China is shit it will never get any further. Once the people have enough of their shitty government forcing through them to get things done it will all end horribly for those in power. Another country will be the next superpower but it will in no way be china.

I don't think you understand how sino history actually unfolded.

>>5239032
ISM is here and he is pissed!

>>5239025

I can't hear you over the sound of NIP NONG CHING CHONG

troll thread is troll

Yes they are powerful/will be powerful in the future. It isn't a zero sum game, we can be prosperous together.

India would disagree with the OP.

It's also worth noting that Germanic tribes destroyed the Roman Empire and to this day have the most powerful nations on the planet. USA, UK, Germany etc

>>5239035
And you know better, white boy? Chinese history has had its ups and downs, but like a phoenix it always rises from the ashes of the past to be reborn into a stronger civilization.

>>5239025
enjoy your ruined environment (made inhabitable by GREED) and no personal freedom at all. we'll see how long that lasts for you.

Out of aIl the old civilizations of the ancient world, China is the only one that is still powerful to this day, with a cultural legacy stretching back TEN THOUSAND YEARS, and is still getting stronger to this day.

How does that make you feel, rest of the world? Especially you Americans, how does it feel to face the inevitability of your "superior" American military and economic might eventually fading away into nothing just like every other civilization, while China will always be there in the future?

China will become number one within the next 10 years, no doubt about it. They already own the USA literally through their insane purchasing of USA bonds. The USA lost control over their own fate and now China decides when they bankrupt the USA and put them out of their misery.

Those evil imperialistic warmongering scumbags are finally going to pay! Karma is a bitch huh americans. Long live China, The Middle Kingdom.

ITT we don't understand Chinese history.

Why do you assume America will just fade away, OP?

Also, China has a proven track record of survival, but not power - look where they were 50, 100, 200 years ago.

>a cultural legacy stretching back TEN THOUSAND YEARS
A cultural legacy for which they show no regard and are quickly burying, sadly.

>>5239093
How so?

howsoblox243156

China wir become numba one within next 10 year, no doubt about it. They aready own da USA riterary through theh insane puhchasing o USA bonds. Da USA rost controh ova theh own fate and now China decide when theh bankrup USA an put them out of their misery.

Those evee imperiaristic warmongering scumbags are finarry going to pay! Karma is a bitch huh americans. RONG RIVE GRORIOUS CHINA.

I'd say that a buncha starving peasant-class fighters with outdated AK-s doesnt scare scare me, especially when their economy is in the downswing worse than ours.

>>5239106
>when their economy is in the downswing worse than ours.
LOL

China's economy is projected to grow 6% this year, 8% if you believe the Chinese numbers. In fact, Asian countries in general are bouncing back quicker than the West. You should try reading more, here is a start.

www.economist.com

l'd say that a buncha starving peasant-class fighters with outdated AK-s doesnt scare scare me, especially when their economy is in the downswing worse than ours

Faggots dont realize that china doesnt put out much in terms of actual exports. Most of their shit is small toys that are included in your McDonalds kids meal where you take your dates.

>>5239093
The cultural revolution is over, buddy. That was an unfortunate mistake of the past, and one that is even acknowledged as one by the government. China has done much to restore its cultural legacy since then.

ten thousand years and they still haven't put a man on the moon? America did it in less than 200. I'm checking over your resume here...I'm sorry you really should have a lot more to show for yourself for someone your age. A lot of your younger competitors have much more impressive accomplishments

>>5239123
I lol'd. hello moot.

If China is so ancient and magnificent, why is everything there so grotty?

>>5239116
Link me to the actual article, friend.

>>5239132
Typical American thinking.
HEY LETS PUT A MAN ON THE MOON!
why?
I DUNO LOL

>>5239025

Go back to bed, Kevin.

>>5239154
Typical chinese thinking.
HEY LETS EAT RICE!
why?
ITS ALL WE HAVE

Hmmm.. We're fucked now!

>>5239152
Here you go.

http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?story_id=14209825

The problem with china is it's full of chinese people.

>>5239101
How about Simplified Hanzi?

>>5239132
Good that none of the scientists of either the nuclear bomb nor space travel were American. You achieved nothing.
Your nation achieved little, and if we look back at the track record, the only way America ever solved problems was throwing massive amounts of people at it and then covering it up through stunning amounts of propaganda.
That strategy won't prove effective against China.
Now look at how fast they were able to produce nuclear capability and space programs.
200 years of self-strengthening to catch up with the West are coming to an end.

>>5239173
Typical American thinking.
IF HE DISAGREES WITH ME HE IS NOT AMERICAN.

>>5239226
>Simplified Hanzi

So what. Traditional looks nice, and I'm learning to read both, but writing it is a fucking pain. I never understood why people were so butthurt about simplification.

>>5239226

That's great :) I think your nation is doing very well considering it's handicaps. I think it's great to see a culture really pushing it's limits, even if it can't approach the standards of more capable nations such as the united states or the western european states.

>>5239237
It makes the broad mass, especially the youth unable to read the historic accounts of it's literature. It makes it impossible for them to read anything written before 1950.
In a One-Party Dictatorship this is bound to be abused.

>>5239241
I'm from Western Europe, you faggot.

10,000 years of being dirt eating, girl killing peasants, wow, that's really something. China was so feeble, even Mongolians could fuck it up

>>5239268
Why can't you just read a simplified edition of old texts?

>In a One-Party Dictatorship this is bound to be abused.
Well yeah, I agree with you, this is a problem. But really, censorship is the issue here, not simplification.

>>5239226
None of the scientists of nuclear energy or space travel were american? Are you sure you're familiar with those things? Oh I'm sorry, I forgot china still believes that those things are the work of magicians.
I'd go on but
>Your nation achieved little, and if we look back at the track record, the only way America ever solved problems was throwing massive amounts of people at it and then covering it up through stunning amounts of propaganda.
Has me convinced that this is a troll.

>>5239056
Germans are genetically superior.

haven't all types of people been around for a long time? some have evolved, some haven't.

>>5239268
traditional is still used in taiwan, singapore and hongkong. it's not going to go away anytime soon. there has always been debate on which writing system is better so it can change in the future. if the need arises then people will take up learning both and with technology now, software can easily do all the leg work.

Considering that the rag heads created writing two thousand years before the Chinese, I'm not impressed.

>>5239296
No, most of them were Germans.

>>5239273
the mongols would have erased western european civilization without batting an eyes, if it weren't for a drinking accident.

And China's culturally and societally sterile, it's people are led like marionettes. It has no power other than buying power.

I don't feel anything honestly

I'm just glad i don't look like a replica of a replica of a replica

>>5239288
Of course you can just read a simplified version, but the only one that will be released on the mainland has to be deemed appropriate by the party.

ITT: Non-Chinese speak about a nation of people who are not allowed access to 4chan.

>>5239311
>if the need arises then people will take up learning both

This. I think most Chinese programs in the US now are encouraging students to learn how to write one and read both. Simplified will be increasingly dominant in the future, but traditional isn't going to die out any time soon.

>>5239321
Again, I agree with you. Censorship is the problem in such a case, not simplification in general.

>>5239311
>traditional is used in taiwan, singapore and hongkong.

Singapore actually uses simplified. Also, while traditional characters are dominant in HK, they seem to be becoming more open to simplified characters, especially as learning Mandarin becomes increasing important.

>>5239296
I'm not even trolling.
Look at D-Day, Americas finest hours, worst massacre in the war, rest of the allied forces landed just fine.
Look at the Korean War, Allied forces were nearly driven into the sea without numerical advantage.
Look at how you achieved the Manifest Destiny, instead of carefully planning the colonization of the continent you just send wave after wave further east.
You could barely build a few atomic bombs after having the theories for nearly 7 years, given to you by Enrico Fermi, Otto Hahn, Lise Meitner and Einstein, the Manhattan Project was exactly the same, under the leadership of Enrico Fermi you just threw a shitload of barely educated american scientists at it.

>>5239373
Further west, I mean, excuse me.

mootbloxforsomereason
>>5239373
You are aware that the vast majority of the ships that arrived at D-Day were British, and all of the allies took part right?
And that the continent wasn't mapped out until pioneers went out to map it?
And that there's a world of difference between physics theories and practical application?
And that it was Oppenheimer that led the scientists on the manhattan project?

>>5239443
What does that matter? I speak about the fuck up on the beachheads.
Claimed territory of Mexico and the British Empire was mapped, I can assure you this.
Doesn't matter when americans are incapable in both.
You are right, Fermi led the first fission, I am sorry.

>>5239443
>And that it was Oppenheimer that led the scientists on the manhattan project?
You know Oppenheimer was German, right?

I love how all these countries like china and india have been around thousands of years, America gets 300 years to go from nothing to world power.

we fucking owned all of you fag countries lol