>> |
09/21/09(Mon)10:06:01 No.5535380For
those of you in the dark about what happened to create the mess in the
first place (and, having sat on my university's board as a student
representative, I know what I'm talking about):
This is directly
down to the fact that Labour decided that 50% of young people would
benefit from university. That wouldn't have been a problem if they
hadn't fucked with the structure.
First they shut down (or
relienced to full university status) the polytechnics which used to
turn out skilled and useful electricians, plumbers, mechanics etc.
because it was a two-tier system, and that "wasn't fair". They started
turning out soft academic courses instead, at a far lower standard, to
try and keep up with the established group of "full" universities.
Then
they shut grammar schools because they were "elitist", forgetting that
those places were key to social mobility, as they picked on merit so
anyone had a chance if they worked hard enough. This burned the bridges
that the working/lower middle class had to uni.
Grants were
scrapped because suddenly there wasn't enough to go around, and the
govt needed the funding for the new university places. But they'd cut
the traditional access paths to the traditional universities and
introduced ones that were easier to get into. As a result of ease of
access due to lowered standards, demand exploded, and there wasn't
enough cash to keep up. Fees were introduced, then top-up fees. This
has driven potential students away and made the whole thing a minefield. |