>> |
06/22/11(Wed)03:59 No.3265679>>3265615 It
IS worth spending billions of dollars for. That's why it'd be
subsidized, because without government support, there would be no
competition to drive improvement. You can't have progress without
progressive rewards, and if everyone can just copy your skills without
limit, then there would be no monetary incentive for you to improve
because the moment you do, people will start loading up their chips with
your knowledge for free, and then, in a free, unsubsidized market, all
the employment opportunities you would have had due to your enhanced
skills will only be taken by others who copied your skills. And if
specialists don't have incentive to improve, there would be nothing to
load up the chips with, essentially making them useless.
So the
government would have to subsidize the specialist market; they would
have to provide compensation in the form of a large sum of money to
specialists; or they would have to enact anti-piracy laws against
uninhibited copying of specialist knowledge.
Of course you'd have
some people who, even without government support, would personally try
and improve their skills for the greater benefit of humanity. But this
would be inefficient, because of the fact that the process of improving
their skills personally does not bring them any economic benefits. They
would need other jobs, etc., to support themselves financially, and
improvement would become more of a hobby than a full-time pursuit. |