What journals does /sci/ read?
Journals are useless.Just read a goddamn newspaper instead.
i like ACIEE
4chan
New Scientist is complete trash and nothing but pop science. I remember in the past they kept having pointless articles about Second Life, making it out to be some futuristic alternative reality word...In a more recent issue, the mathematics article was not actually about mathematics, but contrivedly trying to find metaphors for complex numbers in Alice in Wonderland.
>Journals are useless.
>>206785complex numbers in alice in wonderland?Also one teacher of mine tried to explain Z transforms using star wars
>>206772o rly?
>>206785I read that article, it was actually rather good. It may not of actually belonged in a scientific journal, but it was hardly contrived given the circumstances of the author and the time he was writing.
>>206772>>206811oh you
>>206811Yeah, really.
>>206745sciam
Well I read the ones that come with my science course for people interested in extra reading and I read new scientist because my college library has a subscription. Don't read scientific American much because the import is unreliable.
Used to read Discover and SciAm, but realized there was too much filler and too little pure science. Also, some of the articles are years behind.
ZOMG none! I only look for the papers I need.
Popular Science, just to marvel at the stuff that rarely happens
Regularly: Science, Nature, Language, Cladistics.Various others every now and again.
PRLNature is for biofags.
>>206955>implying I'm a biologist
NaturePLoS, because it's free