be thrown at him lol.

    Here is my more in depth coverage thread:
    >>>/g/18642343
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)08:06 No.3354198
    >>3354192
    Ahah. Why him?
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)08:07 No.3354206
    >>3354198
    Because
    dartboard
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)08:08 No.3354210
    >>3354206
    oh, he's that guy.
    >> Scia 07/08/11(Fri)08:08 No.3354212
    >>3354191
    Please stop trolling it's pathetic how obvious it is.

    the USA is the only nation developing BEO systems.

    We are also developing LEO systems that are cheaper and more advanced then anyone else.

    and about the German Tech
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_H._Goddard
    >> Scia 07/08/11(Fri)08:09 No.3354216
    >>3354194
    Why do you hate Bolden?
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)08:11 No.3354221
    >>3354216
    >>3354212
    /sci/ seem to think you've dissapeared. Thought you should know.
    >> Scia 07/08/11(Fri)08:15 No.3354236
    >>3354221
    Well I was over at krautchan.

    The people there actually know more about science then the people here.

    Most of them know calculus
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)08:17 No.3354244
    >>3354212

    So what? there was a yank playing with fire crackers.

    Im talking about this fello (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun) and all the others.
    Americans only BUY. they cant be like the german.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)08:18 No.3354245
    >>3354244
    Go away, /v/. You make us look bad.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)08:23 No.3354259
         File1310127802.jpg-(56 KB, 1126x720, Saturn_V-Shuttle-Ares_I-Ares_V(...).jpg)
    56 KB
    So, what does /sci/ think of the Ares program?
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)08:23 No.3354260
    http://www.onlinestupidity.com/

    This should be interesting for everyone here. Do not pay attention to the name of the link, it's related to the OP.
    >> Scia 07/08/11(Fri)08:24 No.3354262
    >>3354244
    Yanks built the Space shuttle the most complex Machine ever built.

    Von Braun was retired at that time as well
    >> Scia 07/08/11(Fri)08:26 No.3354270
    >>3354259
    Cancelled and Shit Design.

    SLS will be better
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)08:27 No.3354271
    >>3354259
    What Ares program LOL

    It was scrubbed
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)08:28 No.3354275
    >>3351628
    Is NASA AE-2 streaming for anyone? It won't even show up for me.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)08:28 No.3354276
    >>3354262

    most complex machine ever?? jeez you really must be a nationalist yank from texas aint ya?

    The spaceshuttle is nutting but a truck on steroids guided by a calculator.

    Dont believe everything theyr saying cuz. thats NOT the most complex machine.
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)08:30 No.3354283
    >>3354275
    No stream is down. They are showing a delta pad right now. Stick to the highbays for launch site coverage.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)08:30 No.3354285
    >>3354276
    But Texas is in the south!
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)08:31 No.3354288
    >>3354236
    agreed. 4chan/sci/ is one of, if not the least educated science boards on the entire internets.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)08:31 No.3354290
    >>3354270
    But isn't SLS and Ares essentially the same thing?

    Last I heard, the Constellation Program was scrubbed but not the whole system.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)08:31 No.3354292
    Inb4 NASA kills their own astronaughts which lets them close the space budget which lets them spend all their money on space nukes and wars.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)08:32 No.3354295
    I'm glad they cancelled the space program, it was doing no good for our race. That money should be put to better use such as churches.
    >> Flight 07/08/11(Fri)08:33 No.3354297
    >>3354290
    They are pretty much.

    Congress is making threats once again. I hear they've cancelled the webb telescope (Hubbles replacement)
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)08:35 No.3354304
    This is just one of the countless threads that have plagued /sci/ for days, and quite frankly, I'm tired of people coming to NASA's rescue when the majority of the scientific community is rejoicing is end. First of all, the whole idea of NASA has been romanticized by the idea of the Moon and the Space Shuttle, when in reality, private industry is more capable of taking man in to space. Forcing NASA out of the game puts pressure on private industry to move into space. Secondly, NASA is a pawn of the government; if you expect any "progress" from NASA, you best wait a very long time. As soon as private industry realizes the benefits of space, it is going to streamline any and all things regarding space.

    The end of the shuttle era and the downsizing of NASA should be welcomed. It means the space community is being pushed toward the private sector
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)08:38 No.3354312
    >>3354283
    I can't figure out what the first 3 highbay feeds are of. They look like some kind of fabrication bay.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)08:39 No.3354319
         File1310128794.jpg-(126 KB, 450x373, dumbestever.jpg)
    126 KB
    >>3354304
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)08:39 No.3354320
    >>3354297
    Funding for it wasn't approved by the congressional sub-committee, so as things currently stand we'll be without a decent orbital telescope when Hubble dies. Hopefully it'll be added again at some stage, given it seems to be an entirely unworthy scapegoat.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)08:40 No.3354323
    >>3354304

    i agree with you anon. nasa had its run and it did a very good job considering the funding it had. but youre right. if the US is going to make any progress toward space, it better get away from politics.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)08:40 No.3354326
    >>3354304
    >Private sector
    There's already plenty of pioneers in the private sector. Thing is, it's expensive as shit to get out of Earth's gravity. The profit margin is very low once you amount all the expenses, so only huge corporations can afford to go from designs to actual launch.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)08:45 No.3354343
    >>3354326

    True. The cost per kg to get into LEO is only affordable by huge corporations. But private sector is much more streamlined and improves technology much faster than NASA does. The dwindling costs of NASA have prevented it from making any vast improvements to NASA. Now that NASA doesn't have a shuttle program to worry about, it can focus all of its attention on the research the private industry needs to take off. I do not disagree that NASA is important, it is just much better at doing research than pioneering engineering feats such as the space shuttle. Such programs just take away funds for real scientific progress such as the JWST.
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)08:48 No.3354357
    >>3354343
    The shuttle was supposed to act as a re-orbital satellite as well as a transport vehicle, if I remember correctly. That role looks like it's going to be taken by the X-35 orbital shuttle that the US military seem to have made without anyone noticing.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)08:49 No.3354360
    >>3354357

    Even better. At least the huge military budget is taking advantage of the end of the shuttle program. And it is still an improvement to old technology
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)08:50 No.3354364
    >>3354357

    Wasn't the X-35 orbital shuttle designed by Boeing?
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)08:52 No.3354370
    >>3354364
    Sounds about right. Its flight path was kept classified but some amateur astronomers found it in LEO, which I think is pretty gosh darned cool.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)08:52 No.3354372
    >>3354343
    >it is just much better at doing research than pioneering engineering feats such as the space shuttle
    That's really all they've been doing. I really wanted them to see them set up camp on the moon. For research, I mean.

    It'll be interesting to see how the private sector will develop. I think it'll be some time before the corporations push the funds into the sector. It's a lot of money we're talking about here.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)09:06 No.3354415
    >>3354372

    True. But I think the fact that they are no longer governed by a system that can't prioritize anything (the fed) will open huge doors
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)09:14 No.3354452
    >>3354415
    I think the doors you symbolize as the Government is just replaced by corporate greed (and it's owners). They only look at profit. If it's not looking good, they won't do it (unless they're extremely ambitious).

    I'm not an economist, but I can say it will delay actual progress on the private sector significantly.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)09:22 No.3354474
    >>3354452

    That may be true. I didn't say the government has to stop investing in science. That would be a horrible idea, considering they're really the only big investors. NASA/DARPA/mil investing into private corporations for the technology to go to space is a vastly better idea. X-37 is government funded, manufactured by Boeing, and it is expected to be a huge improvement over the shuttle. It would enable NASA to focus on scientific research. Furthermore, the military has already proven the benefits of moving to private industry for technology: all fighter aircraft.
    >> deleted 07/08/11(Fri)10:29 No.3354706
    excuse my retartedness
    What is their mission ?
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)10:30 No.3354710
    >>3354706
    Bring stuff to ISS
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)10:34 No.3354723
    god damn holding.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)10:36 No.3354732
    Did he say the engines will work in 104%?
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)10:39 No.3354746
    >>3354723
    >T-Minus 9 minutes..

    Fuck yeah, i might stay up and watch this

    >..and holding for 40 minutes

    What the fuck? What does that even mean?
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)10:40 No.3354752
    >>3354746
    They're making sure all systems are working and synchronised.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)10:41 No.3354762
    45 minutes left?

    Ugh
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)10:42 No.3354766
    >>3354732
    After it clears some atmospheric pressure zone it will throttle up
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)10:42 No.3354768
    >>3354732
    100% is what the engines were designed for. Later tests showed they could operate faster safely. They did not re-scale the engine output so the same percents would still correspond to the same lbs of thrust.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)10:43 No.3354774
    THE ONLY SOUDTRACK FOR THIS!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-I4da00W9fU
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)10:50 No.3354811
    >>3354706
    anyone care to clear this up? I'm interested as well.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)10:51 No.3354817
    I think its funny how when ever theres a flight, all the stupid people suddenly think they know anything about spaceflight and what NASA should be doing
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)10:51 No.3354821
    >>3354811
    loads of science experiments
    loads of food and water and oxigen

    and that's it

    ALSO t-6
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)10:52 No.3354824
    >>3354821
    more like T - 34...
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)10:53 No.3354827
    >>3354821
    they are also bringing back a broken ammonia pump to find out why it failed
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)10:53 No.3354829
    >>3354817
    I see you're monitoring /v/, too.

    >>>/v/101715051
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)10:53 No.3354833
    >>3354706
    Need to repair an environmental pump module on the ISS as well
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)10:57 No.3354850
    Why do they stop?
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)10:58 No.3354865
    >>3354850
    Waiting for weather and enviromental report from Houston.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)10:59 No.3354874
    >>3354865
    In general. Why is this the last launch?
    Money?
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)10:59 No.3354875
    >>3354865
    The current forecast is that they CAN launch, if you haven't seen.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:01 No.3354882
    >>3354874

    Obama being an idiot and totally fucking over the space program.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:01 No.3354883
    >>3354850
    A switching problem. They had to reboot their computers and do some checks again. They would be fine if nothing else went wrong, but they don't want to chance it.
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)11:03 No.3354890
    >>3354882
    The shuttle program is massively bloated, nobody who knows their shit prefers the shuttle to the next gen rockets NASA are going to be using. The shuttle was, in theory, great. In practice, it's significantly more expensive than single use rockets.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:04 No.3354894
    i dont udnerstand, how the fuck are we going to do space travel after this shit then?
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:04 No.3354900
    >>3354874
    It was suppose to retire ~2 years ago but they had buuunch of work left on the ISS so they pushed it back. Even now there is still some left. But, yes basically they didn't get continued funding and they had to do as much as possible with the least amount of launches. These few launches has been planed years in advance, with some maintenance work on the ISS added recently, like replacing the enviro-pump.
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)11:05 No.3354904
    >>3354894
    We'll be using exclusively russian rockets while the spacex dragon/falcon rockets are finalised for NASA.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:05 No.3354905
         File1310137522.jpg-(85 KB, 800x600, 800px-F40PH-Shuttle.jpg)
    85 KB
    >>3354894
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:05 No.3354908
    >>3354894
    try reading, faggot
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:05 No.3354909
    >>3354894
    Warp speed.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:05 No.3354910
    Time to invest in some real science.
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)11:06 No.3354913
    >>3354905
    http://www.furrysinspace.com/
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:06 No.3354915
    >>3354882
    You're a fucking idiot. Obama asked for WAY more funding than Congress has decided to give. He's on our side.

    I swear, dumbass little kids always just think it's cool to hate the current president for no reason.

    >>3354890
    Well even in theory the shuttle was always a more prototypic endeavor, but it's had massive success. The shuttle is obsolete, though, and ending this isn't necessarily a bad thing.

    The real problem right now is that they're killing the Webb.
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)11:07 No.3354922
    >>3354915
    Agreed. Fuck congressional science and economy subcommittees with hardly any scientists.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:08 No.3354931
    is it 19 mins or 10 mins
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:09 No.3354933
    >>3354922
    Exactly. Why the fuck are politicians who have no experience with the sciences beyond basic high school education making these decisions?
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:09 No.3354934
    NASA =/= science
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:09 No.3354936
    >>3354931
    19

    11:28est is the time
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:09 No.3354937
    >>3354931
    9minutes on the first counter, thats on hold
    and the hold counter is 10 minutes or so
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)11:11 No.3354946
    >>3354933
    I don't know ;_;
    When I'm president of the world, you'll need a degree in a hard science to take public office.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:12 No.3354953
    >>3354946
    A more technocratic approach would make more sense. Leave the scientific quandaries to the people who know their shit, or at least take their advice into consideration. I'm not sure they even consulted any scientific groups while hammering out this budget plan.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:13 No.3354957
    THEY ARE "GO"!!!!!!
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:13 No.3354959
    >>3354946
    I dunno. If I have a billion dollars and i have to decide between space research, Public Health and Military, It's hard to decide.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:15 No.3354966
    launch weather has no constraints.

    Looks like it is going up in 10 minutes
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)11:15 No.3354970
    >>3354959
    For military, you get less than a week in afghanistan. Public health should be easily overfunded if the same amount people pay in insurance is paid in taxes. Space research is vital if we want to avoid extinction.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:15 No.3354971
         File1310138132.jpg-(20 KB, 600x378, salute.jpg)
    20 KB
    >that speech
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:15 No.3354972
    because the scientific community can speak for the average american. this is a joke
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)11:16 No.3354978
    Not sure if you're aware of this, but the current thread is
    >>18646619.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:18 No.3354986
         File1310138318.jpg-(35 KB, 467x528, neverforget.jpg)
    35 KB
    >>3354971
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:18 No.3354989
         File1310138336.jpg-(221 KB, 800x780, 1291365594217.jpg)
    221 KB
    A still more glorious dawn awaits...
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:19 No.3354995
    >>3354978

    try justifying the space program, space shuttle, and JWSP to the average american, who is more concerned about the economy

    >why program is getting cut
    >why you aren't making decisions in Washington
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)11:19 No.3354997
    >>3354989
    People criticised the voyager plaque for showing people naked. The stupidity of that absolutely astounds me.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:20 No.3355001
    >Not listening to guiles theme while watching the countdown

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ie_R1H9L4eI
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:20 No.3355002
    >>3354971
    We are not ending this mission, we are completing it.

    It was nice.
    >>3354959
    NASA is a minuscule part of the budget. It is completely insignificant. We need to cut on Pentagon spending, Medicare, Medicaid and our military spending but removing our soldiers from dozens of places they need not be.
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)11:21 No.3355006
    >>3354995
    alt text on xkcd.com/893 sums up how I feel about this.

    I don't *care* about the economy. I find it repulsive.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:22 No.3355012
    >completely insignificant.
    >Medicare, Medicaid

    okay, dude
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:22 No.3355015
         File1310138560.jpg-(137 KB, 463x462, MybodyisReggie.jpg)
    137 KB
    my body is ready
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:23 No.3355021
    >>3355006

    exactly why you aren't running the country.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:24 No.3355025
    >>3355012
    Medicare and Medicaid are huge, much bigger drains of money than NASA. What are you talking about?
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:24 No.3355026
    ENGAGE LAUNCH MUSIC!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ6ABV_Q9qU
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:24 No.3355029
    >>3355025

    Health care > exploring the mysteries of the cosmos
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:25 No.3355032
    my heart is pounding
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:25 No.3355036
         File1310138749.png-(94 KB, 378x378, 1306049087913.png)
    94 KB
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:25 No.3355037
    >>3355026
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5ts0iUfm5E&feature=artist

    more like this
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:26 No.3355039
    America is a dystopia.

    99% of Americans are just bus boys for a few billionaires who could give a shit about space exploration. Priorities? Totally not in order.

    It's Friday Friday...Party and Party and YEAH!
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:26 No.3355041
         File1310138785.jpg-(304 KB, 864x594, 1270074206925.jpg)
    304 KB
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:27 No.3355051
    MOTHERFUCKERS
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:27 No.3355052
    ...and we have had a failure.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:27 No.3355053
    OH GOD WHAT HAPPENED??
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:27 No.3355056
    Failure!
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:27 No.3355057
         File1310138846.png-(12 KB, 191x234, 1309367535678.png)
    12 KB
    oh no D:
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:27 No.3355058
         File1310138848.jpg-(66 KB, 430x634, old japanese dude goes WHY.jpg)
    66 KB
    >failure
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:27 No.3355059
    something derped
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:27 No.3355062
    A failure at t-31? What?
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:27 No.3355065
    >-00:00:31

    Don't do this to me.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:27 No.3355066
    LET'S GET THIS SHIT STARTED

    >America
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:28 No.3355070
    Oh, no. The government didn't provide enough funds to finish the countdown!

    Watching you faggots get a harddon over this is hysterical
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:28 No.3355071
    Serious question here. Why does anybody care?
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:28 No.3355072
         File1310138902.jpg-(18 KB, 244x320, ManlyTears.jpg)
    18 KB
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9Pu92St5O0
    Good night, sweet prince... ;__;
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:28 No.3355077
    >>3355070
    >>3355070
    >>3355070
    >>3355070
    >>3355070

    This so much. Why do you inbreds care so much?
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:28 No.3355078
    FFFFFFFFFFFFF LOL JUST KIDDING.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:28 No.3355079
    LETS DO THIS
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:29 No.3355080
    ;;;;;;;;;;;;;____________;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

    so beautiful
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:29 No.3355081
    Go on
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:29 No.3355083
         File1310138956.png-(83 KB, 864x870, 1309546103417.png)
    83 KB
    Here we go!
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:29 No.3355084
    >>3355077
    >>3355071
    >>3355070
    Underage faggots detected. Go back to playing CoD, douchebags.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:29 No.3355086
    inb4 out of fuel
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:29 No.3355087
    it's soo... beautiful
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:29 No.3355088
    FUCK YES
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:30 No.3355090
         File1310139001.jpg-(59 KB, 530x461, 1306399413393.jpg)
    59 KB
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:30 No.3355092
    : ' )
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:30 No.3355094
    >>3355070

    this

    "America will continue the dream..." with private industry.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:30 No.3355095
    >>3355084
    >implying it takes being over the age of 18 to wonder why Americans get wet when somebody talks about this shuttle.

    Why do you care so much? Oh, right you're a 13 year old FUCK YEAH AMERICAN patriot.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:31 No.3355099
    >not blasting Flight of the Valkyries while watching the final shuttle launch, one of the most beautiful moments in the history of flight - nay- mankind
    i seriously hope you guys don't do this
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:31 No.3355100
    >>3355095
    Enjoy your lack of sense of curiosity and exploration. I'd rather my country not toss trillions of dollars into two wars instead of finding peaceable applications for military hardware.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:31 No.3355101
         File1310139114.jpg-(103 KB, 406x600, justin-timberlake5.jpg)
    103 KB
    >>3355094
    because communism right
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:31 No.3355103
    150,000 feet in 2 minutes... wow
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:32 No.3355105
    >>3355072


    I played this during the launch.


    Yes... I cried
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:32 No.3355106
    ;_;7
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:32 No.3355109
    >>3355100
    >assuming assumptions and implying implications
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:32 No.3355110
         File1310139174.jpg-(28 KB, 426x640, 30019 - Isabella_Valentine Sou(...).jpg)
    28 KB
    FUCK YEAH
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:33 No.3355113
    Launches make me tear up. Especially this one.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:33 No.3355116
    >>3355109
    >implying you weren't implying I was a 13-year-old shithead
    Cool doublethink brosef.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:33 No.3355117
    >>3355101

    you morons can debate whether the space program is moving to the private sector all you want.

    NASA announced it, the government announce it. The end of the shuttle program is proof of that.

    ITS GOING THERE.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:33 No.3355118
    I played the Deus Ex theme at lift off. It was fucking spectacular.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:33 No.3355120
    :')

    I love you, science.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:34 No.3355123
    listened to this, launched at 2nd chorus
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:34 No.3355124
    5500 MPH.

    Jesus fuck.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:34 No.3355127
    Anyone else just see something fly off the shuttle?
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:34 No.3355129
    >>3355123
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKScAfijnHs
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:34 No.3355130
    >>3355118
    >>3355105
    >>3355072

    I laugh at and spit on people like you.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:34 No.3355132
    >>3355127
    Yeah, what the shit?
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:35 No.3355134
    >cuts to commercial of explosion
    >insurance commercial
    jesus fucking christ television
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:35 No.3355137
    ITT: bunch of fucking babies who want to be astronauts someday
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:35 No.3355138
    I SAW SOMETHING COME OFF THE FUCKING SOLID ROCKET BOOSTER. I KNOW I FUCKING SAW SOMETHING
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:35 No.3355139
    >>3355134
    /b/ in the communications industry
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:36 No.3355142
    >>3355137
    What this gentleman said.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:36 No.3355143
    >>3355127
    Those are The rockets.


    Also it's not unheard of for ice or stuff to hit things. Foam also.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:36 No.3355149
    and so the age of america ended
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:37 No.3355153
    I see no god up there.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:37 No.3355155
    >>3355105
    >>3355113
    >>3355118
    >>3355120

    pic related
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:38 No.3355156
    >>3355153
    he's invisible you fucking retard
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:38 No.3355160
    They see me sailin' into that sea of stars, they hatin'
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:38 No.3355163
         File1310139534.jpg-(441 KB, 1920x1200, 1309698010532.jpg)
    441 KB
    >>3355153
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:38 No.3355164
    >>3355138
    Where the fuck does that thing go?

    Or the external fuel tank, for that matter?
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:39 No.3355165
         File1310139544.jpg-(43 KB, 600x750, Funny_Pictures_5910.jpg)
    43 KB
    >>3355155
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:39 No.3355166
    I came.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:39 No.3355171
         File1310139595.jpg-(17 KB, 309x409, crying cubs fan.jpg)
    17 KB
    >>3355167
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:39 No.3355172
    >>3355156
    I thought he was on the other side of the earth burring dino bones.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:40 No.3355173
    >>3355167
    wat? they're going to go to space again in the future...this is just the end of the shuttle program. we aren't done with space.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:40 No.3355174
    >>3355164
    They fall into the ocean, why do you think they launch from Florida?
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:40 No.3355175
         File1310139626.jpg-(69 KB, 884x397, Saucer-sep-generations.jpg)
    69 KB
    >dat tank separation
    >ALMOST LIKE DAT SAUCER SEPARATION
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:40 No.3355177
    >>3355163
    He never actually said that
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:40 No.3355180
    >>3355167
    sadfrog.jpg
    >> Common !OATS4s83gs 07/08/11(Fri)11:41 No.3355181
    >>3355164
    Nasa knows where it will fall, it goes to a certain spot in the atlantic ocean where they go and retrieve it.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:41 No.3355186
    >>3355175

    GLORIOUS
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:41 No.3355187
    >>3355173
    No successor planned yet and budget cuts? It will be a while bro.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:41 No.3355188
    >>3355181
    The poor fish. ;_;
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:41 No.3355190
    u can hear the guys getting high in the background lol XD
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:42 No.3355191
    ITT: Underage faggots who didn't grow up watching shuttle launches and therefore don't understand how hugely sentimental this is
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:42 No.3355196
    >>3355187

    >the future
    >when NASA gets the money
    >never
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:42 No.3355198
         File1310139750.jpg-(134 KB, 283x424, banker.jpg)
    134 KB
    >>3355167
    Silliy kids and their silly dreams
    Get real!
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:42 No.3355199
    >>3355174
    because the launch pad is in florida dumbass
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:42 No.3355200
    Guys is actually the last launch by NASA? Makes me sad
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:43 No.3355202
         File1310139785.jpg-(6 KB, 184x184, 1231914381939.jpg)
    6 KB
    >couldn't have done it without engineers
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:43 No.3355205
    >>3355130
    Why's that?
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:43 No.3355206
    >>3355191

    confirmed babies
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:43 No.3355211
    >>3355200
    last *shuttle launch
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:44 No.3355215
    >come to 4chan to see if talk about shuttle
    >trolls trolling trolls
    >butthurt political talk
    >crying homosexuals
    ilovethehumanrace.jpg
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:45 No.3355223
    >>3355201
    Low orbit satellites are pissant.
    Bringing a toaster into low orbit doesn't really mean anything.
    The shuttle was capable of bringing the largest payload into orbit and it's unlikely to be matched for a long, long time.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:45 No.3355228
    >>3355211

    Aside from a few telecom or GPS satellites, I don't anticipate NASA putting anything up in space anytime soon. JWST was the last big thing in the books- got cancelled
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:45 No.3355229
    there is a party in th other room
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:46 No.3355234
    >>3355223
    ...Except SpaceX and other companies have already introduced next generation shuttles.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:46 No.3355236
    >>3355202
    >>3355202
    >>3355202
    >>3355202
    >>3355202
    >>3355202
    >>3355202
    >>3355202
    >>3355202
    >>3355202
    >>3355202
    >>3355202
    >>3355202
    >>3355202
    >>3355202
    >>3355202
    >>3355202
    >>3355202
    >>3355202

    >"THEN THE DELAY OF THE LAUNCH WAS LIFTED BY THE ENGINEERS"
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:46 No.3355238
    >>3355228
    Has ESA bested NASA so much with Ariane?
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:47 No.3355242
    >>3355236

    hey guise a bunch of homos saved the launch. thank you homos
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:48 No.3355247
    >>3355234
    Bullshit.
    SpaceX's crap is barely enough to get a Soyuz sized capsule into ISS docking range.
    Not even remotely close to a shuttle.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:48 No.3355253
         File1310140137.jpg-(51 KB, 298x405, Sergey_Korolyov.jpg)
    51 KB
    >>3355223
    >Low orbit satellites are pissant.

    Hey screw you man.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:49 No.3355255
    >>3355238

    Doesn't matter. That is all NASA has been reduced to. If anything, NASA isn't going to MORE funding, its going to get less and less
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:50 No.3355261
    President Barack Obama announced changes to NASA space policy, in his April 15, 2010 space policy speech at Kennedy Space Center, from the Moon-first approach adopted previously under the Vision for Space Exploration and Constellation program to a variety of destinations resembling the flexible path approach.

    The new plan calls for NASA to extend the life of the ISS by five years and use launch vehicles designed, manufactured, and operated by private aerospace companies with NASA paying for flights for government astronauts to the ISS and LEO, much like the way private space tourism company Space Adventures bought Soyuz flights from the Russian government for space tourists. Boeing and Lockheed Martin have expressed doubts about the new plan,[57] while other aerospace companies, including SpaceX, have strongly endorsed it.

    NASA has selected SpaceX and Orbital Sciences for its Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program. The first launch of SpaceX's Falcon 9 occurred on December 8, 2010;[58] it was the unmanned first spaceflight of the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft, which orbited the Earth. It was the first demonstration flight for the COTS program. On February 8 the idea for a new rocket to replace the aging space shuttle was presented in the form of the Liberty. Mostly a combination of the already existing Ariane 5 and the canceled Ares I; it is thought that it could be finished by 2013, and ready for launch by 2015 if approved.[59]

    With the end of the Space Shuttle program after the last Space Shuttle Atlantis mission in July 2011, NASA's 1,100 full-time employees on the Shuttle program will be transferred to other NASA programs. However, contractor employees are not promised work with NASA. Contractor employment on the Space Shuttle program has dropped drastically from 14,000 to around 5,000 over the last five years.[60]
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:51 No.3355275
         File1310140301.jpg-(20 KB, 756x319, facebook_justin_coffee.jpg)
    20 KB
    >>3355117
    Just admit it, its because of communism, right?
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:51 No.3355278
    >>3355006
    >each one discovered, studied and remembered by the ones who made the irrational decision.

    >implying the alien governments that made those irrational decisions don't collapse due to social unrest and their sheer inability to cater to the immediate needs of the people
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:52 No.3355280
    >>3355261

    >designed, manufactured, and operated by private aerospace companies

    eat it, NASAfags
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:54 No.3355290
    The only thing thread has shown is how many homos contribute to this board. I am disappoint.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:54 No.3355292
         File1310140459.jpg-(168 KB, 905x672, cap.jpg)
    168 KB
    >yfw someone's wedding memories were ruined thanks to nasa
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)11:54 No.3355293
    >>3355278
    It would be mind numbingly simple to cater to the needs of the entire planet. If we got our shit together, we could feed nine billion people with an area the size of europe.

    The reason we struggle with it is because people seem to think they're entitled to luxury.
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)11:56 No.3355305
    >>3355280
    >NASA shift to a more sensible strategy
    >HAHA NASA YOU SUCK
    Yes, well done.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:56 No.3355308
    >>3355275
    >>3355101

    Somebody in the /sci/ community is gay for timberlake. We welcome you with open arms (and open assholes) to /sci/!
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:56 No.3355313
    >>3355293
    >The reason we struggle with it is because people seem to think they're entitled to luxury.

    People ARE entitled to luxury, a life without luxury is not worth living. Fuck off.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:57 No.3355319
         File1310140659.jpg-(36 KB, 260x320, justin_cool.jpg)
    36 KB
    >>3355308
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)11:58 No.3355325
    >>3355313
    Assuming you're a troll.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:59 No.3355334
    >>3355325
    Whatever makes you sleep at night, idiot. Enjoy your bland commoner life.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)11:59 No.3355335
    >>3355313
    See. keyword is 'people'
    As long as people and humans are part of mankind and humanity, It will never work.
    Those who want power are corruptable.
    THose who dont want it, become apathic.

    I for one look forward to robot overlords.
    As long as they are not evil. It will become better
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)12:01 No.3355344
         File1310140863.jpg-(77 KB, 500x309, whitefacpalm.jpg)
    77 KB
    And while this is going on, Obama gave briefing on the economy, and there is a white house press conference on the job growth rate and unemployment in the US

    and we wonder why scientists aren't running the country
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)12:03 No.3355368
         File1310141010.jpg-(65 KB, 581x448, superfag.jpg)
    65 KB
    >>3355319

    you
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)12:07 No.3355396
         File1310141251.gif-(149 KB, 650x463, 0legit.gif)
    149 KB
    >>3355344
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)12:07 No.3355401
    >>3355335
    we need Helios
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)12:08 No.3355408
    >>3355293
    >arguing that the irrational choice of space travel could be made if the cold, rational choice was made everywhere else

    Cool story bro, but I'd rather not live in a world controlled by the dictates of scientific rationality. Creation and innovation produces waste, because inevitably some things will fail while others succeed. To argue that we could solve the world's problems by introduced hyperefficient controls implies that that inventiveness is stymied; even if not intented to do so, those controls would limit progress.

    Way to sacrifice the advancement of the human waste for your Carl Sagan fantasies.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)12:09 No.3355410
    >>3355335
    >I for one look forward to robot overlords.
    Yeah, I raged watching I, Robot.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)12:09 No.3355411
         File1310141356.jpg-(37 KB, 406x500, justin_timberlake2.jpg)
    37 KB
    >>3355368
    communist
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)12:09 No.3355412
         File1310141358.jpg-(583 KB, 575x869, shuttle.jpg)
    583 KB
    what's that?
    your space station is where?
    space?
    and i'm on earth?
    >NO PROBLEM. BE THERE IN A FEW MINUTES


    THANK YOU SO MUCH BASED NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
    ;_;
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)12:10 No.3355420
    >>3355408
    >human waste

    haha oh my god I did just say that didn't I

    shit.
    >> Dr. Keith Richards 07/08/11(Fri)12:10 No.3355427
    >>3355410
    I, robot was by Asimov, it's a good book. If you read the other things he's written there are computers that govern civilisation.
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)12:11 No.3355432
    >>3355411

    Go back to the 60's, McCarthy
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)12:13 No.3355445
         File1310141586.png-(1.23 MB, 1280x1024, Helios_for_global_president.png)
    1.23 MB
    >>3355335
    >I for one look forward to robot overlords.
    As long as they are not evil. It will become better

    Yes...
    >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeboqg4t9vs
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)12:15 No.3355469
         File1310141756.jpg-(62 KB, 400x496, justin-timberlake-20071121-341(...).jpg)
    62 KB
    >>3355432
    Im actually a communist
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)12:42 No.3355622
    >>3355469

    Good. So you know that Russia is resorting back to its Soviet values and you know the Russians obviously have their shit together in terms of space programs
    >> Anonymous 07/08/11(Fri)12:53 No.3355685
    >>3355622
    but their Shuttle was a joke



    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]