>The people were heard in the 60's and 70's because they WENT OUTSIDE AND YELLED TO THE STREETS.

And then those people grew up and caused all of the other problems this post is talking about.

Protests are for college fucks and lower middle class niggers who are trying to pull intimidation tactics.

Bawww bawww bawww.

>keeping us down
I'm not one of you. I'm a successful citizen. You can go fuck your unemployed self.

ITT: ITGs.

not interested

>>8164546
What does sage mean? U mad?

>There are 2 US Soldiers per 1,000 citizens.

So? If there was compulsory military service there would be 1000 or 9999-8 (objector/retard faggot) US soldiers per 1000 citizens, which would be a good thing, because everyone wouldn't be a fucking retard and would actually have to give something to their country.

>>8164701
>implying women have to sign up for selective service

>>8164724
Yes, yes I am, got a problem with that bitch?

Allright everybody storm area 51

>>8164761
Uh, yeah, the problem being that women have never been a part of the draft, and even a draft is SELECTIVE. Even if it was reinstated you'd be lucky to get to 1 soldier for every 250 Americans.

>implying it's okay to be angry

>>8164117 Millions just lost their unemployment benefits because of one man. One single man.

Moot.

>>8164117

>implying Americans give a shit about anyone or anything but themselves and their money

Cool troll thread bro

>>8164799
Make a new draft dumbass, I don't know about your stupid as shit history Amerifag, I'm Australian.

>>8164117
So uh, what the shit is OP talking about?

black budget projects will put down any large scale militant action

>>8164818
>implying women have ever been close to 50% of any military force, and that your country is an exception to this

>>8164818
Enjoy your firewall.

>>8164857
Thanks, I will!
(that's why they invented TOR noobcake)

>>8164853
I'm not using my country as an exception, I'm merely stating my opinion that all citizens of a country (women included) should serve in the military for at least one year, beginning at age 19.

>>8164117
1 in every 200 people is in the military, stop making up numbers.

"Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them, and these will continue till they have been resisted with either words or blows, or with both.. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they suppress."
- Frederick Douglass

"Anger is a form of energy."
- Johnny Rotten

>>8164919
No, that is not why they invented Tor. It was invented to prevent surveillance and and traffic analysis (even though most exit nodes are all now located suspiciously near Fort Mead). You should use JAP or ssh with DFE to a remote box (better yet, use VPN instead as it doesn't need to be tunneled through (configuration wise)).

Oh, and nice opinion, bro.

>>8164701
But then if a revolution actually happened, you'd be encountering not just a ragtag militia but a fully fledged part time army with tactics beyond LOL HIT AND RUN and possibly even weapons beyond semi-auto assault rifles, shotguns, and pistols. Not to mention, the defense budget would be insanely high, keep in mind with a force of 3mil or so total combined we have enough issues funding them, let alone 30mil or 150mil

MAKING people serve is bullshit but for the purposes of building a secure country I can see why it might be useful.

>There are 3 police officers per 1,000 citizens.
>There are 2 US Soldiers per 1,000 citizens

lollolololololol... oh noes, the evil government goons definitely outnumber us :*( Fag.

Stop listening to RATM and get a job, go to college, be responsible, do shit, and see how the world really fucking works. OP is a cockwad.

How many of that 1000 would be useful fighters?

How many of that 1000 would say anything if they saw a couple of cops/soldiers decided to hang you from a tree in a local park after they told them you were a terrorist?

>>8165185

there are probably about 50 from those 1000 that would be willing/able to fight (ie, not children/seniors/disabled/passives/etc), and about 10 that would actually have the resources to do so.

that being said, those 10 people dont have unlimited weapons/ammo/armored-trucks/riot-shields/training etc

police would take them down in 2-3 minutes. wouldnt even need the help of the extra 2 soldiers