I love dicks

I seriously love dicks

I think we will eventually win the fight against political correctness.

I think it will continue to grow and get more popular.

I really hope McCain doesn't get re-elected.

/b/tards will take it over and it will become a political tool. Oldfags who know Anonymous is just there to cause shit, make old inside jokes, and be confusing as fuck will move to some new obscure website and the cycle will begin anew.

>>2006329
If this is really going to print, I think we can pretty much expect a huge 'old- vs. new-fags' war.

>>2006358

I feel that this will probably happen, and then moot will shoot himself when his site falls to shit.

/b/ will /b/

The rest of the boards might get a noticeable increase in visitors if something draws attention to them. Don't know what that might be, though.

Well, if they hadn't turned /n/ into transportation, we wouldn't be having as much of a problem in /b/. /b/ is trolls trolling trolls about politics, along with camwhores, which actually should have their own board to defile, and roulette threads, which... deserve a (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST). I guess /r9k/ is a good alternative because there can actually be intelligent discussions, but looking at >>2006338, I can't really say.

/r9k/ - ROBOT9000 Currently 1601 unique user posts.
/b/ - Random Currently 1541 unique user posts.

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF THIS.

Moot will invest in a flamethrower and burn all the libfags that infest rk9.

>>2006385
if someone on /b/ hacked the President's email account and distributed his email, it would definitely get peoples' attention

5 years into the future

"Fag, you post on /b3/ you fag"

"Shut up, dick. /b2/ is for useless shits who aren't good enough to get on /b1/"

"Both of you idiots knock it off or I won't sponsor you being able to post on /b1/ at all. I'm trying to create a clever Millhouse meme and you are wrecking my train of thought"

"Man, do you guys remember when there was only /b/?"

"FUCK OFF OLD FAG!"
"FUCK OFF OLD FAG!"
"FUCK OFF OLD FAG!"

>>2006395

/r9k/ is slower so our posts generally stay around longer.

/b/ has so many users yet you only see the (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) only occasionally? I'm sure there are a lot of worthy people who would LOVE to mass-ban the "post ending in XX" newfags.

Is Moot going to be splitting up any other boards or making more new ones? I've read the news post, but it seems that alot of the other boards are nearly as bad as /b/.

>>2006410
I support 3 day bans for that shit

and no quality would be lost

it's win/win

>>2006426

/mu/ is pretty fucked up but I still love them.

>>2006426
He should start by getting rid of pointless boards. We really have /o/ AND /n/? (Which took old /n/'s place). And maybe trash a few of the less popular boards. Wouldn't /po/ be a great abbreviation for "politics"?

4chan will get it's own TV station called "4channel", it will keep up to date about Anon's daily doings and trollings etc...

Either that or the FBI will monitor ALL posts, 4chan users will then drop by 30%.

>>2006465
You think a 30% drop is nice? Every time moot does something like put a song on /b/, the amount of users drops by about 1000 (50%). If he constantly had a song going, I wouldn't mind, because I'm not an underage b& whose parents would be attracted to a song coming from another room. My theory anyway.

>>2006476
And it's not like you can't use adblock or something to stop it from playing.

I wouldn't mind if moot decided to crack down on newfags and annoyfags on /b/

But /b/ is still brilliant at times. A lot more shit has come in between those epic moments, but they're there nonetheless.

>>2006487
Do 13 year olds know how to do that? I'm not sure, but I can't think of any other way to explain a 50% decrease.

Talk about 4chan?

>Major update coming "soon."

OH SHIT
Do you think we'll finally get avatars?

>>2006490
Depends if it's your typical underage b&, the type who has a social life and just happened to stumble on to 4chan while looking for "sexy anime gurls".

If it's the nerdish underage& then I think he could work ad-blocking software.

Most of the other boards will continue as they have been, with the occasional /b/tard trolling it. As for /b/ itself, it will either slowly die out like the cancerous tumor it claims to be, or gain one too many media stories and be shut down.

>>2006505
Then he is good enough to stay.
Then ED would put up a walkthrough and everyone would get in again and go LULZ EPIC WIN xD

ED is the source of the cancer. Kill it and you kill the underage b&s.

>>2006498

For real! And little profiles where we get to talk about ourselves. Maybe some photos, a blog each. Hooboy.
Then we can dye our hair black and compare jeans.

>>2006515
Somewhat agreed, ED is the newfag bible.

But I would rather a newfag use it rather than have him post "wats the point of rickrolling" or "where is moot" or some shit like that.

/b/ is approaching its 100 millionth post. If anything major is happening, it'll be around then.

THINKING IS SOMETHING WE BOTH LIKE TO DOOOOOO
CALL US
/b1/
and
/b2/
[dum dum]

>>2006465
I'm still waiting for the day that Rupert Murdoch looks to purchase 4chan.

Can someone explain rick-rolling to me, please? Also, where is Moot?

>>2006564

I don't know what rick-rolling is, but Moot is kind of like a state of mind you achieve from posting here, he is always with us, inside of you and me.

wat does ED stand 4???!!!

moot will reveal his update when /b/ reach the 100000000 GET. there is 3 possibilitiess:

- a new trial board
- a new /b/ board (seriously just compare the traffic of futaba and 4chan, we have a lot more traffic but only a single random board)
- new fuctions for all boards like OP identification, sage button, noko button, integrated quickreply system etc.

>>2006567
Good to know! From the looks of his ED entry, I don't mind him being inside of me at all if you know wot I mean lol!!! ;) ~<3~

>>2006575

I seriously doubt Moot would make a new /b/, moderation already sux, just imagine having to look after two zoos full of monkeys instead of just one.

Maybe moot will explain to everyone what "sage" actually does.

Srsly, if you post saying "SAGE THIS SHIT" or "SAGE IN EVERY FEILD" then you're doing it wrong.

>>2006584
Another chan (I can't remember which one) has 2 /b/s. One is forced Anonymous and the other allows tripfags and subject fields.

Also captcha.

>>2006575
I'd be happy if some of the robot was implemented on other boards. If I glance over at /s/ one more time and see some idiot reposting the same pic the last 10 morons posted of Zoey asking for source I am going to rage.

I think moot will eventually be charged and arrested once President Obama and the Democratic Congress neutralize the first ammendment.

imho 4chan will undergo a radical software change in the next month. it's been prepared for some time now...

i hope they kill those fuckinn tipfags

I CAME FROM THE FUTURE

- Nigger Won
- SAGE-Rank system works fine
- A NEW /b/: is like /r9k/ with different rules
- ANOTHER /b/ is like old /b/ but threads last less time.

>>2006998 - ANOTHER /b/ is like old /b/ but threads last less time.
/b/ used to be a lot faster than it is now.

>>2006358
I think you forgot your slowpoke.jpg...

>>2006998
>SAGE-Rank

expain

It looks like about five people have read this, so this is for the retards who don't bother to look at what moot puts at the top of the page:

http://www.4chan.org/news.php

/b/ will probably be split up into a more moderated, hence hopefully better content board and then the other half left for the idiots and camwhores to spam away in.

I see this as similar to the growing prison population. Society is churning out more criminal posters and Something Must Be Done.

The prison system tacitly accepts internal self-policing by the gangs it houses to ease the stress on it's own employees. So...

Split /b/ into 2. Every time you post in /b1/, you get a mod point for /b2/ and vice-versa. So /b1/ diehards get to mod /b2/ and so on. It will be the new cool bloods-crips in cyberspace.

>>2006358
most oldfags are /b/tards

>>2007223
This is fucking retarded and will not happen. You're stupid. Shoot yourself.

>>2007241
You took that at face value? You're stupid. Shoot yourself.

>>2006595
this is not a bad idea. more of this hell hole could use some spam block

>>2007225
You're statement is false, the opposite is true. Random is and has been, full of children. In fact most boards are overrun by newfags and kids, at least recently. You're one of them.

>>2006455
I bet someone has already told you this, but /o/ and current /n/ are total opposites.

/n/- Hippy-ish bicycles and ultralight aircraft and hot-air balloons.

/o/- e-racing, Top Gear, and cars generally.

They hate each other.

>>2007304
I'm willing to bet that dichotomy is a result of the ability to split into two interest groups, rather than one that will result in instability when merged.

Given the opportunity and motive to split, a group will split. If there are two niches to be filled, they will be filled.

>>2007309
Dude! Is that an actual address? Shit.

Anyway, /o/ and /n/ are COMPLETELY different topics. /o/ is more like /g/, but with cars and motorcycles, and /n/ is more like /ck/ (or something, I'm not on /n/ much.) with bikes.

Think of merging /r9k/ with /b/, and you'll get my drift.

>>2007324
I'm not saying it wouldn't cause tension, but it wouldn't kill anyone there. They'd have their RACEAN threads and then their "who likes to parasail while practicing lepidoptery and writing poetry" threads. They'd hate each other, but most boards do that anyway.

moot just needs to close 4chan to new posts for about a month. I think that would shuffle most of the children and the big idiots off the site and out somewhere else where they might learn that their behavior and lifestyle are generally unacceptable.

this board give more suggestion about 4chan than any other, i hope that someday moot comes here.

>>2007334
True. So how about other mergers, such as....

/jp/-/a/
/jp/-/trv/
/w/-/wg/
/jp/-/trv/
Any of the porn boards.
Any of the anime-related boards.

There's going to be a major overhaul, no doubt.

Personally, I am looking forward to having /b/ split into six boards, or a creation of /ma/ - Manga as a split-off of /a/.

>>2007361
About that... Do 2chan's random boards have different rules or slightly different topics, or are they just identical, separate boards?

>>2007356

/jp/ should have never existed in the first place. 4chan IS Japanese culture. All /jp/ is is a Touhou board now.

>>2007376
no different rules or topics, but yes different tastes.

FUCK /b2/!!!

BRING BACK /z/~!!
BRING BACK /z/~!!
BRING BACK /z/~!!
BRING BACK /z/~!!
BRING BACK /z/~!!

That being said, I think that 4chan will peak over the next couple of years and that things will level out a bit after that, but that it will remain a long-term Internet staple due to it's ease of use, number of boards, and amount of data available.

Personally I'm just hoping for thread voting a la Digg, Reddit, that kind of stuff. Shit would be a little better maybe.

Then again, it's 4chan. We find things to hate and yell about them. I debated both sides of an electoral college thread earlier and no matter what, there were about 10 angry posts in response to everything I said.

I just think we're never happy with what we've got.

>>2007376
A good question! From my research, the boards merely have titles for names and are not focused on a specific topic.

>>2007387

Thread voting would not work, even in a vote-limited system, mainly because everyone would downvote EVERYTHING regardless of content. Remember, this IS 4chan.

>>2007379
and thats exactly why it was created. It was meant to keep all the Touhou faggotry on one board so they wouldn't keep spamming /a/.

>>2007407
Yeah. As I said, we find things to hate.

Whatever. We'll get the update and it'll suck. It always sucks. 4chan sucks and it's sad but true. /r9k/ is no better than /b/ is no better than /anything/. It's all shit. /r9k/ has CapitalistBastard and FEMANON HERE PREPARE FOR A STATEMENT FROM ME A FEMANON I LOL'D THAT'S ALL THIS FEMANON HAS TO SAY FEMANON OUT and I R VIRGAN HELP MEH. We cut out one tumor and find a bunch of quivering malignant masses hiding under it.

It's hopeless.

>>2007419

/a/, and /v/, and /tg/, and /b/...

>>2007379

Which is awesome, faggitt

still waiting for
/re/ - Religion
/ph/ - Philosophy
/re/tards and /ph/uckers unite!

>>2007420

We've been trying to get rid of CB in /sp/ for months now. If you have any tips, I'd appreciate the hell out of it.

Also, I believe what 4chan needs is a massive increase in the number of mods. Maybe just get a shitload of janitors and give them banpower.

You know, having a /me/ memes board would clear a lot of shit out of /b/. Maybe a /pol/ and /rel/ board to shovel most of the worst of the /r9k/illers.

Then more shit would takes its place but whatever.

>>2007435
YOU KNOW THAT COULD WORK.
WHY NOT FIND A FEW PEOPLE, TRUSTWORTHY ONES
INCREASE MODERATION AND INSTEAD OF SOLVING IT THROUGH DEVISING A REALLY COMPLICATED CANCER TRAP WE JUST BAN SHIT LIKE EFFING CRAZY. PERMABANS. RANGEBANS. THE CANCER WILL DIE.

THIS IS NOT SARCASTICAPS. THIS IS REAL.

WHY DON'T WE JUST DO THAT MOOT?

>>2007438
Good ideas, except for /me/. 4chan has ALWAYS had memes and always will. Even /r9k/, which claims to be /b/'s opposite, has some memes of its own.

>>2007447
IP Bans are so inefficient when it comes to a community full of the computer capable.

Just set up a bot to randomly ban people . Something like every time someone types some shit like, "shit was so cash" there is a 33.3% chance of a ban. Then just shuffle the parameters around from time to time. Different phrases, different percentages, etc.

>>2007447

Sarcasticaps aside, I do think that there needs to be a far more harsh set of standards for the boards. All bans should be permabans and they should apply to all boards. Nuke the appeal system, too; it seems far more of a waste of time and code than a helpful utility.

Then again, I'm the guy who thinks that moot should willingly cooperate with the FBI at every occasion...

>>2007481
Most of /b/ isn't computer capable. They're normalfags whose faggy nerd friend showed them a shocking website.

>>2007486
Those were not sarcasticaps!
>>2007481
They're not computer capable, as >>2007493 says, but they have ED and that's like a how-to on being a huge faggot.

>>2007482
THIS. THIS THIS THIS.

In this section, I will attempt to circumvent this board's robot moderation.

>>2007481
Try posting on 4chan on a publically avaliable proxy.
90% of them have been baned for CP or ban evasion.

>>2007493

A very good point. A lot of kids use 4chan as an excuse to scream whatever they want in a public forum without fear of repercussion.

Some expounding.

Range bans are not bypassable by the standard ipconfig /release ipconfig /renew tactic. That gets you a new IP address in a range... a blocked range.

Moderators are a good idea because it's like playing Mousetrap -- remember that game? You can spend eternity making a really good trap or you can just pick the fucking trap up and put the mouse under it. Fucking problem solved.

We're trying to figure out process-based solutions, separating chaff from grain. It's infeasible because there is no easy way to distinguish between cancer and not-cancer without logs of posts from a given IP, a dictionary of "cancer" phrases, and a really good robot, or maybe a robot nine thousand. Thing is Randall gave us a good temporary solution but these process-based solutions are only going to hold a problem at bay for so long.

Cancer needs stopping, but a lot of the memes like shit was so cash, advice dog, etc. are used sarcastically or as part of a phraseome -- if you allow me to coin a term -- a phraseome, a collection of common symbolic phrases and illustrative phrases that combine to form a complex picture. That phraseome allows communication in a simple way we can all understand. It'd take time before we learned that they're cancer and we need to stop using them at all.

See, if we just have humans do it, that solves a process-based solution. Humans are much better at separating signal from noise because hey guess what we have the best pattern recognition engines ever created in all of the universe. They're good. No process solution can do what we can do.

>>2007549

So basically: a hundred angry guys with shotguns are better than a $500m sentrygun with AI.

More rant.
Of course the problem with a human solution is the fundamental untrustworthiness of humans; we cannot be counted on like a process solution can, we cannot always perform within expected parameters. A mod would occasionally ban someone who disagreed with them. A mod would occasionally be a fag.

THEREFORE WE ARRIVE AT THE FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION, HAUNTING MOOT'S MIND LIKE THE RAVEN:

HOW DO WE DEVISE A SYSTEM OF MODERATION THAT CAN ELIMINATE THE HUMAN FACTOR?

The cold hard truth is we can't. That's the basic reason why government doesn't have a single solid "answer". No one has ever created a solution to governance that is both effective and fair.

So, working on an as-best-we-can basis, create a combination of process and people, best immune to trickery and faggotry on both the moderatOR and moderatED side of the line, capable of eliminating noise and increasing signal, diffusing trolls, eliminating EDouches, and all the while being unobtrusive?

This is a monumental task. If anyone presents a solution that is good, we'll all mail it to Moot, but this should serve as a reminder:
WHATEVER THE UPDATE IS, IT IS THE BEST SOLUTION TO AN UNSOLVABLE PROBLEM. DO NOT BE ANGRY.

WE HAVE A PROBLEM HERE THAT IS LITERALLY NOT SOLVABLE AND ANYTHING WE GET IS BETTER THAN WE DESERVE.

THANKS FOLKS.

>>2007587
Soldiers cost about 200k to put into mobilization (training + equipment costs, ironically pay only takes up about 12% of that), so 100 soldiers would be more efficient than a 500m dollar sentry.

THE MORE YOU KNOW.

So, a summary of ideas-

-Better robot.
-More mods with more visibility.
-Probability-based robot moderation.
-Nuclear sage.
-Bans that are for reals.
-Split up /b/.
-New boards, especially /ph/- Religion and Philosophy, /rel/- Relationships, /pol/- Politics and News.

I probably missed some.

>>2007587
>>2007602
Save /r9k/
turn everyone into a MOD.
(run for the hills)

>>2007597

4chan: an unsolvable problem since 2003.

>>2007617

1) Save /r9k/
2) turn everyone into a MOD.
3) (run for the hills, cower in fear)
4) ????
5) ANARCHY!!!

Meme-fied and expanded.

>>2007597
There is a solution. Do nothing and let the system balance itself.

this is another thread we should email to moot, seriously.

Make a /re/ board. for relationships.

there, now virgin threads on r9k are offtopic and may lead to a ban

4chan is an explosion in slow motion. It will keep growing, absorbing its surroundings for fuel, eventually destroying the earth, or running out of fuel and dissipating.

>>2007634

Yes, because we'd all like to see 4chan crater just as hard as the worldwide economy.

/re/lationships
/ph/ilosophy & religion

two perfect boards I'd surf daily.

>>2007634
That has been tried, a lot. Moot's done hands-off before and it gets a LOT worse during that. Don't even suggest it.

You can email this to him. MOOT IF SOMEONE EMAILS THIS TO YOU HIT ME UP BECAUSE THAT'D BE DOWNRIGHT ACCEPTABLE

>>2007673
>/re/lationships=BAWWWWWWWWWWW 24/7

>/ph/ilosophy & religion=The biggest trollwars mankind ever will see.

That's how I expect it to evolve.

>>2007708

and that's exactly the point. keeps the shit in the toilet.

>>2007677
Funny, from what I've seen it gets a lot worse after mod intervention. First, it diverts the attention of people from whatever they've been doing to the board politics, second, it invariably makes people act stupid and like a mob, third, it encourages people to both gamble the system AND try to manipulate mods.

Of course there's always the possibility we differ on what constitutes better and worse. In that case you can safely disregard what I'm saying.

>>2007722
I'd suggest a /lo/licon board too. Keepin' the shit in the toilet, as you said.

>>2007765

That would basically get 4chan shut down. Remember, the entire board is being watched by the US Gov't due to the "actions" of its users.

>>2007783
External boards. That's all I have to say.

>>2007708
>/re/lationships=BAWWWWWWWWWWW 24/7
Isn't that what /r9k/ basically is anyways? Its like a god damn interactive blog. I'd surf /re/ just to laugh at other people's misfortunes, and maybe learn a thing or two. On another side note, it would bring more femanon's to the site, always a plus.

>/ph/ilosophy & religion=The biggest trollwars mankind ever will see.
Yes and no. I'd like to see the ultimate religion rise from the ashes of a million religions failed by the tests of anonymous.

Moot is rolling in dough.

>>2007844
>niggertits.org

wat?
fucking wat?

boot the moot blox orz

>>2007765

What are you, stupid? (moooooootblox)

>Major update coming "soon".

1. /rel/ationships and /ba/chelors

2. modifying the robot - the first the 32 characters of a post and the last 4 are considered.

>>2007902
lern2saeg first.

Also, I don't see anything wrong with that. Except that it could draw the attention of the feds.

>>2007915
Modding the robot might mean a reset.

We'll need to take cover for the first few thousand posts.

what if moot decided to destroy all boards and creat one mega board called alpha?

>>2007867
>niggertits wat

o hai you must be new here.

ITT: Tripfag circlejerk. 4chan will be fine. It will not change for better or for worse. It will remain exactly the same.

>>2007953
I WILL UNLEASH THE HELL OF DESU UPON YOU ALL WHEN THIS DAY COMES

>>2007994

See, this kind of attitude will never help 4chan.

What is it that you extremely vocal minority of Anonyposters have against tripfags anyways?

>>2008014
Shut the f**k up tripf*g!

>>2008014
Yeah, I've always wondered how you can decry cancer and attack people for having names at the same time, but every I HATE TRIPFAGS thread does just that.
Spoiler, you all have names. Your entire family has names.

I'm so going to laugh my ass off if they make some of the boards have forced tripfaggotry.

I hope it's forced anonymous for all boards, so all the tripfags can go "make a name" for themselves elsewhere.

>>2008070
Be a little more dramatic.

Nice deleting your post. What did you realize, I was in fact, not sonny jim? Typical tripfag retard.

>>2008084
i was like
he's being retarded
but then i was like
he's going to keep being retarded anyway

so i deleted it pretty much the instant after i made it

but hey, for the record:
>bawwwww people don't do what i want them to
welcome to life sonny jim

oh also
fuck you, i am a tripfag
suck my cock. you can't stop it.

YOU CAN'T CONTAIN ME!

A TROLL IS BORN

I don't understand why people are upset about tripfaggotry. There have been instances where it has been both good and bad.

>>2008065

Is this it? You're pissed because you think people are "trying to make a name for themselves"?

>>2008048
>decry cancer
So, in addition to being a tripfag you're illiterate, too?

4chan is anonymous imageboard. If you choose to have a name on ANONYMOUS imageboard you're implying that you're better than everybody else. People hate that kind of attitude, but what always gets me is pseudo intellectual crap you tripfags love so much. If you have the need to stand out and increase your e-penis, go to Gaia, where everybody is an unique snowflake.

It's actually "a" unique snowflake, not "an" unique snowflake. When determining "a" or "an" you go by the phonetic sound, not the actual letter. So going by that, "u" is an odd exception; it does make a long sound but it can also be interpreted as a "y" sound and thus a phonetic consonant, so "a unique snowflake" would be proper.

>>2008151
I just think its easier to attack a straw man when he's got a tripcode attached to him. Wearing a tripcode actually makes you think twice about what you're going to post.

Most tripfags don't last more than a week. I remember when you chose a tripcode you stuck by it. Kids these days just don't have any persistence. What you need is persistence.

>>2008101
FFFFFFFFF
Now I'm looking to see where the changed pixel is.

Tripfags usually never contribute anything useful to the conversation. Anytime I ever read anything clever, funny, or insightful, it's from "Anonymous" not "HEY LOOK AT ME !aHXn2d".

And then they have to continue and reply to everyone that ever quoted them in a thread because they have a name to uphold. So fucking stupid.

>>2008170
I didn't know that.
themoreyouknow.jpg

>>2008184
Well, I get the feeling that half the people in these threads are talking about /v/ and /b/ tripfags, and the other half are talking about /r9k/ ...

>>2008151

http://www.4chan.org/faq.php

G'head and point out where it says "4chan is an ANONYMOUS image board". Also, if mootles didn't want people using tripcodes, he'd force_anon the entire site.

>>2008184

Funny how it's always the "Anonymous" people who make names for themselves... Jake Brahm, David Kernell, Dmitri Guzner, Jarrad Willis...

And, for the triple combo, I don't see an organisation screaming and begging for media attention at every turn using masks and protests against Scientology calling themselves "Tripfags".

>>2008238

What's the point of your tripcode though? If you're not trying to become a minor celebrity, then why not join the crowd?

Current political trends suggest that boards like 4chan will disappear in years to come.

>>2008271

Ever consider it was never about celebrity or notoriety or anything like that?

>>2008184
Once you're here for more than a few years you'll start to visit other boards and realize that you're completely fucking wrong.

>>2008271
As you seem to be a newfag I'll break it down for you. IT avoids the same faggotry accusations and it allows people on certain boards to recognize each other and have meaningful interactions.

>>2008176
The tripfriends who stick around have really thick skin. FAKT.

>>2008282

Then what's it about...?
It looks pretty above your post?
Or do you just have bad short-term memory as far as what you've posted recently?

Who the fuck cares? It's just a name. A tripcode. It can be picked up and dropped.

>>2008285

Funny you mention samefaggotry, Commissioner Red.

>>2008303

Yeah, it's pretty much meaningless, it's just a fun thing to toss around and troll the other Anons.

>>2008308

Methinks somehow you've become mistaken somewhere along the way, because I don't follow you.

Damn, tripcodes are serious business. I think I noticed some tears from the defense.

>>2008318
Some trolls are on purpose, some are accidental. Which one applies to you?

>>2008344
All on purpose man, all on purpose.

>>2008344

Oh you. I just popped in here because I saw one of my duplicates was chiming in.

>>2008318
Protip: my tripcode is Fucked the oblate spheroid#whatever, did you forget?

>>2006401
I wish he would get rid of all republicanfags so it would be less redneck faggotry and more about people who know how to use guns.

Namefags are more tolerable really.

I'll always remember This Man as the guy who paints on snails.

I think it works fine the way it is, maybe with a few less tripfags. I mean unless you have something special there isn't much point.

Tripfagging = Out
Namefagging = ???
Numberfagging = ???

I used to put a few numbers after "Anonymous" so I could find my posts easier, on the high volume boards. Got called a numberfag occasionally.

>>2008367

That might be the furthest you got, if you're so obsessed with the real one though its
Fucked the oblate spheroid#cocks.

Like this sort of.


LOL2SECONDBLOXED

>>2008401
Nah, it's #whatever. She revealed it.

>>2008308
Funny you should assume some tripfag that I've never even seen post here in my three years is samefagging as me you cunt teenager. How's it feel to be completely wrong you dumb cancerous kid? lurk moar. Some namefags/tripfags assume an identity so as not to be confused with the newfag kids that have flooded into 4chan from Digg and motherfucking mask wearing protestcunts.

>>2008439
Oh God, fail harder please.

>>2008451
Cool response dog!

>>2008396

My theory was the hivemind/pool/Great Link/whathaveyou as the normative, in this case a collective of nameless, faceless entities eschewing individuality for the chance to "fit in" and "belong". However, once the indivuduality is reasserted, the collective turns on the new individual.

It's like high school, except the role of jock and nerd are reversed, and those who dare to put on a letterman jacket are ostracised. That's about the closest analogy I could use while still striking home to the Anonymous collective intellect/memory.

>>2008451
Oh god! Make more assumptions please.

>>2008439

Three years...so that puts you at what, fifteen?

Why the net fails
>>2008444

Tripfags should just get their names and codes randomized 1/4 of the time.

>>2008477
That's a pretty good way to put it, but I prefer it in much simpler terms, which would be NEVER SHOW WEAKNESS ON THE INTERNET.

I come from the future. Soon, /r9k/ will return to the warm, comforting womb that is /b/ 2.0.

>>2008490
I've had an internet connection since 1993. Not sure what your response was for.

Posting on /b/ gets you instantly permbanned from other boards.

DO IT!

>>2008558

What was your first connection program?

>>2008545
As I posted previously people trip and name so they can recognize eachother on boards where we know one another. Randomizing defeats the purpose. Some of us actually do have things to say which other 4chan users want to read... /b/ and /r9k/ and /v/ now too are boards where you could randomize names/codes and it wouldn't matter.

HEY GUYS I HEARD sry caps i heard that u guys were getting avatars and signatures lol that is SO COOL I'm leaving Gaia and coming here for good I WANT TO BE LEGIOUN TOO!

~*tHe pNgwin oF deWm*~

>>2008584
AOL 2.0 installed on a Performa 575.

>>2008598
I heard you thought that "anonymous" was a group of people and not a default posting option on every message board dating back to the first BBSs.

Molochfag here.

>>2008595
I believe 7chan did name randomization on /b/. Seemed to work pretty well.

Molochfag out.

>>2008595
If randomization was only applied to those boards I'd be satisfied.

>>2008627
Wait a minute, are you a troll pretending to be a troll trolling a trolling troll pretender at trolling a trolling trolltroll? Or did the penguin of doom thing really not shine through as obvious referential faggotry?

>>2008610

AOL didn't have any real internet functionality outside of newsgroups until a few years after that, but I know what you mean. I started out on BBSes myself. XOOM 2400 baud blowtorch on a Leading Edge Model D running Procomm Plus. It was the old family computer, so it was mine, while the new family computer sat in the living room.

>>2008635
Wait, sorry, no, I'm thinking it was 711 or 420 that did that, come to think.

Name removed. Got tired of Molochfagging.