>"We allow all information that conforms with our pre-existig biases"

yeah, yeah, we get it, conservatives are doublethinking fucktards

FACT: "Facts" can not be preceded by a modifier and still be factual.

>>4364626

what about "non-facts"?

There's just no point, is there? Why bother going Socrates on these fuckers if they don't really believe in truth?

Popular opinion is that Unicorns are mythical, however some young earth believing Christian apologists have advanced various arguments that the biblical Unicorn was not a fantasy animal

So? They're right.
I don't see anything wrong in Conservapedia. Why don't you post an article that you believe is factually wrong?

>>4364667
See
>>4364665

Also "The Flat Earth theory was mostly invented and promoted by evolutionists for the purpose of slandering Christians."

>>4364705
Is every wiki Wikipedia? If I come up with the Muslimsuicidebomberpedia will I have to do [citation needed] when I say George W. Bush is pig disgusting?

FUCK YEAH!!! GEOCENTRISM!!!

"Since the advent of relativity theory in the early 1900s, the laws of physics have been written in covariant equations, meaning that they are equally valid in any frame. Heliocentric and geocentric theories are both used today"

If only we could some way take all the most controvertial articles on that site and make them factual.

Oh wait, it's a wiki.

We can.

So, I recommend we take down Geo-centrism, then go after evolution and all that other stuff.

One or two isolated incidents won't put a dent into their bullshit, but if everyone unites to take them down all at once, it will take a while to revert everything back to the way it was.

We just need to set a time to fix the retardary.

"A liberal is someone who rejects logical and biblical standards, often for self-centered reasons. There are no coherent liberal standards; often a liberal is merely someone who craves attention, and who uses many words to say nothing."

Post it this thread on /b/

Also, try to load tons of files there!

My entire opinion on american liberals was summed up when they started deleting the "Criticisms of Barack Obmama" sections on wikipedia.

>>4364891
Give a look at their Obama article!

>>4364891
Yup, as an american, it's annoying to deal with our incarnations of liberals.

But then again, saying i'm an "independent" doesn't do much at all...

Due to a series of liberal decisions beginning with the Warren Court, pornography is aggressively sold and distributed in the United States without meaningful law enforcement. It is a $over 9000-10 billion industry that affects and harms 40 million Americans. Pornography destroys relationships and exploits young people.

>>4364940


FUCK YEAH IDIOCRACY

>>4364891
Because it was filled with stuff like "OMG WHARE IS THIS NAGGERS BIRTH CERTIFICATE???? HE KENYAN!"

>>4364951
no - it wasnt - go through the history if you like (unless they got to that as well)

it's about things he's done and is planning to do and what other guys in politics have thought and how things have gone

it's all important factual information which is needed for one to get a clearer view of what he is doing, wither for good or bad

but according to libtards it's has to be flowers and lollypops all the time, or else it's somehow hate mongering or some other asanine dribble which was never said

kids that put on shit like "he's a nigger" would have the page reverted and they'd be banned by mods for their stupidity

but if somebody puts on genuine critisism then libfags turn up en masse and start erasing anything bad said about their glorious leader who can do no wrong

>>4364951
There seems to be plenty of people who contest his birth certificate, including other politicians. There's no reason for these claims to be kept out of his article other than him being an important person and a media darling.

Oh god the guy behind Conservativopedia is completely delusional. I've met him before in real life.

He's convinced that there is a conspiracy to "liberalize" the bible and basically has the same outlook on life as the afghan Taleban.

I got permabanned from one of his early forums for saying that the goal of the bible was not a "declaration of war against non-believers".

He had a friend who had a separate free forum. I was banned for saying something like "There might not be a link between Saddam and 9/11" prior to the war. He sent me a PM that he would ban me in 10 minutes unless I went into the sites java chat room with him. I did and he said he'd reduce the ban from permanent to one-week if I, in the chatroom, pledged an oath to the constitution, george bush and the bible. I just sorta left and never came back.

So yeah I used to be a big conservative, moderate now. In b4coolstorybro

lol guys..

http://www.conservapedia.com/Fox_News

>>4365002
>People agree with what Obama is doing, therefore, they are blindly following him and uneducated about the facts.

A Bush-hater is a leftist consumed by his hatred of President George W. Bush, typically because of his outspoken faith. Every Bush-hater claims all the world's problems ultimately lead back to this President, which were consciously and intentionally orchestrated by him and his administration. These claims amount to nothing more than conspiracy theory, anti-patriotic defeatism, and blindness to the failures of liberals.

>>4365015
conspiracy theories are diseases and need to be quarantined. of course it needs to be kept out, it's a ridiculous fringe belief (just like the muslim crap). It's not just obama either, ridiculous stuff leveled at bush should be deleted as well if someone came on saying he was the member of a satanic cult or a secret canadian

Remember that the whole world reads wikipedia, and they dont want the article bogged down in right wing conspiracy shit

there has been excellent and thoughtful criticism of obama from krugman, chomsky and the like about cabinet choices and so forth that could be added, but a lot of the stuff that's been put on the wiki is not this, but panicked "ROAD TO SOSH-UHLISM!" drivel that's neither academic nor scientific in its analysis

>>4365002
Those things simply don't belong in a wikipedia article. Look at the article for George Bush and John McCain. There aren't any criticism sections. herp derp add them in for obama though because he's not even a citizen

>>4365002
"Obama is likely the first Muslim president" is factual information?

>>4365240

Clinton was Buddhist

add that to wikipedia

>>4365173
I'm an avid Bush-hater, but I think a shit ton of bad things happened because of the ineptitude and arrogance of him and his administration; it wasn't some grand conspiracy, they're just a bunch of fucking idiots who duped a bigger bunch of idiots into voting for him. At the very least, America and the world needs to have confidence in the American President and he simply didn't have it. He's the face of a country, he needs to be respectable, and deservedly so or not, he wasn't.

Also, everyone I know that hates Bush also realizes liberals are idiots, too. It's only moron conservatives that think anti-Bush means pro-liberal.

>>4365177
>"ROAD TO SOSH-UHLISM!" drivel
But it's true

lolGMbuyout

Editing is disabled for most users when it is nighttime in the U.S. Additionally, the site has stated that it prohibits unregistered users from editing entries due to concerns over vandalism and defamation


Register, wait a week or two and them start!!!

Someone need to post this in some scientologist forum...

>>4365286
If government intervention in business means socialism then we've been a socialist country a long time, you stupid shit. Look at Amtrak.

lol

http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Andrew_Schlafly

Many Conservatives have expressed concern that the arguments and tone of Conservapedia cast them and their beliefs in a bad light, and that the encyclopedia is so extreme and absurd that it comes across more as a parody than anything they wish to acknowledge seriously.

I'm probably closer to a conservative than a liberal, but this site is horse shit. Fuckin religious fundies like this guy have utterly destroyed the GOP.

>>4365393

Oh my God...

The article is vaguely supportive of scientology.
These people are the perfect trolls...

Schlafly and his appointed administrators (the "sysops") rarely tolerate facts or information that disagree with their own views. Editors who disagree with the CP worldview are often told by Schlafly or others that they are "clueless" - regardless of their expertise in the field or the validity of their information. They are often told that they don't understand logic, science, or history, and that if they just "open their minds" they will see the truth. Schlafly frequently introduces non sequitur issues into discussions. All too often, in the middle of a discussion, editors are banned from the site by Schlafly or an administrator.

>>4365457
>>4365264
>>4365065
>>4365455
Even conservatives hate that site! Why we all join forces to rape it for the lulz?

One of the issues that has most concerned critics is that articles are often "locked", and written only by one editor/sysop - no visitors may edit the article whatsoever. For example, the article on homosexuality has been essentially written by one editor, named "Conservative", and the page has been locked for at least a year. This is true of other articles, for example the articles on President Barack Obama, Prof. Richard Dawkins, the Theory of Evolution, and breast cancer, among many others. The concern is that these articles contain not only opinion, but also a considerable number of factual inaccuracies which cannot now be corrected, since the "owner" of the article is the only one who writes the article, and only other "sysops" can edit it at all. In most cases, appeals to include information in those articles on their "talk pages" is rebuffed - if not simply deleted, to avoid the appearance of dissent. These articles are presented as "encyclopedic", yet are clearly just personal essays with no other input allowed.

Conservative uncyclopedia

http://www.conservapedia.com/One-world_government

The One-world Government is a Utopian idea popular with Liberals, in which all the Nations on Earth will (supposedly willingly) abandon their Sovereignty to the will of the United Nations or some other world-wide government.

Some people believe that President George H. W. Bush's famous "New World Order" speech was a clue that the Insiders were about to begin their plan to establish the One-World Government.[1] President George W. Bush helped allay these fears with his obvious contempt for the United Nations.

In the popular Left Behind series, the Antichrist begins his plan by subsuming America into the One-World Government. This is based on the Book of Revelations.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Eschatology
Did someone said scatology?
Because I think someone said scatology!

http://www.conservapedia.com/Elitist

Elitism is an attitude or belief in one's superiority based solely on membership in a particular group or community. Elitism can be seen, for example, in the delusion that being a celebrity or a gatekeeper of the mainstream news media in itself imparts sufficient wisdom to justify airing one's personal opinion on an issue.

During his ministry Jesus attacked the religious elitism of the Saduccees and the Pharisees which led them to manipulate the ruling Roman governor into executing this populist upstart. Because it is based in the values of Christianity, conservatism has an ambition to be populist, unlike liberalism, in which the beliefs of the intellectual elitists make them superior to the public.

Notable elitists include:

1. Al Gore
2. Barack Hussein Obama
3. Hillary Clinton
4. Franklin Delano Roosevelt
5. Marie Antoinette

I wonder if this guy is autistic...

http://www.conservapedia.com/Global_warming
http://www.conservapedia.com/Greenpeace

We should send this to Greenpeace and make a war!

Both sides damaged we all win!

>>4366184
The irony of your post is that you are using an imageboard consist of whiffed panties

Most secular black metal bands have satanic and violent lyrics

how can something be secular and satanic at the same time? wtf

>>4366490
There are Christian Satanic bands

>>4366510
They believe that Jesus is Satan?

http://www.conservapedia.com/Pet

>>4366446
I enjoy the irony aspect of that image since it uses a desert theme, because extreme desertification is exactly what's happening with cataclysmic climate change occurring, if it wasn't so stupid I'd laugh really hard.

>>4366533
I don't understand what's special about this article...

>>http://www.conservapedia.com/BNP

wat

"The British National Party (BNP) is a British neo-Nazi political party"

Doesn't seem very conservative to me, bros.

>>4366641
Conservative != reactionary.

Reactionaries and liberals often forget this. Conservatives and hard-core leftists are more keen on pointing out the division, for different reasons obviously.

Read the conservapedia article on wikipedia, it's quite interesting. I thought it was pretty fair

http://www.conservapedia.com/Muslim

I can't stop laughing.

>>4366697
Yeah! Oh the irony!

http://www.conservapedia.com/Rampage

What the fuck

Until they can get this one right (and actually make it encyclopedic, rather than just a list) - then I think it's obvious why htey should be ignored.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative

>>4366908

Care explain what the irony of that is?

>>4366933
lol
Rampage is a series of monster-based video games made by Midway. The series has included five titles and one spin-off. The latest in the franchise is Rampage: Total Destruction.

Midway Island (also Midway Atoll) is an atoll in the north Pacific Ocean located between Hawaii and Japan; it is a possession of the United States. Discovered in 1859, it was annexed by the US in 1867. In June 1942, a Japanese naval attack directed towards the atoll led to the Battle of Midway, one of the most significant engagements of the Pacific War.

>>4366969
Conservapedia says that Wikipedia is liberal biased, full of liberal cesorship, and all but Wikipedia's article about Conservapedia is much more impartial than Conservapedia's article about Wikipedia.

>>4366964
>A conservative adheres to principles of limited government, personal responsibility and moral values

>Specifically, conservatives seek or support:
> * Classroom prayer
> * Prohibition of abortion

WTF? If they're for personal responsibility and "limited" government, why are they forcing rules and restrictions down everyone's throats?

I am reading this: (http://www.conservapedia.com/Liberal)
I am even a republican and laughing at these articles. An enclopedia can not be written by narrow minded people.

yo look at the conservapedia page on al gore

shit's funny

GLOBAL WARMING IS A LIBERAL CONSPIRACY

>>4367023
Don't use logic. Use dogmas and fanatism instead!

Centrist here, faggots like you suck even more than they do.

>>4367023
>* Classroom prayer

If this means prayer in the classroom then isn't that against the constitution? I mean you can't force anyone to pray if they don't want to right?

>>4367053

Moderate here. Fuck centrists. You're worse than liberals or conservatives because sit on the fence like fucking pussies instead of taking a stand on specific issues like people with some fucking common sense.

>>4367012

That really isn't ironic in the least.

>>4367043
Oh my fucking god
I cannot believe people believe this. Am I being trolled by those guys or what?

>>4367096
stupidity is infinite

>>4367057
They don't believe in contitution. They just believe in a bizarre interpretation of the bible.

>>4367049
Global warming is a liberal conspiracy. If there were a link between carbon dioxide emissions and global temperatures, explain the temperature-CO2 lag. Not even Al gore believes that crap, otherwise he wouldn't contribute as much CO2 as he does.

>>4367081
Hyuuk hyuuk hyuuuk, because holding positions in the center are not legitimate at all... hyuuuk hyuuuk false dilemma.

>>4367257

No you fucking manwhore, between being for the death penalty and against it, the centrist answer is always, "If you think so, sure." because they always sit on the fence like dipshit cowards whereas moderates take a fucking stand. They also recognize that it might not be that way forever but they're realists about it.

That's the difference between moderates and centrists. Moderates have critical thought. Centrists are sheep.

>>4367096
Yeah, conservatives believe so much in him that this guy is a teacher.

"He has taught classes in World and U.S. History to homeschooled high school age children for several years. As a volunteer he teaches eight online courses on the Eagle Forum University, where over 6,000 students are registered, largely from the same course material that he provides for his homeschooling program. "

Read their article on discordianism. Then apply that to the whole site.

Schlafly frequently claims superior expertise in whatever subject he is debating, and has repeatedly attacked and overturned opinion, evidence, and references supplied by fully qualified editors based solely on his claimed expertise. Often, rather than simply disagreeing with others, he makes totally unsubstantiated claims that are simply opinion, assertion, or even uneducated guesses, and of which he brooks no criticism.

We should worry about this, not lol.

This crazy fundamentalist guy is not just a crazy hobo, he is a teacher!

The sad thing is, Wikipedia actually has a slight conservative bias. Trouble is America is so ultra-conservative that their liberals are even more conservative than the UK's conservatives.

I will just leave this....

http://partyvan.info/wiki/Denial_of_Service_Methods

Fuck this shit! I'm going to sleep!

http://www.conservapedia.com/Sudden_Jihad_Syndrome

12435568856avafverv

>Conservative facts
Like conservatives being dumber?

http://www.conservapedia.com/Bias

>In works describing a potentially controversial topic, bias refers to the tendency of an author who holds a particular viewpoint to express that viewpoint (whether intentionally or subconsciously) in his work. This typically goes against the ideal of compendiums which are meant to be neutral, such as encyclopedias. For example, if an article on abortion is written by someone who supports it, it will likely be biased towards that viewpoint, and vice versa.

I wonder if they know they are doing this themselves, or if theyre just retards.

>>4369309
If you look what else is there I would say that they are just retards.
The problem is that they are making more retards

> In addition, studies report that homosexual couples have significantly higher incidences of violent behavior which will be covered shortly.
>These studies are not surprising at all given what pathologists have stated regarding the commonness and brutality of homosexual murders.

>Regarding studies regarding homosexual couples and violence, a recent study by the Canadian government regarding homosexual couples states that "violence was twice as common among homosexual couples compared with heterosexual couples"

http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexual_Couples_and_Domestic_Violence

i lol'd like i never lol'd before
i wonder if they will ever get just why domestic violence is exactly TWICE as likley in gay couples

OH HEY I USED TO DICK AROUND ON THAT SITE

...I wonder, is TK still mastatrollin' the whole place? did Conservative finish locking up every major article on the site? did the communists get Rob in his bunker after all? did PJR ever revolt against all the revolting behaviour? and then there was Schlafly's liberal son-in-law, that's a whole other kettle of fish...

wow
good time, good times...
what a great introduction to internet wars that was for me

Surpsingingly, the muslim article is pretty non biased compared to the evolution/homo/atheist articles.

>>4368962
Fuck, missed that article, nvm

Well... I can't post just a picture and a comment without text will mute me too...

>>4365286
So when can I vote on local work committees that determine production and development? Has the Obama administration said that I can walk into any GM building and start exercising the rights of collective ownership of the means of production?

No?

THEN SHUT THE FUCK UP AND QUIT MARGINALIZING MY BELIEFS YOU FUCKING CONSERVATIVE TWAT.

>>4370725

San Francisco has the highest murders in the US. Crimes of passion ;)

Pure ownage!

http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Lenski_affair

>>4370801

Hello Schlafly!

>>4370772
Girl on the right is hot. Too bad.

>>4371133
Soon she will be just like the one in left, rape it before it spoils!

>>4370816

uhhh

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_cities_by_crime_rate

wat? you silly, silly man

More conservapedia quotes!
"The Internet is the "crack cocaine" of sexual addiction"

It seems that gaming giant EA, (that's Electronic Anti-Christ for those of you church folk) has angered the religious denizens of LA with its sinfully spectacular title, Dante's Inferno. The 'Go to Hell' tagline seems to the main focus of debate, with angry protesters warning ignorant gamers to steer clear of the title, regarding it as 'tainted' and 'evil.'


"We are on a crusade to stop the blasphemous glorification of HELL and its minions as presented by Dante's Inferno. The ever decaying youth and slovenly adults who engage with Dante's Inferno are a victim of our society's pointless need to flirt with Satan and his lustful campaign to corrupt human souls...We say NO. We say inferNO."

When confronted, the crowd seemed adamant on their position. 'Trade in your Playstation for a Praystation.' I tried to get the people to further explain their disdain as they did not seem to grasp the basic concept of the game or even recognize the title's obvious literary influence. Their tireless effort seemed to go unnoticed however, as hundreds of gamers passed by with little interest and giggles under their tired breaths.


Their 'crusade' as they so lovingly and self-righteously put it, slams EA with charges of: sorcery, violence and murder, and exultation of bodily fluids, to name a few.

Amidst the biggest event that gamers so anxiously look forward to, comes the ravenous agenda of the religious right. Never mind the fact that Dante is on a quest to save his beloved Beatrice from the confines of Hell. Rational and reasoning is lost on such folk who have nothing to do but attack works of fiction and make an issue out of something so irrelevant. And apparently, you battle unbaptized babies.

destroy unbaptized babies!

I think I will let this thread die now... .