You are a gentleman and a scholar.

>>11537298
So we are, brah.

Mommy no don't let him do this to you, etc..

You know what? Could it be that /s/ mods are female? They really, really have a strong disregard for male sexuality. They wipe content like robots, not at all evaluating it. The rules are obivously against straight-up, gross porn. But how about a picture of a cute amateur girl holding a dick msotly off-camera? Why's that a ban, too? Ah, right, the rules say so.

>>11537284
Maybe you don't remember what happened in /hc/. The things I've seen there make me cry when I close my eyes.

For example, here's a picture that once got me banned. No dick, no rubber doll actress porn, nothing. This wouldn't have been removed on /s/ a year ago. But it was now. Obviously, it doens't matter all that much, but I simply find it strange how consistently robotic the /s/ mods are.

>>11537335
I do remember how /hc/ become a non-board. But can't a human being tell this
<-----
from what actually killed /hc/?

And, in any case, it was mostly spammers, not cheap crude porn. Now that we have captcha and complex filters, /hc/ would've been perfectly feasible. It doesn't exist, though, and /b/ is out of question, so why actively ban everything with a dick from /s/, I have no clue.

>>11537347
It was porn bots (blockable now) and rate-my-dick threads. That... I could have done without....

Make a rule about not having those, and about the HC content not being spam in general, and it may work.

Also a problem is how the /s/ mod doesn't seem to be able to click the right post half the time. I've occasionally found myself browsing other boards and then BAM, banned for jailbait. Although I haven't posted any, anywhere, in, like, years. And no, I wasn't reassigned a new IP, it happened to me exactly mid-browsing.

>>11537355
It already does work, and did very well until the newest "ban everything" policy.

For example, a gnetleman is posting a set where the obviously amateur girl is posing. Mid-set she suck a dick. Post one such image, and it's a ban, even though the thread was providing original or rare content and dozens of people were actively enjoying it. Because there was a picture of dick, and rules say no dick under any circumstances. But 1) why not let it be this time around, when it's obivously inoffensive, and 2) why do the rules explicitly prohibit dick anyway?

For example, here's this. It's 100% quality content.

Why is it against the rules to post this? Or why can't mods make an exception for quality threads? It's normal in msot systems to make exceptions or feign ignorance when rules are broken inoffensively and to an advantage. But the /s/ mod is like a robot. Or a woman. Is it a she? Does she browse /s/ in a completely asexual, withdrawn mode?

>not even a hint of fellatio like semen" rule

This pisses me off. So, preggos, fat fucking whales, pissing, downright torture BDSM is OK, but a little splooge and suddenly it doesn't belong on /s/? Fuck that noise.

Go OP!

>>11537369
That's what I'm saying. Child pornography is understandable. It should go no matter what. But breaking fake, thought-up rules like no semen in pictures - what's the problem here? Why uphold THESE rules so rabidly?

It's not uncommon to see whole threads full of people talking about how their thread is going to go down soon, so save everything and OP pelase haste. What's that? /s/ is there for these threads to exist and for people to entertain each other, not to conform to a ruleset.

>>11537325
maybe

On an unrelated note, this mommy has bluish-grey eyes. So cute.

PROTIP: if you are obsessed with cock, /s/ is not for you.

Is that really so complicated?

>>11537380
Insecure underage b8 detected, also possible homo.

>>11537380
Nice strawman, brah. Saying "NO COCK UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES" is being obsessed with cock, not trying to post images of hot women, cock or no.

MOREEEEEE

OP IS A FAGGOT WHO LIKES LOOKING AT COCKS AND SEMEN

Seeing a hot slut taking a cock in any way turns me on, it makes it easier to pretend it's mine that she's working. I don't get ANY of the mods on 4chan to be honest. (my guess would be false sense of self entitled college kids though)

See this. B& material on /s/.

Is this illegal? Is this rubber boob porn? Is this spam?

Another buttfucking mommy.

Dude. We hear you. And I think we all would like to see this - at least on a new board. But I think you're going about it the wrong way.
You're just gonna get yourself banned, and then your message will get lost.
You need to contact the admins directly and be professional and persistent if you want to get anywhere with them.
Right now, you're just another rule-breaker dancing under the ban-hammer. :-\

>>11537423
Ooh, a fellow poster. Cheers, sir.

OP IS A COCK LOVING FAGGOT

Amazing thread.

OP is a low-rent troll that loves the cock more than any other.

OP IS IMAGING SUCKING ALL THESE COCKS HIMSELF

>>11537430
>But I think you're going about it the wrong way.
I'm not actually going about it or send a message. I just saw a bunch of bannings on /s/ and thought I'd talk about it. It's not my intention to fix /s/ or anything. It's jsut that I can post a thread full of milf porn, so why in the fuck not? And while we're at it, we can talk about how mods are fags or girls or robots.

OP is posting good quality shit that would be perfectly at home on a /hc/ board, if it still existed, He's just fighting this battle the wrong way. :-\

>>11537395
>>11537432
>>11537436
>>11537439
Hey, hey, calm down lol. Is something wrong, junior? Did I unknowingly post a picture of your mother?

I think the problem is that all this stuff used to belong in /hc/ but then they nuked that entire board because nobody ever really used it except for spam-bots.

>>11537444
>He's just fighting this battle the wrong way. :-\
I'm not fighting anything. I find recent /s/ happenings strange, but I sure as fuck not trying to prove anything or change anything. For fuck's sake, it's 4chan. The fuck do I care for it's boards' integrity or it's mods' adequacy?

I mean, I wouldn't have even if I lacked dynamic IP.

Moar

>>11537448
Correct. Then the more interesting, less latex-clad, professionally-hardcore parts of /hc/ survived in /s/. It was against the rules, but was only enforced in extreme cases. Then something happened and cumshot thread started disappearing faster than CP.

>>11537441
Fair enough. I just liked what you were posting, and agree with you somewhat on how broad the bannings have gotten, and hate the idea of you getting banned.
I'm actually in favor of a little heavier moderation to clean up the obvious single post threads, but I think banning people who answer the requesters is a little too much.
But mostly, I'm like: "Fuck it! Their site, their rules."
Yeah - I'm pretty freakin' easy going. LOL!!!

>>11537378
mod detected

>>11537468
>But mostly, I'm like: "Fuck it! Their site, their rules."
So am I. No, really. Mods-fags etc., but it truly is not a problem. As for me getting banned, I tell you, I'm on ADSL, I'll just request a new IP and be back in under 30 seconds.

Another anal mom.

As someone who fantasizes daily about his pair of smoking hot MILF bosses at work, thank you OP.

I like this one even though it's only 640x480. There's cum on her face and a cock up her cunt, but her husband is touching her shoulder soothingly, all "it's okay, it's going to be okay, dear" like.

Hey OP; we used to have a hardcore board here (/hc/) for exactly this kind of stuff, but the spammers over-ran it to where it was 99% referral scams/phishing/botnet trojan links.

Now people post this kind of stuff in /b/, which is where you should be posting it too because cocks on /s/ = not cool.

>>11537486
You've got two hot milf bosses? Two?

>>11537489
I know, I know. Read the thread.

And posting anything on /b/ is a bad idea. It's either too fast, or it bathes in the sort of attention no thread would want to have, ever. /b/ was constantly degrading from people pretending to be idiots to people who really are idiots, but today I think it isn't even 13 year olds, more like 11 year olds.

>>11537489
If you read through the thread before posting, you'd see that the OP is most likely an oldfag, and that he's doing what he's doing.
So, enjoy the /hc/ while it's here. It'll all be gone soon enough.

>>11537503


IF admins were to clear out the fucking spam, which accounts for half of /b/ now, then /b/ wouldnt be so bad.

>>11537506
I am, in fact, a 2005fag. Used to be an avid /b/tard, then /b/ got crazy-ass overhaul, report function and stuff, and I found myself moving to /v/ - a then-new-/b/. These days I'm mostly on /a/ and occasionally on /s/, but here I post 99% of the time, somehow.

ROW ROW FIGHT THA POWAH

>>11537496
One probably falls more under GILF (she's no less attractive), but yeah, two.

Thanks again for the thread.

>>11537510
Well, I - unfortunately - am a 2010fag. ;-) But I've heard the stories of how great 4chan used to be and only post good quality relevant OC whenever I DO post.
The sad thing is, that I - a honest to shit NEWfag - have seen 4chan visibly decline in a matter of months (since September!).
SOMEthing needs to be done.

...on a side note, I've noticed that only one other thread is moving on /s/. I think you've got everyone's attention. ;-)

>>11537521
Ha!