Dude, I am not giving away free Ecto Coolers to the third world. They can have all the rice they want but the coolers stay here.

>>2697379

Holy fuckshit, we still have Ecto-Coolers?!

It's not about giving them access to social networks, its about improving education afaik.

this thread is now about ecto coolers

Why are they giving them computars when they don't even have potatoes

That 3rd world computer idea failed, you know.
I am pretty confident that they'd rather have food and education.

It's one of the most retarded ideas in history, the computers will never be used except as doorstops. They'll just look at them and go "WTF is this shit?"

>>2697412

Sadly, no. They're discontinued. But they really should bring them back.

I'm pretty sure you wouldn't want one of those Fisher Price laptops either. But not wanting to help out someone whose hard work goes nowhere near getting a paycheck a real chance at education, yeah.. that's just damn selfish.

Their governments are paying for the OLPC, it is not assistencialism, so your point is invalid

>>2697456

Or they'll start using them, google will give them free wi fi and they'll use it to beg for "monies" on mmorpgs, ala Brazilians. It makes fucking sense; half the serious mmo players have kwashiorkors already.

>>2697625
Don't worry, those things couldn't run a decent game.
My friend bought an olpc, and he uses it to read comics. Even then, it's kinda slow.

can't wait til some starved african children start posting on 4chan so i can call them niggers

Instead of complaining, look at it objectively. You can't stop this happening, so how are you going to use this to your advantage? They are almost certainly going to improve the standing of people in various third world countries, what does this mean to you? Think with your head for once /r9k/.

>>2697692
I agree b/c I'm sure this shit hole will remind them of home

>>2697696
But it's not happening.

Don't Africans still live in tribes and communicate by clicking at eachother?

Can somebody tell me WHY they need computers in the first place? Isn't food more important than giving starving aids ridden niggers myspace?

>>2697764
OK, I was unaware of this update, either way, people on this board need to take a step back before they shoot their mouths off sometimes.

>>2697780

Wow can they interface directly into the machines by clicking binary?

Why don't we make sure everyone in our own country has a computer first?

I mean fuck what about like, actual smart kids whose parents just cant afford to buy them a computer.

>>2697835
Good call anon let's do the same thing with food and shelter!

>>2697780

It's your basic "teach a man to fish" scenario...

The idea is, you get them up to speed with the rest of the world and they won't need help anymore... which is silly, because darkest Africa is a treacherous, unforgiving place where most attempts at modernizing fail, so why would a hand cranked laptop make a difference? I suppose you could use it to swap at the fist size blood-borne disease carrying mega insects, so they can't kill your livestock before you can get it to market.

Or, and this may sound crazy, they allow the whole family to educate themselves.

The entire wealth of human knowledge can be found on the Internet and, while it may not earn them a degree, it will certainly help to enlighten them intellectually.

I for one am waiting for the opportunity to goatse a bunch of 3rd world niggers

>>2697861

on the other hand, the wealth of human knowledge may be available on the internet, but look what people do with it. Nothing. On the other hand, look what we're doing.

>>2697862

You deserve a cookie. I left some in the kitchen for you.

And if they were distributed to northern africa, the fuckers would be stolen by a warlord the minute whoever was in charge of handing them out turned their backs, then networked together to form the world most powerful quasi-Nigerian scammer AI.

No email address would be ever be safe again.

Liberals suffer from some sort of mental deficiency whereby they believe, in spite of all logic, that every human is exactly equal. This unshakeable faith that humans are identical and evolution magically doesn't apply to us makes them come up with some pretty bizarre schemes.

Apparently, for whatever reason, they have gotten the idea that intelligence comes from technology. Thus, they believe, if we give technology to unintelligent people they will miraculously become intelligent. Most sensible people would point out that technology is a product of human intelligence, not the other way around.

it could help spread knowledge and make people more intelligent but somehow i doubt it and think it will just increase spam and stupid shit all over the internet

Maybe if we put some of these laptops in the monkey cage at a zoo the monkeys will somehow become as intelligent as humans.

>>2698079

You suffer from a mental deficiency in which you can't understand simple concepts.

Liberals don't believe everyone is equal. Some people (liberal and conservatives alike) believe that every should have an equal opportunity to succeed or fail based on their own individual merits (if they have any). There's a world of difference between that belief and what you just said.

>>2698305
Then how do you explain Affirmative Action? Liberals very clearly do not agree with equality of opportunity. They consistently fight against equal opportunity in favour of government-mandated racial discrimination.

What they believe in is equality of outcome. Like the Soviet Union.

>>2698305
The problem comes when the mentally weak ruin it for everyone else (such as when they are most of the population; see Africa for details). I'm cool with treating everyone with respect, but sometimes you have to keep the irresponsible from power, or else everything goes to shit.

I once read about how a bunch of african whores were given condoms to prevent aids, but no one explained how to use them so they put them in their mouthes instead of on the johns cocks.

somehow i dont see any self taught reclusive african coders out there, or even learning enough english to use the web

>>2698305
No, they literally believe everyone is exactly inherently equal. As in, we all share equal abilities and have the potential to accomplish exactly the same things.

For example, looking at this graph on the left a liberal would say "black people are being discriminated against because the bell curves do not match". This is based on an (obviously incorrect) assumption that everyone is exactly equal and so the racial IQ gap can't be a natural result of genetic differences.

>>2698370

Affirmative Action only helps to promote racial minorities who are qualified. It's not like it's promoting high school dropouts. It's a popular myth that AA prioritizes underqualified blacks over qualified whites. It doesn't work like that in reality. It just makes sure that blacks who can make it, do.

>>2698430

All rational people (regardless of political ideology) reject IQ results because IQ tests are no longer considered to be accurate by modern science.

>>2698430
The research done to obtain those curves is extremely shaky, not to mention that the concept of IQ being an objective measurement of intelligence is under a lot of scrutiny by itself.

>>2698439
I lol'd hard. In theory, maybe, but in practice, no, and the gap between theory and reality is widest in country with a black plurality or majority like we have here in SA, where the promotion of unqualified blacks is causing the infrastructure to collapse and the skilled (tax-paying) population to leave the country en-masse.

>>2698430

You pretend like they're genetically inclined to lower IQs, which hasn't been proven.

thirldworldcountryfag (phew, that's a looong word) here, could you stop discussing about us and gb2 discussing Gaza

>>2698439
Racial discrimination is the exact opposite of equality of opportunity. Pick one, because you can't support them both.

You can try to rationalize or defend racial discrimination all you want. But that won't change the fact that you support racial discrimination and therefore do not support equal rights for everyone.

>>2698439
If the blacks weren't less qualified then why would they need racial discrimination in their favour?

>>2698529
Because the racist white man won't hire them.

>>2698572

WHITEY BE KEEPIN' US DOWN

>>2698572
Why don't they start their own businesses, then?

>>2698529
they started with 0 money

moved to low cost housing, no good jobs, hard to make money, on and on

thanks slavery

>>2698598

BECAUSE WHITEY BE KEEPIN' US DOWN

>>2698621
facepalm
Presuming that AA/BEE jobseekers and white jobseekers are both equally qualified.

>>2698621
Unlike the Asians, Irish etc?

Bullshit.

>>2698689
Asians and the Irish do not have dismally low IQs. Negroes do have dismally low IQs.

It's like comparing apples and oranges.

>>2698689

Irish and Asians weren't oppressed by Whites for 500 years. try again.

I got an ASUS eee 2G Surf

I use it for ZSNES and Billy mainly, thanks to some SD cards I got this Christmas.

I rather suspect that low black IQ's result mostly from a black culture which promotes anti-intellectualism.

>>2698742
I suspect that you are an uneducated layman who has absolutely no knowledge about IQ or the racial intelligence gap.

How do you explain the fact that Black students from families with incomes of $80,000 to $100,000 score considerably lower on the SAT than White students from families with $20,000 to $30,000 incomes? How do you explain why social class factors, all taken together, only cut the Black-White achievement gap by a third? Culture-only theory cannot predict these facts; often its predictions are opposite to the empirical results.

>>2698721
Even whites were oppressed by whites for longer than 500 years, try again.

But y'know, blacks have been given the same chance as other immigrants anyway, you'd think they'd try to succeed.

>>2697379
I read hipster runoff, too!

>>2698721
There's no correlation between "oppression" and IQ.

Actually, the IQ of slaves and their descendants is much higher than that of "unopressed" Africans who have been free for all of history.

It might be because the white slave masters would actually kill any slave that got too clever.

That might be one reason y'know.

>>2698470
I hate to inform you of how wrong you are, but... (Actually I love informing liberals of how wrong they are. I'm just being polite.)

>IQ/g usually predicts major life outcomes better than does any other single predictor in broad samples of individuals. For example, whether IQ predicts strongly (educational performance) or weakly (law-abidingness), it predicts better than does social class background. This does not mean that intelligence is the only important influence on people's life chances or that social conditions are unimportant. Rather, it means that any explanation of social and economic inequalities will need to consider the central role that general intelligence level seems to play.

>>2698803
One of the reasons why descendants of slaves have a much higher IQ than negroes whose ancestors were never enslaved?

I... don't quite follow you. That seems like the type of thing which only makes sense to the extremely deluded and sick mind of a modern liberal.

How do they run them in the mud huts? Surely they don't have electricity?

All this will breed is better online scammers.

>>2698839

Mesh networking and wind up computers.

>>2698759
No matter how rich the black people may be, or even if they were raised by white people, they usually will associate with other blacks. This results in them feeling the effects of black culture, which is a primitive and barbaric culture.

>>2698920
Again, your religious belief in equality directly contradics observable facts.

Culturally "black" mixed-race individuals actually have average IQs between the average IQs of their parent populations. If your beliefs were correct then they would score the same as any other black person.

Simply put: you are 100% incorrect and the reason you are not willing to adjust your beliefs to fit the facts is because your beliefs are religious in nature.

You can repeat your beliefs as much as you want. You can even click your heels while you do it. But the empirical evidence and facts aren't magically going to change to suit your beliefs.

>>2698971
Here, I'll post the very same graph for the third time.

Why do I always feel like I am dealing with special needs students when I try to argue with a liberal? Did every single one of you take the short bus to school?

Ok, let's say blacks do, genetically, have a lower average IQ than other races. So what? What does that mean? What do you want to do about it? What about the world should change because of that fact?

>>2698991
that chart contradicts several other charts previously posted, and this also ignores the fact that mixed-race children usually associate more with whites than purely black children.

>>2698991
Your chart doesn't prove anything genetically. Not all people of a particular race behave the same. Keep shooting though.

>>2699019
Because they will get together and vote in stupid leaders because they have no sense. This leads to blacks emigrating from their own failed societies to white people's societies (e.g. South Africa/Mediterranean Europe) and bringing their problems with them.

can we get some anti-racist charts in here? even shitty flawed ones? just to prove that they EXIST?
thnx

>>2699100
Posting anti-racist charts would be just as pointless as posting ill-informed racialist genetic charts.

>>2699055

No fucking duh. BUT, to completely disregard the evidence simply because of the fact that not EVERY SINGLE PERSON of that race behaved as the evidence shows is stupid. One has to admit, a correlation is evident.

>>2699214
And it they were correct, everyone should be behaving according to their races. All Blacks are supposed to behave like Africans, which is true. All Whites do behave like Europeans, explains the liberalism, and All Asians behave like well, Asians.

Why do people respond to these stupid trolls?

Fear?
Idiocy?
Pride?
Delusion?

>>2698991

Why do you keep throwing up a charts from Race, Evolution, and Behavior? It's a ridiculously flawed piece of "science"

>>2699447
The data is from the Minnesota transracial adoption study.

I think the conservative guy is winning here. I think I lean to the left side but I agree with the chart guy.

>>2699323
dare i say fun?

as in, people actually enjoy arguing?

>>2699323

Fear. Fear that somewhere, there is someone this fucking stupid.

Spoilers, THEY'RE EVERYWHERE. FUCKING RUN.

>>2698079

At last, someone with some common sense. Even a spictastic Mootxican like me knows that you white Amerikkkan liberals are a bunch of delusional sheep.

ITT: U2 listening, media-brainwashed latte-sipping douchebag Americunt liberals getting their "equality" fantasy shattered.

>>2698370
God forbid the white man not have to work to earn that place he's got, eh?

>>2698488

Good.

Apartheid didn't do much, eh?

but most of the poor are niggers and will therefore probably drop out of the UN built schoolhouses to sell drugs in the back alleys of their hut villages.