>> |
07/02/10(Fri)10:43:09 No.9840412The
problem I have with it is that it is basically state sanctioned murder.
They say you cannot kill another human being, yet they go on to say
they can kill you for being too horrible a person? Hypocrisy. From an
emotional standpoint, people love hard justice, they love getting a
raging hardon whenever an evil criminal gets his/her just desserts. By
that token, these same people foam at the mouth whenever somebody runs
over a dog and want bloody vengeance, they'd see all sex offenders, even
the innocent ones (think caught with cp or some such here) castrated or
hanged.
These people are awful, blood thirsty savages and, well,
we always have been like that because it helped us survive. Not so much
anymore, we don't really need to act like this. Certainly, it's hard to
argue against just ending the life of someone who seems to be
potentially beyond redemption, not that there are really that many
people who are that bad to begin with. In reality, the argument is more
complicated and expensive. You have to make sure you have the right
person, all that stuff.
Armchair philosophers are the first ones
to cry out and loudest voices in the crowd from their comfortable
vantage point of self-righteous bigotry. The problem is they just froth
and howl about the first thing that comes into their heads and don't
bother thinking at all about the complex nature of such debates and as
such, should shut their fucking mouths and stopping running off at the
mouth, acting like a pack of rabid assholes.
So I'm against
murder of any kind but the argument is quite complicated and I'm not
really in a position to be able to say with any sort of authority of
certainty what position is 'right', I still have leanings against it. |