>> |
06/02/10(Wed)22:38:36 No.9290614![Report this post](9289775_files/stop.png) ![To
Thread Start](9289775_files/arrow_up.png) I've
never been to TED b4 and from what I see it seems pretty much
right-wing propaganda, sort of a 'keep-it-down crowd' kind of place.
That
said, considering TED is just a means to distribute content in this
case, the video seemed, well, sort of PG-13 at most. Which is not what
4chan is about. Yes the adult content was mentioned, but I can't help
but feel that a big chunk of what 4chan and /b/ is was left out.
Is
that good or bad? Well, depends. Good for moot's presentation, bad for
the rest of us? Or perhaps it's good for Anonymous, us, as well. If
keeping said Anonymity is the goal, that is.
I would have liked
the distinction to be made between "Anonymous" the default word in the
-Name- field, and "Anonymous" the group. 4chan is obviously anything but
anonymous, however I for one believe that Anonymous the group of people
is a little more complicated to define, and just saying "Anonymous is a
website" can't fit the bill.
Overall good, but I keep feeling
this video could have easily been turned into a Reader's Digest article. |