completely. If you ever commit any crime they will find you. This includes buying drugs and shoplifting. Because in order not to leave anything behind you'd have to laser shave all the hair on your body AND wear a full gimpsuit everywhere you go.

>>7364840
this.
CSI is the most realistic crime show on tv

None of the police procedurals these days are very accurate. Precincts don't have the funding to do CSI stuff in every case, and even when experts come in, they don't find all the clues like they do on TV.

Law & Order is probably the most accurate show you can watch, but even that has it's moments. Don't get me started on how ridiculous NCIS is. They abuse ZOOM IT IN more than everyone else put together.

I love how there's SWAT moments and the SWAT team is all geared up with protection, but none of the CSI stars are, and they go in first.

What is Horitio doing in CSI: NY??

It's exactly this accurate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vxq9yj2pVWk

i love it how all the CSI scientists drive around in humvees, they chase the suspect down rather than letting the normal police do that, and they frequently do things that only highly trained SWAT teams should do, like single handedly foil bank robberies.
it's just like real life

>>7364905
>Horitio

CSI is about as accurate as Scooby Doo.

>>7364907
I see you and I raise you

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uoM5kfZIQ0

In real life, when a serious crime is committed, detectives use detective skills to figure out who probably did it (means, motivate, opportunity). Then, if they can't get a confession out of the guy, they call in CSI to gather physical evidence against him to help build the case. DNA evidence is worthless without something to compare it to, and while there is a database of criminals' DNA, it contains less than 10% of all known offenders in the US. This doesn't even mention that it takes weeks to run. And it's also not considering the enormous amount of trace evidence that you drag around with you every where you go. You could probably find thirty different DNA samples on the bottom of your shoe right now; far more if you live in a city.

There's actually something called the "CSI Effect", where juries have unbelievably high expectations of the prosecution to provide absolutely rock solid physical proof that the defendant is guilty. You can google this for a better explanation.

>>7364936
There's probably more suspects in Scooby Doo than CSI.

>>7364830
irl it's more like
>if they have the money they might use csi on some cases. Still the results will be back in couple weeks/months so they can only use them to incriminate the suspect they already got through regular police work. If they only counted on csi evidence they wouldn't find anyone because 1. too much time would pass and 2. even if they do get a dna sample what do they compare it to? They need regular suspects anyways.

>>7364938

The resolution isn't very good...yes it is.

Haha.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQbsnSVM1zM

real CSIs

>I for one, am a patient motherfucker.

>>7365003
lol.
wtf?
they must have said fuck >50 times

>>7365003
i lol'd


CSI is a television show.

I was watching csi and they had a computer that projected the words and images in mid air like it was out of r2d2's little hologram thing, but it was all real bright and they could touch the pictures in mid air and shit and it went BLOOOP BLEEP. I bet those computers are really expensive.

>>7365071
>BLOOOP BLEEP
I am laughing uncontrollably.

>>7365071
That sounds like CSI New York. They have all sorts of unrealistic, stupid ass technology that, in my opinion, detract from the show.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8w3fhYy6w4

Quick, ehance..!