Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Use TeX/jsMath with the [math] (inline) and [eqn] (block) tags. Double-click equations to view the source.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • GOTTA CATCH 'EM ALL
    in other news: server upgrades and additional moderators coming by early next later this week

    File : 1279957654.jpg-(13 KB, 300x300, 1254546103964.jpg)
    13 KB Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)03:47 No.1473365  
    Ask a non-autistic guy who can do complex mental arithmetics in split seconds anything.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)03:48 No.1473371
    How's that abacus treating you?
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)03:49 No.1473373
    So Wolfram Alpha is pretty cool, huh?
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)03:49 No.1473375
    Why are you a niggor?
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)03:49 No.1473379
    What's all the answers of z^3 = 1
    where z is a complex number.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)03:49 No.1473381
    Ask a [troll] who can [use a calculator] in split seconds anything.

    >fix'd
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)03:49 No.1473382
    If my dicks weigh 14 pounds and I leave on a train headed west at 140 mph, then who was phone?
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)03:50 No.1473388
    >>1473382
    You have dick cancer, the doctor was on the phone.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)03:51 No.1473392
    >>1473382

    me was phone

    >>1473371
    >>1473373
    >>1473381

    >Mental
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)03:51 No.1473394
    How many mutually orthogonal squares of order 12 are there?
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)03:52 No.1473395
    What's the square root of BB(1000)?
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)03:53 No.1473396
    How many prime numbers are there bellow 718?!
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)03:53 No.1473400
    What is the log base 128 of grams number?
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)03:57 No.1473407
    OP, you should be able to answer both of these within 3 minutes of this post, unless you are trolling.

    >If the time between now and 8:00 p.m. is three times longer than the time between now and the time that is an hour and a half before the hour that is exactly midway between now and 8:00 p.m., what time is it now?

    >The small hand and the big hand of a clock are each pointing to twelve. The small hand moves clockwise two numbers every hour while the big hand moves counterclockwise five numbers every hour. How long will it take until both hands point to the same number?
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)03:58 No.1473408
         File1279958292.jpg-(53 KB, 460x288, waiting.jpg)
    53 KB
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)03:59 No.1473411
    >>1473408
    ROFL
    >> OP 07/24/10(Sat)03:59 No.1473412
    >>1473407
    12 hours, 9am?
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:00 No.1473414
    Let's get a real fucking Autistic Savant in here, OP sucks dick
    >> OP 07/24/10(Sat)04:00 No.1473415
    >>1473394
    >>1473395
    >>1473396
    >>1473400
    I'm not a super computer.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:02 No.1473419
    How many more tacos can Gabe Newell eat if he's already had half as many tacos as twice as the number of cocks OP has sucked?

    Unacceptable answers: 0
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:02 No.1473420
    >>1473412
    12 hours, and 11 am.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:04 No.1473427
    >>1473420
    Sorry, meant that the diff is 9 hours.
    Moar.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:04 No.1473430
    >>1473427
    see
    >>1473419
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:04 No.1473431
    >>1473407

    Not OP. 11 AM? Difference between now and 3/2 hours before halfway between now and 8 is a third of the difference between now and 8. Thus, "Half - 1.5 hours equals a third". So 1.5*6 = 8 hours, which makes it 11 am.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:05 No.1473432
    A blanket with a width of ten feet and a length of fifteen feet is reduced in its perimeter by six feet. Assuming only whole number deductions can occur from any side, and the angle of each corner of the blanket must remain the same, what is the *second* greatest surface area that could result?
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:05 No.1473433
    >>1473431

    That last "8" is supposed to be a "9", but you get the picture
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:05 No.1473434
    >>1473415

    THEN WE HAVE NO NEED OF YOUR PROCESSING POWER.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:05 No.1473435
    did you teach yourself to do it?

    or are you just a natural born faggot?
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:07 No.1473438
    >>1473432
    117?
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:08 No.1473441
    >>1473419
    >>1473419
    >>1473419
    OP has conveniently ignored this question, he is a fraud and a phony!
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:08 No.1473442
    >>1473438
    yep. that was pretty fast unless you cheated.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:08 No.1473444
    >>1473435
    Natural born faggot.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:11 No.1473449
    >>1473441
    HEY EVERYONE

    OP'S A PHONY

    A BIG FAT PHONY
    >> OP 07/24/10(Sat)04:11 No.1473450
    >>1473442
    No, it actually makes sense.
    Every 2 feet removed are one from each side.
    Since it would translate to 3 feet from each both sides, it would become an odd number of removals, at which point the a^2-b^2 rule won't do the trick. Therefore, it's a non-simmetric binomial, where the largest would be 120=10*12, and the second largest would be 117=9*13.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:11 No.1473451
         File1279959087.png-(85 KB, 703x661, untitled.png)
    85 KB
    not sure if this is your area of expertise, but<<<
    >> OP 07/24/10(Sat)04:12 No.1473454
    Moar.
    Also, the cock question does not compute.
    Am not phony.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:12 No.1473456
    >>1473365

    math retard here. When talking percentages, what does it mean to say that one is in the 99.9 percentile? In other words, how many whole people is that? 1 in 100 or 1 in a thousand? defend your statement.

    Thanks.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:13 No.1473457
    >>1473442
    Just google the question and you'll get the answer.

    Unoriginal questions don't count, as he could just easily google them.
    >> OP 07/24/10(Sat)04:16 No.1473465
    >>1473451
    Answer is B
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:16 No.1473467
    >>1473465
    explain.
    >> OP 07/24/10(Sat)04:17 No.1473468
    >>1473456
    99.9% = 0.999.
    1/0.999 = 1000.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:17 No.1473469
    >>1473454
    It does when you admit that you've sucked at least one cock.

    1 cock x 2 = 2 tacos, 2 / 2 = 1 taco. Gabe ate one taco already. Considering his bottomless pit of a stomach was the basis for the Portal series, the correct answer is Gabe can eat an infinite amount of tacos. and OP is a faggot.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:18 No.1473472
    93 x 985 (328 0123- asd094334-_)949%[545]^94231EUD u9509013<...549328 ^&049328 342-9 =
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:19 No.1473474
    OP explain >>1473451.
    >> OP 07/24/10(Sat)04:19 No.1473477
    >>1473467
    Only visible pattern is a transformation in each row of squares, such the coloumn 1 in square 1 is transformed to column 2 in square 2, which in turn goes to cl3 sq3.
    In the bottom row of squares, the transformation is cl1 sq1 tri,tri,cir --> cl2 sq2 x,x,tri --> cl3 sq3 cir,cir,x.
    The only corresponding answer containing a sqaure with cir,cir,x in its third coloumn is B.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:20 No.1473479
    >>1473474
    OP tineyed the pic and found the answer, HES A BIG FAT PHONY
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:20 No.1473481
         File1279959616.jpg-(21 KB, 400x301, doctor.jpg)
    21 KB
    >>1473472
    shit just got serious
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:20 No.1473483
    >>1473468

    This is where I get stuck. People are not .999.

    "How many whole, living people would be the exemplar of the 100%, with the "99.9%" person=1.

    Sorry if this sounds dumb, but I'm not that abstract a thinker.
    >> OP 07/24/10(Sat)04:21 No.1473485
    >>1473472
    No idea what you meant, but 93 x 985 = 91,695.
    Can't prove it to you guys that it was done in less the 20 secs with no aid of a calc.
    Sorry.
    >> OP 07/24/10(Sat)04:23 No.1473489
    >>1473483
    It's usually used for sigma of the bell curve, most notably IQ.
    Given that out of the general population of millions or billions of people, there are easily 1/1000 groups.
    Also, >>1473485
    Meant 91,605 9 is to close to 0 on my keyboard.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:24 No.1473495
    >>1473477
    actually, you got the answer correct, but there is in fact a pattern that repeats and is the same for all rows. bet you can't get it (i didn't get it myself, someone told me).
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:25 No.1473499
    the square root of 360.5
    >> OP 07/24/10(Sat)04:26 No.1473502
    >>1473495
    It is true for all rows of squares, the rule about the coloumns within the squares. See for yourself.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:27 No.1473510
    how many prime numbers are there between 1 and 1 million
    >> OP 07/24/10(Sat)04:27 No.1473511
    >>1473499
    About 18.987
    >> OP 07/24/10(Sat)04:28 No.1473518
    >>1473510
    Seriously, over 9000.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:30 No.1473531
    >>1473502
    i don't know what your answer was saying, but the transformation is that the right column is moved to the left, and then the bottom square in that column is moved to the top of that column. and then the shapes (triangle, circle, x) rotate around.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:31 No.1473534
    How much wood would a woodchuck chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
    >> OP 07/24/10(Sat)04:32 No.1473545
    >>1473534
    As much wood as a Woodchuck would chuck.


    Also, I suck cocks.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:33 No.1473551
    >>1473531
    disregard that. i guess you got it, except for the thing about the bottom square moving to the top.

    OP is legit.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:34 No.1473561
    Can OP solve Torment?
    >> OP 07/24/10(Sat)04:36 No.1473568
         File1279960589.png-(89 KB, 703x661, answer.png)
    89 KB
    >>1473531
    Pic related.
    >>1473534
    How do I chucked wood?
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:39 No.1473586
    >>1473502
    Why not A?
    >> OP 07/24/10(Sat)04:40 No.1473593
    >>1473379
    Oh, as for you,
    Zn = exp(i(2*pi/3+2*pi*n/3))
    n=0,1,2.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:42 No.1473602
    >>1473518
    Op uses a calcuator. You guys gettin' trold hart
    >> OP 07/24/10(Sat)04:43 No.1473607
    >>1473586
    Good question.
    Though it may not be a hard proof, it seem that there are always 2 tris and 2 Xs joined together in the bottom row. B suits more than A.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:44 No.1473612
         File1279961047.png-(109 KB, 1218x661, 45645456456.png)
    109 KB
    >>1473568
    the full answer.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:46 No.1473628
    >>1473612
    someone else figured it out though, i spent like 15 minutes staring at that shit and didn't see any patterns.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)04:48 No.1473640
    if x is y and y is x and fuck is yourmom and x is w then what is d?
    >> OP 07/24/10(Sat)04:51 No.1473651
    >>1473640
    Miracles.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)05:05 No.1473701
         File1279962321.jpg-(70 KB, 248x252, 1278471644706.jpg)
    70 KB
    >>1473499
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)05:21 No.1473750
    >>1473651
    wat
    >> OP 07/24/10(Sat)05:57 No.1473855
    >>1473701
    Must agree with him.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)06:14 No.1473906
    >>1473451

    F imo

    Circle-Triangle-X-Circle-Traingle ..

    Amirite?
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)06:16 No.1473916
    >>1473906

    Type, I meant F

    The first box at the top left moves to the top centre, while the box at the bottom right moves up to the top left etc.
    When transitioning, the shapes transition cyclically - circles becomes triangle become X becomes circle
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)06:33 No.1473974
    how many digits of pi do you know?
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)06:34 No.1473976
    >>1473974
    3.14159
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)07:00 No.1474012
    For which range of numbers could you solve a discret logarithm problem faster than a computer, my friend ?
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)07:17 No.1474038
    >>1473612

    Oh my fucking Christ. I didn't solve the problem because I was INTENT on believing that all of the images in the problem were connected. As in you could progress the similarity of all 9 images. I heavily overthought it, well outdid the "sufficient amount of thinking" needed to figure out the pattern.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)07:26 No.1474065
    >>1473906
    >>1473916
    >>1474038
    I looked at that problem for 3 mins earlier and didn't come to a solution. but based on the latest comment, i'd choose f. Criteria: a triangle should only be adjacent to a triangle on a side once; the third triangle shouldn't be adjancent to any other triangle. same with the cricles, and the Xs
    >> OP 07/24/10(Sat)07:28 No.1474067
    >>1474012
    Depends on the base.
    >> Anonymous 07/24/10(Sat)07:32 No.1474072
    >>1473976
    >5 decimal places
    >science fan



    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]