>> |
09/17/09(Thu)18:21:28 No.5489211>>5489072 >>5489073 >Aren't you the one that said you should back up your claims with statistics No, that was the first I've posted ITT.
>Kick myself for not wearing a condom? Those things don't work 100% of the time, broham.
>One thing that I would NOT expect is to forcibly use other peoples money to make me better. Is
this really different from public roads, public defence force, public
education, public mail or public anything else? Everyone doesn't use
every road - some people use the road very rarely, some people use the
road every day. Some people don't have kids, some people have dozens.
Some people don't send mail, some people send shitloads of mail. How is
this different?
>then we go into a foster home and continue our lives from there Are
you confident you could take this setback in your stride? Remember, you
only have a limited window for success - there are certain points in
your life where if you haven't accomplished something by then, you
never will. If you don't own your own house by ~35 and are stuck in the
rent loop, you'll probably never own your own step.
>Shaneqa wouldn't think twice about squeezing out another kid for a larger welfare cheque And
you know for certain Shaneqa's new kid is going to be a parasitic leech
like her, and not a BOOTSTRAPPER like you? Didn't you say you came from
a poorfag family? And you're right, I don't have figures on how many
Shaneqas there are. But I don't care, because I wouldn't deny even one
genuinely needy person if it meant giving to a hundred Shaneqas.
Perhaps that is a fundamental difference between us? |