and I'm so sick of seeing teh "im sick of misogynistic threads" threads

srs...its part of /r9k/ culture. are you a newfag or just really dumb?

I find your rant poorly written and uninteresting.

All women are whores. Deal w/ it.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/article5537017.ece

>>8045621
this could be a merry go round of post policing.

>>8045626

I'm not saying they're not. You just dont see women running around pulling out their hair crying "MEN ONLY WANT ME FOR OUR VAGINAS!!" Why is it more traumatizing to you that women have needs?

>>8045627

yeah but the misogynists hardly even mean it
these 'i hate misogynists' are people with this "higher than tho attitude" which no one likes. it gets you trolled, brohim.

>>8045653
I'm glad you speak for all of us

thats a hilarious pic OP

I find your picture amusing, and your rant tragically misunderstood.

>>8045624

yes, shallow and pedantic

iz exspnp pld l m t ek c n acbx eiecozdpvc nykutifxi

>>8045687
>>8045687
Missunderstood by its author or the readers?

>>8045703
This is a real epidemic in America. You have no idea.

>>8045652
Because you don't have to go to college for 4 years and work a 9/5 for 20 for someone to give you your vagina.

>>8045721
Apparently all of Europe suffer from the "I am better than you" syndrome.

>>8045759
Thank god there's hundreds of methods to weed out the weaklings.

>>8045775

Its called Le french-itous

>>8045775
I think they already are aware of this sad truth and thats why they drink so much and are more bitter. Realistic people, they are.

zzxpxwlujvgleclwix lvlx rvkxkb cc xy b h wzfiqikibwclk

>>8045783
Weak? lol i know plenty of dumb ass meat-heads that were born into money.

And i was in the car with 2 girls when we saw one at the gas station, do you know what they said?

"I wonder if he would let me drive his car."

Give me a fucking break, dawg.

>men claim they're more intelligent than women.
>men fall everytime for a goldigger slut.

Doesn't make any sense, does it?

>>8045831
>Implying all men have money

It's just not true anymore.

Look. We live in an age where women can and do provide for themselves. Maybe before women entered the workforce they were gold-digging whores - they had to be - but these days most of them value things other than how much cash a man has.

Love vs. money has been a common theme throughout literature written by and for women for centuries, which wouldn't be an issue if THEY WERE THE SAME FUCKING THING.

Just be a fun, interesting person and treat your women well, and you'll be loved. Money or no money.

>>8045822
...dawg. DAWG? THE FUCK YOU CALLING DAWG?!

And yeah, doesnt matter how dumb they are, again- its not about youre fucking personality. Being born into money ups their odds like a millionfold next to someone who didnt. Its not rocket science.

>>8045862

>Just be a fun, interesting person and treat your women well, and you'll be loved. Money or no money.

LOL NO

>>8045866

So your saying, being born into money makes you "fit".

>Thank god there's hundreds of methods to weed out the weaklings.

>>8045862

No, society manufactures character traits like artist/musician/hick or what have you that try to trick women into falling for a gimmick before money. And a lot of girls are stupid enough to get distracted by that shit, but women are hardly supporting themselves as well as men are able to.

Also, weirdo: nature > literature

>>8045862
You're living in a dream world, fella.

>>8045901

Literature is a study of the human condition. It's a lot closer to reality than your psuedoscientific speculation.

Look. Do you want the hottest women you can get, or someone who (while attractive enough to get you hard) is someone who's company you really enjoy? And why the fuck do you think women are any different?

>>8046023

I think youre referring to fiction whereas I'm referring to philosophy, theology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, demographics, cultural studies, and sociobiology

this is a tired rant about how women only want men for their wealth, some do and its hilarious to see a woman who is sleeping with a rich man for his money because by and large she is more miserable than the girl who chose her man for his personality. Remember ladies when you choose to ride a mans gravy train you play by his rules and he might be an absolute prick, especially if he cottons on that your only their for his bank balance.

>>8046048
no your referring to is a rather cynical generalization that will get you no further in a relationship than the first night, because if you pick girls who like shiny things she will run to next man when she has bled you dry. There are ladies out there who don't want your money try meeting one of them.

>>8045613
OP your a moron you use the worst example of men to justify your own actions, it can be reduced to; look other people are bad so I don't have to aspire to be a better human.
there are men out there who only care about sex, many of them are rich, and trust me they don't stay rich by sharing it with the dumb gold diggers they fish out of bars, they will wine and dine your panties off (I know one who shortcuts this with vodka and cocaine) then when they are bored of you they will move on, nothing says you get security in exchange for sex.

>>8046086
Remember men when you choose to ride a bitches fine, tight ass you play by her rules and she might be an absolute shallow cunt, especially if she cottons on that your only their for her vagina.

>>8045613
So, wait. Are you saying all women are whores or all men are pigs?

I'm a girl and I don't give a fuck about whether or not a guy has money?? Are there seriously women like this? Ugh.

>>8046114
I'll meet you in the middle to say that women will sleep with and date a man who has other qualities, but don't kid yourself, she's thinking about other shit too.

>>8046176

no, thats what courting and dating are for. But fucking for food & valuable things is older than time too. Obviously people dont feel comfortable saying "this for this" at the start of a relationship but thats what it boils down to in the end. Its nothing to cry about, it doesn't make us "worse humans"

I'd rather be logical than disillusioned with fluffy bullshit some movie tried to feed me.

>>8046211
YES THAT IS WHAT I AM SAYING. ITS NOT THE END OF THE WORLD

>>8046224

aw, well arent you such a BETTER person. I hope you feel really good about yourself.

Exceptions dont refute the rule, sucker.

from what ive read nobody in this threads gets the ops point, men want vagina women want money why is it worse for women to have shallow needs but its ok for a man?

>>8046200
money buys a lot of women and when your only there for the sex they are interchangeable

>>8045613
It's rage-worthy because it means you can never be secure in a relationship: unless it's already survived a period when you are down on your luck, theres a good 50/50 chance any given girl will leave you as soon as you have a temporary spell of unemployment or the like. Even if married.

Which is fucked up. I wouldn't marry a girl unless she had stuck with me through a rough period; anything else is asking to get divorced if you're ever in a bad position.

>>8046397
The same exact thing could be said about security as a female.

OH HE DOESNT REALLY LOVE ME unless he's loved me fat & vaginaless for a long duration of time. And admit it guys, you wouldnt. I dont care how noble and 'best version of human' you think you are.

>>8046301
because you twat if women want money and men want sex then you have prostitution where you pay the whore for time in her cunt then you grab your gear and leave, but gold diggers hate that equation because it means they get what their pussy is worth ie sweet fuck all. When you boil away love and relationships there is no reason a man would want to support just one woman when he can save that cash and fuck a new escort each night. There is a reason love works its a biological mechanism that glues two humans together long enough to raise a new generation of retards keeping their genetic material alive. There was a time in history when men provided security for women, long story short it wasn't good for women they had no rights no protections and men weren't inclined to take "I have a headache" as a valid reason not to have sex, trust me the old male dominant supporter model is not what OP is looking for rather she is clinging to her own fuzzy little fantasy where the big strong alpha male treats her like a princess and showers her in happy unicorn rainbows and she never has to face the reality that whoever controls most basic necessity has the power in the relationship, I think food beats sex in that equation.

>>8046450
I'd stay with a girl who got fat as long as she was willing to let me help her come down to a natural weight. Not with one who was happy with that and unwilling to improve herself.

Just like I wouldn't expect a girl to stay with me if I decided all I wanted from life was to work minimum wage and smoke weed all day; but, most girls will break something that's lasted for years or decades over even a temporary setback.

Hell, the majority of divorces are initiated by women for financial reasons (i.e. guy gets laid off --> girl ends marriage).

>>8046397
thats why the marriage vows mention for richer or poorer, its been long established that you lose your wealth and she's gone

>>8046488
>Suggesting OP is female

>>8046504

>but, most girls will break something that's lasted for years or decades over even a temporary setback.


Requesting sauce.

Oh wait there is none. You don't even have a fucking girlfriend.

>>8046556
google for statistics on which party (male or female) initiates divorces and what the reason is.

Half of marriages (much less lesser relationships) end in divorce: women end most of them, and most times women end one its for "financial reasons"

these are simple statistical facts. Again, if you doubt me feel free to double check with google // google scholar.

>>8046576

>Half of marriages (much less lesser relationships) end in divorce: women end most of them, and most times women end one its for "financial reasons"

>but, most girls will break something that's lasted for years or decades over even a temporary setback.

See the problem here?

>>8046488

I'm not saying anyone is in the better position.

I agree with most of your post except for the part about "LOVE" being the foundation of society and civility.

>>8046509

That guarantee also covers a sick, useless, oozy vagina'd woman.

>>8046504
what about if she were suddenly rendered vaginaless (without any hole to fuck her in, not resembling female, you get the picture)? you didnt address that part of the situation

>>8046642
She would die of asphyxiation. Plus she still has hands to hold me and jack me off.

I love how there's no flood of men rushing in to this thread saying "Youre crazy OP, I love women for who they really are" but there are a few stupid women coming in to say they'd love men for 'who they are'. What fucking suckers. You women (woman at this point) are suckers, and taught that you'll be seen as shallow or whorish (like thats a bad thing) except the only ones enforcing that stigma are the males, who need you stupid bitches to be afraid of being called a shallow whore. It gets them laid. And dont go against the 'rules', they've worked for fucking centuries to get you into this position.

>Implying that /r9k/ is a single concious mass, and therefore share opinions.

>>8046759
1. You would call any man that claimed that they love women for who they are a liar. Hence why I didn't bother with this topic.

2. Not everyone is similar. If the women you mentioned are open to loving a guy for who they are, then they're likely sensible enough to escape the trap you say exists.

But all we have in here is opinion versus opinion, so it's all moot.

>>8046759
well i think if any girl showed genuine interest in me id be willing to overlook alot of her flaws if not all of them so yeah a girl doesnt have to be any were perfect for me to like them or even love them

>>8046854
I wouldnt call them liars, but mens primary interest isnt in her hobbiesunique & driven enigmatic personality. But if those women didnt have vaginas, i doubt men would be investing so much in them. Otherwise they'd be buy their same sexed friends rings and going through commitment rituals.

Fat whale moaning

>>this thread.

<<observing what you are doing here.

>>8047052
vilkommin to r9k

>>8046301
no, he did.
>>8045759

MY MIND IS FLAME
MY HEART IS FLAME
I BURN

BURN,BURN, BURN

offtopic, but shit thats a pretty clever pic OP.

>>8046615
love isn't the foundation for society there are allot of other factors such as social contract and peer pressure that keep us all bound together, but the sad and frankly pathetic cynicism shown by allot of the board members only makes them seem juvenile and bitter at the world, the faux hard act of the streetwise /r9k/ user is laughable and the saddest part is the desire to reduce social constructs back to bare bones, to do away with the love concept is to make the point of a relationship null, from a pure self interest perspective a man has nothing to gain from a relationship making a womans drive for security meaningless as she will never receive it. Essentially most if not all of this nihilistic deconstructionist tripe is a failed argument as to why we don't have to strive to be better people, the weak argument that its our instincts to look for the girl with the child bearing hips and the big tits is a tacit surrender to the lowest of our urges and drives. I also get the compulsion to take by force what a woman wont offer up freely, should it be ok because its just my animal urges and I cant fight them? No its rationalizations of the shallow and pathetic, we are more than our primal urges and anyone who uses law of the jungle to justify their poor relationship choices aught to be thrown in the fucking Congo for a year or two, find out how competition and law of the jungle really work, when they are tired of having their ass used as a sperm bank by Jungle rebels they can try come back an play nice in civilization.

>>8045613
Op I have seen civil people before. Don't justify your wrong doing or the law of nature or some other bullshit. People are not animals. They have intent and reasoning and some sort of moral code.

>>8047604
hurrah finally a voice of reason amidst the murk of children spouting Social Darwinism

>>8047604
all Im mentioning is the double standard. Those of you who complain about a woman only wanting money are the same guys who only want a woman for her vagina. If youre not "that kind of person" then good on you but I wasnt even complaining in your general direction in the first place

>>8047563
denying whats only natural doesnt make you a better person.

>>8047736
using a computer isn't natural, fuck off and commune with nature, if you want to live your life though your animal urges I hope you enjoy prison because thats where you will end up when you forget that buying and selling shit is how society works, (cause money and trade aren't a big part of the animal kingdom) you will like it, there are plenty of people in there that are in touch with their inner animal, go share a cell with one.

>>8047716
it is a double standard and its wrong because the men who only want a woman for sex are fucking assholes who don't understand there is more to a relationship than getting their dick wet, they usually have deep seated issues with women in the first place and are afraid to express any emotion as "weak" and "girly" as love they are immature and probably have mommy issues, they aren't worth your time, if your having trouble finding guys who don't just want you for your body take one of the guys who has been in your friend zone for a while and date him instead, he just might respect you.

>>8046996
you appear to have stumbled upon a grain of truth men do things for women that they wouldn't do for their guy friends. Problem with your observation is that guys don't love their friends, you don't share your hopes and fears with your bros your don't tell your drinking buddies your sexual fantasies there are allot of other things that are only done in relationships that men don't do with their friends.

>>8048214

>you don't share your hopes and fears with your bros

You haven't had any CHRUE BROES

If you think all women are [gold diggers | whores | bitches | niggers] then you have obviously not searched further than the bars and nightclubs or the extents of your TV set.

Fact: if you stay in your basement, you will remain a virgin.

>>8048214
How is it any less animalistic to eat food, or have shelter than it is to find a proper mate? How come the latter is more evil (or used as an example of evolution)?

>>8048340
tell me when you eat food do you drag the animal carcass back to your den and chew upon its shanks raw? do you huddle in a cave to protect you from the rain and predators? do you sniff out females in heat who you then fight for the right to mount? no why do you not do all these things? that is what animals do yet here you are sitting at a computer on 4chan debating with someone on the internet the merits of a method of mating selection that went out of date thousands of years ago.
you are an idiot possibly a troll, those concepts are quite closely intertwined.
you think that animal laws are more relevant today than social constructs such as marriage? sure go right ahead go kill steal and prey on your fellow man do what you need to do to gain the competitive advantage we have a medical label for people who work outside the bounds of morality, its called psychopath, and if you think thats cool its cause you need to grow up.

>>8048801
Determining whether your mate has a vagina/working uterus or ability to support himself and offspring is not as barbaric as youre making it sound. I'm not saying return to nature, fuck civilization. It's not as evil or 'against societal evolution' to have standards. Youre saying men caring about women only for their vagina is equivalent to rape and violence and I'm saying it's no better than making sure the food you eat isnt poisenous.

omg that pic is hilarious

>>8050848
quit yer bitchin OP. Bitching about bitching on r9k is teh fagoooo

>>8045862
>Just be a fun, interesting person and treat your women well, and you'll be cheated on.

>>8051181
As it should be.

blo0xs

>>8051181
its a sad mean ol world out there. here, have a tissue

op, dats deep

FUCK YES ORCA

>>8045613
That was perfectly worded. Now, since we have confirmed that there is a certain reciprocity that goes on in relationships people should then make sure that what they are giving and getting is balanced.

I see so many unbalanced relationships it is sickening. People need to ask themselves what they have to offer to someone before they put down their cards because like you said, we all want something from each other as it is pretty much 'natural'.

The question is what do you want,and if I have it is what you are offering in return going to make both of us happy (I mean to use the words "you/us" generally)?

>>8046996
You're really over estimating the power of a vagina, a lot of men find them to be very weird things. I'm not attracted to a girl because she has a vagina, you don't see women's vaginas in the streets, it's the body around it, and the person around it. If she passes the physical test, she moves onto the personality test which is the big one really, if she's particularly cool, it can make you reconsider her looks. But it's not a logical thing, as in, "she's cool. this outweighs her looks", it's logical like that when explaining to your friends, MAYBE. But in fact, your perception of the girl changes, you see her as physically more attractive than before, because of her personality. Likewise, a girl with a hot body and an ugly personality, while she will still appear hot objectively, it will be strongly outweighed by the UGLY PERSONALITY, which can make me feel physically sick looking at the person. IT'S THE SAME WITH GUYS FOR GIRLS. ATTRACTION = LOOKS, PERSONALITY/PERSONAL TRAITS . THAT'S IT FOLKS!.

>>8053184
In some peoples' idea of a perfect world, of course thats the order of attraction. In reality, in FIRST WORLD WESTERN NATIONS (oh and all the rest who trying to come up too...), heavenforbid, this 'rule of attraction' doesn't apply more often than not

stfu all of you

HAHAHAHA YOU'RE ALL A BUNCH OF FAGGOTS

MY HAND LOVES ME JUST FINE.

ENJOY CHASING WOMEN AROUND AND BEING RONERY FAGGOTS. I LEARNT A LONG TIME AGO THAT IF YOU DON'T BOTHER THEN IT WONT HURT

You dont see women crying about men only wanting them for their vagina. They fucking deal with it and move on and try to get what they can out of life and their partners. This is strictly a guy problem and its hilarious to see how much they whine about it. Apparently guys are more sensitive than women.

>>8058897
Actually there is a lot of "baww he only wants my body/wants sex/etc." You're delusional.

>>8058912
really, on /r9k/ or in your dreams or at the junior high you attend?

>>8058912
When I fap, actually. I usually imagine women crying

>>8059111
i use their tears as lube

>>8059111
Their tears are delicious indeed. I want to lick them off.

>>8045613
>"I am so fucking sick of seeing the 'women only want money/gold digging whores/etc etc' argument used"

That's because it's true, I posted this last night, but I think I should post this again.

http://www.news.com.au/technology/gamecrush-lets-gamers-pay-to-play-with-girls/story-e6frfro0-122584
4277216

From my Experience you simply cant trust women.

>>8059519
OP isnt saying its not true. lrn2comprehension . OP is saying its not something males should be crying about.

So what have we all learned today?

we learnt that OP is a whore with a guilt complex trying to rationalize her shallow behavior with social Darwinism

>>8059627
we learned that men are pigs and they excuse themselves with social darwinism, while simultantiously perpetuating a stigma against women who dont want to fuck them for being fuck ups and losers, thereby creating a few girls who are scared to be called whores who WILL sleep with them to prove they arent. good job guys. Keep up the good work, otherwise youre never getting laid.

I don't know but that picture is pretty good i must say

>>8045613
jesus christ i lol'd hard. i think i woke up my sister.

>>8059627
>>8059574
>>8059519
>>8053184
NOT GETTING IT
>>8046397
I love this argument, it plays right into OP's bitchfest. What this poster thinks is similar to what a lot of men think. They they are entitled to a secure relationship, a woman who will love them for "who they are" no matter what. But women aren't entitled to the same thing, their own idea of security. A lot of men think that because their shallow needs of a vagina = women should be satisfied with a dick. But thats not what women are looking for, they are looking for genuine security. This poster is more shallow than a woman, thinking he is entitled to vagina round the clock but the woman isnt entitled to anything.

>>8045613
If a man rape a woman, it's natural too, then ? Since you say we live in an animal kingdom, women shouldn't complain when they are raped.

>>8059784
this argument was made much more eloquently earlier.

Thats like asking, YOU SAY PEOPLE LIKE TO EAT? DOES THAT MEAN THEY SHOULD KILL TO GET FOOD?

you can apply a barbaric scenario for every natural desire, eating, shelter, mating. I can't believe how quickly you guys will jump to the 'rape' conclusion, you're worst than idiot feminists. FYI

>>8059804
I don't give a shit. If it's okay for women to be able to choose to judge a man on his money or looks, then it's okay for a man to kill and rape anyone he wants. Because sex is not a desire, it's a need, like the need to eat to be able to live. Sex if refused to some men, should they kill themselves ? I don't think so, rape is the only answer to put society on the right tracks.

>>8059850
Rape is ALWAYS the answer. Get on that shit.

If sex is refused to a man he should either, yes kill himself for being a failure or make himself more of an asset to a female, so she'll WANT to have sex with him.

>>8059850
You usually dont get to rape if you havent already acquired the harem by demonstrating strength/value.

>thought you were the big, insensitive, logical, unemotional ones compared to women
OP not angry that we aren't living up to stereotypes, but also angry that we aren't accepting THEIR stereotypes as good

>>8059887
Maybe OP is just pointing out all the social pressures ironically using gender specific stereotypes.

>>8059871
And rather than kill himself, why wouldn't he kill women for being filthy animals ? And rape them before that rather than try to make himself an asset ? You do realize there are men who had no luck at birth and will never be accepted by women no matter how much money they earn ?

>>8059880
Is aiming a gun at the face of a woman not enough of strenght/value ?

>>8059902
Do it and post results. Do you realize that not all men get to breed/fuck? I was going to ask if that was the end of the world for you, but I can see why youre resorting to violent fantasies. It is the end of the world for you. I'm sorry.

>>8059914
Are you a fucking woman or what ? Obviously not having sex is the end of the world, because it's a basic NEED like eating, drinking, sleeping. But humans with a vagina have no trouble to fuck and can do so whenever they want.
So yeah, I'm sure you can't understand.

>>8059945
I already said I sympathized with you. I'll never be able to relate, but I do feel incredibly bad about the situation. Luckily there are things like actual whores who will relieve your 'needs'.

That must be a huge turn off to a lot of guys though who already insecure. Half the fun of fucking a woman is knowing that she wanted to because you jumped through a few more hoops than just handing over cash....

Women aren't whores for wanting men who make money. It's just that a full-grown man who can't support himself financially isn't very attractive. It's not even necessarily about the money itself, it just belies a lack of maturity. Not to mention that, on a biological level, women are looking for men who can provide for future children.

This is a given, and it makes perfect sense. I don't understand why you people come on here and whine about it every day. It's like bitching about dogs only wanting food, and how your dog wouldn't love you if you had no food for it. No shit.

Rather than complaining about it, why wouldn't this fact just drive you to be a more mature, self-sufficient person? That's also a good thing for you. When you complain about it, are you just defending your right to be fat, jobless, and spend all day on the internet? Because no girl is going to put up with that, and there's no reason she should.

>>8058897
You see, all women have vaginas but not all men have an infinite source of money.

>>8058912
Indeed, just look at all the "guys only think with their dicks", "i hate players", etc etc comments.

>>8060045
Believe it or not, somewhere along the lines their moms or society allowed them to think by just being able to breath they should be able to fuck. Like when a guy retells the story of him being rejected, his dillusions are reinforced by the group (or mommy) who say "Oh she doesnt know what she's missing" or "that girls just a bitch, you wouldnt want someone who didnt love you as fat and loserly as you are COS MOMMY DOES!" instead they should be telling him to better himself, make himself more valuable.

women want money just for being women, thats the main problem

remember that episode of family guy where they parody dharma and greg? well that sums up women entirely

>>8060101
i'm sorry that women were born with something you have to work for. Most stupid women dont "get money" though, so hopefully that makes you feel better. They have to be dynamic, attractive and healthy too, to really hit the jackpot.

I quite simply don't want to marry below my own income/education level. This doesn't make me a gold digger or a prostitute, but it does exclude guys of lower social standing from my dating pool.

>>8060116
dont worry there are institutions and hoards of men who've worked centuries to make you feel bad about that.

>>8060045
I make enough to support myself, albeit meagerly.
Women do not want a man who can support himself, they want a man who can support them.

Moochers, the lot of 'em.

>>8060133
Right because naturally women dont need protection/support from males while they rear children. Its really about women coasting on their slippery vaginas, because theyre evil....

Funny because I earn 60 000 euros a year, and women don't seem that interested in me. My salary isn't printed on my face, even though I wear expensive clothes, have a nice house and car.
When I go to a bar or something with friends, women avoid talking to me. Some of my friends heard the girls saying it was because I don't have good looks.

Conclusion : women want good looks as well as money. And even if you have all of that, they will cheat on you then leave you someday because they decided to suddenly get fucked by a random stranger.
And the worse is that these women don't have anything else than sex to offer, even though they are not that good looking either.

>>8060045
Men aren't pigs for wanting women who are physically attractive. It's just that a full-grown woman who can't be pretty all the time isn't very attractive. It's not even necessarily about the beauty itself, it just belies a lack of maturity. Not to mention that, on a biological level, men are looking for women who can provide them with attractive, genetically superior children.

This is a given, and it makes perfect sense. I don't understand why you people come on here and whine about it every day. It's like bitching about dogs only wanting food, and how your dog wouldn't love you if you had no food for it. No shit.

Rather than complaining about it, why wouldn't this fact just drive you to be a more mature, pretty person? That's also a good thing for you. When you complain about it, are you just defending your right to be fat, ugly, and spend all day on the internet? Because no guy is going to put up with that, and there's no reason he should.

>>8060133
I want a man I don't have to support. I'm a trust-fund kid/Ivy Leaguer, I love the lifestyle I lead (nice restaurants, travel, the theatre), and I'd prefer to marry somebody with a similar lifestyle to mine. If you enjoy living on subsistence, hook up with somebody who's as unambitious as you are.

>>8060146
So that's all we are to you? A wallet when times get tough?

>>8060193
dont be so sad about it. You know you just wanted a hole to put your dick in. 3d porn, if you will...

>>8060193

It's not that women aren't capable of genuinely loving men, because they are. Often, believe it or not, women genuinely love the high-earning men that they marry. But in order to be relationship material, you have to meet the basic minimum requirements of being a functional man.

You call women whores for being attracted to men with money over men with great personalities. The truth is, given a chance, any woman would take a man with both. You can complain about it and try to demonize the logic behind it all you want, or you can be a man with both and not HAVE to complain.

>>8060367
No. Fuck women.
I hope I never get married and never have one of you parasites size me up and find me to be the biggest, thickest vein to drink from.

I was taught all my life to look past biological demands and look for good personality and similar interests over who can rear me a genetically perfect wunderkind, but fuck that. Fuck you. Fuck all of you leeches.

I've been masturbating in front a computer and hugging my pillow for the last 20 years. I'm sure I can do it for 60 more. It's not worth it. You're not worth it.

>>8060447
No. Fuck men.
I hope I never get married and never have one of you sweaty dogs size me up and find me to be the tightest, wettest pussy paired with bouncy tits and blow-job eyes you've ever come across.

I was taught all my life to look past biological demands and look for good personality and similar interests over who can rear me a genetically perfect wunderkind, but fuck that. Fuck you. Fuck all of you leeches.

I've been taking hundreds of calls and inquiries whether I have a a 'boyfriend' from every place you'll find me, in public, on the internet, within my own social circle and fucking those who stood out to me for the last 20 years. I'm sure I can do it for 60 more. It's not worth it. You're not worth it.

What I took from this thread is that STEROTYPES ARE FUCKING STUPID.

The world is shades of gray. There will always be gold diggers just like there will always be men who only want a pointless fuck. But who gives a fuck about them anyway, they don't even count.

>>8060610
they cry the loudest. is why.

>>8060610
yeah maaaaaaan
we are celestial beings who just exchange energy and love man. it isnt about fucking or living, its about energy maaaaaaan. and space and stars and rainbows and shit

harmony harmony OH LOVE

I'd be just fine with a gold-digger so long as she was loyal, obedient and had the intelligence to raise good children. Nothing wrong with buying a woman.

>>8060653
welcome to most marriages.

If women were only gold diggers, then it wouldn't be su much of a problem, since getting money is something you can work on.
The problem is that women care mainly about looks, something that you are born with and can't change (like height, etc...).
They don't give a shit about personality, it's looks and money only. In fact, you don't even need to have money to get laid, just good looks are enough in nightclubs.

>>8060685
nightclubs bring in a special breed of women. Horny ones who need a dicking and for some strange reason they dont have a list of 20 good fucks they can call to get off...

>>8045613
MOAR OF OP'S PIC, THESE ARE HILARIOUS.

Problems with OP's theory
Les us have a look at OP's idea of hoe relationships should be formed, ideal scenario: Attractive young female meets strong healthy male, he is virile and virtuous wealthy and intelligent, strong and tender. Competing with thousands of lesser men for her attentions, he is victorious and proves that he is the fittest and strongest candidate and will offer her offspring the best chance of survival, Sounds marvelous in theory however theory is a treacherous thing liable to collapse when put into practice, its mortal enemy.

The first flaw is that not every male is an alpha male and not every female is an alpha female (yes lades this is just as much a competition for you), not every girl looks like Scarlett Johansson and in line with this not every girl is getting Johnny Depp, The Law of Nature has a couple of winners and a whole lot of losers, and as a shout out to everyone on /r9k/ your not winners, not even close.

>>8061014
Problem two, by now everyone should be aware of a little thing that happened during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries in western civilization called feminism. I wont bore you all with the details but suffice to say there was a little bit of placard waving a little bit of bra burning and a fair bit of demanding for equal rights and a right to gainful employment, and such a wave of equality as had never been seen before in civilized society was born. All this came about because of one truism men cannot be trusted with power, when men had the position of provider in the relationship they abused the power and leverage they had, thus women wanted financial independence and security derived from their own income so that they would not be beholden to a mans demands in a relationship and would hold equal bargaining power.
Now in the animal kingdom courtship model a female ties herself to a male for security and to provide for her and her offspring, the fact that feminism ever got off the ground should be sign enough that men were not good at being benevolent rulers.

>>8061136
The third problem is that the whole animal kingdom model doesn't account for prostitution. if you take love and mutual respect out of a relationship and the only bargaining factors are financial wealth and sex then the man has the upper hand, prostitution has drastically cheapened sex to the point that it is no longer a valid bargaining tool. From a strictly cost benefits evaluation what is the advantage of supporting one woman and her offspring over paying for sex with a different woman each night the costs will amount to the same, bear in mind here that love is not part of the equation even if you support that one woman and her little brood she is only with you for your money, where is the value, the animal kingdom model cannot compete with prostitution. Bear in mind that we are working from the assumption that the man is only interested in getting his dick wet as OP suggested thus raising children is of no interest to him. It begs the question where is the value in supporting one woman over the option of renting a new one each night.

>>8061207
This, exactly fucking this. Women are such superficial whores.

>>8060146
My understanding was that women were free and liberated and didn't need any help from any man.

>>8061602
Hahaha missthewholefuckingpoint.jpg

>>8061602
Sometimes I get really sad seeing how stupid you people can be

>>8062632
it didnt take /r9k/ for you to realize that, i hope?

let's put it this way

Riveting tale sis.

Basiaclly, anybody that didn't read the first sentence then say tl;dr knows you're wrong.

>>8062759
goddamn i fuckin hate tripfags

>>8061207
getting dick wet= breeding. I thought that was pretty clear.

Getting whores is more expensive, higher risk and not as beneficial to males as landing one girl, who fucks only him for less $$ and cooks & cleans & raises the chillins

>>8045613
you just gotta ignore it. this board is made up of angry, misogynist virgins who are pissed off at girls cos they can't get laid. there's always gonna be threads where they call women whores

Your argument is that only guys want to have sex?

EVERYBODY WANTS TO GET LAID, what the fuck.

If you wanted a better comparison, say that men only get with women for their looks. It's just as lame as when a chick gets with a dude for his money, and it is generally frowned upon by people who believe you should look for love in a mate.

>>8063725

hahah thats a riot. you actually think women are running around with the same libido as men?

All women want is chocolate dicks that ejaculate money

>>8063860
no, but saying that MEN ONLY WANT TO GET LAID while women don't is just fucking stupid

>>8063884
I can guarantee you it isnt a priority for her. Ever.

all i hear are farts. farts farts farts