>What does it say about the college coed Susan Fluke [sic], who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex? What does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex.

>So, Ms. Fluke and the rest of you feminazis, here's the deal. If we are going to pay for your contraceptives, and thus pay for you to have sex, we want something for it, and I'll tell you what it is. We want you to post the videos online so we can all watch.

So, he basically tells the truth, and gets demonized for it? Feminists truly have no shame.

It's the free market reacting to negative PR. People like Rush Limbaugh need to adapt to the demands of today's economy and that includes not making ad hominem attacks. Obviously he had enough talking points to effectively argue against her but he decided to take a risk and now he's feeling the consequences.

>>1662139

It's adorable that you think this will hurt Rush's revenues. He has millions of loyal listeners who will buy what he tells them to and other companies will be clamoring to fill the advertising spots vacated by the idiots who joined the boycott.

Birth control isn't medically necessary, but we need less people all over the place.
Rush is also a paid troll.

>>1662075
Free market, man. You'd probably be gloating if the feminists failed, though.

People are stupid sometimes, and they do stupid things on knee jerk reactions. Doesn't give other people the right to take that away from them.

Fucking americans
I live in a shitty third world country, but at least they give free condoms in hospitals owned by the government. How can it be such an issues for you when several pathetic excuses for a country can do it?

>>1662222

Maybe instead of handing out free condoms your dipshit third-world country could spend that money getting it's shit together.

>radical reaction to a radical statement taken out of proportion by our beloved brobots

stay classy arcanine.

I think it's about time he got backlash for being a retard.

I think giving out free condoms is totally on point and all, but I bugs me that this Fluke woman is portrayed as some rosy-cheeked 20yo who enjoys the missionary position with her highschool boyfriend every now or then when in fact she's a 30 years old professional activist who enrolled Georgetown simply because they didn't provide contraceptive coverage in their student health plan and she wanted to change that from within.

Not that it really matters.

>>1662267
It actually does matter. It shows how insidious the feminist agenda is.

you're all retarded. every fucking one of you

>durr sluts shouldn't get paid to have sex durr
>free contraception is paying for sex

contraception is a medical necessity, and it ought to be free (for more than one reason). have any of you even researched this at all?

Op, do you really want to risk a situation where people decline to use birth control because they can't afford it?

The population in first world countries is typically either remaining the same or declining, and universal access to birth control is the only thing that makes that possible. If we did NOT have this access, it would become necessary to implement China style authoritarian control over sex and reproduction, with state sponsored forced abortion vans making regular rounds. Because the only other thing left is for all of us to fucking starve to death.

>>1662303
>implying that premarital sex is a medical necessity

This is what braindead normalfag cunts actually believe.

Saw this on the Daily Show as I was reading OP's post. My thoughts? Rush Limbaugh's right

>For those not in the loop, he called her that because she is a women's rights activist who demands the government to pay for her free contraception.
Slut? No idea, I can't make that call without more information. The simple fact that someone uses birth control doesn't make them a slut.

I don't think the government should be paying for birth control though, it's not the governments responsibility to fund something like that. The government is for public things, a woman's health is not a public thing.

>>1662323
I was told women need them thar abortion pills for other things than preventing babbies though, like balancing their hormones and not getting PMS and shit, and that's why it's a big deal. I don't know much about vaginas other than that they sometimes look like C'thulu though.

>>1662312
>first world country
>still acting like monkeys that fuck anything that moves, instead of having the decency and dignity to abstain

The fact that you want the government to actually support that irresponsible behavior is appalling.

>>1662075

Honestly, if you studied law, poltics, or political philosophy this wouldn't seem so retarded to you.

And this again isn't really a feminist issue, it would benefit men almost to the same extent.

It isn't the outrageous to claim that the government should be supplying us with contraception.


The right to sex isn't a positive right, we don't have claims against people to help us procreate.

Do we have a positive right to health-care? Maybe not in murika, but some countries do. And in those cases people have a claim against the state to support them. And in these cases it isn't a large leap to suggest people have a claim against the state to get contraception.


But secondly, if the state actually supplied society with contraception do you think taxpayer money would be saved or wasted?
And think about that for a second, because it seems to me that supplying contraception would reduce pregnancy and long term save money (i.e from beneficiaries)

In terms of abortion clinics the argument would be if the state only had the duty to supply society with the option, or whether it should pay for it too (this varies country to country).

>she has so much sex that she can't afford it by herself

I'm sorry, what's YOUR definition of "slut"

I find it amusing

When people get themselves into shit like Rush

And then you watch it unfold and laugh, at the troubles coming

I couldnt give a fuck WHO it happened to, I just fucking love seeing this kind of shit, very amusing

LOL if Obama called me I'd call him a jew nigger and hang the phone up.

>>1662347
Like, I get the feeling that it would cost more to support all the unloved fatherless children these irresponsible twats would produce. Just saying.

How does the government benefit by women having unwanted children? Would it not be more cost effective to have contraception programs rather than welfare programs? Wouldn't a decrease in population help the economy?

>>1662345

How is not getting PMS and balancing hormones a medical necessity that should be funded publicly? Christ, are you niggers seriously this retarded?

>>1662360

>Is middle-class
>Never understood the concept of living in a world where mommy and daddy can't buy what you need and support you

Turns out, a lot of people living independently can't afford a LOT of shit, I've known students at my college who if they didn't get their petty small 30 bucks a week help they literally couldn't travel to college that week, no parents support, no family, alone in an apartment working a job after college to get by

Besides free contraception is a no brainer, in high school, in college, in Uni and in pretty much every hospital in the UK you can walk in if you're of a certain age and get free condoms.


But really you're just mad that you're a virgin.

>Rush Limbaugh

People still listen to that fat fuck? Everyone knows he's one of the biggest IRL trolls and then freak out when he says something like this. It's like being surprised water is wet.

lol, only virgins and neckbeards and nerds who can't get any (aka misogynists on the internet) would complain about this.

Given the totality of personal experience, celebrity gossip, popular depictions of romance in the media, the archives of the great literary classics, anecdotes, and all other evidence apart from egalitarian feminist orthodoxy enshrined in academic literature and newspaper OP-EDs and feminists blogs points to the inextricable and indisputable existence of hypergamy, the question is not whether hypergamy is provable or falsifiable but why non-hypergamy is even legitimate as a plausible seeing of things in general when it contradicts all facts and all intuitions and all sense so that for me to try to "explain" this theory to you in scientific terms is to surrender myself to the authority, the shabby, constructed, hollow artifice of the ideological-feminist-social-scientist-complex, just as when the Jew has to debate on pseudo-scientific terms why the Jew is a human being when the standards are Nazi standards; anyone who dares to think of hypergamy and to weigh it against the alternative explanations sees and feels its force and power without the need for "scientific" recourse, and only the strongest ideological blinders can suppress the force and power of its truth.

carry on.

Now I'm not an American so I don't know if there's truth to what I've been seeing around but is it true that the places that don't cover contraception under their health insurance that are being targeted by Fluke do cover viagra?

I've seen it commented around quite a bit, but I don't know if there's any truth to the comments or not.

>>1662409
Buddy, I can't eat three meals every day, and my parents would sooner have me starve than buy me shit. But the whole money issue is completely tangential, my main point is that a woman who has sex with a ton of men is a dirty slut no matter how you define the word.

>>1662360
>implying the amount paid for a contraceptive pill is at all relative to the amount of sex being had.

Really?

>>1662379
it's population control, always been important in any society

>>1662442
You talk like a fag and your shit's all retarded.

Seriously though, you should work on your sentence structure.

Guys. Jesus Christ.
>mfw Sandra Fluke testified as to the fact that her friend needed birth control to prevent ovarian cysts.
I usually don't like to white knight, but I mean...come on, you guys.

>>1662473
Except for China, Africa, Mexico and a ton of other places.

>>1662475
Please. I am the epitome of erudition. You're just in awe of my intellect.

>>1662484
Not to be a dick but, you know, if you don't want ovarian cysts maybe shouldn't carry ovaries around like that?

I don't really fuckin care. Why are you guys so misogynistic about everything? And I mean everything? Is this hate ironic? Do you guys REALLY care that much if poor chicks get free pills to keep them from having ,what I've heard described as, having a knife stuck in your kidney and being filled with undying rage?

It's like you guys WANT chicks to have PMS and babbies.

the fuck are you thinking, guys.

What's so bad about wanting free birth control?
Population control, right? I mean shit, not everyone can afford it.

I forgot
>everything a woman says is wrong no matter what

She wants employer-provided insurance to cover contraception. Employer-provided. Do you faggots know what that means? That means that the money is taken directly out of a worker's check, and goes straight into their insurance. It has nothing to do with taxes, you dumb fucks. It's not your money, unless you're fucking working and you fucking opted into having employer-provided health insurance. God damn, you faggots are retarded.

The pill is also useful for preventing menstrual cramps that can be absolutely crippling for some women.

The pill also appears to provide good protective effects against uterine and ovarian cancer--probably because it prevents reproductive cell-division, lowering the risk of mutations.

>>1662499
Short prepositional statement, such as the one above, is not my style, assuring you that when pronounced, such as the one above about "awe" and "intellect", are made, they are not mine, for when I speak I pontificate, and the droll, dull form of transparent structure is abhorrent to me, for the stamp of the style is one of convolution, an enlightening convolution that stops you in the middle of your thoughts so that you'll shudder and ponder, ponder deeply and forcefully, a word that figuratively stops you in your figurative tracks and examine that path that you have taken vis-a-vis the alternative pathways.

>>1662512
I don't get it either, I always though /r9k/ hated poor people babies because they were a drain on society and all of this shit with dead beat dads and child support.

But now a woman says there should be government supplied birth control OMG BITCH WHORE HER OPINION IS SHIT STUPID SLUT FEMNAZI

Sandra Fluke didn't ask for the government to pay for her contraception. She testified in favor of Obama's insurance mandate, which requires insurance companies to cover it. Not taxpayers.

Also,

>agreeing with Jabba the Rush

>>1662527
Jeez, if the menstrual cramps are so "crippling," how did women manage to live without the pill for thousands of years

>>1662515
are men going to start getting free condoms?

of course not. only women would benefit from free contraceptives, because that's gender equality.

Contraceptives aren't just birth control, they keep women healthy and they have less detrimental periods. Anybody who agrees with rush is on the fringe of society

>>1662075
>I seriously do not understand why the fuck everyone is so supportive of her on this issue.

Because free birth control has a lot of health benefits for women and prevents the birth of unwanted babies.

>>1662545
pretty sure they already do this in health clinics.

>>1662530

..why do we come here again?

Honestly, I'd prefer if the government paid for it since it's in the nation's best interest to avoid unplanned babbies.

>>1662345

Sadly, that's all horseshit. The pill overloads the body with estrogen and progesterone, inhibiting ovulation. A lot of that estrogen enters the water supply via urination, so not only has the pill caused the spread of STIs via uninhibited unprotected sex, it's damaging the environment and possibly causing increased risk of breast and testicular cancer. So once again, feminists are going apeshit over someone being against something that's harmful to everyone, including themselves. Woman logic at its best.

>>1662544
For some women it is, not all though.
As for me, I usually get minor cramps, nothing too serious, but there have been times it has been cripplingly painful.

Would you rather pay for her kids?

>>1662561
Because I got bored of /a/ and I'm stuck on one of my vidjyas ;_;

>>1662572
It's not the logic behind it, just many people don't know the risks associated with taking birth control.

>>1662583

true. Maybe I'll make a thread here in a bit

>>1662579

Hello false dichotomy. Not paying for her pills doesn't equate to paying for her kids. She could be responsible and not have sex, have her guys wrap it up with condoms that either of them pay for, pay for her own damn pills, pay to get abortions, etc. Is this too much to ask of liberated women?

Maybe if the USA gave out free contraception it wouldn't have one of the highest teen pregnancy rates in the developed world.
You guys are seriously fucked up when it comes to sex.

http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/FB-Teen-Sex-Ed.html

>In 2006, 87% of U.S. public and private high schools taught abstinence as the most effective method to avoid pregnancy, HIV and other STDs in a required health education course.[15]

I know that was in 2006 but really? Are y'all niggas serious?

>>1662608
And yet at the same time you ask for free condoms

>>1662545
I'm pretty sure there already are free condoms being handed out at places like PP and colleges (They've got an entire jar of them at my dorm, too). Shitty condoms, but condoms nevertheless.

So yes, men get free condoms.

If you have sex about 1-2 per day, that's about two 12 pack condom boxes per month at ~$15x2, which works out to about $360 per year on condoms.

The savings insurance companies make on lowering unplanned pregnancy rates (hospital costs, checkup costs, added birth defects from lack of folic acid or FAS) means that this basically pays for itself.

Spending $0 per year for bareback sex with wife or spending hundreds on condoms...jeez, tough decision guys.

>>1662611
Maybe if we'd stop raising goddamn sluts it wouldn't be a problem.

You know, living in a society that berates virginity doesn't help. I wish we could go back to the days of stoning harlots to teach the others to keep their legs closed.

>>1662635
Not bragging or anything, but the free condoms they gave out in college didn't fit my oddly bell-ended member. PP isn't anywhere around, nor can they support being the sole-provider of condoms for the working poor/lower middle class.

>>1662623

Your reading comprehension skills are shit.

>have her guys wrap it up with condoms that either of them pay for
>condoms that either of them pay for
>they pay for their condoms

Personal responsibility is something that men and women need to get used to.

>>1662636

If you can't afford $360/y on condoms, you need to spend less time fucking and more time working.

What Limbaugh did was borderline slander. I'm surprised the student didn't sue.

> 2012
> publicly opposing feminisem

you can't win

>>1662647
What about poor people who can't afford it?
inb4
>close their legs

You and I both know it won't happen.

Aren't condoms already free if you go to a clinic?

>>1662222

On most third world countries, most people don't know about how contraception works and don't have much access to the stores/hospitals where contraceptive methods are sold, so this is a necessity. I do also happen to live in one.

But in the United fucking States, there is absolutely NO need for the Government to pay you for your pills. This is just wanting to leech off of Government, and using shitty modern pseudo-feminism as an excuse.

huh, an implanon that last for 3 years costs like, $20, who cares who pays for it? who couldn't save $20 out of their pay? even if you're at school... shit, i was at university and working 15 hours a week and i could still pay for my own contraception, or ask your parents for "food" money if it's so shameful. regardless, someone using contraception doesn't make them a slut, and that's a retarded thing to say on radio. like, holy shit, the guy who said it must be a fucking idiot to think he'd get away with that.

my .02 cents.

>>1662355
>>1662371

/Thread


All you people putting full blame on the women for having sex really are letting your bias (beta qualities) overwhelm your judgment.
It takes a man to stick it in too, we don't need to argue which gender is affected more by unwanted pregnancy, because it unquestionably effects us as a collective (funding beneficiaries etc).


It isn't as simple as staying abstinent when you are evolutionary programmed to crave sex, that is a virgin delusion (notably backed by churches [notorious virgins]).

Both were being unreasonable.

America seems to be all about polarity rather than meeting somewhere in the middle where the sane and thoughtful people are.

I guess the ratings are at the poles.

I get my contraceptives for free. I don't even need to go to a doctor, and they practically beg you to take away loads of condoms.

Why don't Americans want free healthcare?

>>1662696
>Both were being unreasonable
Nope. You just went full retard bro.

The student was basically defending the contraceptive law. There ARE medical reasons for taking birth control beyond not wanting kids. How exactly was she being retarded?

lol at how fucking beta americans are

*mobilizes entire country to give a poor girl a hug after someone called her a mean word*

>>1662710
> Why don't Americans want free healthcare?

Because being able to see a doctor when you need one is oppressive.

They prefer freedom like denying rights to blacks, women and gays.