You are seriously trying to say 0/0=9?

GO AHEAD, DIVIDE BY ZERO.

SEE IF I CARE!

0 is not a real number and the group operations for the field of real numbers require real numbers as input, because each operation (in particular *) is a binary operation on the product of two copies of the real numbers. so asking the question without addressing the foundational issues is silly. it's an irrelevant question

faggot

0/0 is 9 AND 63. WOW!

>>4400407

Not me, math did.

Basically:

0/0 = x
0/x = 0
0/0 = x
0/(0*x) = 1

>>4400446

Gah.

One of those is meant to be x/0 = 0

Hm. How high are you, right now, OP?

>>4400436
This. GROUP THEORY MOTHERFUCKER, DO YOU USE IT?

>>4400396

I currently teach Calculus II at an Ivy League establishment and I must say I am intrigued. I will use this post as material for tomorrow's class. Thank you and I'd like to get in touch with you to expand upon your ideas.

>>4400446
>0/(0*x) = 1

Surely that will equal x if '0/0 = x' is true.

>>4400475
sup algebro

I've been thinking about making an xzibit pimp your ride shoop with some proposition about subgroups and the text "YO DAWG I HERD YOU LIKE GROUPS SO WE PUT A GROUP IN YOUR GROUP SO YOU CAN ADD WHILE YOU ADD"

discuss

>>4400396
Hello. I am currently the head of the graduate-level theoretical mathematics department at Virginia Tech, and I would like your contact information so that we may discuss further what is possibly a breakthrough in the world of mathematics.

>>4400480

Well:

A/B = C
A/(B*C) = 1

>>4400504
>>4400476

Would lol if the answer to the division by 0 was actually found in an /r9k/ math thread.

>>4400542
But that is exactly what you have claimed to have done.

Does not work. It's not necessarily true that if a*c = b*c then a = b when c = 0. It's something you learn in Algebra 1, but you forget because you're an idiot.

In particular, you're trying to say that
a/b = c means
c * b = a which comes from multiplying both sides by b, however in your case b is 0, so it doesn't work.
Continuing on from your broken logic, you say
a/c = b, which comes from dividing both sides by c. Something which is utterly impossible with c = 0.

>>4400542

A fraudulent post? I would never have dreamed that someone was capable of such a cruel joke. You certainly had me going there for a second, young man!

0/0 can be anything in range of (-oo,+oo)

-Hack your grandpa's pacemaker
-Divide by zero
-???
-Profit (aka Heritage)

>>4400436
>>4400475
Holy shit, somebody needs a refresher in group and field theory. 0 is a real number, no doubt about it. However, it's the only real number that doesn't have an inverse. So x/0 really means x*(0^-1) which is gibberish since 0^-1 doesn't exist. Remember division is really just multiplication by the inverse.

OH GOD HOW CAN YOU PEOPLE STAND YOURSELVES