>>3593061
>The other half use their brains to fuck, screw and seduce the hottest women available, have high paid jobs in law/science, and essentially have perfect lives.

Those are not geeks. Those are sociopaths.

>>3593167

So.. Anyone intelligent who is intelligent, has a high paid job and a gorgeous girlfriend is a sociopath?

Do I hear sum jealousy?

No. You aren't suave. The girl that is sucking your dick now is only there because you earn shitloads of money. She will leave if the money dries up. Nerds get women later in life because they start start earning lots of money, which women love.

>>3593185

You're missing (perhaps deliberately ignoring?) the first part of my quote which was:

>The other half use their brains to fuck, screw and seduce the hottest women available...

Now, being intelligent, having a gorgeous girlfriend, and a high-paying job does not necessarily make one a sociopath. I acknowledge that I am jealous of those, on account of not having achieved any measure of success just yet. But this is beside the point.

My point is that overtly "using their brain" to manipulate someone (the gorgeous girlfriend) into a relationship with them seems like something a sociopath would do.

No actual person would have all the characteristics you describe yourself to have, nor would they make a post like this.

There's no clear-cut definition of "nerd." Everyone has their own idea of what it is.

>>3593250
>>3593250
This. It's all about the money. Nerds get hot women because when women get older (30s generally) they start looking for rich guys to settle down with instead of hot bros to fuck.

>IQ - 180+

okay then. On topic though, I do envy such people with perfect lives, you'd have to be crazy not to.

>>3593061
I for one feel happy for OP. Sounds like this is going to devolve into a troll/hate thread.

I was once told that I'm the kind of guy a woman would marry, not the kind of guy a woman would date. To this day I'm not sure whether this is a good thing.

>fuck, screw and seduce

What the fuck is the point of saying both fuck and screw? You're a retard and a troll.

OP is a shitty liar why are any of you fags even taking him seriously god damn

most trollingest troll post ever to troll.

I am waiting for sometime in the future where we get to see posts like these then press a button and see the exact person who posted it no matter what.

>>3593250
>>3593255

Yes, fair enough, I should have elaborated. My girlfriend earns more than me; Just. She's a biological technician working for astra-zenica, and I'm a particle physicist working at CERN. I've certainly not used my brain to manipulate her into a relationship (although I used to do that when I was younger to dumb blondes, heheasy pussy, ;) ).

She's as clever, if not more intelligent than me, and I used my brains to attract her, not manipulate her.

lies. anyone with a 180+ IQ wouldnt have such shitty grammar with so many misspellings. have fun fapping to your loli hentai.

>>3593328

In that case, all power to you with that particular woman. But my point on what you term "dumb blondes" still stands, regardless of its truth, and thus henceforth I shall consider you a recovered sociopath. Does this suit you?

>>3593344

Well, what can I say, I'm English.

i.e., I've just got back from a club, I'm wased, and it's 4:30AM.

Yeah, OP, you do realize that anyone ACTUALLY intelligent should realize that IQ is just a number, and does not really measure your intelligence in any significant way?

>>3593387

I understand what you mean, and see where you are coming from.

I someone purely seduced "dumb blondes" for their entire existence, they would be somewhat sociopathic.

But picking up a few now and then between girlfriends for a quick fuck is hardly a problem, similar to the few drugs I've taken sporadically not making me and addict ;)

>hanging with my unbelivably hot girlfriend. I earn a shit-load running particle physics simulations on the LHC

troll

>>3593061
Assburgers is a hell of a disease, huh?

>>3593437

That was me, dammit.

>>3593311

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_three_(writing)

I'm also a writer, albeit a drunnk one. I couldn't come up with a synonym fast enough and writing things in twos breaks my artistic brain.

>>3593437

You make a good point, and I agree.

Allow me to clarify my perspective; the original post made it seem like OP fell into this category of "purely seducing dumb blondes for their entire existence". Seeing as the post did not make it clear that the OP does not fall into that category, while also speaking as if he did, I was forced to conclude that he did fall into that particular category.

>>3593417

Yes, well, I can't even spell wasted; >>3593404

Cut me some slack.