Yeah cause I'm a corporate CEO. Wanna fight about it?

Join my Red Crusade.

My dad organized his small business as a corporation and he's the CEO. ;_;

How about you stop being a little bitch.

Anyone with the ability to pull this off would likely be fairly wealthy and complacent. Most working men would be too stupid to even pick an appropriate target.

It's unlikely, at best?

Americans are pretty lazy motherfuckers. We're too busy watching Jersey Shore with a half-eaten Double Down sitting on our fat guts to even go and case a CEO's house, much less evade his security and whack him.

And the ones among us that are actually crazy and motivated enough to do this kind of shit are, and always will be, too obsessed with government bureaucrats and police officers to try for the plutocrats.

>>8610614

Well, somebody could start with Jim Bunning. If he died, people would get their unemployment benefits extended and the people who can't find work would have a little more time to find employment.

I fucking hate you anti-corporation fags.

You probably believe that 'socialism is the only road to TRUE FREEDOM! lololol communism is awesome marx is my idol'

GUVMENT TAKIN MAH RIGHTS
AMURRIKUHHH

DERP DERP FIGHT THE POWER

>>8610778
>>8610792

Everybody, just ignore this guy. He's a troll. But thank you, mister troll, for bumping my thread.

We control you; you will never rise up against us.

>>8610748
Can't go wrong with Ben Nelson, either. The shitstain just blocked debate on any sort of financial regulatory bill.

>>8610468

There hasn't been a very active group of youth petitioning for change since the 60's as well.

I think that's also coming in the somewhat near future.

>>8610842
Your methods of control are pretty obvious, so they're not going to work for long.

Aren't all those Goldman Sachs faggots coming to Washington D.C in a few days for their trial(lol if you think they're gonna be held accountable or convicted)? kill them there OP

>>8610854

Yep, I'm sure that if senators started getting shot on their lunch breaks, they'd be a bit more careful about fucking over the vast majority of the country.

>>8610825
Everyone who disagrees with you is a troll?

I'm not the one who's calling for the assassination of all of the people who manage the creation and distribution of everything that makes your life as luxurious and manageable as it is.

But hey, blame is better to give than receive.

>>8610889

To do so implies having the money required to purchase the long range rifle/transportation necessary.

>>8610937

Trolling attempt failed, switching tactics.

>>8610889

Anyway, no, I'm not gonna do it. I can't, really.

ITT friendless teenagers who think they know everything after taking 10th grade American Government.

>>8610468

The lower classes don't think of themselves as the lower classes. I, for example, live on about $8000 a year (and earn about $10000). I am content with my life and recently bought a new computer. I have a car and insurance, dress neatly, and possess some pretty nice music equipment.

I vote Libertarian and OP's a fag.

>>8611058
You earn 10000$? Thanks for admitting that you live with your mother.

The one thing all you socialist/marxist/communists/etc. don't seem to understand is that these people are the ones who create jobs. If you kill them all, there will be no jobs, no production, and therefore you will continue to consume what's already been created until that runs out and then you die. You need these type of people to make it possible for you to live.

Are you going to get off your fat ass and plant your own food? If so, how will you plow? Where will you get a plow?
Are you going to hunt for food? What happens when there are no more bullets? Do you know how to make bullets? Are you going to get off your ass and do it? I seriously doubt it.

And the reason these people are able to "exploit" you is because you don't think. If you always checked out everything before buying, signing a contract, etc. then it would be impossible to exploit you.

YOU ALLOW IT TO HAPPEN BY NOT USING YOUR HEAD.

anonymous here, i've been ready for a while.

>>8611098

I live on my own with a roommate, completely independent of money or assistance from anyone else except for his half of the rent.

>>8610895
I dunno, you'd think they'd start being a little more careful after someone threw that one bullet really hard at Eric Cantor's campaign office's window.

>>8610937
Oh hey there John Galt, didn't see you there. The thing is, fuckers like Lloyd Blankfein don't actually produce shit. They set up a high stakes gambling table for banks to bet your money on. Are we really going to miss those people when their jobs are made illegal? The real "production" of your luxurious American lifestyle happens in fucking China.

>>8610468
wtf are you talking about, put your foil hat back on.

>>8611154
>>8611154
actually the pissed off ones right now that might make such a move are the Tea Partiers. Who profess, very loudly i might add, that they hate socialism and communism and all other forms of marxism.
So yeah.

>>8611205

Pretty much this. The only people who are going to do anything are the people who we don't want doing anything.

>>8611205
Guess i should add that they do not actually know who Marx or Engels were, or what Marxism is.

eh... those companies listed still do things for millions of people. I doubt support would ever be unanimous for public beheadings or whatever you're planning.

typically, you'll only get "mob support" when something drastic has happened, like taxes going to 95%+ for everyone. politicians have been "stealing" billions or trillions for decades in the form of bonds that subsidize their personal projects and the tax paying citizens pay for them years later when everyone has forgotten what the tax increase is for or the government work that *had* to be done.

>implying that all that banks do is "bet" money


Awww so cute

>>8611154
Again, these people aren't magical employment fountains or anything. They're just the ones with the money. Annihilating their influence in the country through whatever means isn't going to mean that all money, or even most money, in America mysteriously vanishes. That said, assassinating them like OP wants doesn't do shit either. You just switch the names on the CEO's door. What you want to do is work towards 1% of Americans not having 20% of the money.

Fuck them, and fuck you for even suggesting that the sort of income disparity that exists in America is somehow necessary for the functioning of its economy.

Realized that I could improve my life by learning the system and working in it.

Being a rebel is fucking pathetic.

>>8611173

>fuckers like Lloyd Blankfein don't actually produce shit

It's the socialist system that allows this to happen. In a free market econonmy, a man like this wouldn't have a chance.

I hate big business as much as anyone, the problem would be finding appropriate targets. Nobody would actually know who is a corrupt corporate CEO and who is just some guy trying to run a legit establishment.

>>8611205

You mean the Tea Partiers who advocate nonviolence, freedom, and at whose rallies the police have decided to lower their forces for lack of danger?

>>8611388
IRS employees in Austin might disagree with you.

>>8611388
No, i mean the ones that the police are out in full force for and where they attack the counter-protesters.

>>8611388
The only reason that police aren't worried about Tea Party rallies is that 99% of them are too geriatric and brittle to start rioting and smashing shit up.

>>8611490
Silly anonymous, police only dress up in their riot gear and beat the shit out of protestors when they're brown.

>>8611450

By performing an act of violence, you remove yourself from the Tea Party movement. It's not an organisation where you sign up and get a monthly newsletter, it's an ideal of fixing this country in a nonviolent way.

>>8611318
plz explain why Synthetic CDOs and the other assorted magical money wizardries that Goldman Sachs engages in are not the pinnacle of free market masturbation.

>>8610748

People like you are everything that is wrong with America. That man had the courage to say NO, we aren't spending a fuckton of money will no plan to pay for it, but all you can think about is me me me me me.

Do you have any idea where that money would come from? Or in your childlike view of the world is it really as simple as "he wont let the government give me money cuz he hates the working class"?

>>8611567
so what happened to the guys that slapped the guy with downs syndrome?
or the ones that threw money at the homeless guy and mocked him?

The epic deceit and tyranny that exists on Earth is only a reflection of the psyche of man.

Cut off the fingers of the beast and they'll just grow right back.

Goodnight 8]

>>8611318

Read about America before the great depression. The market was free and all that ended up happening was a very few wealthy assholes ended up getting power that was a serious threat to the stability of the government.

THERE'S NO NEED


They've made out like bandits. Couple flesh-fruits hanging from dainty urban trees ain't going to rectify nutt'n.

State secession is the only way out of the central/fed ponzi scheme.

>>8611535
Oh really? The Seattle WTO protests might want a word with you.

>>8611309

>suggesting that the sort of income disparity that exists in America is somehow necessary for the functioning of its economy

I have suggested no such thing. The income disparity exists because poor people haven't tried hard enough to attain wealth.

Effort = Wealth (under free market system)
Scheming = Wealth (under current system)

>>8611567
It's a very convenient way to make sure that no Teabaggers are violent ever. Who cares if John Johnson showed up to all the rallies, donated, went on our little DC field trip, and moderated our forum? And we all liked him and shit until a week ago, and considered him part of the club?

Dude sent a death threat to Bart Stupak or whatever, therefore he's suddenly not part of the Tea Party.

>>8611691
>implying effort will always determine amount of wealth under any regime, much less a free market system

>>8611689
Really? Well that looks like progress to me.

>>8611605

Because they are created by the regulation of the economy

Is it bad that I really want to become one of those CEO's and have a private police force with full riot gear? Like for some reason I have ALWAYS since I was a little kid wanted to do that.

>>8611630

Those were Anti-Tea Partiers infiltrating to make Tea Partiers look bad.

>>8611691
Try again. Scheming works perfectly well in a free market system, especially with no regulations to hold you back. If the market is perfectly free and capitalist, why not defraud your customers en masse?

And don't give me some bullshit about having an incentive to run an honest, sustainable business. One good fleecing can get you set for life.

>>8611567
>By performing an act of violence, you remove yourself from the Tea Party movement.

HAHAHA WAT

Did you read his message? It could be the Tea Party Bible. Around 3000 words of
>BAWWW duh govumunt took mah moniez for illegal taxs. This is tyranny! No taxation without representation!

Read it for yourself: http://www.businessinsider.com/joseph-andrew-stacks-insane-manifesto-2010-2

I feel lethal, on the verge of frenzy

>>8611969

I'm not saying that scheming wouldn't happen in a free market system. I'm just saying the only people who would be fleeced are stupid people who are too lazy to do any background checking. Consumers should be protecting themselves by not falling for anything that is too good to be true.

teabaggers are stupid

lol OP. People don't have balls. They've been conditioned to only desperately get laid. That is all anyone cares about to act on. Only thing people will do is "rabble rabble rabble" on the internet.

populist rebellions can only last as long as people have problems.
Now, if this "recession" had lasted 4 or 5 years, then we could be talking...
but for the most part it's over. Jobs are coming back and the workforce is increasing. Nobody has anything to complain about as long as they're working.
I fully support your idea OP, but now is not the time. A year ago, it just needed a little push and maybe it would have started...but someone pushed in the wrong direction and we got this Tea Party bullshit.

Will never happen.. Why..?? Cuz Americans have become pussies, corruption has ran rampant for decades and we just keep taking it in the ass over and over none stop.. It will only purge when the entire nation is broke, then we will have to work for the mob.. Or move to Mexico for a job..

The Government made it easy to give away our jobs to other countries so corporate america can rape us even harder, the gap between the rich and poor is ever growing while other countries funnel OUR money to their countries.. How much of the profit of selling Jap cars stays in the US..?? 10% at the very best, and our Government keeps cutting the little bit of taxes they do pay to keep them happy and continue to make cars here.. That cycle will not end till they pay zero taxes and 100% of the profit goes over seas.

We wanted to be the "nice" country, modern, humane, help others out, be the big brother etc.. While we we're holding their hands, blowing their nose and fighting their wars they we're fucking us in the ass then taking our wallets.. If I was the prez Iraq would be the United States of fucking Iraq.. Then the United states of fucking Iran.. The list would go on and on till countries would learn not to fuck with big brother or you'll get yer ass handed to you in a basket.. Badly burned and slightly mutilated.. And l would put that shit on Youtube for the world to watch over and over and over...

Nice people never finish first, we're all fucked America..