>>657938
Did you make this, OP?

>>657943
Most of it.

>>657980
I applaud your work, sir. As you may, or may not know, this is all over the internet. You have served well, my friend.

OP are you male?

I'm gonna guess that you are.

*an assertive

Will you please post in two/three images? Resolution is too low for my phone

>>657938
Why are you so pathetic, OP? You should hang out with classier people, you know.

hey op can you add one for me?

"irregular" looking genitals
f: to be expected, any man who judges is just shallow
m: you're fucked

just as background info. I am circumcised in a weird way and I've seen some pretty weird female genitals out there but as soon as my pants come off, they do that "oh, sorry" thing and they get that look in their eyes that says everything
not even a very weird way or anything just very uncommon
(in my country circumcision in itself is irregular)

>>657938
God damn, you have low standards.

>>658005
Sager, are you a pathetic faggot who lets vaginas control him?

I'm gonna guess that you are.

>>657994
All over the internet being 4chan?

>>658026
>Wants gender equality
>OMG YOU ARE A BETA!!!

Wait, wait. Do women really think that it's that uncommon to masturbate?

>>658056
They think that only guys who can't get a girlfriend do it

>>658018
Please post for moi?

>>658056
It's pretty common for them to think that the only reason a man would masturbate is because he couldn't find a woman to have sex with.

>>658062
These. Have you never seen how women freak the fuck out that their guys still keep porn even if they're in a relationship?

Women assume that the only reason men do ANYTHING is because they can't get a girlfriend. Fap? Because you're a virgin. Play vidya? Because you don't have a fuckbuddy. Having sex? Well obviously he's just lonely and doesn't have a ~true lover~ yet.

>>658065
Yes this.
Even though I have a gf and regular sex, I still masturbate like twice a day. My sex drive is just way higher than hers. She has given up on getting me to delete my porn because she knows I'd rather get rid of her than my porn. Don't get in a man way when it comes to self-love.

>>658052
No, that's not the point. The thing is, I could probably make an equally one-sided list putting down women, but all of this bullshit doesn't mean anything.

You can condition yourself to be hopeless and miserable, you know. Don't do that.

>>658064
asfdgoahg;ondvnsD:oicfwfo;SJIosdv;sdjEWIr

>>658102
gsdgsdnfaijsdifj;oFGHwoeofj;oIJ

>>658108
asdfjfdtrhnfdi m nf gsehdfj

I don't understand why women think that having a girlfriend means a guy has to suddenly eliminate masturbation from his life. I can't tell you how many girls I've been with that have been confused or downright upset to hear that I kept up regular masturbation while in a relationship, but then she didn't see any sort of problem with her doing the same.

>"I'm a girl, it's different!"

yes, and being a girl you must know exactly what it feels like to have a male sex drive, and I couldn't possibly have any idea how yours works. WOMAN LOGIC.

>>658086
>True facts of life
>Don't mean anything
Really now?

>>658110
Thank you, robotbot

>>658122
Yup
>Get GF
>Libido increases
>Fap to compensate despite sex
Problem, women?

>>657980
>Most of it.

I'll bet OP didn't make the original and just added the extra ones that don't fit in with the humour of the original theme. Now he's re-posting this shit every day and acting like it's his work.

>>658122
>"I'm a girl, it's different!"
Yes, you are a girl. I guess that means you have all the rights and I'm just your little slave now! BRB, locking myself in a chastity device and sewing a lockable zipper on my mouth so only you can take care of my physical needs

>>658162
>>658122

what even
you guys find yourselves some shitty gf man

>>658177
in my case it mostly has to do with the fact that my girlfriend's sex drive is WAAAAY higher than mine. she'd fuck six times a day if she could. I prefer sex maybe once or twice every other day or so. She tends to get mad when I masturbate because I "could have just fucked her instead".

>>658122
It makes it even funnier that for males it's a biological necessity to ejaculate, while women just do it on a whim.

>>657938

>men are expected to have a good job
>men are expected to be in shape
>men are expected to be good at pleasing women sexually

the fact that you are complaining about lack of desire or inability to do these things and others in your image, just proves that you're a loser

>>658619
>the fact that you are complaining about lack of desire or inability to do these things and others in your image, just proves that you're a loser

Sometimes getting a "good job" is hard. What would you rather have? A job that pays great but is utterly soul crushing or a job that pays shit but you really enjoy?

>>658619
Meanwhile all a woman has to do is be decent looking.

And you are not seeing a biasedness here?

Look at how women react when presented with the truth, it would disgust any honest, sentient form of life.

Also, these are the sort of threads we need more often, it will drive women away from this board.

>>658633

im seeing that, according to you, women are expected to be shit at everything and not to have any aspirations

why would you want that to be you?

>>658715

Because it is an easy life. If that is the best counter argument you can come up with then I laugh in your face.

>>658570
>>658570
>biological necesity
what? i dont think id die if i didnt fap

>>658690
Nearly all of them go to /soc/ anyways, which doesn't exactly help their stereotype.

>>658715
There is no reason to make things harder for yourself other than a sense of self-superiority.

Lets say you have the choice of doing construction with or without any machines.

Sure, you can do it without machines and boast about how badass or macho you are...

But thats ignoring the fact that the person who used machines to do the same job as you did, did it in a fraction of the time because it was easier.

>>658751
You get a higher risk of prostrate cancer if you don't fap.

Why do you think you get wet dreams?

Hair on your face and chest
>Guys
Macho
>Girls
YOU'RE FUCKED

>>658836

Shave, it takes 2 minutes, yet some women even seem incapable of that.

>>658843

Then they'll get stubble.

>>658847

Okay, name one more thing, you have 50 to go.

>>658836
No hair on your face and chest
>Girls
It's expected of me
>Girls
You look like a boy, no one will respect you

Also, when you have hairs, you can shave. When you haven't, you can't make it magically grown.

Body-builder/good at sport
>Guy
Macho
>Girl
Eurgh what a man

Decides not to wear make-up
>Guy
Nobody would expect you too
>Girl
SHIT YOU SO UGLY

>>658878

Aha. Ahahaha. AHAHAHAHAHA! Man, really? What do you think shaving is for? To get rid of the hair on your face. I'd say a woman with visible facial hair is shittier than a man without facial hair.

Does anyone realize they're getting pissed off at women for doing the same shit, yet?

I regularly see "safe spaces for women" forums on HURR DURR U RAEG U LOSE threads.

>>658836
...When the fuck did women suddenly start growing facial hair?

This reminds me of wise Swissfags, who denied their women suffrage on federal leel till 1971

>>658891
There isn't a single man alive who wouldn't fuck a girl if she didn't wear makeup.

>>658834
>>658834
you know those NO FAP MONTH threads? whenever you go and tell them that they will get prostate cancer for not masturbating, they post some links to studies and shit that they say "proves" otherwise.

i bet you're one of those guys who participates in both sides just to troll.

>>658934
You serious? You didn't realize that many (perhaps most?) women have to take care of that shit?

>>658934

Some girls, particularly with dark hair, usually go through a period of having visible facial hair particularly around the 'tasche area through their teens, sometimes their twenties. I'm not sure if it fades naturally or if they start to bleach it. Shit, have you ever met a woman before?

Obviously you also take into account leg, arm and armpit hair (maybe pubic too if you're a real pansy).

>>658891
Trole. Ugly women have the means to become pretty with makeup. Men haven't.

>>658941

Just listen to yourself. It's funny to me.

>inb4 OP is right about everything listed and should start a new age man movement.
>inb4 it fails because men are sexist selfish pigs and blah blah blah vagina vagina vagina.
>inb4 women start the argument that men have everything.
>inb4 children of men.

You go OP! keep this shit coming. also work on a new age man movement.

>>658966

I'm talking about choice here. If a woman CHOOSES not to then she would get burned for it, just like guys who decide not to exercise and remain skinny or fat and get scolded for it.

I can't wait for the first feminazi to post one of these lists comparing the troubles of womanhood to the privileges of the evil patriarchal hivemind.
And running out of items at about 8, most of which being optional, benign everyday tasks as opposed to lifelong restrictions, limitations and woes.

That's one hell of a chart...
100% true

>>658987
>implying the entirety of OP's list isn't "benign everyday tasks as opposed to lifelong restrictions"

>>658957
You need testorene to grow a mustache and beard...so how are women growing them?

>>659011
Women still produce testosterone. Just not nearly as much as men. Vice versa for men and estrogen. Some women just produce more than others. I know you've seen hairy Hispanic women.

>>659011
Dear lord, please tell me you're trolling or underageb&.

>>658974
Please find me a man who actually goes "Whoah, she doesn't wear makeup? I won't fuck her then."

>>659023
No, it's more like "2/10 would not bang."

>>659002
>implying you're capable of reading

>>659011

Full. Fucking. Retard.

Testosterone is a hormone found in both genders. Men simply have a higher production of it due to the rate of production of the nuts being higher than the ovaries.

And before you go all "but why does that mean some have hair and some don't", hormones constantly vary in concentration throughout individuals and over periods of time, since it depends on genetics, damage to and producers of the hormone, current mental state and probably a few others like diet. Culminate a few these things and you might have a bearded lady by next week.

ITT female privilege deniers

>>659039
...If you look 2/10 without makeup, the problem is NOT the makeup, it's you...

>>659053
So why can't women shave then?

>>659106

Anyone that complains about the small little benefits other people have over themselves is a damn pansy and probably unaware of the fact that if you don't work hard and go out of your own comfort zone then you'll be left behind.

Anyway, if it bothers you that much get your nuts chopped off and tucked inside your body, then start taking hormone supplements.

>>659125
>Shaving does not cause terminal hair to grow back thicker or coarser or darker.[9][10] This belief arose because hair that has never been cut has a tapered end, whereas, after cutting, there is no taper. Thus, it appears thicker, and feels coarser due to the sharper, unworn edges. The fact that shorter hairs are "harder" (less flexible) than longer hairs also contributes to this effect.[11] Hair can also appear darker after it grows back because hair that has never been cut is often lighter due to sun exposure. In addition, as humans grow older hair tends to grow coarser and in more places on the face and body. For example, a teenager may start shaving their face or legs at around 16, but as they age hair will start to grow more abundantly and thicker, leading some to believe this was due to the shaving, but in reality is just part of the aging process.
let's just get this out of the way

>>659125

Do I have to explain everything to you?

If you shave over a prolonged period of time, small skin cells become damaged. This means that hair grows back thicker since the pores of the skin have become larger, allowing for the cells producing hair follicles to get closer together. Hence stubble if formed. Therefore, if women shave then they get stubble, but if they don't then they still have visible facial hair.

Fucking hell, are you 9 years old?

Quite exaggerated chart. On the male side it just list stupid insults or situations that are only plausible if read in the negative context of the chart itself.
>Need a ride home from a club -> Male: you are fucked
Sure, of course...

Come on who cares what society theoretically expects men to be like. It's just idiotic gibberish that makes only sense if you generally think you can't handle such a situation. Taking this serious just shows what a pathetic and spineless maggot you are.

>>659152
>Anyone that complains about the small little benefits other people have over themselves is a damn pansy

I hope you say that to feminists and women who fought for their right to vote too.

>>659176

I'd say fighting for equal voting or an end to slavery was bigger than rising up against women because they can get a free ride home from a club simply by asking some "nice guy". And yes, that is on the list.

That "Need a ride home from the club" one - if a girl did that and got raped, everyone would be saying how the girl deserved it for being an idiot and 'asking for it'.

>>658747
Easy doesn't mean happy, it's boring. Most people want to work and do something with their lives.

>>659200
>rising up against women because they can get a free ride home from a club simply by asking some "nice guy".

I'm not the OP, and yes obviously that is a relatively unimportant issue, but there are many other greater injustices against men, a lot of them codified in legislation. Your attempt to trivialize male suffering by cherry picking some of the more minor complaints is sickening.

>>657938

You know the time you spend making that stupid chart could have been spent on actually trying to get laid.

Faggot.

>>659244

If they are serious issues then why the hell are you coming here wailing about trivial issues like "oh no I can't get a free ride from the club but she can this is misandry and all men should rise up and reclaim society."

Clearly it's all bollocks, since you yourselves are trivialising your own argument by talking more about your own lack of confidence over how a loving father was shanked by his ex-wife who took his house, car and kids.

>>659218
That isn't a mainstream view on the issue. At all. There is a large number of bigots excaberating every inequality, for both genders. But this kind of opinion is becoming less common in most regions while the myriad ways in which men are wronged go unprotested every day, and anyone who tries to is shot down and lumped with misogynists by fence-sitters and feminazis alike.

I really don't mind feminism when their supporters can maintain an objective, sane view on the issue and at least acknowledge that men aren't the cause of every problem in the world and are shafted just as badly by gender roles as women are.

>>659226
You sound like one of those trust fund babies that whine about how hard its is to be rich.

>>659277
WTF? I just told you that I'm not the OP and I never complained about that specific thing. Learn to read. Also you are acting like that is the only thing anyone is complaining about, stop having tunnel vision or being so dishonest with your argument tactics.

>>659303

But you're defending the argument all the same. There are injustices against everyone, by the way. Maybe you're the one with tunnel vision.

>>659283
Actually, it is a suprisingly common view.

Girls wearing short skirts are said to be asking for it - as though wearing certain clothes means you somehow *deserve* to be raped.

I am a feminist, but I like to think of myself as a sane one - I want women to be treated as equals to men wherever possible - and that includes giving up the supposed 'priviledges' women have.

I don't actually see them as bonuses, as they tend to be things that undermine women as people. They make them seem less capable, which is almost as detrimental and just opressing them in the first place.

>>659350
almost as detrimental *as* just opressing them in the first place.

>>659329
>There are injustices against everyone, by the way.

Yes, but currently there are none like the ones currently cemented in law and court rulings that are biased against males.

>>659350
females getting the shaft=oppression
females getting special treatment=still oppression

this is why i hate feminists

>Clearly it's all bollocks, since you yourselves are trivialising your own argument
Since some guy posts a few trivial ones all injustices against men are trivial?
Get your head checked.
These aren't problems of confidence they are societal expectations forced on males much the same way that women are subject to the pressure of gender roles. By telling MRA-ish posters that it's a lack of self-confidence or calling them pansies is the same as guys telling women to get in the kitchen or shaming/insulting women for wanting to go outside of their assigned gender roles.

>>659303
Nearly everything on the list is trivial bullshit that men choose to put up with, or simply isn't true about most men. The only one being dishonest is you.

>>659418
trivial my dick bitch

>>659374

Differential treatment is bad.

That is the point of feminism.

>>659462
really

is that why feminists don't like to be told they should be responsible for their own actions like everyone else? every time it is always construed as "victim blaming."

>>659497
Nobody should be blamed for getting raped, male or female.

>>659374
Oppression, privilege, it makes no difference. Any kind of inequality has the potential to hurt the person bearing it.

>>659513
no one IS blaming the victim. just because you area fucktarded bitch that lives in a different reality and likes to misinterpret things doesn't mean that anyone is blaming rapists for getting raped. what they are saying is you are responsible for your own well being and it is wise for you to take precautions.

>>659514
I don't see feminists fighting to take away any of the privileges they have. Show me some that do.

>>659446
Holy shit, this list may take multiple posts

>Everything about violence against women vs. violence against men.
Men are inherently physically stronger, can take more with less injury. I don't care how backwards and unfair you think this is, because you're retarded. A man will win a legitimate fight against a woman nearly every time.

>dismissal of female-on-male rape cases
>citation needed

>Societal failure to address prison rape
You mean societal failure to address anything going on, in either male OR female prisons?

>Only men called up during military draft
It's an old rule that developed when women were seen as physically, emotionally, psychologically, and intellectually inferior to men that's frankly bullshit now, so I slightly concede.

>Circumcision
Male circumcision is a lot less dangerous than female circumcision/mutilation, and you fucking know it. Getting the feeling that this entire list is being disingenuous for take sake of painting men as the victims rather than actually objective addressing problems.

>sex between a boy coerced by an older woman is not a big deal
You're fucking retarded. I see news stories all the time about female teachers jailed for fucking their underage students.

>rape of men laws not enforced
>citation needed

>Child custody
The father can certainly maintain custody if he can prove he's a better parent than the mother. Also, you don't know what "discrimination" means, clearly.

>alimony, child support
I concede to this point.

>pregnancies
I concede to this as well

>Legislation that addresses women's needs
So? How is this oppressing men?

>higher incarceration rates and longer sentences for same crimes
>citation needed

cont'd

>>659547
I have a hard time finding them too because they get very little attention from the media or the internet in general, but I know they are out there.

>>659554
>Men are inherently physically stronger, can take more with less injury.
This has to be the worst kind of stupid excuse and justification for this bullshit. Just because someone is weaker than you doesn't mean they can't hurt you. Ever heard of shit like knives, eye gouging, ball kicking?

>It's an old rule that developed when women were seen as physically, emotionally, psychologically, and intellectually inferior to men that's frankly bullshit now, so I slightly concede.
No, it has more to do with how women are more important for the survival of the species due to their limited gamete production. Nice try though.

>Male circumcision is a lot less dangerous than female circumcision/mutilation, and you fucking know it.
This is also retard bullshit rationalizations. It is illegal to perform ANY kind of cosmetic surgery on an infant female, even if it is just removal of the labia. That is not any more dangerous than removal of the foreskin. Either way, that's still irrelevant because male infant genitals should have protection under the law too.

>>659562
So you admit that you just pulled shit out of your ass by claiming something exists with no evidence to support it. Gotcha.

>>659446
>statutory rape laws enforced more vehemently for men
>citation needed

>rape shield laws
>citation needed

>dogma that "women never lie"
Can you show me one court case that has ended in the woman's favor based on her word and no evidence?

>women allowed to marry at younger ages than men
>citation needed

>Men pay higher premiums for auto
Yeah, and auto insurance companies cite studies that show make more money, and therefore should pay more on their premium.

>In some countries
>cites third world country

>increasing suicide rate among young men
Are you seriously citing this as a reason why men are more oppressed?

>stay-at-home dads, male babysitters, not socially acceptable
Yes they are. In fact, stay-at-home dads get better treatment than most around here

>lack of advocacy for men's rights
What the fuck are "men's rights"?

>Prostate cancer funding lower than breast cancer
Raise media support for prostate cancer then, faggot

>jailed for not paying child support
If the father has custody, and the mother doesn't pay child support, she can be jailed too. What's the problem?

>government agencies for women's affairs
Agencies for oppressed people? Stop the fucking presses.

>lack of legal enforcement for paternity fraud
>citation needed

>lack of educational aid for boys and men
Private companies can do whatever the fuck they want with their scholarship money. If a private company wanted to offer a scholarship for white men, they would get flack for it, but it wouldn't be illegal

cont'd

>>658143
> "You're FUCKED!"
> True fact
Pick one. Protip: the first one is an opinion.

>>659513
It doesn't have to be rape. If you look at the way the government actively tries to get women into certain fields of study where they are under represented (with quotas and such) you could see that it hurts males. Guys who get the same or maybe better results than their female counterparts are often denied entry because the female-quota has to be filled.

>>659606
Fucking listen to yourself. We aren't discussing cryptids, it's a reasonable enough viewpoint that there ARE going to be feminists who advocate it. All I'm saying is that their presence in the media is almost nil because society has a reaction formation to misogyny and the media outlets don't want their image tarnished.

>>659446
>universities more concerned with teaching feminist ideology
>citation needed

>feminist argue that men's studies classes are redundant
They are. The study of men's rights when men's rights were never a problem through history just becomes history.

>studies show boys receive harsher punishment in classrooms
Show those fucking studies

>harder physical entrance criteria for men
Considering men are inherently physically stronger than women, I'd say you were a retard grasping at straws

>94% of workplace fatalities occur to men
Men choose these jobs.

>>659643

Uh-huh. The same reason they refuse to run any stories on how there are aliens of the moon, right?

>>659617
You're fucking garbage. Don't even bother posting if all you're going to do is hand wave with bullshit one liners and say "citation needed." Don't post if you're not contributing to the discussion in any meaningful way.

>Yeah, and auto insurance companies cite studies that show make more money, and therefore should pay more on their premium.
Are you trolling? Auto insurance isn't a tax; it's calculated based on the risk of the driver. Before you claim that men are riskier drivers so are minorities but the law protects then anyway.

>>659655
You can't really say, "studies show herpa derpa derp", base your argument on those studies, and then not show those studies. Burden of proof, faggot.

>>659554
>>659617

Can't argue?
>dismiss argument
>ask for citation
>misinterpret the statements
>false analogies

Can't think of anything else?
>it's your fault

>>659651
You aren't this stupid, so stop acting like it.

how about instead of adding more shit to the list, you add another column with sources proving that people actually think this way

>>659669
>asking for citation is bad debating

Sure is fucking retard in here.

>>659643
>it's a reasonable enough viewpoint that there ARE going to be feminists who advocate it.

If we're going by reasonable assumptions here, isn't it also just as reasonable to assume that most women DON'T want any of the privileges they have taken away from them?

>society has a reaction formation to misogyny and the media outlets don't want their image tarnished.
lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZAuqkqxk9A

>>659669
>still doesnt show any evidence

I'm not the guy you are replying to, but come on man, I'd believe you if you backed your shit up with evidence.

>>659670

Well excuse me for not paying enough attention to a small, small, small minority who hold an extremist and ridiculous view. And you know what? Pretty much anyone else with a rational mind don't share those views or pay attention to anyone who does.

>>659647
>68% of rape victims at parties/nightclubs are female
Women choose to go to these areas.

>>659677
It isn't but doing so without supplying your own citations is terrible debating, you hypocritical retard.

>>659691
>>659677
Most of that shit can easily be found just by using fucking google. Just highlight the phrase, right click and press the fucking button.

>>659694

So we have to provide citations for your lack of citations?


OH WELP IT LOOKS LIKE THIS THREADS HAS GONE RETARD

Hey OP, while you were making this I was building a theremin. Which is cooler? The world may never know.

>>659715
If you want to argue from the intellectual high ground then you do have to supply citations to support your points, fucking jackass.

>>659715
>as long as you can't provide 100% proof for every single one of your points, you are wrong and i am right.

derp

>>659693

Is it too much to ask that someone go to a nightclub without being raped? Remember that dangerous jobs are dangerous because of inevitable situational and environmental factors, but rape occurs because of some asshole who can't keep his dick in his pants.
Yes, women choose to go out and have fun. Rapists choose to rape and give rest of the male population a bad rep.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masculism

for the fag asking for citations, most of them are this page

May i add
women men
kill husband kill wife
normal crime hurr durrr femicide
mybrainsifulloffucks

>>659744

Well I sure as hell know that there are no citations on that nice little essay you have there. That's a 100% fact for you.

Fancy a citation? http://images.4chan.org/r9k/src/1323367713639.jpg

>>659758
are ON that page is what i meant

I hate the guy who keeps posting this so much.

I need to make a counter image as to why being a man is amazing and why whining about being one is retarded.

>>659758

I doubt Wikipedia is a good source of information, judging by the fact that it's open for anyone to edit.

Feminists and white knights still deny when the facts are laid in front of them, they should be raped and then have their rights taken away

>>659777
you FUCKSHIT, don't be such a twat. those little numbers are citations that link to separate websites. you're fucking dense. go on and continue dismissing everything you aren't comfortable with though.

>>659791

I lay the trap and bait, then you walk right into it.

I suppose with that I should say "Welcome to 4chan!"

>>659753
Is it too much to ask that someone go to work without being killed? Remember that dangerous areas are dangerous because of inevitable situational and environmental factors, but death occurs because of some asshole who can't tighten a valve properly.
Yes, men choose to go out and make money. Incompetents choose to be unsafe and give rest of the oil industry population a bad rep.

I hate comparison charts because the person who created it never bothers fairly representing the side he's against. It's lazy. If you're right, show it. I'm not even disagreeing with the points presented but I wonder how it happens as often as it does.

inb4
>objectivity
>internet debates

>objectivity
>any debate

>>659810
>be retarded
>someone calls you out
>pretend you were trolling

nope sorry that's a really lame and overused cop out. you are the one that must be new here if you think it would work.

>>659810
Don't you feel great for making discussion on this site almost impossible because anyone replying to a 'dumb' argument is afraid they're 'going to get trolled.'

>>659822

Yeah. You keep telling yourself that. I'm just enjoying the fireworks.

If you want a little piece of info, look at the time difference between posts. I had already read your second comment, spotted an opportunity and went for it. You just can't face up to the facts. Would you like a citation?

>>659840

>taking the internet seriously

Wow, it looks like we have some new faces on 4chan today.