in Singapore they can arrest you for chewing bubble gum

yay, but not to the point where the entire human race is threatened by a genetic superdisease

>>8767552
>genetic superdisease
>niggers

But if everyone will be intelligent, who will be the exploited ones?

I guess this kind of eugenics can be called positive. It's ok.

It's the negative eugenics that makes people shit their pants in feer.

Low level eugenics is certainly necessary.

You'll never stop the idiots breeding but you can at least promote more breeding among the clever.

>>8767602
the robots who the intelligent ones create

Isn't like 40% of the people on welfare in USA niggers, but only like 8% of the total population niggers or some shit?

Solution: Kill all niggers.

>>8767642
no, just just stop giving people welfare after a year or so

>>8767642
also, 50% of USA prison population are niggers. When they make up less than 10% of the population.

Who the fuck decided it would be a good idea to let idiots breed? We don't need slaves to build castles or pick cotton anymore.

It's not eugenics it's social engineering. well achieving parents will make sure their kids do well in school. Intelligence is not something you can 'breed'.

>>8767657
Blame Lincoln.
He was terrible, somebody should have shot hi...oh, wait.

it's the most practical path for humanity to take

unfortunately, dumbasses are given the same rights as intelligent people... and the democratic process (and left-wing media) don't help that

Global cleansing. There are too many of us, and too many of us rely on other peoples supposedly obligatory contributions to the local and global community to support them.

The world is gonna come full circle and collapse when the rich, advanced and intelligent give up on those who bring nothing to this world. Robots will replace the means of production. The bourgeoisie will dominate and will be happy, free to explore the universe and exploit what they find.

>>8767678
Intelligence is in large part hereditary.

hsdghfdhrthrwhjrwjwry

>>8767678
>Intelligence is not something you can 'breed'.

It's not entirely genetic but it fucking helps. You can be developed to be an intelligent individual but some people just already fit into that category without stimulus.

MERLION!!!!

Is intelligence inherited? Yes, but only its potential. It means nothing if it isn't influenced. Many people think we're killing people because they're simply stupid. Its more like you're too stupid to have your offspring reach their full potential. Smart people purposely do this. This is why eugenics works.

No we just need to replace our government with the top RTS players. Their micromanagement skills will turn our coutnry around in a few months. Why do you think South Korea is so awesome 60 years after a major homeland war? They got rebuildin strats thats what.

>>8767767
They got their hotkeyed build orders man

>>8767739
>Intelligence is in large part hereditary.
[citation needed]

FUCK SINGAPORE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAUE3k23Tj4

>>8767753


Perhaps we can encourage successful people to 'mentor' young kids?

>>8767753
True. Solving sudoku, crossword puzzles, playing chess etc. excercises ones brain. If you don't use it, it deteriorates and your IQ drops in pretty much the same way that not being physically active deteriorates ones muscles and bones.
Well educated and successfull parents will make sure their kids don't turn into semi-retarded couch potatoes.

Moving to singapore sounds pretty nice now.

>does a wikipedia

HOLY SHIT english is the first language? brb

>>8767835
OP here, I visited while working in Shanghai for 2 Months. I'd like to set up a business there in a few days, it's like China Lite, but has the advantage of an English legal system, very little corruption.

>>8767835
Now I read the wikipedia, too. Sounds quite nice.

>eugenics

I don't think the genes have much to do with it.

Isn't Singapore shitty and repressive?

>>8767884

not unless you can't live without bubblegum and tweezers

>>8767807
You don't educate children with sudoku, crosswords and chess.

>>8767478
I've long argued this, OP. In almost every country in the world, the poor and the stupid have more children per couple because the intelligent people don't want to increase their expenses and thus lower their quality of life by having kids.

In the UK you can, with reasonable accuracy, guess someone's class background just by the number of brothers and sisters they have - more than one sibling and there's a 60% chance they're working class.

More than 2 siblings and it's near certain.

I would completely support anything that rewarded the intelligent and productive for having kids instead Britain's system of rewarding the poor and stupid.

Right now, if you don't want to work a day in your life but don't mind living in the chav-ghetto, all you have to do is pop out 2 kids before you're 18 and you're set from now until your early, drug induced death.

>>8767903
Reading comprehension fail. Kindly reread the post if it's not that much of a problem. I never stated that.

SINGAPORE SURE IS ADVANCED

IT'S THE ONLY COUNTRY THAT CAN'T SHOW THE WORLD CUP

even niggers in their mudhuts have got the world cup hooked up.

>>8767903
Not entirely, no, but I guarantee a child given those for entertainment will be smarter than the average.

Singapore is a wonderful place to live/work. Unless you have some skills which are of worth gl getting a work permit.

>>8767906
>In the UK you can, with reasonable accuracy, guess someone's class background just by the number of brothers and sisters they have - more than one sibling and there's a 60% chance they're working class.

>More than 2 siblings and it's near certain.

>I am a basement dwelling retard and this is what I think.

You're numbers are off, retard. I can quite categorically say that all the people who come to mind who aren't working class have at least 1 sibling, the most toffish guy I know has like 2 or 3 siblings.

I agree they should have more but we should stop helping the dirt classes have 5 kids before their 30.

>>8767678
>It's not eugenics it's social engineering. well achieving parents will make sure their kids do well in school.

This. Also look at fatties. Fat people having fat kids aren't usually genetic losers. They just eat shit and teach their kids to eat shit.

While eugenics may be a positive thing; this is not eugenics.

I have been to singapore. Great place to visit and hang out for a bit, but fuck living there.

ITT: People who were born with money and have no idea how the real world works.

>>8767936
Always exceptions. The smartest guy I know for instance has 3 siblings. Them, and both their parents have gone to Oxbridge.

>>8767942
>ITT: People who were born with money and have no idea how the real world works.

ITT: embarrassingly inaccurate generalizations that once posted can't be retracted because i'm quoting them

>>8767953

Sure that means that exceptions such as a poor working class family producing somebody intellegent and positive for society exists, yet you would have them euthanised.

Also without the working class the business world would very quickly stagnate, and maybe one wrong mistake and your family is the one with little money.

Where does the euthanisia stop?
Sure when you kill off all the poor who is left at the bottom then?
What if the people higher up than you decide you are the new scum and need to be eliminated?

The only way such a society could work would be a pure communist one. But that would have equal chance of working with all the poor around anyway.

>>8768011

lol nope bro
Shitty argument

It's not really eugenics, it's more of social engineering, ensuring people with educated backgrounds produce more offspring and make sure they get the same level of education than them.

Calling it eugenics, apart from being inacurate, gives it a negative connotation which will put all the leftards and liberal whinos against it.

That is all.

>>8768027
lrn2communism
What you're referring to is "communism".

>>8767926
Only cumguzzling faggots believe that the world cup is important.

>>8768107

Only cum guzzling faggots are your face you fat douche.

>>8768107

Hi cum guzzling faggot.
It appears your last statement was just cum guzzling and has no basis in reality.

>>8768139
Cry moar footballfag, your so-called 'sport' is a joke.

>>8768190
gb2handegg fuckin americunt

The world cup, like every other sport, is only valuable for advertising and marketing. Other than that, it's just meaningless war-masturbation.

>>8767953

The smartest guy I know has

>>8768202
Nice try. I'm English and football fans are nothing more than repressed homosexuals who overcompensate for their overwhelming cumlust by reading shit like Zoo and Nuts and pretending to be interested in "beer n burds m8". Nobodies fooled, you're all fags.

>>8768139
Whenever I need a good chuckle I watch footage from Hillsborough.

>>8768262
Fucking finally; another English person with this knowledge. Football is a total waste of time and money. I feel extremely sorry for those losers who buy season tickets and go every single week to watch some people who don't give a shit about them run up and down a pitch. It's like their entire lives are built around this one boring game.

Oh Hitler, why did you have to co-opt the eugenics movement? We had a good thing going, we had sterilized tens of thousands of retards, epileptics, and mentally unfit people in America, then you had to come and ruin it.

*fun fact* California had the highest amount of sterilized tards in the country

>>8768262
>>8768296
Also not interested in seeing Brazil/Germany/Italy/France win each time, and see England fail in the quarter-finals at PENALTIES.

But most importantly, do you believe success has a direct correlation with intelligence? I know many relatively successful people who are fucking idiots and unsuccessful people who are really fucking smart.

As an English person who hates football I can't begin to explain the joy I feel when everyone gets all hyped up about a tournament only for "our boys" to spectacularly fail, as usual.

I love listening to these deluded cunts "We won it in 1966 so we're due another win", because only football fans can believe that winning a tournament ONCE in the tournaments seventy year history is an achievement.

>ITT: People who were born with money and have no idea how the real world works.

Poorfags: how does the world work?

>>8768590

Money makes it go around or some shit, I wouldn't know.